You are, right, the affected victims should have posted a proper scam accusation. But they did not.
Shall this be the reason to get away with a scam? I don't think so...
Have you any proof of those scams? No? Can you proof any so-called scam? I am 99.9999% sure there was no scam and you have just pointed out a baseless post which has made about 4 months ago.
Let's make you more clear, untrusted feedbacks are mentioned below:
USA.seller told scammed 300$ where on trust gave risk BTC amount 0.01
BTC can you prove that time 0.01
BTC=300$, can you post blockchain link? If not then how you can call that is a scam?
nolulooow gave negative trust where risked BTC amount 0.008
BTC and not posted on the thread so can you proof that scam happened?
kiko2001 gave negative trust where risk BTC amount 0.01 but not posted on the link, can you prove that scam?
And one more thing all negative trusts came from newbie accounts except your where you have mentioned 1
BTC risk amount and on reference, you posted a baseless link.
So, think yourself how suit your scam accusation thread is. If you try to check then you will find out a lot of accounts who got negative trust from newbie and negatively trusted accounts.
If there was no scam happened and the person creates a post on reputation board then all will go against you except the account trading matter, I can't say anything about those account trading as I have no idea of those accounts.
Please read my suggestion, shasan.
I already contacted the potential victims to gain evidence.
I adjusted the "risked BTC amount" in my negative feedback - you are right with that point.
I am 99.9999% sure there was no scam
And how can you prove that?
As i look through the marketplace i see accounts like these over and over, and barely any of them is legit.
There are no doubts that there are proofs missing so far.
Ask yourself: When you buy something from the digital goods section from a "newbie seller", which scenario is more likely to happen? To get scammed or not?
So i think in this case we should presume that a scammed happened, not vice versa.
Also, don't forget this is an
accusation, not a conviction.