Question about Bounty managers

[trade2winnn]

But now, the bounty stopped to give the fruits and revenues,it actually is gone,and many projects are now just not worth it or anything,it's the projects that were done on the bounty,many even fell from prices ISO in x 100 or more times,so imagine to make x 100 it should be 10000% percent the token to grow,here's to many, many projects upali sorry

[Fadhil Pahlawadi]

I choose number 1, namely managers who share with bounty participants. I think that all managers want every project they manage to succeed and can pay on time. It can also happen otherwise because of one thing that cannot be explained

[Greatchu]

As per info on the web many ICO projects are scam so its not a wise choice to allow the project teams to do the distribution and I believe that should be the work of a bounty manager

[Genkotsu]

I believe if all bounty hunter will choose number one.
Because if BM hold that bounty payment, no delay distribution and distribution will have fast finish.
The big problem of bounty hunter is delay of distribution and we don't know when it will happen.

[adzino]

To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.

Wouldn't the first option be better? This way, if the bounty manager is someone trusted, there is high chance you guys won't  get scammed. If the second option is taken, there might be a probability that the bounty managers may refuse to pay the bounty rewards and run away. Either way, if the project is a scam, there is no way the tokens will have any value and you will have just wasted your time.

[Lagonda]

Whether you choose the first or second option, both have advantages and disadvantages. Those advantages and disadvantages mainly come from honesty of bounty manager or project team. It doesn't matter if both manager and team are honest and vice versa if one party is dishonest. From point of view of a bounty doer, I prefer the first option based on the fact that bounty manager's reputation can be evaluated through time. Whereas, project teams' are not that easy to evaluate.

[rosezionjohn]

Most would definitely vote for bounty manager's holding the tokens but I would prefer having an escrow instead. Keep in mind also that there are some who do not want the added responsibility holding.

[Ghebung Masam]

for me it is equally important that they are professionals like they demand participants to be professional.
and another important one is legit.

[OptimusPrime_3]

To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.

I will go for the first choice where the bounty managers should be the ones to hold the tokens and distribute them after bounties but this is very unlikely to happen because some bounty managers might not be trusted

[maianh09]

To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.

I prefer the first one

1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants

provided that the bounty manager is highly trusted here in Bitcointalk
I have been into a lot of campaigns and some bounty manager also suffers the same fate every time there are delays in bounty distribution
trusted bounty managers want his campaign to go smoothly and all participants to receive his share because a successful bounty distribution is his recommendation for another project.

I also like the first one like you. The reward manager must be the money holder of bounty hunters or use escrow to minimize the risk for bounty hunters. Because many teams do not distribute bonuses on time after the campaign ends or try to reduce the rewards as announced. Or many teams disappeared after the successful campaign and left the bounty hunters.

[aioc]

I prefer the first option like the Bounty hive does,  because they are the one es-crowing the tokens after the bounty is over you surely gets your allocated stakes at the right time with no delay. even the tokens has not list on any exchange yet you can still get your hard earn tokens. unlike the second option sometimes they will surprise you with the KYC procedure which is so damn brutal for bounty participants.

I have seen that so many times on so many bounty campaigns, the devs change the rules, from no KYC to KYC, bounty manager will never do that because it harms his reputation and no bounty hunters will trust projects that he is handling, so let the bounty manager hold the tokens, because he has a reputation to protect.

[Atang Sulaeman]

I prefer the first statement, as long as it is trustworthy and does not harm the bounty hunters,
the advantage is that we will quickly get our rewards from each of our jobs.

[suzanne5223]

To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.

With a lot of project owners changing rules and regulations or total token allocated for bounty campaign. I bounty managers holding the coin or token allocated for bounty campaign will be the best for this will make bounty hunters feel more save and go after reputable bounty manager bounties.

[terencio]

I've joined a lot of bounties in the past, but I still prefer the #1 statement based on my experience because  those bounties where the team will distribute the rewards later, those are the projects that I've got no rewards.

[drumamat]

To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.

I will go for the first choice where the bounty managers should be the ones to hold the tokens and distribute them after bounties but this is very unlikely to happen because some bounty managers might not be trusted

Accordingly, then do not participate in projects that lead bounty Manager that You do not trust.To be honest,this is the first time I've heard of a bounty Manager having the privilege of distributing tokens on his own.This is mainly done by the project team.It’s a special difference who will distribute tokens no. The main thing is that they have value after the first listing.

[valuater]

I like the first choice actually, but I have a bad experience with that because the bounty manager actually takes part in the participants' rewards. but I know that not all bounty managers do the same thing, for the second choice it is often done only if the team refuses to distribute bounty participants' rewards and the bounty manager cannot do anything.

[4rzun4]

Of course I will choose and prefer the first choice (number 1). If the bounty manager is in control of the token in the bounty, of course the bounty participants are a little more calm. For reasons, there are no rules that change when counting is completed in a spreadsheet. Participants will be more calm in doing all their work assignments.

[irsykes]

To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.

If must pick, maybe a lot of people here include me will pick first one, but as bounty manager i know it is really a lot of job and maybe developer itself will think twice to give their coins to bounty manager to pay the reward for bounty participants, and fees from that bounty manager will be higher than usual.

[Question123]

They have bounty manager who held the token which is more safety because they will give the reward of the participants and there's no doubt about that. But the team of the project will choose best bounty manager who have experienced and trusted about managing a campaign and for sure everythinh will be fine . Paritipants will don't have any doubt to join to bounty campaign only they problems is when the token listed.

[BayAngelo]

hunters deserved to be paid. you question is baseless. whether the team paid or not. what we are concern about is our pay for work done. nothing  more to say here. most times the payment delay are as a result of lazy BMs, also bounty managers that are selfish.