No collateral, interest free 0.02 BTC loan to any Legendary member - experiment

[🏰 TradeFortress 🏰]

I'm offering a 0.02 BTC loan, with no collateral requirements, to any Legendary bitcointalk member.

The duration is 14 days and it is interest free. You repay the same amount.

Please reply to this thread if you're interested.

[1714979682]

1714979682

[1714979682]

1714979682

[1714979682]

1714979682

[1714979682]

1714979682

[Patatas]

It's worth mentioning that if you're willing to give out loans to the negative tagged legendary members. If yes, there is a high chance they will default since they have nothing to lose but a worthless account.

Also, I suggest checking if the account belongs to the rightful owner. Watching this thread.

[TMAN]

It's worth mentioning that if you're willing to give out loans to the negative tagged legendary members. If yes, there is a high chance they will default since they have nothing to lose but a worthless account.

Also, I suggest checking if the account belongs to the rightful owner. Watching this thread.

dont help the fool

[equator]

If you offer the loan to Red Trust believing me, then here i am applying for loan.

[Parodium]

I'm offering a 0.02 BTC loan, with no collateral requirements, to any Legendary bitcointalk member.

The duration is 14 days and the interest is a fixed 5% (return 0.021 BTC).

Please reply to this thread if you're interested.

It's worth mentioning that if you're willing to give out loans to the negative tagged legendary members. If yes, there is a high chance they will default since they have nothing to lose but a worthless account.

Also, I suggest checking if the account belongs to the rightful owner. Watching this thread.

Let's see if OP sticks to his word when the tagged members start showing up.

[suchmoon]

How about you finish your experiment of refunding scam victims.

[🏰 TradeFortress 🏰]

No red trust for obvious reasons.

[PrimeNumber7]

I am going to speculate that your "experiment" has some kind of nefarious purpose.

I haven't yet figured out the specific angle, but I will look at any fulfilled loan with a suspicious eye.

[LFC_Bitcoin]

Might be nice if you refund the bitcoin’s that are owed to the people you scammed before you start fucking about doing ridiculous experiments.

I’m sure they’e love to experiment by water boarding you until you give up the private keys to the thousands of bitcoin’s you stole.

[🏰 TradeFortress 🏰]

Might be nice if you refund the bitcoin’s that are owed to the people you scammed before you start fucking about doing ridiculous experiments.

I’m sure they’e love to experiment by water boarding you until you give up the private keys to the thousands of bitcoin’s you stole.

Reimbursements happened > https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4589356.0

Hey everyone,

I’m a little bit sad (okay, seriously sad) to announce that the reimbursement program is closing early.

I am happy that I was able to reimburse more than a hundred users, including 11 out of 12 of reachable users with the biggest balances.

Unfortunately, I do not have any more cryptocurrencies or assets that I can reimburse CL / Inputs users with. For context, the top 9 reimbursed individually have received more bitcoins from me, than anything I have to my own name today.

As far as I know, this might be the only instance in bitcoin where a significant amount of lost funds has been reimbursed, even 5 years down the track.

So the reimbursement program is now closed. I’m sorry to the ones that missed out, unfortunately there’s nothing I can do.

Best of luck with your crypto adventures,
TF

As mentioned, I simply don't have the bitcoins to make further reimbursements, but 0.02 BTC is another story. I am simply curious to see if I lend someone 0.02 BTC, will they pay it back?

[condoras]

As mentioned, I simply don't have the bitcoins to make further reimbursements, but 0.02 BTC is another story. I am simply curious to see if I lend someone 0.02 BTC, will they pay it back?

So you really believe that someone, as you mention in your Op, will risk his account for 0.02BTC?

[Quickseller]

As mentioned, I simply don't have the bitcoins to make further reimbursements, but 0.02 BTC is another story. I am simply curious to see if I lend someone 0.02 BTC, will they pay it back?

So you really believe that someone, as you mention in your Op, will risk his account for 0.02BTC?

The test is if someone will be willing to scam a scammer and if anyone is willing to do anything about it.

I am not sure if anyone would scam TF, but I strongly suspect that most of the most active “scam busters” will do nothing if TF doesn’t get repaid.

[FFrankie]

I am not a legendary, but I cannot believe that you are still active. Ill take a loan if you wanna give me one.


You can send the btc here

3NV8KMxpxj4dxMLLpMdX4xPvNJb6C6FFDz

[Quickseller]

I am not a legendary, but I cannot believe that you are still active. Ill take a loan if you wanna give me one.


You can send the btc here

3NV8KMxpxj4dxMLLpMdX4xPvNJb6C6FFDz

killyou72 is probably a good person to test the bolded part:

The test is if someone will be willing to scam a scammer and if anyone is willing to do anything about it.

I am not sure if he would intentionally scam TF, but he does have a history of screwing around a lot.

[hacker1001101001]

I am also not an legendary member here, but still if I can I would be happy to take a loan from one of the most popular member here!

Let me know if you are willing to.

I would send the BTC address in PM.

[condoras]

As mentioned, I simply don't have the bitcoins to make further reimbursements, but 0.02 BTC is another story. I am simply curious to see if I lend someone 0.02 BTC, will they pay it back?

So you really believe that someone, as you mention in your Op, will risk his account for 0.02BTC?

The test is if someone will be willing to scam a scammer and if anyone is willing to do anything about it.

I am not sure if anyone would scam TF, but I strongly suspect that most of the most active “scam busters” will do nothing if TF doesn’t get repaid.

This "test" (like other tests) have two serious factors. The one is the reputation/trust that someone will risk for this amount, which is very, very, very low.
So even if you are mostly right about the second factor, which is who will tag a defaulter for the same (proven) reason, is not so strong and "safe" to make an old account holder to take this loan.

There will be always a chance/risk to get tagged, especially now that the trust system have this structure. It would be a pity for an "elder" one to take this risk, for that amount.

[Quickseller]

As mentioned, I simply don't have the bitcoins to make further reimbursements, but 0.02 BTC is another story. I am simply curious to see if I lend someone 0.02 BTC, will they pay it back?

So you really believe that someone, as you mention in your Op, will risk his account for 0.02BTC?

The test is if someone will be willing to scam a scammer and if anyone is willing to do anything about it.

I am not sure if anyone would scam TF, but I strongly suspect that most of the most active “scam busters” will do nothing if TF doesn’t get repaid.

This "test" (like other tests) have two serious factors. The one is the reputation/trust that someone will risk for this amount, which is very, very, very low.
So even if you are mostly right about the second factor, which is who will tag a defaulter for the same (proven) reason, is not so strong and "safe" to make an old account holder to take this loan.

There will be always a chance/risk to get tagged, especially now that the trust system have this structure. It would be a pity for an "elder" one to take this risk, for that amount.

I suspect the two would go hand and hand.

A borrower might wait until TF complains about him being late, see how much pressure he receives from those on DT to repay the loan, if he receives no pressure, he wont repay, if he does receive pressure, he repays the loan.

[condoras]

As mentioned, I simply don't have the bitcoins to make further reimbursements, but 0.02 BTC is another story. I am simply curious to see if I lend someone 0.02 BTC, will they pay it back?

So you really believe that someone, as you mention in your Op, will risk his account for 0.02BTC?

The test is if someone will be willing to scam a scammer and if anyone is willing to do anything about it.

I am not sure if anyone would scam TF, but I strongly suspect that most of the most active “scam busters” will do nothing if TF doesn’t get repaid.

This "test" (like other tests) have two serious factors. The one is the reputation/trust that someone will risk for this amount, which is very, very, very low.
So even if you are mostly right about the second factor, which is who will tag a defaulter for the same (proven) reason, is not so strong and "safe" to make an old account holder to take this loan.

There will be always a chance/risk to get tagged, especially now that the trust system have this structure. It would be a pity for an "elder" one to take this risk, for that amount.

I suspect the two would go hand and hand.

A borrower might wait until TF complains about him being late, see how much pressure he receives from those on DT to repay the loan, if he receives no pressure, he wont repay, if he does receive pressure, he repays the loan.

The "time" doesn't wait, 14 days is 14 days... Besides will can all watch this thread and leave our feedback accordingly, after the deadline.

[Quickseller]

As mentioned, I simply don't have the bitcoins to make further reimbursements, but 0.02 BTC is another story. I am simply curious to see if I lend someone 0.02 BTC, will they pay it back?

So you really believe that someone, as you mention in your Op, will risk his account for 0.02BTC?

The test is if someone will be willing to scam a scammer and if anyone is willing to do anything about it.

I am not sure if anyone would scam TF, but I strongly suspect that most of the most active “scam busters” will do nothing if TF doesn’t get repaid.

This "test" (like other tests) have two serious factors. The one is the reputation/trust that someone will risk for this amount, which is very, very, very low.
So even if you are mostly right about the second factor, which is who will tag a defaulter for the same (proven) reason, is not so strong and "safe" to make an old account holder to take this loan.

There will be always a chance/risk to get tagged, especially now that the trust system have this structure. It would be a pity for an "elder" one to take this risk, for that amount.

I suspect the two would go hand and hand.

A borrower might wait until TF complains about him being late, see how much pressure he receives from those on DT to repay the loan, if he receives no pressure, he wont repay, if he does receive pressure, he repays the loan.

The "time" doesn't wait, 14 days is 14 days... Besides will can all watch this thread and leave our feedback accordingly, after the deadline.

Unless a group of people are looking for a reason to leave negative trust, the majority of people are going to be forgiving for a late loan payment.

[condoras]

As mentioned, I simply don't have the bitcoins to make further reimbursements, but 0.02 BTC is another story. I am simply curious to see if I lend someone 0.02 BTC, will they pay it back?

So you really believe that someone, as you mention in your Op, will risk his account for 0.02BTC?

The test is if someone will be willing to scam a scammer and if anyone is willing to do anything about it.

I am not sure if anyone would scam TF, but I strongly suspect that most of the most active “scam busters” will do nothing if TF doesn’t get repaid.

This "test" (like other tests) have two serious factors. The one is the reputation/trust that someone will risk for this amount, which is very, very, very low.
So even if you are mostly right about the second factor, which is who will tag a defaulter for the same (proven) reason, is not so strong and "safe" to make an old account holder to take this loan.

There will be always a chance/risk to get tagged, especially now that the trust system have this structure. It would be a pity for an "elder" one to take this risk, for that amount.

I suspect the two would go hand and hand.

A borrower might wait until TF complains about him being late, see how much pressure he receives from those on DT to repay the loan, if he receives no pressure, he wont repay, if he does receive pressure, he repays the loan.

The "time" doesn't wait, 14 days is 14 days... Besides will can all watch this thread and leave our feedback accordingly, after the deadline.

Unless a group of people are looking for a reason to leave negative trust, the majority of people are going to be forgiving for a late loan payment.

Even so, there will be always 1 chance to have a neg from someone who will not remove it, even if you repay late.
Plus there is a difference between a "late" loan and a "default" loan. Most of the defaulted though will never been repaid and the account is "dead".
If you mean that a default loan can be a late one under the pressure of a negative feedback, i agree. But that's one of the points of being tagged, right?