No collateral, interest free 0.02 BTC loan to any Legendary member - experiment

[Stedsm]

Hey, can I give it a try and see if I'm eligible here? 🤔
If yes, no need to ask my BTC address as you can find it there in my profile. But beware, if it's for trust building, I'm not interested.

[1714003693]

1714003693

[1714003693]

1714003693

[1714003693]

1714003693

[1714003693]

1714003693

[1714003693]

1714003693

[Stedsm]

Or is this ^experiment^ limited to just 1 single entity?
Or you didn't check the thread like last time?

[Patatas]

Or is this ^experiment^ limited to just 1 single entity?
Or you didn't check the thread like last time?

Well, he did take a day to respond to me. I waited for a reply on the thread for a long time but had to send them a private message to get the attention. Maybe you should try doing that as well?

P.S: The service doesn't guarantee instant loans lol

[condoras]

P.S: The service doesn't guarantee instant loans lol

TF doesn't say anything about a "lending service"...
Is an experiment from his side, nothing more. We all wait though to see how it will end.

[🏰 TradeFortress 🏰]

It's a one time experiment, sorry!

[papundekli22]

Its possible the loan ?


Thaks a lot

Best Regards Papundekli22

[nydiacaskey01]

Its possible the loan ?


Thaks a lot

Best Regards Papundekli22

Did you read the post of TF?

It's a one time experiment, sorry!

So its not a loan, its an experiment. I'm looking at it as a test of honesty and integrity.

Did you even checked what are the requirements to qualify for this experiment?

I'm offering a 0.02 BTC loan, with no collateral requirements, to any Legendary bitcointalk member.

Unless you have another account which is Legendary and you want to test it.

[nutildah]

Bookmarked to see what happens.

[bill gator]

IMO, the purpose of this is to see if people are willing to scam a scammer and if anyone is willing to do anything about it (leave negative trust).

Isn't the answer to that question already obvious? "It depends".
If 3-People scam then they will all receive different reactions.

If (almost) anyone else were running this experiment I would happily take the "loan" to aide in your research with the caveat of neutral feedback or no feedback, but given your current standing (inb4 hypocrite) I feel like participating in this might assist you in scamming members in the future.

TF doesn't say anything about a "lending service"...

Sure about that?

I'm offering a 0.02 BTC loan

Isn't offering a loan, with qualifying-criteria to multiple people exactly fitting the definition of a lending service?

[Quickseller]

IMO, the purpose of this is to see if people are willing to scam a scammer and if anyone is willing to do anything about it (leave negative trust).

Isn't the answer to that question already obvious? "It depends".
If 3-People scam then they will all receive different reactions.

If (almost) anyone else were running this experiment I would happily take the "loan" to aide in your research with the caveat of neutral feedback or no feedback, but given your current standing (inb4 hypocrite) I feel like participating in this might assist you in scamming members in the future.

I don't think this is about a "protected" person possibly scamming. I think it is more about what would happen if *anyone* scams TF.

[condoras]

Sure about that?

Besides the fact that i'm still able to read and understand what i'm reading off (jk), TF answered and clarified it already. So yes, pretty sure about that.

It's a one time experiment, sorry!

[DireWolfM14]

If (almost) anyone else were running this experiment I would happily take the "loan" to aide in your research with the caveat of neutral feedback or no feedback, but given your current standing (inb4 hypocrite) I feel like participating in this might assist you in scamming members in the future.

I don't think he would lend to you anyway, not with your current trust level.

No red trust for obvious reasons.

I don't think this is about a "protected" person possibly scamming. I think it is more about what would happen if *anyone* scams TF.

It's an interesting experiment, but the value of it is eludes me.  TF won't lend to a member with red trust, so it's almost like he wants, or needs a member with a good or neutral trust score to scam him for the experiment to work.  And if or when that happens, what then?  Does he expect DT members to stand by and not tag the scammer?

[Quickseller]

I don't think this is about a "protected" person possibly scamming. I think it is more about what would happen if *anyone* scams TF.

It's an interesting experiment, but the value of it is eludes me.  TF won't lend to a member with red trust, so it's almost like he wants, or needs a member with a good or neutral trust score to scam him for the experiment to work.  And if or when that happens, what then?  Does he expect DT members to stand by and not tag the scammer?

I previously stated that it is my belief that part of the experiment was to see if someone with reputation to lose would scam him, so he doesn't necessarily need to get scammed.

I am not sure what his end goals are, if any. He might be trying to see if it is safe for him to trade here.

[LFC_Bitcoin]

...snip...
I am not sure what his end goals are, if any. He might be trying to see if it is safe for him to trade here.

Repaying 0.02BTC is going to prove nothing other than the person taking the loan is trustworthy enough to repay a small loan.

It is perfectly safe to trade here if you use a reputable escrow service.

I don’t see anything positive for TradeFortress to gain from this other than him hoping that he gets a DT member borrower so he can get a positive trust towards trying to repair his unrepairable trust score.

This is all a pointless waste of time imo.

[Quickseller]

...snip...
I am not sure what his end goals are, if any. He might be trying to see if it is safe for him to trade here.

Repaying 0.02BTC is going to prove nothing other than the person taking the loan is trustworthy enough to repay a small loan.

It is perfectly safe to trade here if you use a reputable escrow service.

I don’t see anything positive for TradeFortress to gain from this other than him hoping that he gets a DT member borrower so he can get a positive trust towards trying to repair his unrepairable trust score.

This is all a pointless waste of time imo.

I think this response is pretty good evidence that you haven’t read the thread.

[LFC_Bitcoin]

...snip...
I am not sure what his end goals are, if any. He might be trying to see if it is safe for him to trade here.

Repaying 0.02BTC is going to prove nothing other than the person taking the loan is trustworthy enough to repay a small loan.

It is perfectly safe to trade here if you use a reputable escrow service.

I don’t see anything positive for TradeFortress to gain from this other than him hoping that he gets a DT member borrower so he can get a positive trust towards trying to repair his unrepairable trust score.

This is all a pointless waste of time imo.

I think this response is pretty good evidence that you haven’t read the thread.

I’d expect this type of response from somebody who got into bed with TF.
Leave it out, QS.

I posted on page 1 of this thread. Maybe you didn’t read page 1?

Might be nice if you refund the bitcoin’s that are owed to the people you scammed before you start fucking about doing ridiculous experiments.

I’m sure they’e love to experiment by water boarding you until you give up the private keys to the thousands of bitcoin’s you stole.

[minifrij]

Announcing the experiment beforehand kind of defeats the purpose, does it not?

[Quickseller]

Announcing the experiment beforehand kind of defeats the purpose, does it not?

He said it is an experiment. I am speculating what the experiment is.

[minifrij]

He said it is an experiment. I am speculating what the experiment is.

I am simply curious to see if I lend someone 0.02 BTC, will they pay it back?

I guess that's it.

[condoras]

i'm looking for a loan can we get in contact ?

You can't even read the title of this thread and you want a loan?!