6 Reasons why IEO is better than ICO

[8rch7]

Yes, for now the IEO is indeed better than ICO, but for some of these reasons, it doesn't guarantee that all IEOs don't scam, I think there is still a possibility that the IEO is scam.

[1715021745]

1715021745

[SlimShadyMmp]

ICOs and IEOs are just same thing with one thing different that is token are offered in exchange and the other using smart contract But dont just deceive yourself with some points man There are IEOs that are basically reap-off and meant to sell trash tokens just make sure to make research on any investment you are making

[Cryptomindset]

One of the main advantages of IEOs is trust. As the crowdsale is conducted on a cryptocurrency exchange platform the counterparty screens every project that seeks to launch an IEO on its website. Exchanges do this to maintain their good reputation by carefully vetting token issuers. Therefore, IEOs can eliminate scam and dubious projects from raising funds via cryptocurrency exchange platforms, and it becomes much harder to scam contributors with IEOs.

[CjMapope]

the person who wrote the article WORKS 4 a token exchange...

talk about biased, i wont even bother to read that shit

~IEOs are hyped ICOs, they gurantee nothing but newbs getting recked~

[bitsurfer2014]

The reasons listed here are quite valid except for the aspect of it being cheaper which I don’t see any correlation, because you don’t also spend much time on ICO to purchase as much as one even does for IEO, Before an IEO is launched, do you we know how many people will stay on queue burning gas to participate?

One thing IEO fails to tell people is that it is very difficult to participate in it, you have to be on queue for too long and hoping to participate which you might not get a chance to do so before the token gets sold out, which majority are being bought internally. If IEO can solve this challenge, then it will become perfect.

Another thing  that I would like to point out is the trend right now for investors is to participate in an IEO which of  course is a strategy for them but it doesn't help the whole crypto ecosystem because they are only focusing to support exchanges which is getting saturated right now and in reality, exchanges don't really care if there will be a serious development on a project as long as there will be incentives that can be gained with it. This practice is shifting more emphasis on  exchanges than developing projects with ICO that has actual and viable use cases but I can't blame them since some ICO's turned out to be fraud victimizing investors in the process but it could also be possible with projects doing IEO. So I guess there must be something that could be done about it?

[iqlimasyadiqa]

ICOs and IEOs are just same thing with one thing different that is token are offered in exchange and the other using smart contract But dont just deceive yourself with some points man There are IEOs that are basically reap-off and meant to sell trash tokens just make sure to make research on any investment you are making

Analysis remains the thing that is needed in investing. The IEO is bound to have success because it depends on our choice. Coin in the IEO is not certain to be successful, so everything is the same and it depends on us in choosing. our ability will determine what we will get. invest in smart and think about what we will do next.

[soulripper]

ICOs and IEOs are just same thing with one thing different that is token are offered in exchange and the other using smart contract But dont just deceive yourself with some points man There are IEOs that are basically reap-off and meant to sell trash tokens just make sure to make research on any investment you are making

Analysis remains the thing that is needed in investing. The IEO is bound to have success because it depends on our choice. Coin in the IEO is not certain to be successful, so everything is the same and it depends on us in choosing. our ability will determine what we will get. invest in smart and think about what we will do next.

It doesnt matter if it was IEOs or ICOs. That was not guarantee the success of the projects at all. If the projects used IEO and cannot delivered their promises it will become a failed projects even they used IEOs. So to be smart on picking what to invests pick on what is releven and choose on the best projects only even it used ICOs or IEOs it still the same for me. Pick with smart and invests smart on IEOs or ICOs.

[Cosbycoin]

I was very much interested in investing to such IEO. Thus, made me the urged to browse the internet and found some compelling informations. I found it very informative for some members here like me who are disoriented between IEO and ICO.

Here is the infographic that is worth to share.

[im g]https://i.ibb.co/3YB3wsy/1-0z-C-Uuh-Y42-Ze-Rk-SZ3-Zk-Vk-A.png[/img]

Here is the SOURCE

It's better if you read the whole article to enlighten your confusions about Initial Exchange Offering (IEO).

We don't even need many reasons as to why IEO is better than ICO, for the fact that IEO is controlled by popular exchanges is a plus for investors because this exchanges have built reputation for themselves and will not want to spoil it for some few amount of dollars, so they will make sure to checkmate every project before approving them for IEO, and for the fact that it's done on exchanges, this just means that it is also secured and to some extent free from scammers.

[doycku]

I was very much interested in investing to such IEO. Thus, made me the urged to browse the internet and found some compelling informations. I found it very informative for some members here like me who are disoriented between IEO and ICO.

Here is the infographic that is worth to share.

[im g]https://i.ibb.co/3YB3wsy/1-0z-C-Uuh-Y42-Ze-Rk-SZ3-Zk-Vk-A.png[/img]

Here is the SOURCE

It's better if you read the whole article to enlighten your confusions about Initial Exchange Offering (IEO).

We don't even need many reasons as to why IEO is better than ICO, for the fact that IEO is controlled by popular exchanges is a plus for investors because this exchanges have built reputation for themselves and will not want to spoil it for some few amount of dollars, so they will make sure to checkmate every project before approving them for IEO, and for the fact that it's done on exchanges, this just means that it is also secured and to some extent free from scammers.

I don’t understand this situation a bit, because I don’t know how new opportunities for implementing new projects may differ from eco companies.  It seems to me that the scammers will invent new ways to deceive the investor anyway.  There, we need to think about how to protect investors' funds. And with the help of an exchange this will be very difficult.

[OrangeII]

ICOs and IEOs are just same thing with one thing different that is token are offered in exchange and the other using smart contract But dont just deceive yourself with some points man There are IEOs that are basically reap-off and meant to sell trash tokens just make sure to make research on any investment you are making

yes, you might be right on one side, but the more exciting thing is, when you have the token launched, you have it right away when you buy it. that is the advantage of the IEO. in fact, the IEO might have prepared a better start than ICO. well, but anyway, now ICO is still used.

[fianaindriati]

Yes, for now the IEO is indeed better than ICO, but for some of these reasons, it doesn't guarantee that all IEOs don't scam, I think there is still a possibility that the IEO is scam.

Some things that might be a consideration of my address to the IEO. Even though the IEO is indeed interesting now. but clearly there is still controversy about this. as an example :

• Transparency
• Project Selection System From Exchange
• And also an agreement regarding fees. I think there must be

But as long as the exchange that carries out the IEO still has high trust if you are interested, the risk may not be too big because of course if the wrong selection can reduce the reputation of the exchange.

[vindermarch]

Yes, for now the IEO is indeed better than ICO, but for some of these reasons, it doesn't guarantee that all IEOs don't scam, I think there is still a possibility that the IEO is scam.

Some things that might be a consideration of my address to the IEO. Even though the IEO is indeed interesting now. but clearly there is still controversy about this. as an example :

• Transparency
• Project Selection System From Exchange
• And also an agreement regarding fees. I think there must be

But as long as the exchange that carries out the IEO still has high trust if you are interested, the risk may not be too big because of course if the wrong selection can reduce the reputation of the exchange.

Thats right, as an additional token sale in IOS if it's not long. After the tokensales, tokens directly listed in the exchange

[herurist]

ICOs and IEOs are just same thing with one thing different that is token are offered in exchange and the other using smart contract But dont just deceive yourself with some points man There are IEOs that are basically reap-off and meant to sell trash tokens just make sure to make research on any investment you are making

yes, you might be right on one side, but the more exciting thing is, when you have the token launched, you have it right away when you buy it. that is the advantage of the IEO. in fact, the IEO might have prepared a better start than ICO. well, but anyway, now ICO is still used.

But on the other hand the IEO has no fraud while there are still many ICOs, I believe that IEO is the best solution.

[GregH37]

if it is true that this IEO will be able to provide many benefits and security for investors, of course, in the future, many people will switch from ICO to the IEO. I hope that in the future we will develop more security and security, so that people will not hesitate in investing in cryptocurrency.

For now, I think the security of investor’s investment is still fully guaranteed, but I don’t know what might become of IEO in future, when ICO started too, there was no issue of scam until scammers saw an opportunity to use it in scamming people, now I am beginning to hear at the early stage of already discovered loop hole, which are weak exchanges coming up with IEO too.

It will be so much easier for scam to be done through weak exchanges and if care is not much taken, Binance and other great exchanges will not be able to curtail it except hey start coming up with another strategy that will block this.

[motienvolam]

snip

You mentioned two important things: 1. You thought that the security for investors now is guarenteed, I don't know which things led to such conclusions. Even when authorities have good requirements on ICO, IEO, exchanges, the risks for investors only existed, because there are always loop holes and they will be found and abused by bad guys. 2. Weak exchanges: I guess you meant young, small, unreliable exchanges (because they are young). For them, yes I agreed with you that they can make scam exits whenever they want, with IEOs Or without IEOs for their exchanges' fundings. For two reasons, I think IEOs are risky as same as ICOs, or even higher. Higher because if investors invest in IEO of a specific exchange, they might also store their money or trade on the exchange. So, they might lose more money (from their investment in IEO, from their money stored on that exchange).

[slaman29]

The reasons listed here are quite valid except for the aspect of it being cheaper which I don’t see any correlation, because you don’t also spend much time on ICO to purchase as much as one even does for IEO, Before an IEO is launched, do you we know how many people will stay on queue burning gas to participate?

One thing IEO fails to tell people is that it is very difficult to participate in it, you have to be on queue for too long and hoping to participate which you might not get a chance to do so before the token gets sold out, which majority are being bought internally. If IEO can solve this challenge, then it will become perfect.

Exactly. I will say though that maybe on IEO it's "cheaper" because everyone has the chance to buy it, without the ICO "bonuses" to dilute the value or without those nonsense bounties that give away 5% of the value. At least everything on IEO is as is, at least with the ones I've seen. Other than the tokens allocated to founders and what not, every other token is sold on exchanges with an IEO.

[Chacha1000]

I also believe IEO is better than ICO, but the only thing i dont like in IEO is the rush involved during the purchase,people really burn their gas for nothing just to be able to participate

[GREENch]

FCFS this format of IEO, which is now used on most Launchpad forces ordinary investors to look for additional ways to have time to buy tokens(I'm talking about special programs). So that causes certainly less than 6))

[raven7886]

We don't even need many reasons as to why IEO is better than ICO, for the fact that IEO is controlled by popular exchanges is a plus for investors because this exchanges have built reputation for themselves and will not want to spoil it for some few amount of dollars, so they will make sure to checkmate every project before approving them for IEO, and for the fact that it's done on exchanges, this just means that it is also secured and to some extent free from scammers.

It is not a plus to many people, sometimes leaving the IEO in the hands of these top exchanges could be dangerous, do you think any exchange will go that far to create IEO platform just because they have the interest people at heart? They do so to in other to make more money, using people’s weakness.

They have seen the week point of many potential investors now and fear of getting scammed if they get involved, and when thy built on that, the people they said they are protecting cannot even get involved other than whales, because only a whale would have such money to gather lots of the tokens at once without given little chance to the one that are not much financially buoyant to participate.

[motienvolam]

Better or worse, it depends on which exchanges you choose to join their IEOs, and which companies you choose to join their ICOs. Joining good ones will results in good things (profits for your investments). In contrast, choosing bad ones will likely cause losses. There is no guarentee that invest into IEO is better and will lead to certain profits, whilst invest into ICOs is worse and will cause losses for investors. It is too objective to judge which one is better between ICOs and IEOs, without details of each pair of ICO and IEO use to compare.