Quickseller is a dangerous person to deal with - avoid

[suchmoon]

babo, you really need to cut that shit with your google-translated garbage, or at least contain it to one thread instead of spreading all over the forum. It's spammy, incoherent, waste of time for anyone trying to read it. If you're doing some "investigation" - get it done and post the results instead of doing a "diary" here.

[babo]

i'll close my threads and ask for deletetion
gg

[poptok1]

It's usually a bad idea to put yourself between a hammer and a hard place... so I will do it 
Mostly because I do not understand one thing in all this commotion.

If this:

I support this flag! Thank you suchmoon for the compelling evidence in OP which makes opposing such a flag quite difficult. Surely it could even be labelled as misuse of the new flag system?

Then WHY?


  WHAT are we not aware of 

[TheBeardedBaby]

It's usually a bad idea to put yourself between a hammer and a hard place... so I will do it  
Mostly because I do not understand one thing in all this commotion.

If this:

I support this flag! Thank you suchmoon for the compelling evidence in OP which makes opposing such a flag quite difficult. Surely it could even be labelled as misuse of the new flag system?

Then WHY?


  WHAT are we not aware of  

Hhampuz wanted to quit with the DT drama and asked the other members to remove him from their trust lists. Of course, not everyone agreed with him and that's why he left postitive feedbacks here and there to make them do it. He got himself blacklisted from the DT1 at the end but he is still in DT2.

[CryptopreneurBrainboss]

Hhampuz wanted to quit with the DT drama and asked the other members to remove him from their trust lists. Of course, not everyone agreed with him and that's why he left postitive feedbacks here and there to make them do it. He got himself blacklisted from the DT1 at the end but he is still in DT2.

Maybe next time the community will learn to respect people decisions, when they asked to be removed from any system. We should at least grant them their wish instead of turning them into something else out of desperation to leave. It happened to Vod (meriting in large amount just to get attention and now Hhampuz, giving feedbacks to drawn attention) Next time we (the community) should just respect these guys decision and give them some time to cool off, not everyone can handle the stress in the forum.

[LoyceV]

Maybe next time the community will learn to respect people decisions, when they asked to be removed from any system. We should at least grant them their wish instead of turning them into something else out of desperation to leave.

Part of the DT-system is giving each user their individual vote. I don't exclude users when I don't think they deserve it.
As for the positive trust on Quickseller: I don't think a few more red or green matter much on the grand scheme of tags he has already collected. Hhampuz has 36 DT2-inclusions. He won't be excluded any time soon.

As for the topic title: I'm not really afraid I'm perfectly capable of using my own judgement, and so are (most) DT members. Cryptohunter (or his alt) for instance has made accusations about me, but that doesn't make me afraid of him and I don't think anyone takes it seriously. I just don't really care, and ignoring his posts solves the problem of trolling.

[Quickseller]

Here is something crazy — perhaps Hhampuz saw what I was doing when I messaged the LiveCoin signature participants and saw that I really am looking out for others and for the good of the community.

[nutildah]

Here is something crazy — perhaps Hhampuz saw what I was doing when I messaged the LiveCoin signature participants and saw that I really am looking out for others and for the good of the community.

Yeah, you are 100% right about that: your statement is genuinely crazy. Whose good were you looking out for when you opened the insane, totally unfounded embezzlement threat about him?

[suchmoon]

crazy

QFT

I really am looking out for others and for the good of the community.

No, you're just proving once more what a narcissistic prick you are.

Others were able to participate in that discussion without making it a personal attack on Hhampuz. You're simply unable to step over your butthurt and you weaponize every opportunity for revenge.

Its OK, I am indeed but I keep it off the forum.

Well, everyone supposedly knows I have really fat fingers so I'm gonna go with that excuse.

Facts clearly don’t matter to you. What you describe doesn’t match reality. Although this should be expected from someone as dishonest as you.

The facts of your butthurt retaliatory shitposting are all over this forum and this thread just scrapes the surface.

I would suggest relaxing and viewing the video of Alex Morgan twerking and perhaps you will be inclined to be less dishonest.

Not a bad attempt at trolling. Sadly I can't send merits to a signature.

That's some meta level retardation there.

It's just a wrongly attributed quote but you can call it anything you want if it soothes you. Any chance you'll contribute on topic today?

[dkbit98]

Anyone thought that QS changed his ways, well think again.... he accused me for lies, promoting and shilling Mercury wallet after I wrote only a few posts in forum mentioning Mercury.
Expecting from me to answer all his question even after I told him that I am not an expert or in any way related with Mercury is ridiculous.
I have him on ignore now and I would not trust him about anything.

These kinds of attacks against someone asking basic questions should set off red flags to anyone considering to use this wallet.

I also think it is strange that you are promoting something originally posted by a one-post newbie

There is also the concern that dkbit98 is shilling for this wallet while falsely saying he is not.

[suchmoon]

~

I'm a bit surprised by his attack on you, on a tech board no less. Is there some history between you two that I don't know about? (or forgot, happens a lot lately LOL).

[dkbit98]

I'm a bit surprised by his attack on you, on a tech board no less. Is there some history between you two that I don't know about? (or forgot, happens a lot lately LOL).

No, I never had anything to do with him and I certainly never attacked him in any way.
If this is what he considers to be an attack on him than I think that something is seriously wrong with him, and I hope he gets well soon:

I never asked anyone to send bitcoin to any service, there was testnet and you could test how it works, not just speak in theory after few minutes of reading docs.
You can do as you like, but I also don't trust anything you say and I have your reputation to back me up on that  

[Quickseller]

~

I'm a bit surprised by his attack on you, on a tech board no less. Is there some history between you two that I don't know about? (or forgot, happens a lot lately LOL).

My attack on him
Below is when dkbit98 started attacking me for asking questions about the project he is shilling for:

I don't think it is safe to entrust your money with Mercury until the issue of an malicious SE stealing your money is addressed.

I never asked anyone to send bitcoin to any service, there was testnet and you could test how it works, not just speak in theory after few minutes of reading docs.
You can do as you like, but I also don't trust anything you say and I have your reputation to back me up on that  

Every centralized service that holds custody of your bitcoin says that you can withdraw at any time. So did most ponzis before they imploded.

I also think that Catena XXX and other defi stuff that you are advertising is also centralized junk that only have decentralized label.
Hope you also checked their ''documentation'' as well... sounds almost like a very visionary scam thing to me.

[suchmoon]

I'm a bit surprised by his attack on you, on a tech board no less. Is there some history between you two that I don't know about? (or forgot, happens a lot lately LOL).

No, I never had anything to do with him and I certainly never attacked him in any way.
If this is what he considers to be an attack on him than I think that something is seriously wrong with him, and I hope he gets well soon:

I never asked anyone to send bitcoin to any service, there was testnet and you could test how it works, not just speak in theory after few minutes of reading docs.
You can do as you like, but I also don't trust anything you say and I have your reputation to back me up on that  

Ok, well, he's touchy about his reputation, which he thinks is impeccable.

I made the mistake using Show/Hide on Quicksy's posts the tech boards thinking that he'd be less of a vengeful moron there than usual, but apparently not.

Watch out for doxing, that's his go-to move when someone disagrees with him.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

No, I never had anything to do with him and I certainly never attacked him in any way.
If this is what he considers to be an attack on him than I think that something is seriously wrong with him, and I hope he gets well soon:

dkbit98, I would just roll with this and let it slide off you like water from a duck's buttocks.  Maybe Quickseller is in a bad mood or on his period.  Don't get slick with sweat and anger over this, because it's just words.  A few of us have had beefs with him and other members of the forum just like you and QS did, and the best thing to do is not to escalate it--it'll never end otherwise, and it's just not worth the time and mental energy to argue continuously over something that to me seems extremely trivial.

Funny how you bumped this particular thread to air your grievance in public, by the way.  I'm amused by it.

[suchmoon]

Funny how you bumped this particular thread to air your grievance in public, by the way.  I'm amused by it.

Hey, if you have something to say about my thread, say it to my face

I think it's a good idea to move the grievance here, instead of continuing the trollfeed on the tech board.

[dkbit98]

Ok, well, he's touchy about his reputation, which he thinks is impeccable.

My bad, I didn't know that talking about reputation is causing this kind of side effects  

Funny how you bumped this particular thread to air your grievance in public, by the way.  I'm amused by it.

It's not funny, it's just facts and link that anyone can found in his profile reputation.
I am not angry at all at him, I wish him all the best in his life, and I am sorry if I offended his majesty or if I said anything wrong about defi projects.

[DireWolfM14]

~

I'm a bit surprised by his attack on you, on a tech board no less. Is there some history between you two that I don't know about? (or forgot, happens a lot lately LOL).

I see things differently.  Assuming no posts were deleted from that thread, it appeared to me that dkbit98 refuted QS's comments based solely on his reputation.  QS's reputation aside, I've always thought of him as somewhat technically astute, and his questions in that thread were valid.  Perhaps the question about about dkbit98's involvement in the project was a loaded one, I don't know.  Even if it wasn't I can see how dkbit98 might have interpreted it that way.

I will say that I believe dkbit98 has had a short fuse lately, he attacked me a couple of weeks ago.  Maybe I deserved it, I was shilling spyware, after all.

[Quickseller]

~

I'm a bit surprised by his attack on you, on a tech board no less. Is there some history between you two that I don't know about? (or forgot, happens a lot lately LOL).

I see things differently.  Assuming no posts were deleted from that thread, it appeared to me that dkbit98 refuted QS's comments based solely on his reputation.  QS's reputation aside, I've always thought of him as somewhat technically astute, and his questions in that thread were valid.  Perhaps the question about about dkbit98's involvement in the project was a loaded one, I don't know.  Even if it wasn't I can see how dkbit98 might have interpreted it that way.

I will say that I believe dkbit98 has had a short fuse lately, he attacked me a couple of weeks ago.  Maybe I deserved it, I was shilling spyware, after all.

The questions about dkbit98‘s involvement in the project came after his attacks. I don’t think it is u reasonable to conclude that dkbit98 is shilling for the project based on his attacks. The initial questions were reasonable as you note. In addition to the conclusion of dkbit98‘s inconvenient, attacks on someone asking basic questions should tell onlookers they should be asking more questions.

dkbit98 had a history of attacking people that disagree with him. See his interactions with Lucius, HCP,    ~DefaultTrust, and I would not be surprised if there are others.

[dkbit98]

I will say that I believe dkbit98 has had a short fuse lately, he attacked me a couple of weeks ago.  Maybe I deserved it, I was shilling spyware, after all.

Ah you are the Windows guy who created that WIN topic in Bitcoin section... that was epic I must admit
I never said that you shilled anything, IQ remark was obviously regarding Windows11 reduced performance for AMD chips (known fact), not about anyone personally, but I don't want to go more off-topic with that.
Sorry if I offended you in any way, it's true that I can have those days, but I don't want to have bad blood with anyone.

I agree that QS is good tech guy but he is much better liar, and I have full right to suspect anything he writes because of his scamming history.
I am sure that suchoom, babo, nutildah, marlboroza, yahoo62278, The Pharmacist and many others can say more about him than I can.
Some sadly people passed away so they can't speak anymore.