theymos why remove the red tag from Lauda?

[otrkid1970]

Lauda completely lied and broke your own rule for falsely flagging so you RED negged him and then remove it???


Why? This user needs to be removed from DT

[LFC_Bitcoin]

This has literally nothing to do with you. You haven’t been contacted by anybody about it, stay in your lane, bitch.

[otrkid1970]

This has literally nothing to do with you. You haven’t been contacted by anybody about it, stay in your lane, bitch.

Stay on topic it's a valid question....Bitch

[yahoo62278]

Lauda completely lied and broke your own rule for falsely flagging so you RED negged him and then remove it???


Why? This user needs to be removed from DT

Lauda was removed from DT1 according to Bpip

https://bpip.org/default.aspx

[theymos]

He withdrew the accusation.

I'm still pretty annoyed about it, though. I mean, he checked a box which said:

On my honor, I affirm the following: 1) This user [Quickseller] violated a written contract [with me], resulting in damages; 2) I have not been made whole by the user; 3) no existing flag covers this same incident; 4) this incident is accurately and completely described in the above topic; 5) the incident occurred roughly in the month given above [Sep 2015]. Furthermore, I promise to withdraw my support for this flag if this user makes me whole in the future.

Which has several blatantly-false statements.

[Lauda]

I had to remove mine too then:

The introduction of the new system removed the scamming requirement from negative trust. Selectively tags people for lying depending on who the author is. Facts: Reference link - substantial long term lie, one of many by the author. Handled by theymos? Ignored. On the other hand, there is this rating on me: https://i.imgur.com/P5ESdmB.png, related to this flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=35.

He withdrew the accusation.

I'm still pretty annoyed about it, though. I mean, he checked a box which said:

On my honor, I affirm the following: 1) This user [Quickseller] violated a written contract [with me], resulting in damages; 2) I have not been made whole by the user; 3) no existing flag covers this same incident; 4) this incident is accurately and completely described in the above topic; 5) the incident occurred roughly in the month given above [Sep 2015]. Furthermore, I promise to withdraw my support for this flag if this user makes me whole in the future.

Which has several blatantly-false statements.

Maybe you ought to slowly-introduce a system next time, i.e. first deploy the rules and then make it go in effect. Several people followed into that flag, whilst misunderstanding the implications that it has. The flag can't be deleted or changed in any way, so I had to advise people to create a flag-type-1.

[otrkid1970]

He withdrew the accusation.

I'm still pretty annoyed about it, though. I mean, he checked a box which said:

On my honor, I affirm the following: 1) This user [Quickseller] violated a written contract [with me], resulting in damages; 2) I have not been made whole by the user; 3) no existing flag covers this same incident; 4) this incident is accurately and completely described in the above topic; 5) the incident occurred roughly in the month given above [Sep 2015]. Furthermore, I promise to withdraw my support for this flag if this user makes me whole in the future.

Which has several blatantly-false statements.

Thank you for responding

[LFC_Bitcoin]

Lauda completely lied and broke your own rule for falsely flagging so you RED negged him and then remove it???


Why? This user needs to be removed from DT

Lauda was removed from DT1 according to Bpip

https://bpip.org/default.aspx

Lauda wasn’t removed from DT1 in the sense of actively being removed. He was rotated out due to the monthly changes, suchmoon was too.

There are only 100 DT1 members permitted per month. People who qualify will rotate in & out occasionally.

[Quickseller]

Lauda made an affirmation that was untrue. Why would anyone believe what Lauda says in the future if he is willing to knowingly and intentionally affirm (promise to be true) some untrue?

[mindrust]

Some super weird shit is happening with theymos.

He asked me to remove lauda from my trust list, and not just that, told me to distrust her. He says BSV is scam but they need to break a contract to to be able identified as a scam.

I replied to him "If it is a scam, it doesn't need a broken contract. Please start to make sense dude. I am taking lauda to my trust list now."

Did he get hacked? What the fuck is happening?

I thought trust wasn't moderated, this is some weird deep shit. I regret being a DT1 member from day one fuck this.

[otrkid1970]

Lauda made an affirmation that was untrue. Why would anyone believe what Lauda says in the future if he is willing to knowingly and intentionally affirm (promise to be true) some untrue?

Lauda left retalitory feedback on theymos too and since removed it.

[Lauda]

Did he get hacked? What the fuck is happening?

I thought trust wasn't moderated, this is some weird deep shit. I regret being a DT1 member from day one fuck this.

I assume one of the following two:
1) There's been a legal case where theymos was silently beaten - or he is afraid of this.
2) He's gone crazy-liberal and wants to see existing scammers walk as there is no way for all current DT members to go through all ratings that were ever given out in any reasonable time.
1. Is my bet.

Maybe you ought to slowly-introduce a system next time, i.e. first deploy the rules and then make it go in effect. Several people followed into that flag, whilst misunderstanding the implications that it has. The flag can't be deleted or changed in any way, so I had to advise people to create a flag-type-1.

This was the cause of this issue. Furthermore, he should be focusing on resolving open questions while scammers are free and not on going after some Queen-cat.

[Quickseller]

Some super weird shit is happening with theymos.

He asked me to remove lauda from my trust list, and not just that, told me to distrust her. He says BSV is scam but they need to break a contract to to be able identified as a scam.

I replied him "If it is a scam, it doesn't need a broken contract. Please start to make sense dude. I am taking lauda to my trust list now."

Did he get hacked? What the fuck is happening?

I thought trust wasn't moderated, this is some weird deep shit. I regret being a DT1 member from day one fuck this.

You should distrust Lauda from your trust list.

Theymos probably means that BSV is ~insane from a technical standpoint, but has not caused anyone harm by existing.

[otrkid1970]

Trust list

~Lauda

[LFC_Bitcoin]

Trust list

~Lauda

That’s your right. You don’t really count in the voting though as you’re a noob account. Sadly for you your vote doesn’t mean anything for DT1 qualification.

[TheNewAnon135246]

Some super weird shit is happening with theymos.

He asked me to remove lauda from my trust list, and not just that, told me to distrust her. He says BSV is scam but they need to break a contract to to be able identified as a scam.

I replied him "If it is a scam, it doesn't need a broken contract. Please start to make sense dude. I am taking lauda to my trust list now."

Did he get hacked? What the fuck is happening?

I thought trust wasn't moderated, this is some weird deep shit. I regret being a DT1 member from day one fuck this.

You should distrust Lauda from your trust list.

Theymos probably means that BSV is ~insane from a technical standpoint, but has not caused anyone harm by existing.

His exact words were "BSV is a scammy project created by two conmen".

[Lauda]

Some super weird shit is happening with theymos.

He asked me to remove lauda from my trust list, and not just that, told me to distrust her. He says BSV is scam but they need to break a contract to to be able identified as a scam.

I replied him "If it is a scam, it doesn't need a broken contract. Please start to make sense dude. I am taking lauda to my trust list now."

Did he get hacked? What the fuck is happening?

I thought trust wasn't moderated, this is some weird deep shit. I regret being a DT1 member from day one fuck this.

You should distrust Lauda from your trust list.

Theymos probably means that BSV is ~insane from a technical standpoint, but has not caused anyone harm by existing.

His exact words were "BSV is a scammy project created by two conmen".

Which takes the following

Some super weird shit is happening with theymos.

to the next level. No contract = no victim = no scam. Are we turning this place into a scam utopia?

[otrkid1970]

Trust list

~Lauda

That’s your right. You don’t really count in the voting though as you’re a noob account. Sadly for you your vote doesn’t mean anything for DT1 qualification.

I know this account is Noob acct my legendary was hacked last year otrkid70  

[Quickseller]

Some super weird shit is happening with theymos.

He asked me to remove lauda from my trust list, and not just that, told me to distrust her. He says BSV is scam but they need to break a contract to to be able identified as a scam.

I replied him "If it is a scam, it doesn't need a broken contract. Please start to make sense dude. I am taking lauda to my trust list now."

Did he get hacked? What the fuck is happening?

I thought trust wasn't moderated, this is some weird deep shit. I regret being a DT1 member from day one fuck this.

You should distrust Lauda from your trust list.

Theymos probably means that BSV is ~insane from a technical standpoint, but has not caused anyone harm by existing.

His exact words were "BSV is a scammy project created by two conmen".

Okay. Thanks for that. This doesn’t change the need to wait for the person behind the account (or business behind it), to scam to create this kind of flag.

[LFC_Bitcoin]

Trust list

~Lauda

That’s your right. You don’t really count in the voting though as you’re a noob account. Sadly for you your vote doesn’t mean anything for DT1 qualification.

I know this account is Noob acct my legendary was hacked last year otrkid70  

Sorry to hear that.