Are IEO's bad?

[IvugeoEvolutionCoin]

My understanding for IEOs is basically instead of project handling raising funds etc. It will be for an exchange to do so.

An IEO hosted by Yobit or Binance can clearly not be compared. In other words, the exchange gives more credibility to the project regardless of whether it's worth it or not.

Am I the only one who thinks this is actually a bad thing and make people focus on the exchange hosting rather than the actual project and what the team is offering etc.?

I don't think so, best exchanges attract best projects. Its a common natural law of attraction. With that succinctly put, it is normal for people to focus on the exchanges which are already adjudged credible and capable of picking the highest quality projects devoid of scam. Investors can now research on Tokenomics and determine what is best for them

[boty]

My understanding for IEOs is basically instead of project handling raising funds etc. It will be for an exchange to do so.

An IEO hosted by Yobit or Binance can clearly not be compared. In other words, the exchange gives more credibility to the project regardless of whether it's worth it or not.

Am I the only one who thinks this is actually a bad thing and make people focus on the exchange hosting rather than the actual project and what the team is offering etc.?

I have not found clear evidence that explains that this IEO is bad. I cannot judge something without proof that can be accounted for. Indeed, at the beginning we can be complacent by focusing on exchange and not focusing on the IEO project itself. IEO projects are more important to note. If the project is indeed good, then we just see the exchange because a good IEO should be useful. If the IEO is exchanged but does not have real benefits, I am sure that it cannot last long on the market.

[mekar sari]

now the IEO is the best way to attract investors to invest in new crypto project regarding the clarity of the IEO will be give profit or not all of the skills of each , check and understand the project before investing

[Gi01]

Am I the only one who thinks this is actually a bad thing and make people focus on the exchange hosting rather than the actual project and what the team is offering etc.?

I have also been thinking about this for a while now. People will rather invest in projects hosted by well known exchange platforms without cross checking how feasible the project is to the entire crypto ecosystem.  But my main concern is on whether these big platforms really examine and cross check the validity of the projects before hosting their IEO's on their platforms ...

[Dimas99]

The IEOs which is published on Binance are definitely not bad. Many people who is invested IEOs of Binance, earned a lot of money thank to Binance. That's why i would like to win a ticket for Harmony's IEO.

Exchange that has a high level of trust such as binance is indeed trusted by investors to make their investment in Projeck provided. but being able to join alone is difficult. the average profit is quite large if we can follow IEO or Launchpad at binance

[Chicky213]

IEOs are really great, it has assisted so many projects in fundraising and some even hit hardcap with IEO on reputable exchanges. IEO restorted people's confidence in crypto currency investment.

[gunhell16]

For me IEO is better than ICO which is not bad for the community and investors...

IEO has turned over an exchange which that exchange must review the project and investigate the team first before launching the IEO on their platform.

this gives another security for the investors.

[crypt0.r3negades]

There was a side that it was bad. Because the final decision if the token was good if it was listed on a a good exchange. But it was like a shortcut if IEO can do that. Because they just pay immediately.

[tenakha]

It is more correct to direct attention to the project. IEO is more attractive but all of them can not be good. You can look at Binance to make easy money for a short time, but you also should look out for the future.

[Jrfranco]

My understanding for IEOs is basically instead of project handling raising funds etc. It will be for an exchange to do so.

An IEO hosted by Yobit or Binance can clearly not be compared. In other words, the exchange gives more credibility to the project regardless of whether it's worth it or not.

Am I the only one who thinks this is actually a bad thing and make people focus on the exchange hosting rather than the actual project and what the team is offering etc.?

Nowadays its doesnt matter for anyone like me, because it depends on our purpose, if we think of making a profits only, we should learn to play the game of trading but if your purpose is long term investments, ieo is really something like you.need to understand the pros and cons but people nowadays, they always look in the reputation of the exchange rather than the project.

[anggracoin]

The IEO is an effective way to raise funds for a project, but the reputation of exchange seems to be the key to its success. Investors are more likely to quickly enter the project when they are registered at Binance Launchpad. However, it is different when a project is registered in an exchange with a low reputation that is quiet from investors, even though the project might be worth choosing.

[proTECH77]

The popular the exchange for the IEO is the better for the projects ,exchanges like binance ,digifinex ,yobit are top exchanges which will have positive impact on any IEO projects listed on these exchanges ,even if the project is not too good it will do better still

How yobit are top exchange? I don't think yobit is a really top exchange. Top 10 exchanges is reliable for IEO i think. And IEO is better than ICO because in IEO token surely list on exchange. But only most of the top exchanges IEO will success. IEO play good impact instead of IEO i think.

Probably Yobit was and not known as one of the top of exchange becasue we have the likes of Binance among others. Also, IEOs are far more better than those days where we had ICOs. My investment now is based on the top exchanges that operate on IEOs else, they may be shitcoin or coins without prospect.

[Lexurdania]

The popular the exchange for the IEO is the better for the projects ,exchanges like binance ,digifinex ,yobit are top exchanges which will have positive impact on any IEO projects listed on these exchanges ,even if the project is not too good it will do better still

How yobit are top exchange? I don't think yobit is a really top exchange. Top 10 exchanges is reliable for IEO i think. And IEO is better than ICO because in IEO token surely list on exchange. But only most of the top exchanges IEO will success. IEO play good impact instead of IEO i think.

Probably Yobit was and not known as one of the top of exchange becasue we have the likes of Binance among others. Also, IEOs are far more better than those days where we had ICOs. My investment now is based on the top exchanges that operate on IEOs else, they may be shitcoin or coins without prospect.

I am agree, we have a choice and if we can choose binance why we should invest in yobit right?. I think IEOs or ICOs is about making profits and as long the project give us profits, i think IEOs not a bad thing and its gaining trust from investor now

[InwardContour]

IEOs are not bad, the bad aspect is what you mentioned here;  people focus more on the exchange listing the project, then FOMO and forget about what the actual project has to offer. It's clear that IEOs done on credible exchanges like Binance, Kucoin and OKEX sell very fast because investors are confident that the team members have been verified thoroughly by the exchange and the coin will be listed fast. I will strongly encourage everyone to look deep on what the project has to offer, the product or MVP, the token economics and other vital aspects before buying into any token sale.

[PLATO]

IEOs are really great, it has assisted so many projects in fundraising and some even hit hardcap with IEO on reputable exchanges. IEO restorted people's confidence in crypto currency investment.

IEO is a very risky investment but it is much better than current ICO projects. It is possible that many IEO projects do not achieve the desired profit but if you join IEO projects at the top exchanges, your profits will easily double in just a few days. I often participate in top IEOs and so far most of the major IEO projects I have participated in have been very profitable and helped me a lot in investing.

[Kasabus]

IEOs are not bad, the bad aspect is what you mentioned here;  people focus more on the exchange listing the project, then FOMO and forget about what the actual project has to offer. It's clear that IEOs done on credible exchanges like Binance, Kucoin and OKEX sell very fast because investors are confident that the team members have been verified thoroughly by the exchange and the coin will be listed fast. I will strongly encourage everyone to look deep on what the project has to offer, the product or MVP, the token economics and other vital aspects before buying into any token sale.

The advent of IEO makes investors do little research as they know some of the task are done by the exchange itself already.
They trust the exchange, so they trust their judgment, that's why some coins after IEO pump in Binance because people love Binance so much as they can trade blindly thinking a project is good as Binance listed it.

[Tahdayi]

I think that if this is a good project, it will not do IEO on a bad crypto exchange. From this will depend on how much money he collects. Well, maybe there is some truth in your words.

I agree, ieo is now very good at raising money and only on top exchanges, as many people have lost a lot of money due to poor-quality ico , I think it's good that this is happening and there will be less in the Scam market.

[FelippeHeinz]

IEO's are much safer than ICO's, especially if done in a good exchange. Exchanges have an image to watch out for, they can't make the mistake of approving bad or scam projects.

[poodle63]

IEOs are not bad, the bad aspect is what you mentioned here;  people focus more on the exchange listing the project, then FOMO and forget about what the actual project has to offer. It's clear that IEOs done on credible exchanges like Binance, Kucoin and OKEX sell very fast because investors are confident that the team members have been verified thoroughly by the exchange and the coin will be listed fast. I will strongly encourage everyone to look deep on what the project has to offer, the product or MVP, the token economics and other vital aspects before buying into any token sale.

The advent of IEO makes investors do little research as they know some of the task are done by the exchange itself already.
They trust the exchange, so they trust their judgment, that's why some coins after IEO pump in Binance because people love Binance so much as they can trade blindly thinking a project is good as Binance listed it.

But the truth usually is different than what most people think. Binance could list whaterever they want and to fulfil their agenda without even people knowing and despite publishing a project that's near to useless people would still buying it thinking that the project is awesome and all. I'm not a hater but don't just blindly trust exchange. Most of Binance IEO is a huge success because the hype not because the project itself.

[ufaiz50]

My understanding for IEOs is basically instead of project handling raising funds etc. It will be for an exchange to do so.

An IEO hosted by Yobit or Binance can clearly not be compared. In other words, the exchange gives more credibility to the project regardless of whether it's worth it or not.

Am I the only one who thinks this is actually a bad thing and make people focus on the exchange hosting rather than the actual project and what the team is offering etc.?

I agree with some of the things you said, investors more look at who exchangers? and more like IEO with big exchanger such as binance and put aside what projects will be offered in the IEO and its benefits. But some points I also disagree because in my opinion IEO is more credible and more transparent in providing information, IEO is also more cooperative towards all those involved in the IEO project, because they carry the name of the exchange site so if there is a project that brings bad feedback then it will have an impact on the exchange site itself