Tomatocage wakes up, posts a ref link... be careful

[Timelord2067]

@Tomatocage, if you're still around can you edit your thread OP Stake your Bitcoin address here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=996318.0 to include the following piece of code (or the whole quote)

[quote author=shorena link=topic=990345.msg10775516#msg10775516 date=1426375818]
If you write a post/PM it should look like on the picture below:


and for everyone else reading, it looks like this:

Code:

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
<insert message here>
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
<insert address here>
<insert signature here>
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[/quote]

which was originally posted in the How to sign a message?!  - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=990345.0 thread please?  It'll save on a lot of extra posts asking people to sign their messages etc.

[1715657406]

1715657406

[1715657406]

1715657406

[TheNewAnon135246]

There was at least one episode where you "woke up" after a lengthy period of inactivity and excluded (in your trust list) a number of users who happened to be targets of Quickseller's attacks. That will probably keep raising doubts despite the signed message.

If you're now planning to stick around for a while you should review your trust list as it has a different impact than it used to. If you're planning to go inactive again you should consider clearing the list out.

What probably happened was I logged in, saw that I had a zillion PMs, then went through them and responded accordingly. I did get quite a few PMs from various people advising me to add so-and-so to my Trust, or exclude someone from it. I didn't really feel like going back and doing months worth of research on the matter, so I probably just made the changes based on whether I liked the sender of the PM. That's why there may have been a bunch of changes on a certain date. Sorry, it's not quite as exciting as the theory of QS being in control of this acct

Anyway, that method of curating my Trust list isn't very scientific or objective, so I'll consider your last bit of advice. However, I'd have to weigh the consequences a bit more carefully before I do.

You did not really answer the question in RED above.

You specifically kicked well-trusted users off of DT1/DT2 based on QS's or OG's PM's, huh?

Why don't you ask that same question to LFC-Bitcoin ?

Do you have double standards when Lauda is doing it?

This topic is about TC. It has nothing to do with Lauda or LFC.

[Quickseller]

And I'm not associated with QS at all. He seemed pretty chill back in the day, but I haven't really kept up on the forums lately.

Great, do everyone a favour and go back to the place where you were all this time.

I presume you do not like this because he has the integrity that you and those you support lack.

[Timelord2067]

~Tomatocage is Distrusted by:
1. theymos (Trust: 211: -0 / +22) (DT1! (49) 4686 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

I hadn't seen that yet. This change happened the week before March 9, in which theymos stopped trusting and started distrusting Tomatocage.

I presume you do not like this because he has the integrity that you and those you support lack.

I was wondering if you would jump in with your main account or with one of your sockpuppets.

I wouldn't call waking up just in time for DT1 election "integrity" but he would be instantly excluded so who cares. How about you try to post something on topic, TYVM.

...and just like that, TomatoCage is in poll position once again...

DT1 update (June 11, 2019)

Added:
Tomatocage       Trust list

[LoyceV]

...and just like that, TomatoCage is in poll position once again...

DT1 update (June 11, 2019)

Added:
Tomatocage       Trust list

Tomatocage only needed to become active to qualify for DT1, he was already trusted by enough users.
But he's also excluded with a net result of DT1 (-5) (see dtview).