Court issued an order for Craig Wright to produce his public bitcoin address

[Baofeng]

https://www.scribd.com/document/408636766/Wright-Motion

The court has ordered Craig Wright to produce the list of bitcoins owned as of December 31,2013 in the in the case of the estate of Dave Kleiman vs Craig Wright. So let us see how Craig will response on the decision of the court, he initially say that he can't get the information but the court think otherwise and ordered a "sua sponte".

[1715137870]

1715137870

[1715137870]

1715137870

[1715137870]

1715137870

[1715137870]

1715137870

[xvids]

Well time to for the truth to be told,
It is time to end it all,We would now know if he is real or fake.
The unending issue about Craig claiming he is the creator.
He should show all of his address and open the wallet that have the very 1st Bitcoin transaction.

[Ailmand]

Found this article in google:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/bitcoinexchangeguide.com/lies-emails-and-satoshi-forgery-the-dave-kleiman-v-craig-wright-court-case-drags-on/amp/

Well, this could be the end of Craig's delusional claim as Satoshi Nakamoto. I am tired of Craig's drama and controversy, stop giving this man the attention he seeks.

[AB de Royse777]

https://www.scribd.com/document/408636766/Wright-Motion

The court has ordered Craig Wright to produce the list of bitcoins owned as of December 31,2013 in the in the case of the estate of Dave Kleiman vs Craig Wright. So let us see how Craig will response on the decision of the court, he initially say that he can't get the information but the court think otherwise and ordered a "sua sponte".

I would just ask him to sign a message using the PGP publicly known owned by Satoshi. This BS Craig will have a shameful end, I can see it. The real Satoshi is having fun by the way. How shameful Craig is.

[mk4]

Whatever the result might be, there's going to be some juiiicy drama that's for sure. Going to call it now, Reddit r/bitcoin and r/cryptocurrency will be flooded with Craig Wright posts on May 15(deadline date)[1] and the next few days after that.

[1] https://www.theblockcrypto.com/tiny/craig-wright-required-to-produce-records-of-bitcoin-ownership-by-may-15-in-multi-billion-dollar-kleiman-case/

[Patatas]

Sometimes I feel the people who share news about Craig-Wright on this forum are his paid shills. Like, why would he be the hero that you've to follow him religiously? I'm not even interested in reading that article. The headlines sound like this issue will be never ending just like all of his stupid claims.

[mk4]

Sometimes I feel the people who share news about Craig-Wright on this forum are his paid shills. Like, why would he be the hero that you've to follow him religiously? I'm not even interested in reading that article. The headlines sound like this issue will be never ending just like all of his stupid claims.

You don't need to follow CSW religiously to be at least slightly interested in this topic. I personally don't like him, and I'm pretty sure a lot of others don't like him either, but there's nothing wrong with being updated to what's happening in the space. To each their own.

[Patatas]

Sometimes I feel the people who share news about Craig-Wright on this forum are his paid shills. Like, why would he be the hero that you've to follow him religiously? I'm not even interested in reading that article. The headlines sound like this issue will be never ending just like all of his stupid claims.

You don't need to follow CSW religiously to be at least slightly interested in this topic. I personally don't like him, and I'm pretty sure a lot of others don't like him either, but there's nothing wrong with being updated to what's happening in the space. To each their own.

Well, not like I was never interested in the topic but from the dramas, we experienced in the past I feel he does nothing interested for the community except getting unwanted attention. As I said, I came to the topic, read the news and now I know what is he upto.

[target]

Sometimes I feel the people who share news about Craig-Wright on this forum are his paid shills. Like, why would he be the hero that you've to follow him religiously? I'm not even interested in reading that article. The headlines sound like this issue will be never ending just like all of his stupid claims.

You don't need to follow CSW religiously to be at least slightly interested in this topic. I personally don't like him, and I'm pretty sure a lot of others don't like him either, but there's nothing wrong with being updated to what's happening in the space. To each their own.

Disgust makes them to follow Craig Wright and maybe curious as to how he will prove himself to be the real satoshi. But why is the court only asking for the BTCs he own as of December 2013, they should be asking for the coins he own since 2009 because after all he claimed to be Satoshi, which will also mean he has to proof the identify he claims.

[franky1]

this is non-news. and just dramatic distractions.

1. the klieman/wright case is just a facade. its done just to keep alive a fake veil of speculation that coins from 2011 are somehow involved in craig wrights businesses. ira klieman and craig are actually working together to use the courts as their drama stage. thus keeping other courts government proceedings at a distance.

2. this non news event is requesting craigs personal holdings at 2013.... which has nothing to do with the supposed 'satoshi stash' of 2011 which supposedly is in trust (not craigs possession)
this means similar to saying a court is requesting the queen to show her personal belongings of 2019, which would be just a couple old dresses and pair of underwear. but not requesting the contents of 'her' trusts (HMRC) (crown estate)

thus a pointless exercise just done to cause delays in the hope that craig can pass by the statute of limitations period to avoid the aussie government going after him for his scam

[XCANA]

https://www.scribd.com/document/408636766/Wright-Motion

The court has ordered Craig Wright to produce the list of bitcoins owned as of December 31,2013 in the in the case of the estate of Dave Kleiman vs Craig Wright. ~~

Now i need more cool stuff, because am about to laugh-out-loud as i can clearly see the end of a boaster without shame. He has claimed many glory from what we all assumed never belong to him, but fingers across and am watching to see the end of Craig Wright!!.   

[joshy23]

Sometimes I feel the people who share news about Craig-Wright on this forum are his paid shills. Like, why would he be the hero that you've to follow him religiously? I'm not even interested in reading that article. The headlines sound like this issue will be never ending just like all of his stupid claims.

You don't need to follow CSW religiously to be at least slightly interested in this topic. I personally don't like him, and I'm pretty sure a lot of others don't like him either, but there's nothing wrong with being updated to what's happening in the space. To each their own.

Even I'm no longer interested with how this things will proceed, being updated is also one of those things that I sometimes checked, maybe it will bring some clarifications with his claims and it will reveal some information but in the end of the day there's nothing will affect any decisions that I will comes
up regarding to my trust and my investment process.

[erikalui]

Craig is a proven liar so no point of following his case too. He made such false statements that are not even proved and he claims it's impossible for him to provide any information about his BTC holding. He's a gone case.

[kryptqnick]

Is that the case in which Craig Wright is suing a guy that doesn't believe he is Satoshi? I didn't understand the order well. Is it just about Craig disclosing one if his old wallets he is supposed to have, or is it an order to unlock the Satoshi's bitcoins? I think franky1 suggests it's the former, and in this case I agree it's not worthy of our attention.
When I first heard about the case, I was actually hoping the judge would make him do the latter. This way the uncertainty can end once and for all. It's sad if it turns out he can prove that he is in control of those funds, though.

[Netnox]

Craig S Wright is a compulsive liar and attention seeker and the best thing for us would be to ignore him. But at the same time, this court order can't be implemented. If Craig Wright claims that he doesn't own a particular address, then there is no way that he can be linked to that address. A Bitcoin address is not like a bank account. It is not linked by any ID document or residential information.

[Haunebu]

Craig S Wright is a compulsive liar and attention seeker and the best thing for us would be to ignore him. But at the same time, this court order can't be implemented. If Craig Wright claims that he doesn't own a particular address, then there is no way that he can be linked to that address. A Bitcoin address is not like a bank account. It is not linked by any ID document or residential information.

The horrible thing here is that some people got inspired by his move and tried duplicating it in their own ways. Examples:

- John McAfee claims that he knows who Satoshi is and does not provide proper proof.
- gotsatoshi.com claim that they will unveil the BTC creator soon etc

Idiots inspiring even more idiots. Ignore them!

[fiulpro]

This is actually good , this way we will be Able to actually know what he was faking till now is real or not actually the problem is more and more people are now for the sake of publicity are doing this , claiming to be Satoshi Nakamato and this is actually putting everyone in a turmoil , also if he would have been Satoshi then wouldn't he be just loggin in into his account and letting us know for real ?

Just one post is all it takes .

[Bitinity]

I dont think CSW will respond to this court, high possibility he will ignore it and keep on claiming that he is the real satoshi without providing any solid evidence. Case ends imho, we do not need to talk about him anymore as it will only help him to spread the BS.

[bustedsynx]

I don't know why we keep pandering to Craig Wright's delusions. It is as simple as "not your keys, not your coins." And it has been years and still he cannot prove he is Satoshi. I might as well claim I'm Satoshi since I don't have to provide concrete proof.

[akamit]

I do follow Craig drama to see where it goes at the end. Faketoshi drama will end today or tomorrow with a handful of shame and he has to live with it.

When you spit out up, there is a chance it will fall onto your face. Craig will get caught and will get fucked up by his own bad deeds. Soon Enough, if he doesn't surrender by saying the truth.

[Jating]

I do follow Craig drama to see where it goes at the end. Faketoshi drama will end today or tomorrow with a handful of shame and he has to live with it.

When you spit out up, there is a chance it will fall onto your face. Craig will get caught and will get fucked up by his own bad deeds. Soon Enough, if he doesn't surrender by saying the truth.

Good riddance. At least we can finally see the end of all this drama because it looks like he can't get out this time. It's already a court of law that ordered him, if he doesn't follow, then he can go to jail for sure.

It make sense to follow his drama, not just because we are shills or something, but really to see and prove that he ain't Satoshi and he should stop claiming to be the creator of bitcoin.

[rodel caling]

Well time to for the truth to be told,
It is time to end it all,We would now know if he is real or fake.
The unending issue about Craig claiming he is the creator.
He should show all of his address and open the wallet that have the very 1st Bitcoin transaction.

Yeah time know the truth for him he is one of the personality telling to tye public he is r al satoshi nakamoto the cr ator of bitcoin, because we should know the real creator is quietly don't like show show to the public his real identity, so let's wait the result about this.

[CryptoBry]

The court has ordered Craig Wright to produce the list of bitcoins owned as of December 31,2013 in the in the case of the estate of Dave Kleiman vs Craig Wright. So let us see how Craig will response on the decision of the court, he initially say that he can't get the information but the court think otherwise and ordered a "sua sponte".

This is getting to be funny I think he can't produce the information because this will finally expose him as just another publicity-riding charlatan nothing less nothing more. It would be illogical just to think that a man claiming to be the real Satoshi Nakamoto could not remember where did he stocked all of his Bitcoin holdings. This time around he can be in a do-or-die situation as his Bitcoin holdings can tell us if he is indeed telling the truth or just plainly lying on his teeth ever since his claim started in his own imagination. On lighter side, we have to thank Craig Wright though for providing us here a continuing entertainment for free. Soon he can be proclaimed as the Joker of Crypto.

[pooya87]

this is just more drama about Satoshi and the continuation of the Craig Wright's identity fraud and no court is yet investigating that fraud of his so he continues milking that scam more and more. at this point all i want to hear in topics like this which keep on popping up is when CW is behind bars for all the scams that he has been pulling over the past couple of years.

[ranman09]

So he still can't prove himself? haha. And he also stated he can't provide bitcoin address he owns?

[Yaunfitda]

this is just more drama about Satoshi and the continuation of the Craig Wright's identity fraud and no court is yet investigating that fraud of his so he continues milking that scam more and more. at this point all i want to hear in topics like this which keep on popping up is when CW is behind bars for all the scams that he has been pulling over the past couple of years.

Haha. I'm sure someone will posted it complete with pictures when CW is behind bars will all the bad things he did to enrich himself by taking advantage on his friends.

So I don't know what CW is thinking right now when he see this order from the court because it will really exposed how much he scam the estate of Dave Kleiman.

[DooMAD]

Since he is a compulsive liar, hopefully he'll take this opportunity to perjure himself, get caught and subsequently locked up for a nice long time.   

[Baofeng]

Sometimes I feel the people who share news about Craig-Wright on this forum are his paid shills. Like, why would he be the hero that you've to follow him religiously? I'm not even interested in reading that article. The headlines sound like this issue will be never ending just like all of his stupid claims.

I'm not a paid shill of Craig-Wright if that is what you insinuating here, and I don't consider him hero. On the contrary, if you look at my post history, everything that I shared is against CW, exposing him. So this is another expose of him, majority of us hated that guy for claiming he is Satoshi. Now he has a court battle but I agree that it will be never ending, but at least it's hard for CW to claim everything now as he will be under the microscope of the court and as others have wanted to see, him getting lock up for good.

[franky1]

Since he is a compulsive liar, hopefully he'll take this opportunity to perjure himself, get caught and subsequently locked up for a nice long time.   

all of craigs court drama is just waste of time publicity stunt civil court stuff. trying to gain fame to hope the fame is the "proof"
all it amounts to is paying a £50 court application and using a agreed second party(ira K) to pretend to be the opposition to his claim. that way he controls the narrative and direction.

hense why the request was for craigs personal holdings and not the supposed trust holdings
and then have the results of the personal holdings redacted/sealed.. meaning a waste of request

because what private companies and aussie government care about and what if the klieman drama was real, would be about the trust not the personal holdings. thus craig showing just personal stuff is meaningless and done just as stupid drama

[okala]

The truth will be open to the whole world now as Craig will have to produced those documents to the court, if he is the real santoshi he should be able to provide those wallets but if otherwise then the whole world will know the fakesantoshi.

[Ucy]

I tried reading the article before commenting but the page didn't work very well on my device.

I do not understand your post very well unfortunately.  Why would Wright produce address from 2013 instead of 2010 to 2011  when satoshi left the scene? Is the lawsuit about proving he is satoshi?

[Becky666]

The truth will be open to the whole world now as Craig will have to produced those documents to the court, if he is the real santoshi he should be able to provide those wallets but if otherwise then the whole world will know the fakesantoshi.

Indeed, haven him onboard with all his rantings about himself be the real Satoshi Nakamoto will definitely come to an end if the court will do the needful. But lets also consider this happenings that, it will give him more public exposure but the beauty is the truth will be see at the end of the day. Will ensure to monitor the case to know the updates.

[btc_angela]

I wonder if they will make him sign messages for each of those addresses?

I'm assuming that the court will do that because Craig needs to proved that he own that addresses and perhaps those addresses are being question by the other side. And I doubt that Craig will produce any sign addresses, meaning he is really a fraud act.

[Baofeng]

Just a follow up:

After Ira filed this claim, Craig committed a fraud on this Court in an attempt to  circumvent  its  jurisdiction.  As  detailed  in  paragraphs 160to 170 Craig filed  a  sworn declaration  that is incontrovertibly false based on an affidavit (and supporting evidence) he  previously  submitted  to  anAustralian  court.  The  boldfaced misrepresentationsCraig has told this Court demonstrate his desperation to avoid this suit.

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.24.0.pdf

This is according to the Florida Judge who handle the case. They ordered him to appear in Court in June 18, CSW filed for a motion to postpone and attend thru video conference in which the Court rejected his motion.

[naska21]

snip

CW already "played out possum" on that regard saying that all secrets where divided in parts via  Shamir's Secret Sharing scheme,  handed over to trust fund so that neither he nor someone else has personal access to private keys. Let's see if he can   "walk between raindrops"  once again.

[leea-1334]

CW already "played out possum" on that regard saying that all secrets where divided in part via  Shamir's Secret Sharing scheme,  handed over to trust fund so that nether he nor someone else has personal access to private keys. Let's see if he can   "walk between raindrops"  once again.

Whatever it is that happens,,, Craig Wright is going to pull the wool over peoples eyes again and again, because they are willing. I did not realize how badly the situation is, when I read the news,,, it is clear to me who is trying to fool. But after reading his supporter's comments and then I realize so many people believe and support him.

[squatter]

So, has he perjured himself then? As I understand it, he filed a sworn declaration that he didn't own or control W&K. Now it's been uncovered that he owned 50% and directed the company, or at least filed documents to that effect.

I'm not sure what the penalty for perjury is under Florida law, but it's up to five years imprisonment at the federal level.

CW already "played out possum" on that regard saying that all secrets where divided in part via  Shamir's Secret Sharing scheme,  handed over to trust fund so that nether he nor someone else has personal access to private keys. Let's see if he can   "walk between raindrops"  once again.

That might explain why he can't access the private keys, but isn't the court just asking for public addresses? How can he claim to not have that information?

[waitforme]

https://www.scribd.com/document/408636766/Wright-Motion

The court has ordered Craig Wright to produce the list of bitcoins owned as of December 31,2013 in the in the case of the estate of Dave Kleiman vs Craig Wright. So let us see how Craig will response on the decision of the court, he initially say that he can't get the information but the court think otherwise and ordered a "sua sponte".

I think he may not be able to list all the information the court requires. Maybe he doesn't have a list to disclose all the information publicly. I will be here and follow this case. This is the most significant bitcoin-related lawsuit. Who will win this lawsuit, and how will it affect Crypto?

[naska21]

So, has he perjured himself then? As I understand it, he filed a sworn declaration that he didn't own or control W&K. Now it's been uncovered that he owned 50% and directed the company, or at least filed documents to that effect.

I'm not sure what the penalty for perjury is under Florida law, but it's up to five years imprisonment at the federal level.

CW already "played out possum" on that regard saying that all secrets where divided in part via  Shamir's Secret Sharing scheme,  handed over to trust fund so that nether he nor someone else has personal access to private keys. Let's see if he can   "walk between raindrops"  once again.

That might explain why he can't access the private keys, but isn't the court just asking for public addresses? How can he claim to not have that information?

It's not a problem  to find the right address and provide it, but the ownership of any public address can be justified in only one  way i.e. via  address signing with relevant private key. That's it.

[Pursuer]

if anybody deserves to be behind bars, it is Craig Wright and it should be because of identity fraud but unfortunately I don't think it will ever happen because of that since Satoshi Nakamoto is not a known identity that he stole it and the real person should come out and sue him for stealing his identity and that is not going to happen either. but I am still happy to see him in jail for any other reason.

[DooMAD]

So, has he perjured himself then? As I understand it, he filed a sworn declaration that he didn't own or control W&K. Now it's been uncovered that he owned 50% and directed the company, or at least filed documents to that effect.

I genuinely hope so.  Totally called it if he has.   

Might be the best news the crypto community has had all year.

[Suslura]

So, has he perjured himself then? As I understand it, he filed a sworn declaration that he didn't own or control W&K. Now it's been uncovered that he owned 50% and directed the company, or at least filed documents to that effect.

I genuinely hope so.  Totally called it if he has.   

Might be the best news the crypto community has had all year.

But how will this situation affect the entire cryptocurrency market or cryptocurrency users?  These people always manipulate their opinions, manipulate the market and hide that information in order to use it for their own personal purposes. 

[DooMAD]

I genuinely hope so.  Totally called it if he has.   

Might be the best news the crypto community has had all year.

But how will this situation affect the entire cryptocurrency market or cryptocurrency users?  These people always manipulate their opinions, manipulate the market and hide that information in order to use it for their own personal purposes. 

I can only see the positives in terms of the effect it'll have on users if they lock him up.  One less liar filling their heads with nonsense.