..IMO, nobody should really care if they were selected every month or "won the lotto" every month, but it's still kinda interesting to keep track of it since it went monthly.
Of course, this list isn't to be taken seriously. But in between all the serious drama, I don't mind some less-serious Trust related things. And I'm curious to see who's going to be the last man standing on DT1. Although it's random, it still looks like some sort of record.
Yeah I did that too mostly due to the op running a THREAD saying I was the worst offender of trading postive feedback.
For all of bitcointalk. Which truly annoyed me so I removed 200 positives trust and shrank my list down to next to nothing.
Are you sure that was me? I kinda recall it being someone else, I had
Dabs as biggest Trust Selfscratcher.
To avoid getting annoyed By statistical threads. I suspect Loyce deciding to come up with this one without thinking it would annoy me.
Usually, I'm not creating threads with the purpose of annoying someone. There have been some exceptions (hi CH), but not much. On the other hand, I'm also not going to stop myself from posting something because it might annoy someone. This applies here too:
Just recently, I saw several posts saying: "I hope I'm not offending anyone", and it's been on my mind for a while now.
I only recently realized why this is so common in English. In Dutch, "offended" and "insulted" are the same word ("beledigd"). But lately, it seems like people treat the word "offending" as if it's "insulting".
I'd say insulting isn't needed and makes you look bad, but being offended is a choice of the receiver, and honestly I'm offended by people who want to limit their own freedom of speech out of fear that someone might get his feelings hurt on the internet! Oh noes!
It's okay to offended people! Offensive jokes are often funny. Don't let SJW decide what you're allowed to say or even think!
Trying to be nice doesn't hurt you, but don't let someone's made up feelings stop you from speaking your mind.
But it did anger me a bit due to theymos list saying I never missed an update and loyce counting the first list which was not an updated list against me.
You're taking this way too seriously
There are millions of users who never lost a DT1-lottery, because they were never in it. The main reason to include 14 rounds instead of 13 rounds is that I happen to have data for 14 rounds. It's just me being lazy
I should not be so petty, but sometimes I am. My apologies please forget I posted here at all.
I'm glad though this got solved already while I was still sleeping
Statistics are statistics, hopefully members here aren't naive enough to think a statistic automatically determines someone an offender to some sort of community standard or not.
Exactly
It's just data, open for interpretation.