Court issued an order for Craig Wright to produce his public bitcoin address

[Baofeng]

https://www.scribd.com/document/408636766/Wright-Motion

The court has ordered Craig Wright to produce the list of bitcoins owned as of December 31,2013 in the in the case of the estate of Dave Kleiman vs Craig Wright. So let us see how Craig will response on the decision of the court, he initially say that he can't get the information but the court think otherwise and ordered a "sua sponte".

[1715072680]

1715072680

[1715072680]

1715072680

[1715072680]

1715072680

[1715072680]

1715072680

[xvids]

Well time to for the truth to be told,
It is time to end it all,We would now know if he is real or fake.
The unending issue about Craig claiming he is the creator.
He should show all of his address and open the wallet that have the very 1st Bitcoin transaction.

[Ailmand]

Found this article in google:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/bitcoinexchangeguide.com/lies-emails-and-satoshi-forgery-the-dave-kleiman-v-craig-wright-court-case-drags-on/amp/

Well, this could be the end of Craig's delusional claim as Satoshi Nakamoto. I am tired of Craig's drama and controversy, stop giving this man the attention he seeks.

[AB de Royse777]

https://www.scribd.com/document/408636766/Wright-Motion

The court has ordered Craig Wright to produce the list of bitcoins owned as of December 31,2013 in the in the case of the estate of Dave Kleiman vs Craig Wright. So let us see how Craig will response on the decision of the court, he initially say that he can't get the information but the court think otherwise and ordered a "sua sponte".

I would just ask him to sign a message using the PGP publicly known owned by Satoshi. This BS Craig will have a shameful end, I can see it. The real Satoshi is having fun by the way. How shameful Craig is.

[mk4]

Whatever the result might be, there's going to be some juiiicy drama that's for sure. Going to call it now, Reddit r/bitcoin and r/cryptocurrency will be flooded with Craig Wright posts on May 15(deadline date)[1] and the next few days after that.

[1] https://www.theblockcrypto.com/tiny/craig-wright-required-to-produce-records-of-bitcoin-ownership-by-may-15-in-multi-billion-dollar-kleiman-case/

[Patatas]

Sometimes I feel the people who share news about Craig-Wright on this forum are his paid shills. Like, why would he be the hero that you've to follow him religiously? I'm not even interested in reading that article. The headlines sound like this issue will be never ending just like all of his stupid claims.

[mk4]

Sometimes I feel the people who share news about Craig-Wright on this forum are his paid shills. Like, why would he be the hero that you've to follow him religiously? I'm not even interested in reading that article. The headlines sound like this issue will be never ending just like all of his stupid claims.

You don't need to follow CSW religiously to be at least slightly interested in this topic. I personally don't like him, and I'm pretty sure a lot of others don't like him either, but there's nothing wrong with being updated to what's happening in the space. To each their own.

[Patatas]

Sometimes I feel the people who share news about Craig-Wright on this forum are his paid shills. Like, why would he be the hero that you've to follow him religiously? I'm not even interested in reading that article. The headlines sound like this issue will be never ending just like all of his stupid claims.

You don't need to follow CSW religiously to be at least slightly interested in this topic. I personally don't like him, and I'm pretty sure a lot of others don't like him either, but there's nothing wrong with being updated to what's happening in the space. To each their own.

Well, not like I was never interested in the topic but from the dramas, we experienced in the past I feel he does nothing interested for the community except getting unwanted attention. As I said, I came to the topic, read the news and now I know what is he upto.

[target]

Sometimes I feel the people who share news about Craig-Wright on this forum are his paid shills. Like, why would he be the hero that you've to follow him religiously? I'm not even interested in reading that article. The headlines sound like this issue will be never ending just like all of his stupid claims.

You don't need to follow CSW religiously to be at least slightly interested in this topic. I personally don't like him, and I'm pretty sure a lot of others don't like him either, but there's nothing wrong with being updated to what's happening in the space. To each their own.

Disgust makes them to follow Craig Wright and maybe curious as to how he will prove himself to be the real satoshi. But why is the court only asking for the BTCs he own as of December 2013, they should be asking for the coins he own since 2009 because after all he claimed to be Satoshi, which will also mean he has to proof the identify he claims.

[franky1]

this is non-news. and just dramatic distractions.

1. the klieman/wright case is just a facade. its done just to keep alive a fake veil of speculation that coins from 2011 are somehow involved in craig wrights businesses. ira klieman and craig are actually working together to use the courts as their drama stage. thus keeping other courts government proceedings at a distance.

2. this non news event is requesting craigs personal holdings at 2013.... which has nothing to do with the supposed 'satoshi stash' of 2011 which supposedly is in trust (not craigs possession)
this means similar to saying a court is requesting the queen to show her personal belongings of 2019, which would be just a couple old dresses and pair of underwear. but not requesting the contents of 'her' trusts (HMRC) (crown estate)

thus a pointless exercise just done to cause delays in the hope that craig can pass by the statute of limitations period to avoid the aussie government going after him for his scam

[XCANA]

https://www.scribd.com/document/408636766/Wright-Motion

The court has ordered Craig Wright to produce the list of bitcoins owned as of December 31,2013 in the in the case of the estate of Dave Kleiman vs Craig Wright. ~~

Now i need more cool stuff, because am about to laugh-out-loud as i can clearly see the end of a boaster without shame. He has claimed many glory from what we all assumed never belong to him, but fingers across and am watching to see the end of Craig Wright!!.   

[joshy23]

Sometimes I feel the people who share news about Craig-Wright on this forum are his paid shills. Like, why would he be the hero that you've to follow him religiously? I'm not even interested in reading that article. The headlines sound like this issue will be never ending just like all of his stupid claims.

You don't need to follow CSW religiously to be at least slightly interested in this topic. I personally don't like him, and I'm pretty sure a lot of others don't like him either, but there's nothing wrong with being updated to what's happening in the space. To each their own.

Even I'm no longer interested with how this things will proceed, being updated is also one of those things that I sometimes checked, maybe it will bring some clarifications with his claims and it will reveal some information but in the end of the day there's nothing will affect any decisions that I will comes
up regarding to my trust and my investment process.

[erikalui]

Craig is a proven liar so no point of following his case too. He made such false statements that are not even proved and he claims it's impossible for him to provide any information about his BTC holding. He's a gone case.

[kryptqnick]

Is that the case in which Craig Wright is suing a guy that doesn't believe he is Satoshi? I didn't understand the order well. Is it just about Craig disclosing one if his old wallets he is supposed to have, or is it an order to unlock the Satoshi's bitcoins? I think franky1 suggests it's the former, and in this case I agree it's not worthy of our attention.
When I first heard about the case, I was actually hoping the judge would make him do the latter. This way the uncertainty can end once and for all. It's sad if it turns out he can prove that he is in control of those funds, though.

[Netnox]

Craig S Wright is a compulsive liar and attention seeker and the best thing for us would be to ignore him. But at the same time, this court order can't be implemented. If Craig Wright claims that he doesn't own a particular address, then there is no way that he can be linked to that address. A Bitcoin address is not like a bank account. It is not linked by any ID document or residential information.

[Haunebu]

Craig S Wright is a compulsive liar and attention seeker and the best thing for us would be to ignore him. But at the same time, this court order can't be implemented. If Craig Wright claims that he doesn't own a particular address, then there is no way that he can be linked to that address. A Bitcoin address is not like a bank account. It is not linked by any ID document or residential information.

The horrible thing here is that some people got inspired by his move and tried duplicating it in their own ways. Examples:

- John McAfee claims that he knows who Satoshi is and does not provide proper proof.
- gotsatoshi.com claim that they will unveil the BTC creator soon etc

Idiots inspiring even more idiots. Ignore them!

[fiulpro]

This is actually good , this way we will be Able to actually know what he was faking till now is real or not actually the problem is more and more people are now for the sake of publicity are doing this , claiming to be Satoshi Nakamato and this is actually putting everyone in a turmoil , also if he would have been Satoshi then wouldn't he be just loggin in into his account and letting us know for real ?

Just one post is all it takes .

[Bitinity]

I dont think CSW will respond to this court, high possibility he will ignore it and keep on claiming that he is the real satoshi without providing any solid evidence. Case ends imho, we do not need to talk about him anymore as it will only help him to spread the BS.

[bustedsynx]

I don't know why we keep pandering to Craig Wright's delusions. It is as simple as "not your keys, not your coins." And it has been years and still he cannot prove he is Satoshi. I might as well claim I'm Satoshi since I don't have to provide concrete proof.

[akamit]

I do follow Craig drama to see where it goes at the end. Faketoshi drama will end today or tomorrow with a handful of shame and he has to live with it.

When you spit out up, there is a chance it will fall onto your face. Craig will get caught and will get fucked up by his own bad deeds. Soon Enough, if he doesn't surrender by saying the truth.