Bitcoin Forum
August 03, 2021, 03:03:22 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.21.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Trust flags  (Read 11157 times)
mosprognoz
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 275



View Profile
June 13, 2019, 07:51:54 AM
 #241

We're use to seeing RED warning below the user profile in threads where they participated. Now we have to look into their trust to check if a user has the credibility before making transaction.

It takes 1 minute only. To check the profile. I opened a new thread about this.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153576.msg51442422#msg51442422
1628003002
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1628003002

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1628003002
Reply with quote  #2

1628003002
Report to moderator
Make sure you back up your wallet regularly! Unlike a bank account, nobody can help you if you lose access to your BTC.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
FIFA worldcup
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064
Merit: 92

★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!


View Profile WWW
June 13, 2019, 08:53:22 AM
 #242


We're use to seeing RED warning below the user profile in threads where they participated. Now we have to look into their trust to check if a user has the credibility before making transaction.

Red trust has been given for different purposes. You need to read the details why the red trust is given and then you will know if doing a transaction with a particular user is safe or not.

marlboroza
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918
Merit: 2259


Mixing Reinvented For Your Privacy


View Profile
June 13, 2019, 01:47:41 PM
 #243

I still don't understand this system. Example:



As I can see flag is not created but warning is visible to guests but not to forum users. (On the other hand, if "+ number" is higher than "- number" there is no warning)

Account is tagged by bustabit's owner for "violating the terms of bustabit's open source license", obviously not forgiven, but no one can create flag type 2/3 except owner of site.

Is this how system should work?

Phinnaeus Gage
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918
Merit: 1562


Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending


View Profile WWW
June 13, 2019, 02:16:11 PM
 #244

I still don't understand this system. Example:



As I can see flag is not created but warning is visible to guests but not to forum users. (On the other hand, if "+ number" is higher than "- number" there is no warning)

Account is tagged by bustabit's owner for "violating the terms of bustabit's open source license", obviously not forgiven, but no one can create flag type 2/3 except owner of site.

Is this how system should work?

Okay, on first view, I applaud the initiative. Ideally, the warning should be index by Google et al.

Please let me know if there's something I'm missing via reply to this post or PM, reserving the right to reassess my position.
singlebit
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 264


View Profile
June 13, 2019, 03:00:44 PM
 #245

My trust rating is +0 / =0 / -2,How it works with -2 on right side without sign of "Warning:Trade with extreme caution!"?.We can allow to participate on campaign with this?

ETHRoll
mindrust
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2240
Merit: 2149



View Profile
June 13, 2019, 03:02:39 PM
 #246

My trust rating is +0 / =0 / -2,How it works with -2 on right side without sign of "Warning:Trade with extreme caution!"?.We can allow to participate on campaign with this?


Depends on the campaign/campaign manager I guess. I don't think managers will hire people with red trust from DT members but who knows. You can always try.




▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄    ▄▄▄▄                  ▄▄▄   ▄▄▄▄▄        ▄▄▄▄▄   ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄    ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄   ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄   ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
 ▀████████████████▄  ████                 █████   ▀████▄    ▄████▀  ▄██████████████   ████████████▀  ▄█████████████▀  ▄█████████████▄
              ▀████  ████               ▄███▀███▄   ▀████▄▄████▀               ████   ████                ████                   ▀████
   ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█████  ████              ████   ████    ▀██████▀      ██████████████▄   ████████████▀       ████       ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄████▀
   ██████████████▀   ████            ▄███▀     ▀███▄    ████        ████        ████  ████                ████       ██████████████▀
   ████              ████████████▀  ████   ██████████   ████        ████████████████  █████████████▀      ████       ████      ▀████▄
   ▀▀▀▀              ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀   ▀▀▀▀   ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀  ▀▀▀▀        ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀   ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀        ▀▀▀▀       ▀▀▀▀        ▀▀▀▀▀

#1 CRYPTO CASINO & SPORTSBOOK
  WELCOME
BONUS
.INSTANT & FAST.
.TRANSACTION.....
.PROVABLY FAIR.
......& SECURE......
.24/7 CUSTOMER.
............SUPPORT.
BTC      |      ETH      |      LTC      |      XRP      |      XMR      |      BNB      |     more
singlebit
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 264


View Profile
June 13, 2019, 03:11:47 PM
 #247

My trust rating is +0 / =0 / -2,How it works with -2 on right side without sign of "Warning:Trade with extreme caution!"?.We can allow to participate on campaign with this?


Depends on the campaign/campaign manager I guess. I don't think managers will hire people with red trust from DT members but who knows. You can always try.
Thanks for concern,I dont know what happen last year,They giving red trust when i use and borrowing the btc address of my friend coz here in my country the btc wallet have limit to recieve,withdraw.Since my friend have level 3 wallet it means he have a unlimited for recieving btc and withdrawal,but unexpectedly no one cares to my prob and someone DT2 gave negative trust for accusing.Maybe im wrong when i use his wallet address.I dont know if this new update for trust is effective.I hope someone good to start again.

ETHRoll
o_e_l_e_o
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 6646


Wear a mask, slow the spread


View Profile
June 13, 2019, 03:34:03 PM
Merited by DdmrDdmr (1)
 #248

Is this how system should work?

See this post from theymos:
Some changes:
 - If the number of pre-flags-system negative trust ratings is greater than the number of all positive trust ratings, a warning banner is shown for guests & low-login-time newbies.

The example you have given had more pre-flag negatives than current positives, and so a warning banner is shown. This warning banner seems to maintain the text and appearance (red background) from the old system, rather than the new text and yellow background from the new system.

If this account did not have pre-flag-system negatives, then I would have thought that only bustabit would be able to create a type 2/3 flag based on the contract you linked, but any user could create a type 1 flag based on the thread you linked to in the negative trust you left this user.

AdolfinWolf
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722
Merit: 1365


(white, depressed, poor, disabled, bald, gamer)


View Profile
June 13, 2019, 03:56:19 PM
 #249

My trust rating is +0 / =0 / -2,How it works with -2 on right side without sign of "Warning:Trade with extreme caution!"?.We can allow to participate on campaign with this?


Is this only for accounts that received negative feedback before, or do you also not get a "Trade With Caution" tag anymore if you receive negative feedback after the update?

Isn't this going to unleash a legion of previously red-trusted bounty farmers/signature campaigners/etc, or am i missing something? The current way of "red-trusting" someone doesn't nearly look as intrusive anymore. I wonder if bounty managers will change their rules due to that.

Findingnemo
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 222


Bitcoin = Financial freedom


View Profile
June 13, 2019, 04:23:05 PM
 #250

My trust rating is +0 / =0 / -2,How it works with -2 on right side without sign of "Warning:Trade with extreme caution!"?.We can allow to participate on campaign with this?

I guess reason of that negative feedback will plays a role on being signature campaign,if it is for cheating and abusing bounties with alts then no chance of getting into the signature campaign if the signature campaign recognizes it.

suchmoon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2758
Merit: 6460


https://bpip.org


View Profile WWW
June 13, 2019, 04:32:32 PM
 #251

Is this only for accounts that received negative feedback before, or do you also not get a "Trade With Caution" tag anymore if you receive negative feedback after the update?

No "caution" anymore from trust feedback. Only from contract violation flags (red boxes), which can only be initiated by victims.

Isn't this going to unleash a legion of previously red-trusted bounty farmers/signature campaigners/etc, or am i missing something? The current way of "red-trusting" someone doesn't nearly look as intrusive anymore. I wonder if bounty managers will change their rules due to that.

Every previously red-tagged user lost the "caution" label, including heavyweight scamming champions like TradeFortress. Well, at least until new flags are created for them.


malevolent
can into space
Staff
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3010
Merit: 1574



View Profile
June 13, 2019, 07:41:05 PM
Merited by mprep (1)
 #252

So how should we doing it with som kind of the " Fake Ann creators " that posting links to there Malware Software in there text ?

In addition to the mentioned type-1/newbie-warning flag you can still report these topics, luring unsuspecting people to run malware is still a bannable offense. And a nuked user has all of their posts removed automatically anyway.

suchmoon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2758
Merit: 6460


https://bpip.org


View Profile WWW
June 13, 2019, 07:48:29 PM
 #253

Is a non-victim creating an otherwise factual flag also considered to be abusing the system?

Is someone who supports a factual flag that was created by a non-victim also considered to be abusing the system?

And is someone who opposes a valid flag also considered to be abusing the system?

That's all misuse of the system.

How much proof of "victimhood" do we expect?

For example, is this sufficient:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153934.msg51455373#msg51455373

Not trying to put eddie13 on the spot here, just want to know if I can re-flag some old scams (GAW, hashie, etc) where I lost some money but there is no way for me to find TX IDs or any other tangible proof of that.

Lafu
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1960
Merit: 1810



View Profile
June 13, 2019, 07:48:46 PM
 #254

So how should we doing it with som kind of the " Fake Ann creators " that posting links to there Malware Software in there text ?

In addition to the mentioned type-1/newbie-warning flag you can still report these topics, luring unsuspecting people to run malware is still a bannable offense. And a nuked user has all of their posts removed automatically anyway.

Thanks and if i see something like that and , or other posts with links that have some suspicious i am definitely reporting this posts !




▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄    ▄▄▄▄                  ▄▄▄   ▄▄▄▄▄        ▄▄▄▄▄   ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄    ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄   ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄   ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
 ▀████████████████▄  ████                 █████   ▀████▄    ▄████▀  ▄██████████████   ████████████▀  ▄█████████████▀  ▄█████████████▄
              ▀████  ████               ▄███▀███▄   ▀████▄▄████▀               ████   ████                ████                   ▀████
   ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█████  ████              ████   ████    ▀██████▀      ██████████████▄   ████████████▀       ████       ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄████▀
   ██████████████▀   ████            ▄███▀     ▀███▄    ████        ████        ████  ████                ████       ██████████████▀
   ████              ████████████▀  ████   ██████████   ████        ████████████████  █████████████▀      ████       ████      ▀████▄
   ▀▀▀▀              ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀   ▀▀▀▀   ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀  ▀▀▀▀        ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀   ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀        ▀▀▀▀       ▀▀▀▀        ▀▀▀▀▀

#1 CRYPTO CASINO & SPORTSBOOK
  WELCOME
BONUS
.INSTANT & FAST.
.TRANSACTION.....
.PROVABLY FAIR.
......& SECURE......
.24/7 CUSTOMER.
............SUPPORT.
BTC      |      ETH      |      LTC      |      XRP      |      XMR      |      BNB      |     more
Quickseller
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2520
Merit: 2106


View Profile
June 13, 2019, 09:10:11 PM
 #255

Is a non-victim creating an otherwise factual flag also considered to be abusing the system?

Is someone who supports a factual flag that was created by a non-victim also considered to be abusing the system?

And is someone who opposes a valid flag also considered to be abusing the system?

That's all misuse of the system.

How much proof of "victimhood" do we expect?

Ahem
Roll Eyes
suchmoon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2758
Merit: 6460


https://bpip.org


View Profile WWW
June 13, 2019, 09:14:45 PM
 #256

~

Talking about red box here. Try to keep up.

Flying Hellfish
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1750


Verified Bernie Bro - Feel The Bern!


View Profile
June 13, 2019, 09:22:47 PM
 #257

~snip~
How much proof of "victimhood" do we expect?
~snip~

Enough to prove you were contractually violated haha!  Wink

Check with your lawyer which you will now need to ensure your contracts are rock solid!!!

P.S NOTHING I EVER SAY SHOULD BE CONSIDERED A CONTRACT BETWEEN US (ME AND ANYONE ON THE FORUM)... EVEN IF I SAY ITS A CONTRACT IT'S NOT.

Now that we have that out of the way I can never be a scammer, who wants to lend me 3000 BTC!!!!
suchmoon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2758
Merit: 6460


https://bpip.org


View Profile WWW
June 13, 2019, 09:37:37 PM
 #258

Enough to prove you were contractually violated haha!  Wink

I feel violated every time anyone breaks my implied contract of paying me 1 BTC for every post but I'm willing to overlook these transgressions in exchange for a non-Quickseller answer to my question Smiley

eddie13
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1890
Merit: 1779


BTC or BUST


View Profile
June 13, 2019, 09:42:24 PM
 #259

How much proof of "victimhood" do we expect?

Good question.
I'd say it depends on how extraordinary the claim is, or beyond reasonable doubt, and if their is any opposition or debate of the validity..

I believe I can reasonably prove that I used cryptsy right to the end with TXs but can't really prove a final balance, I'm not sure their is reasonable doubt to doubt my statement (or even anyone unreasonably doubting), their is also no opposition and likely never will be, nor any debate of the validity..

I think even the receivership accepted about that amount of "proof", so if you like US law as a standard (I don't) I think my claim would fly if requested to prove it, but I didn't go through that because it was a small amount.

Someone who was named in the receivership might have slightly better "proof" with a court having granted them a portion of recovered value, but even that isn't solid blockchain proof because that's what you get for sending coins to a 3rd party.. That would just be trusting a court's opinion, and who trusts a court? Much less a courts opinion on altcoins, lol.

LOL @ FH and your welcome for a non-QS opinion, there's mine but I did it so I might be biased toward myself..

Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks
suchmoon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2758
Merit: 6460


https://bpip.org


View Profile WWW
June 13, 2019, 09:59:53 PM
 #260

reasonable doubt to doubt my statement

None whatsoever for me, I recall you being part of Cryptsy scam discussions back in the day, so it would have been a mighty long con for you to stage it in the anticipation of this flag system just so that you could stick it to Big Vern's long dead account...

But we also have the [in]famous PM where a user was recommended to be excluded due to lying about being a victim.

It would help to know where the "lying" line is. What happens if someone says you (or I or whoever) lied about losing some dust in some shitcoin exchange.

A more recent example: I lost $20 or $30 in Bittrex due to them blatantly disregarding their own rules of allowing non-KYC withdrawals up to a certain amount. Unlike Cryptsy they're still alive. To me it's a clear-cut violation of a written contract. I don't know if I can put a red flag on them though.

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!