Trust Sytem or trusted member list Must Be Removed?

[olcaytu2005]

You want weapons to crush this bunch? read all of cryptohunters previous postings on them. They use the trust system to eliminate whistle blowers and their COMPETITION in sig campaigns/managers and escrows.

You are right about that. They want to be monopoly.

[1714929858]

1714929858

[1714929858]

1714929858

[1714929858]

1714929858

[marlboroza]

Owww well-done bro. I bet you dont have a job :DDDDD So when you read this do you buy tokens? or do you do your research?  If you are not stupid you search right?

I thought you went to bed. So, you are aiming stupid naive people? Thanks for sharing this with us.

Hello everyone, pre sale is ongoing. Do not miss out 40% discount.

When you see a banner ad on bitcointalk do you buy immediately?? Do you trust Theymos???  

Sorry, I don't remember theymos saying "hello everyone, check our latest banner and don't miss to use service".

[olcaytu2005]

I really dont care what you are writing here because I know you are not objective. You just follow lauda. You dont use your mind. You are talking about off topic man :DD

tell me trust system must be removed ? or trusted member list must be removed? but use your mind pls


note: stop licking theymos boots

[marlboroza]

You just follow lauda.

I don't see lauda in this thread.

I really dont care what you are writing here because I know you are not objective. [...]You dont use your mind.

Bounty managers never encourage poeple to give money to ICOs. Everyone do their search and invest if they like. I never saw if any bounty manager said like that Hey Everyone please buy this token. Did you see? I havent

Hello everyone, pre sale is ongoing. Do not miss out 40% discount.

You are talking about off topic man :DD

What is off topic in topic full of lies?

tell me trust system must be removed ? or trusted member list must be removed? but use your mind pls

No.

note: stop licking theymos boots

Interesting. So you want to hear opinion which should be the same as yours?

[theymos]

Note that olcaytu2005 is banned on his request.

There are aspects of the trust system that are clearly less than ideal, some of which are probably solvable (and some probably not). But caucusing with people who have very clear and serious questionable behavior isn't going to help you convince people of anything. Anduck had a good case for the trust system being broken. You (cryptohunter) might've had some case for the trust system being broken if you had handled your initial trust issues with rationality and patience instead of absolutely losing your mind and throwing lies around, and even now I could imagine your red trust eventually being cleared if you were able to attain a stable mindset. olcaytu2005 on the other hand hasn't even attempted to defend himself against the accusations (from several independent widely-trusted members, based on publicly-available data) of knowingly assisting scams, so he does not have a good case for the trust system being broken.

[TalkStar]

You (cryptohunter) might've had some case for the trust system being broken if you had handled your initial trust issues with rationality and patience instead of absolutely losing your mind and throwing lies around, and even now I could imagine your red trust eventually being cleared if you were able to attain a stable mindset.

I am completely agree with you and I believe its possible to remove negative feedback by abiding proper steps. From this necessity I have already opened a thread in forum reputation section. where I have described about the proper way of getting apology. some of my points there is similar with your thinking.
    

[Lauda]

Note that olcaytu2005 is banned on his request.

That is a very odd request after everything that's been going on.

You (cryptohunter)..

Ah, now that the the master has spoken will it run away?

[The-One-Above-All]

Note that olcaytu2005 is banned on his request.

That is a very odd request after everything that's been going on.

You (cryptohunter)..

Ah, now that the the master has spoken will it run away?

There is never any running away on our part. Never use your own natural behaviors as a basis to speculate on the behaviors of the honest and upright members here. ANYTIME you want to debate with us one on one your past here you are more than welcome to do so. Reply yes or no now or just run away. Remember the extensive arguments you had and lost in the past with cryptohunter. Remember the 2 billion dollar lies you tried to push down investors throats when you had bags of dirtcoins? You said you were new then and had changed your ways since then. We now realize you have not changed at all LaudaM.

Our response to theymos will remain as it always shall be. We disagree with parts but are fully open to public debate on his opinions.
Regardless of which we still believe theymos is far more fair than you and your goons. Except he will not debate his opinions. He gives them and it is final in his own mind. That is the end of it.

We opened a thread for theymos alone to come and discuss things with us. Not to be derailed and destroyed by false claims from you and your goons. You should be struck off from this forum for all of the dishonest things you have done.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5138500.0


EDIT - it seems they deleted that thread. We call for presentation of these lies cryptohunter was spreading after his red trust? we doubt this is true since cryptohunter repeatedly challenged the entire meta board to present any incorrect information he had posted and they failed to bring 1 instance. We also doubt that ANY person can have a more valid claim of trust abuse or a broken trust system than a scammer and liar giving red trust to an honest member for them suggesting they would encourage others to review their post history after repeated lies and groundless attacks from the trust abuser.  That is the inverse of what red trust is for. So we cast in to doubt that part of theymos's post also.  It seems theymos is lacking the knowledge of the entire situation or is misrepresenting what took place.

[TMAN]

Our response to theymos will remain as it always shall be. We disagree with parts but are fully open to public debate on his opinions.

Theymos, me and everyone else here does not give 1 flying fuck about what you think. you have had multiple opportunities to debate with some of us and you chose to just give us eye cancer with your posts..

fuck off back under your trolling rock you piece of poo.

[The Cryptovator]

Our response to theymos will remain as it always shall be. We disagree with parts but are fully open to public debate on his opinions.
Regardless of which we still believe theymos is far more fair than you and your goons. Except he will not debate his opinions. He gives them and it is final in his own mind. That is the end of it.

We opened a thread for theymos alone to come and discuss things with us. Not to be derailed and destroyed by false claims from you and your goons. You should be struck off from this forum for all of the dishonest things you have done.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5138500.0

I have read your thread, haven't reply because of your fucking rules. If only theymos could reply then why you have made thread publicly? Why not just send PM to theymos ?

What does it means by "Our", "We", "Us"? That means you are CH or cult of CH. Seems you are using it on you whole thread and reply.

[TMAN]

What does it means by "Our", "We", "Us"? That means you are CH or cult of CH. Seems you are using it on you whole thread and reply.

the cult of Cryptocunt..

[stompix]

I have read your thread, haven't reply because of your fucking rules. If only theymos could reply then why you have made thread publicly? Why not just send PM to theymos ?

What does it means by "Our", "We", "Us"? That means you are CH or cult of CH. Seems you are using it on you whole thread and reply.

Yeah, I think the pills are showing their limits and as things happen in those cases it's even worse than before the treatment.
Has he (she,them,it) come to the point he actually thinks each of his own accounts is a different person?

Note that olcaytu2005 is banned on his request.

Pretty weird, are those bans permanent or are you going to reverse them if they come back and ask nicely?

[morvillz7z]

Pretty weird, are those bans permanent or are you going to reverse them if they come back and ask nicely?

I was going to ask the same thing as I can't seem to find his UID in the seclog. Maybe it's just a temp ban?

[stompix]

Pretty weird, are those bans permanent or are you going to reverse them if they come back and ask nicely?

I was going to ask the same thing as I can't seem to find his UID in the seclog. Maybe it's just a temp ban?

This reminds me of:

Is it possible that a direct ban from the theymos won't show in whatever dashboard you moderators have?

This would explain the so-called ban for CH none of us saw on the seclog
Maybe theymos bans are not shown because he didn't make them through the dashboard

A temp ban on request makes zero sense...

[coinlocket$]

Pretty weird, are those bans permanent or are you going to reverse them if they come back and ask nicely?

They done a ton of money (checking his bitcoin address) with they bounty ico so my guess they don't give a f**k about their accounts here.

[suchmoon]

This would explain the so-called ban for CH none of us saw on the seclog

I don't think CH was banned. Otherwise he wouldn't be allowed to run around with his alt. More likely he made up the story so that he could park his Legendary account and avoid the ban.

A temp ban on request makes zero sense...

Maybe the term is 1000 years.