RawDog (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1026
|
|
May 26, 2019, 06:47:12 AM |
|
But you cannot say he is not Satoshi the inventor of Bitcoin. After all, look at all of his patents and now even the US government is awarding copyrights to him which can ONLY be given to the original author. It's a fact: CSW is Satoshi.
Cry all you like, you won't change the facts.
|
|
|
|
Nadziratel
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 1568
Merit: 321
★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!
|
|
May 26, 2019, 06:55:20 AM |
|
But you cannot say he is not Satoshi the inventor of Bitcoin. After all, look at all of his patents and now even the US government is awarding copyrights to him which can ONLY be given to the original author. It's a fact: CSW is Satoshi.
Cry all you like, you won't change the facts.
Why should I like CSW? I can't understand why are you thinking he is Satoshi. Having too many patents doesn't make him Satoshi or any awards. I think you missed a point. There is nothing to make us cry here. It is so simple if he wants to prove that who Satoshi is. Satoshi has a big amount of BTC as we all know. I am waiting collect all of them in a wallet... Just an idea.
|
|
|
|
pushups44
|
|
May 26, 2019, 06:56:50 AM |
|
But you cannot say he is not Satoshi the inventor of Bitcoin. After all, look at all of his patents and now even the US government is awarding copyrights to him which can ONLY be given to the original author. It's a fact: CSW is Satoshi.
Cry all you like, you won't change the facts.
But you're not a lawyer, and lawyers have openly said anyone could have registered to copyright the bitcoin whitepaper. The government even gave a press release stating they do not do in-depth investigations with such applications.
|
|
|
|
stfN2128
Member
Offline
Activity: 882
Merit: 14
|
|
May 26, 2019, 07:06:14 AM |
|
And we all know that the US government is doing only good things to the world Just having patents doesn't mean that i'm the founder of something. I still think that satoshi is a group of people who still wanna stay anonymous. maybe craig was involved in any way and he is the one who's looking for attention.
|
|
|
|
Nadziratel
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 1568
Merit: 321
★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!
|
|
May 26, 2019, 07:06:22 AM |
|
But you cannot say he is not Satoshi the inventor of Bitcoin. After all, look at all of his patents and now even the US government is awarding copyrights to him which can ONLY be given to the original author. It's a fact: CSW is Satoshi.
Cry all you like, you won't change the facts.
But you're not a lawyer, and lawyers have openly said anyone could have registered to copyright the bitcoin whitepaper. The government even gave a press release stating they do not do in-depth investigations with such applications. Yeah, I'm not a lawyer. And registering whitepaper does not make him Satoshi. In addition, by law, the person who put forward a claim is obliged to prove it! The gentleman claims to be Satoshi in every environment. Just claim! There's no evidence! So, if I register the whitepaper on me, will I be Satoshi? Let's be serious, that's enough comedy!
|
|
|
|
Kakmakr
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3472
Merit: 1961
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
|
|
May 26, 2019, 07:24:53 AM |
|
Ah, the forum Troll is back. Ok so the guy has some money to file a Copyright claim on the Bitcoin White paper, obviously something that can be done by the average Joe on the street with some money to burn. As far as my knowledge about Copyright is concerned, it can be challenged with a little bit of money too. It is also a criminal offense if you file a claim for something and you cannot show that you have a legitimate ownership of the thing you are claiming ownership of. As far as I know, CW has not signed a single Bitcoin address that is known to have been used by Satoshi Nakamoto and he even gave false information on owning a early Bitcoin address and the real owner came forward by signing that address...
|
..Stake.com.. | | | ▄████████████████████████████████████▄ ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██ ▄████▄ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ██████ ██ ██████████ ██ ██ ██████████ ██ ▀██▀ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ █████ ███ ██████ ██ ████▄ ██ ██ █████ ███ ████ ████ █████ ███ ████████ ██ ████ ████ ██████████ ████ ████ ████▀ ██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███ ██ ██ ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████████████████████████████████████ | | | | | | ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄ █ ▄▀▄ █▀▀█▀▄▄ █ █▀█ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▄██▄ █ ▌ █ █ ▄██████▄ █ ▌ ▐▌ █ ██████████ █ ▐ █ █ ▐██████████▌ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▀▀██████▀▀ █ ▌ █ █ ▄▄▄██▄▄▄ █ ▌▐▌ █ █▐ █ █ █▐▐▌ █ █▐█ ▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█ | | | | | | ▄▄█████████▄▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄█▀ ▐█▌ ▀█▄ ██ ▐█▌ ██ ████▄ ▄█████▄ ▄████ ████████▄███████████▄████████ ███▀ █████████████ ▀███ ██ ███████████ ██ ▀█▄ █████████ ▄█▀ ▀█▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄▄▄█▀ ▀███████ ███████▀ ▀█████▄ ▄█████▀ ▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀ | | | ..PLAY NOW.. |
|
|
|
CryptoBry
|
|
May 26, 2019, 07:42:29 AM |
|
But you cannot say he is not Satoshi the inventor of Bitcoin. After all, look at all of his patents and now even the US government is awarding copyrights to him which can ONLY be given to the original author. It's a fact: CSW is Satoshi.
Cry all you like, you won't change the facts.
Why should I like CSW? I can't understand why are you thinking he is Satoshi. Having too many patents doesn't make him Satoshi or any awards. I think you missed a point. There is nothing to make us cry here. It is so simple if he wants to prove that who Satoshi is. Satoshi has a big amount of BTC as we all know. I am waiting collect all of them in a wallet... Just an idea. The main test is if he can move the big hoard of Bitcoin that Satoshi Nakamoto has under his control but so far he is not taking the challenge and have chosen to instead cloud the issue with so many of his shenanigans. But I am not wondering why Craig Wright is doing what he is doing. Because he is good in seeking publicity and he knows how to use the media mainstream or not into his favor. Craig Wright has all the right in the world to believe that he is the real Satoshi but he can never impose that the industry will believe and install his name as the real one.
|
|
|
|
Herbert2020
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1137
|
|
May 26, 2019, 07:44:33 AM |
|
the US government is awarding copyrights to him
if you want to be brain dead and gullible that is your choice and Craig's chance to empty your pocket.
|
Weak hands have been complaining about missing out ever since bitcoin was $1 and never buy the dip. Whales are those who keep buying the dip.
|
|
|
vycl87
|
|
May 26, 2019, 08:07:44 AM |
|
But you cannot say he is not Satoshi the inventor of Bitcoin. After all, look at all of his patents and now even the US government is awarding copyrights to him which can ONLY be given to the original author. It's a fact: CSW is Satoshi.
Cry all you like, you won't change the facts.
Why should I like CSW? I can't understand why are you thinking he is Satoshi. Having too many patents doesn't make him Satoshi or any awards. I think you missed a point. There is nothing to make us cry here. It is so simple if he wants to prove that who Satoshi is. Satoshi has a big amount of BTC as we all know. I am waiting collect all of them in a wallet... Just an idea. The main test is if he can move the big hoard of Bitcoin that Satoshi Nakamoto has under his control but so far he is not taking the challenge and have chosen to instead cloud the issue with so many of his shenanigans. But I am not wondering why Craig Wright is doing what he is doing. Because he is good in seeking publicity and he knows how to use the media mainstream or not into his favor. Craig Wright has all the right in the world to believe that he is the real Satoshi but he can never impose that the industry will believe and install his name as the real one. Well, since he claims to be Satoshi. Why did he initially want to remain anonymous? I think CSW should explain this before! This event is the biggest proof that CSW is not Satoshi.
|
|
|
|
Rufsilf
|
|
May 26, 2019, 08:20:07 AM |
|
So what of he has patents, or if the US government is awarding him copyrights it doesn't prove anything about him being Satoshi who invented Bitcoin. Also, it's also possible that he is not the real Satoshi and that the patent was only awarded to him, and maybe he just wanted to get all the credit knowing that the real Satoshi wanted to stay anonymous.
|
|
|
|
|
talkbitcoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1032
All I know is that I know nothing.
|
|
May 26, 2019, 08:54:16 AM |
|
not liking him is not a personal opinion, it is about the fact that he is a scammer and nobody likes scammers specially those who steal other people's identity and abuse it for their own personal gains by fooling people like OP... these people and all those who support them should be behind bars because they are robbing people in broad daylight.
|
|
|
|
bitbollo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3290
Merit: 3569
Nec Recisa Recedit
|
|
May 26, 2019, 08:54:39 AM |
|
But you cannot say he is not Satoshi the inventor of Bitcoin. After all, look at all of his patents and now even the US government is awarding copyrights to him which can ONLY be given to the original author. It's a fact: CSW is Satoshi.
Cry all you like, you won't change the facts.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5144781.0Early Adopter Proves Ownership of Bitcoin Address Claimed by Wright If you are not able to prove ownership of a bitcoin address .... you're not satoshi
|
| | . .Duelbits. | │ | ..........UNLEASH.......... THE ULTIMATE GAMING EXPERIENCE | │ | DUELBITS FANTASY SPORTS | ████▄▄▄█████▄▄▄ ░▄████████████████▄ ▐██████████████████▄ ████████████████████ ████████████████████▌ █████████████████████ ████████████████▀▀▀ ███████████████▌ ███████████████▌ ████████████████ ████████████████ ████████████████ ████▀▀███████▀▀ | . ▬▬ VS ▬▬ | ████▄▄▄█████▄▄▄ ░▄████████████████▄ ▐██████████████████▄ ████████████████████ ████████████████████▌ █████████████████████ ███████████████████ ███████████████▌ ███████████████▌ ████████████████ ████████████████ ████████████████ ████▀▀███████▀▀ | /// PLAY FOR FREE /// WIN FOR REAL | │ | ..PLAY NOW.. | |
|
|
|
antisocial77
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 378
Merit: 4
|
|
May 26, 2019, 08:55:48 AM |
|
getting patents is nothing if the tech is new. ibm and alibaba gets tons of patents because there are so many things to discover or create.csw is a trash thats all.
|
Silica NeXus ▄▄▄▄▄ Crowdfund the Nexus ▄▄▄▄▄
|
|
|
pushups44
|
|
May 26, 2019, 09:14:30 AM |
|
Ah, the forum Troll is back. Ok so the guy has some money to file a Copyright claim on the Bitcoin White paper, obviously something that can be done by the average Joe on the street with some money to burn. As far as my knowledge about Copyright is concerned, it can be challenged with a little bit of money too. It is also a criminal offense if you file a claim for something and you cannot show that you have a legitimate ownership of the thing you are claiming ownership of. As far as I know, CW has not signed a single Bitcoin address that is known to have been used by Satoshi Nakamoto and he even gave false information on owning a early Bitcoin address and the real owner came forward by signing that address... If you read the OP's previous messages, he makes it clear that he believes CSW is actually Satoshi. He has also bashed bitcoin as an investment since 2013 I believe - meaning he may have missed out on the massive bull run of 2017. He's entitled to believe CSW is Satoshi. And I will remain a skeptic of that claim, until CSW moves funds or signs messages from the first blocks.
|
|
|
|
gentlemand
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2590
Merit: 3014
Welt Am Draht
|
|
May 26, 2019, 09:23:12 AM |
|
If you are not able to prove ownership of a bitcoin address .... you're not satoshi Proving ownership of an address proves... ownership of an address. Nothing more. Whoever signs Satoshi's address could have obtained the private keys from him. Ultimately the only power Satoshi has left is his however many coins so it would be relevant. Beyond that he's been left far behind and that's what he wanted all along.
|
|
|
|
traderethereum
|
|
May 26, 2019, 10:01:54 AM |
|
Bitcoin doesn't need to be patent, and the original inventor doesn't need to prove himself as the inventor of bitcoin. The real Satoshi Nakamoto still prefers to remain in the dark and don't tell anyone that he is the real inventor of bitcoin. I only smile to see many people tried to prove that they are the real Satoshi Nakamoto, but they cannot sign in into the wallet of Satoshi Nakamoto itself. That is strange, why the owner of the wallet cannot sign into his own wallet and it doesn't make sense hahaha I don't care who will be the real Satoshi Nakamoto because I think he will not reveal himself to public easily and he likes to stay in the grey side as ordinary people which other people don't know who is he.
|
|
|
|
Jating
|
|
May 26, 2019, 10:25:56 AM |
|
But you cannot say he is not Satoshi the inventor of Bitcoin. After all, look at all of his patents and now even the US government is awarding copyrights to him which can ONLY be given to the original author. It's a fact: CSW is Satoshi.
Cry all you like, you won't change the facts.
Hey, where have you been? But what you are stating is not a fact. CSW is not Satoshi and no matter how many patents/copyrights he file we all know that is not the originator of bitcoin and the whitepaper.
|
|
|
|
Indamuck
|
|
May 26, 2019, 11:15:12 AM |
|
He was obviously around during the early days of bitcoin but most people don't think he was the original creator. Of course signing those early keys would have done away with the doubters but he could have always obtained the keys from the real satoshi since most suspect he is dead.
|
|
|
|
pushups44
|
|
May 26, 2019, 12:23:13 PM |
|
He was obviously around during the early days of bitcoin but most people don't think he was the original creator. Of course signing those early keys would have done away with the doubters but he could have always obtained the keys from the real satoshi since most suspect he is dead.
The problem with this theory is that he'd have to be an unmitigated masochist to deal with the constant humiliations of being mocked and called Faketoshi without even so much as moving the first bitcoins. Ockam's Razor suggests he does not have the private keys he claims to have.
|
|
|
|
|