Roger Ver's Bitcoin.com propaganda against bitcoin

[pushups44]

It's worth noting that the millennials who will be jumping into bitcoin in the coming years are largely onto the scammy nature of Bitcoin Cash, or Bcash, if the Urban Dictionary is any indication:

Also known as Bcash, Btrash or Shitcoin, it is scam aimed to confuse new bitcoin buyers, it's a highly centralized shitcoin...

This entry has 357 upvotes.

[1715282785]

1715282785

[1715282785]

1715282785

[klaaas]

Also known as Bcash, Btrash or Shitcoin, it is scam aimed to confuse new bitcoin buyers, it's a highly centralized shitcoin...

We cant argue the urban dictionary on that.

Low move to confuse readers to make them believe that nonsense.

[Carollzinha]

It's worth noting that the millennials who will be jumping into bitcoin in the coming years are largely onto the scammy nature of Bitcoin Cash, or Bcash, if the Urban Dictionary is any indication:

Also known as Bcash, Btrash or Shitcoin, it is scam aimed to confuse new bitcoin buyers, it's a highly centralized shitcoin...

This entry has 357 upvotes.

Your post really made my day, I wish I still had any merit I could send you, I really do..
Your post made me remember (and laugh a lot) about a video I have seen in the internet about 1 year ago, when he did rage quit an interview because he felt "insulted" because the interviewer said "Bcash".. that was just too epic, imma drop the link here if I can find it


Edit:
Found the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCOjCEth6xI   

[gentlemand]

It's worth noting that the millennials who will be jumping into bitcoin in the coming years are largely onto the scammy nature of Bitcoin Cash, or Bcash, if the Urban Dictionary is any indication:

Also known as Bcash, Btrash or Shitcoin, it is scam aimed to confuse new bitcoin buyers, it's a highly centralized shitcoin...

This entry has 357 upvotes.

That must drive him nuts. That's the type of derision money can't erase because it's the will of the people.

I occasionally dig something he says but then remember he more than likely put together risible squit like this - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCllEvfvgUY

I definitely remember a post from him on there telling people to concentrate on the lyrics. Now gone.

[pooya87]

it is so absurd that they keep advertising "Satoshi vision" and talk about being the "original" while they are betraying the first and most important thing in bitcoin which is consensus (that is a part of being decentralized). basically they started the movement that any idiot with 1 to 5% hashrate started creating a fork of bitcoin and called his shitcoin the "real" bitcoin.
what you never see them talk about is how they are showing a middle finger to the "majority" by doing that. it is like if in a country 99% of the population voted for president X but Y were put in the seat of power instead whilst talking about democracy!

[o_e_l_e_o]

He tries to show good sides of his coin and can't blame for it.

No he doesn't, because it doesn't have any good sides. His coin can't stand up on its own merits, so all he can do is shit on actual bitcoin and trick newbies in to thinking his coin is something else. Go to his site, which I refuse to link, and tell me what you see. "Get started with Bitcoin". "Buy Bitcoin here". "Download the official Bitcoin wallet". Lies and trickery, and not much else.

Also, does it not worry you that you refer to it as "his coin"? Isn't crypto supposed to be decentralized?

it is so absurd that they keep advertising "Satoshi vision"

But haven't you heard!? Our lord and savior CSW proved he was Satoshi by filling in a copyright form. What more do you need? A signed message!?

[Lily_Olive]

Well this picture shows that he is just trying to show that bitcoin cash and bitcoin is same thing.. he is just misleading.. and this is not right...

[Lucius]

This is just one of many attempts from RogerShitVer, and I bet it's not the last one in the intention to show shitoforkcoin as some true / real bitcoin. However with time is proved what actually people think about it, and this is at the end only relevant. In this case the lie remains a lie even though it is spoken or written 1000 times.  Only people who follow him are some newbies who see cheap bitcoin, and are not aware of the differences between fake and real bitcoin, and those who hate real bitcoin from some reason.

[chek2fire]

is very easy now for everyone to sue Roger Ver and get from him easy money. He only need to buy bcash from his site and after that to claim that he misleading and lost money from this misleading.
Roger Ver play with fire there.

[Wind_FURY]

The topic is boring without franky1. Where is he?

Roger Ver is also so disingenuous in making it look like that Bitcoin and BitcoinCash not only split, but that BitcoinCash already existed pre-fork.

Remember everyone, BitcoinCash did not exist before it forked away. It's a new network.

[chek2fire]

The topic is boring without franky1. Where is he?

Roger Ver is also so disingenuous in making it look like that Bitcoin and BitcoinCash not only split, but that BitcoinCash already existed pre-fork.

Remember everyone, BitcoinCash did not exist before it forked away. It's a new network.

not only new but double forked network

[franky1]

it is so absurd that they keep advertising "Satoshi vision" and talk about being the "original" while they are betraying the first and most important thing in bitcoin which is consensus (that is a part of being decentralized). basically they started the movement that any idiot with 1 to 5% hashrate started creating a fork of bitcoin and called his shitcoin the "real" bitcoin.
what you never see them talk about is how they are showing a middle finger to the "majority" by doing that. it is like if in a country 99% of the population voted for president X but Y were put in the seat of power instead whilst talking about democracy!

not defending ver or wright coin, as they have no big merchant adoption.. but, even the likes of luke JR and greg maxwell admit that the august 2017 event was a TWO WAY SPLIT
to me all this drama is like comparing american dollar with canadian or australian or even zimbabwe dollar. where some cry babies are crying that people dont like others using the word dollar. even though no one should own completely and exclusively the brand dollar, not even USA.
(analogy swap dollar for bitcoin, swap usa for core, swap canada for ver, swap australia for wright)

segwits code is not the same as the pre split code. meaning the post-split code is different. so yes it is a
       /------------
----<
       \------------
and not a
_____________
      \_________
also looking at the timestamps of the blocks of the split. cores blocks split first. and then vers coin reacted HOURS later.even the social drama shwows that core devs wanted a split first by talking about such months earlier.. and vers coin was only a reaction a few weeks befor the split.
i only say this because so many people wanna kiss ass soo much that facts get blurred out and over exaggerations start forming to try making one side or the other seem better/worse then they are
if you could sit on the fence and see both sides. your vision would be clearer

take the august 2017 split. to get the "99% core control" by november2017 which pooya87 mentions above. core had to mandate off controversially not just 1%, not just 5% but alot more than that in august 2017

the august 2017 was not a 99% vote for core. again even luke jr and greg maxwell know and mentioned it.

anyways
vers coin and wrights coin dont have merchant adoption or any real world publicity. so just leave them in the altcoin discussion category

if you want to continue to cry about that only core should own brand bitcoin. then you failed test one of decentralisation.
think about the word 'dollar' and its multi community usage in the world as an example analogy, it might wake you up

[Austin_Lord]

Ohhh thats so sad.. this is not happening.. that is wrong way to misguide people.. must take an action. He is misleading  the people...

[Wind_FURY]

it is so absurd that they keep advertising "Satoshi vision" and talk about being the "original" while they are betraying the first and most important thing in bitcoin which is consensus (that is a part of being decentralized). basically they started the movement that any idiot with 1 to 5% hashrate started creating a fork of bitcoin and called his shitcoin the "real" bitcoin.
what you never see them talk about is how they are showing a middle finger to the "majority" by doing that. it is like if in a country 99% of the population voted for president X but Y were put in the seat of power instead whilst talking about democracy!

not defending ver or wright coin, as they have no big merchant adoption.. but, even the likes of luke JR and greg maxwell admit that the august 2017 event was a TWO WAY SPLIT
to me all this drama is like comparing american dollar with canadian or australian or even zimbabwe dollar. where some cry babies are crying that people dont like others using the word dollar. even though no one should own completely and exclusively the brand dollar, not even USA.
(analogy swap dollar for bitcoin, swap usa for core, swap canada for ver, swap australia for wright)

segwits code is not the same as the pre split code. meaning the post-split code is different. so yes it is a
       /------------
----<
       \------------
and not a
_____________
      \_________

There she goes, there she goes again. Racing through my brain.

But in all seriousness franky1, why don't you try sending some BitcoinCash to an old Bitcoin address before the fork. You should get out of /r/btc's echo chamber.

[franky1]

windfury. try reading some actual information. stop crying
i am not team bch. i just detest the core ass kissers that want centralisation. and that includes those advertising other networks that require middlemen authorisation just to make payments.

i find it soo funny that is someone isnt kissing core centric ass they must be on another team. thats the foolish mindset of people that cant understand the word independent.

learn what bitcoins ethos was 2009-2015 before all the rekt campaigns
learn what code was used, who used it and the results it caused
you can social drama your rhetoric all you like but the blockchain data can prove you wrong.
so try to learn whats real via code, stats and data. not by social drama
oh.. its called research by the way. i know you hate the word, but try it

[Wind_FURY]

windfury. try reading some actual information. stop crying
i am not team bch. i just detest the core ass kissers that want centralisation. and that includes those advertising other networks that require middlemen authorisation just to make payments.

There's no crying here. But what should be dested are fraudsters telling newbies that "BitcoinCash is Bitcoin".

i find it soo funny that is someone isnt kissing core centric ass they must be on another team. thats the foolish mindset of people that cant understand the word independent.

Which people are we talking about? Signatories of the NYA perhaps?

learn what bitcoins ethos was 2009-2015 before all the rekt campaigns
learn what code was used, who used it and the results it caused
you can social drama your rhetoric all you like but the blockchain data can prove you wrong.
so try to learn whats real via code, stats and data. not by social drama
oh.. its called research by the way. i know you hate the word, but try it

You post Roger Ver's "bilateral split" propaganda, and tell us we are causing social drama? Hahaha, ok.

but, even the likes of luke JR and greg maxwell admit that the august 2017 event was a TWO WAY SPLIT

That is simply NOT true.

[franky1]

bilateral split was GMAX's buzzword
RESEARCH IS HEALTHY. try it

luke JR loved his mandatory code to cause the split. he has been celebrating its success ever since.
RESEARCH IS HEALTHY. try it

[chek2fire]

it is so absurd that they keep advertising "Satoshi vision" and talk about being the "original" while they are betraying the first and most important thing in bitcoin which is consensus (that is a part of being decentralized). basically they started the movement that any idiot with 1 to 5% hashrate started creating a fork of bitcoin and called his shitcoin the "real" bitcoin.
what you never see them talk about is how they are showing a middle finger to the "majority" by doing that. it is like if in a country 99% of the population voted for president X but Y were put in the seat of power instead whilst talking about democracy!

not defending ver or wright coin, as they have no big merchant adoption.. but, even the likes of luke JR and greg maxwell admit that the august 2017 event was a TWO WAY SPLIT
to me all this drama is like comparing american dollar with canadian or australian or even zimbabwe dollar. where some cry babies are crying that people dont like others using the word dollar. even though no one should own completely and exclusively the brand dollar, not even USA.
(analogy swap dollar for bitcoin, swap usa for core, swap canada for ver, swap australia for wright)

segwits code is not the same as the pre split code. meaning the post-split code is different. so yes it is a
       /------------
----<
       \------------
and not a
_____________
      \_________
also looking at the timestamps of the blocks of the split. cores blocks split first. and then vers coin reacted HOURS later.even the social drama shwows that core devs wanted a split first by talking about such months earlier.. and vers coin was only a reaction a few weeks befor the split.
i only say this because so many people wanna kiss ass soo much that facts get blurred out and over exaggerations start forming to try making one side or the other seem better/worse then they are
if you could sit on the fence and see both sides. your vision would be clearer

take the august 2017 split. to get the "99% core control" by november2017 which pooya87 mentions above. core had to mandate off controversially not just 1%, not just 5% but alot more than that in august 2017

the august 2017 was not a 99% vote for core. again even luke jr and greg maxwell know and mentioned it.

anyways
vers coin and wrights coin dont have merchant adoption or any real world publicity. so just leave them in the altcoin discussion category

if you want to continue to cry about that only core should own brand bitcoin. then you failed test one of decentralisation.
think about the word 'dollar' and its multi community usage in the world as an example analogy, it might wake you up

and if so why there is only one line to bcash even after 2 forks and not two lines?
you are not honest even to your shitcoin propaganda.

edit: i forget.... this forks are "upgrades"....

[bitcampaign]

I see Roger Ver's nonsense, I often see his tweets full of nonsense always comparing the transaction costs of Bitcoin with BCH, whereas I'm sure not many people are interested in him, only some small groups that don't influence Bitcoin 

[franky1]

and if so why there is only one line to bcash even after 2 forks and not two lines?
you are not honest even to your shitcoin propaganda.

edit: i forget.... this forks are "upgrades"....

my shitcoin propaganda?.... dang seems you too cant contemplate independent thought

i dont care about the drama of the altcoins after the august 2017 event.(emphasis upon emphasis 'bilateral' is gmax's buzzword)
you seem to be stuck in a team X or team Y mindset that you cant even envision independent thought of not belonging to any team... i know shock right. someone thats not fanboying any team.. OMG your thinking it must be impossible.

core devs admit to a bilateral split as do those on the altcoin side.
the only propaganda is those trying to fight over ownership of a brand NO_ONE should own
if you keep thinking core deserves bitcoin brand then you have failed decentralisation class lesson one
EMPHASIS NO ONE should own the brand.
EMPHASIS NO ONE should own the brand.

take 2 steps back, open your mind. sit on the fence and ask yourself
"who owns 'dollar'?"
some patriotic hillbillies will scream blue murder its 'murica
but really think about the real world
canadian DOLLAR
australian DOLLAR
zimbabwe DOLLAR

then think
is the world at crisis with the confusion CAD vs USD... no