x

[AB de Royse777]

Craig Wright is sneaky, but a lot of people know that bitcoin core is the only and real bitcoin,

there is no such coin as "bitcoin core", the name is "bitcoin" without any additional words appended to it. the name "bitcoin core" is the name of the full node implementation of bitcoin aka the client. i think you should stop reading /r/btc and bitcoin.com

"bitcoin core" is the misleading term for Roger Ver to establish his bCash shit. Bitcoin is Bitcoin, we all know about it so no need to add any extra words to separate it from Bitcoin Cash.

Bitcoin Cash is an altcoin.

Consider this:
The site name is Bitcoin.com but they are pushing BCH and they know they have to explain what is BCH so bringing Bitcoin was necessary. Now if they call Bitcoin only Bitcoin instead calling it "Bitcoin Core" then this will conflict them to push BCH since the site name is bitcoin.com. So they came up with this misleading term "Bitcoin core" to introduce the Bitcoin itself.

It's a trap for newbies to sell their BCH.

[1714645875]

1714645875

[1714645875]

1714645875

[1714645875]

1714645875

[Sithara007]

This online petitions are not going to have any effect. If you really want to challenge the copyright, then we need to launch a legal challenge. But the problem here is that the legal challenge needs to be done by the original author of the whitepaper. When we don't know about the real identity of Satoshi Nakamoto, how we are going to do that?

[Pursuer]

the copyright office already said these issues are disputed in the courts; it's not their problem. they just keep records when people register copyrights.

Exactly. They're not going to remove or revoke the copyright just because a good number of people that submitted their email on a website wants to. That's simply not how stuff works as far as I know, especially when talking about things that involves the government.

Correct me if I'm wrong.

the only way that this can work is if the person whose identity is being stolen or copyright's infringed, to step forward and file a complaint with US copyright office indicating that his work and identity is being stolen by an imposter. and we all know Satoshi has remained anonymous for whatever reason and he will never come out for something this small.

[tsaroz]

the copyright office already said these issues are disputed in the courts; it's not their problem. they just keep records when people register copyrights.

Exactly. They're not going to remove or revoke the copyright just because a good number of people that submitted their email on a website wants to. That's simply not how stuff works as far as I know, especially when talking about things that involves the government.

Correct me if I'm wrong.

the only way that this can work is if the person whose identity is being stolen or copyright's infringed, to step forward and file a complaint with US copyright office indicating that his work and identity is being stolen by an imposter. and we all know Satoshi has remained anonymous for whatever reason and he will never come out for something this small.

And satoshi is highly unlikely to do that. But there are still many ways the authorities can research about the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto or at least find impostors and make them pay for their fake claims. Whatever people may claim at the moment, time would make their hype disappear while the true legend would always remain a legend.