Stake flags for ponzi schemes here

[babo]

I'm happy to lend a hand with the limited time I have available
I'm always ready to improve the community even at my personal expense
a cohesive community is a strong community
thank you for the trust you give me

[GazetaBitcoin]

I really appreciate that The Italian Brotherhood came by to help HedgeFX! (Perhaps this was his initiation to be accepted in the brotherhood? )

[babo]

I really appreciate that The Italian Brotherhood came by to help HedgeFX! (Perhaps this was his initiation to be accepted in the brotherhood? )

you always accepted my friend

you know very well that I respect you, I voted you for the annual contest of the best members, I consider you a pillar of the community

I'm not very active in international areas because I have little time, but I read and I know who is a good person and who is an asshole

you are a great member

[GazetaBitcoin]

you always accepted my friend

you know very well that I respect you, I voted you for the annual contest of the best members, I consider you a pillar of the community

I'm not very active in international areas because I have little time, but I read and I know who is a good person and who is an asshole

you are a great member

Blushing  Grazie tante, babo!

[holydarkness]

[...]
"Butt Hurt^TM", "stuffed pig" or "brain dead"
[...]

I'm here exclusively and solely to quote this for my personal future reference, shelved next to Newspaper and Mr. Almeida.

[GazetaBitcoin]

Sup holydarkness 

I'm here exclusively and solely to quote this for my personal future reference

Loooooooooooool! I hope I won't receive such nice compliments from you though 

shelved next to Newspaper and Mr. Almeida.

But who is Mr. Almeida?

[HedgeFx]

Timelord posts another trust (this time neutral) in addition to the red trust posted on may 31. And he continue to delete posts with proof. Also admin moved my post here but left his post in lending board.
He continue to offend my honor and my reputation.
This is not a good thing for me.

[holydarkness]

Sup holydarkness  

I'm here exclusively and solely to quote this for my personal future reference

Loooooooooooool! I hope I won't receive such nice compliments from you though  

Hmm... Can't promise you that, I find myself particularly fond of the stuffed pig part, LOL. Somehow an image of a squishy fluffy pink pig plushie with cherry-red dots on each cheek grinning widely kept appearing on my mind.

shelved next to Newspaper and Mr. Almeida.

But who is Mr. Almeida?

[gasp] why, Mr. Almeida, why? Why did you forget your alias?

OK, much that I love this banter, I think we'll get kicked out for derailing the thread if we kept on with it, LOL.

Timelord posts another trust (this time neutral) in addition to the red trust posted on may 31. And he continue to delete posts with proof. Also admin moved my post here but left his post in lending board.
He continue to offend my honor and my reputation.
This is not a good thing for me.

I am not saying this with any negative tone: why would it matter? The pace of the other thread where timelord got distrusted in matter of minutes and the amount of opposition for the flag raised against you showed that people are mostly see his feedback as invalid and see you for who you really are.

I can understand that you get offended by his feedbacks or how you have the need to post something else as rebuttal of his claim, but wouldn't it better to just leave it and ignore it? Or even put him on ignore list, if you deemed it necessary? Less stress that way. There are a lot of users --DTs, especially-- who got negative or neutral retaliatory feedbacks from people who got annoyed by them and the things they exposed, they mostly treat those feedback either like a bug or a battle scar.

I mean, for instance, look at GazetaBitcoin Stuffed Pig Plushie, he got a lot of name calling. If I'm not mistaken, he also once or twice called tabloid other than newspaper [still laughing at this creativity by our beloved ----dev] and he take it lightly. Deeply keeping the grudge, I believe --remind me to never cross path with you, dear plushie-- but he never let it ruin his day.

[alterra57]

Ladies and gentleman, I present to you, the perv Timelord:

[nutildah]

So Timelord was downgraded to DT Strength -4, quadrupled down on his wrongness with a second rating to the (wrongly) accused, and locked his thread, but not before deleting more posts and proclaiming that everyone telling him he's wrong is simply part of an "echo chamber," lol.

Just because one person says "You're wrong!" doesn't make it right - the rest is just an echo chamber.

 

What about 10 people saying you're wrong?

Another strange part about this whole thing is that the thread is still in Lending -- its definitely a Reputation matter. I attempted to post a somewhat similar thread in Lending - but with actual evidence of scams - and it was moved elsewhere. WTF. Suppose it doesn't matter so much now that its locked but still.

[Free Market Capitalist]

Just because one person says "You're wrong!" doesn't make it right - the rest is just an echo chamber.

 

What about 10 people saying you're wrong?

Lol. So, I've just seen the locked thread in question and what I think is: how much time wasted and how much energy in dismantling a conspiracy that only he believed, right? I see you took your time in dismantling his arguments very rationally, which I see commendable. I don't have so much patience for that. That's why some time ago I used the wonderful ignore button.

[nutildah]

Lol. So, I've just seen the locked thread in question and what I think is: how much time wasted and how much energy in dismantling a conspiracy that only he believed, right? I see you took your time in dismantling his arguments very rationally, which I see commendable. I don't have so much patience for that. That's why some time ago I used the wonderful ignore button.

Its not "wasted" IMO. If nobody took the time to dissect his b.s. there'd be a lot more forum members walking around with unfair negs on their heads. Its not the first time this has happened by any means. I've had this relationship with him for significantly longer than you've been here. But to rehash it all would be the true waste of time. The appropriate measures have been taken (for now), time to move on.

[HedgeFx]

Yes, he was downgraded. But he left red trust on my feedback (why?) and added another trust (neutral, accusing me again).
This is a bad, bad thing.

So Timelord was downgraded to DT Strength -4, quadrupled down on his wrongness with a second rating to the (wrongly) accused, and locked his thread, but not before deleting more posts and proclaiming that everyone telling him he's wrong is simply part of an "echo chamber," lol.

Just because one person says "You're wrong!" doesn't make it right - the rest is just an echo chamber.

 

What about 10 people saying you're wrong?

Another strange part about this whole thing is that the thread is still in Lending -- its definitely a Reputation matter. I attempted to post a somewhat similar thread in Lending - but with actual evidence of scams - and it was moved elsewhere. WTF. Suppose it doesn't matter so much now that its locked but still.

[LoyceV]

So Timelord was downgraded to DT Strength -4

Make that DT2 Strength -5. I try to be conservative with Trust exclusions (and negative feedback), but this guy has shown to be unfit to be on DefaultTrust far too often. He's built a forum carreer linking alt accounts, and it turned out he doesn't understand the difference between an exchange and a wallet. Unbelievable!

Yes, he was downgraded. But he left red trust on my feedback (why?) and added another trust (neutral, accusing me again).
This is a bad, bad thing.

Don't worry about it. This is exactly how the Trust system is supposed to work: users who leave incorrect feedback have no business being on DT. Exclude him and move on. This shows how little Untrusted feedback matters.

[HedgeFx]

Thank you Loycev, and thanks again to other forum members.

Don't worry about it. This is exactly how the Trust system is supposed to work: users who leave incorrect feedback have no business being on DT. Exclude him and move on. This shows how little Untrusted feedback matters.

[GazetaBitcoin]

Sup again holydarkness  

Hmm... Can't promise you that, I find myself particularly fond of the stuffed pig part

Lucky me

But who is Mr. Almeida?

[gasp] why, Mr. Almeida, why? Why did you forget your alias?

Damn, I only remembered the nym Freddy! It happens to forget when you have so many names...

I mean, for instance, look at GazetaBitcoin Stuffed Pig Plushie, he got a lot of name calling. If I'm not mistaken, he also once or twice called tabloid other than newspaper [still laughing at this creativity by our beloved ----dev] and he take it lightly.

This is true, saxydev, shitcoincollector10 and Rizzrack (the lattest being paid by the forum to protect scammers) have a broad imagination for finding new names for me  

Deeply keeping the grudge, I believe --remind me to never cross path with you, dear plushie-- but he never let it ruin his day.

Don't worry, holydarkness, you are with the White Side of the Force. This is also how we met, right? Nevertheless, your advice is very good!

He's built a forum carreer linking alt accounts, and it turned out he doesn't understand the difference between an exchange and a wallet. Unbelievable!

Same as he still does not know what Marketplace Trust system is supposed to be (with accent on "Marketplace"). Or the Flag system.


3 more DT1 users distrusted or no longer trust the baboon.



Thank you all!

I still encourage TwitchySeal, Igebots, KTChampions, YOSHIE, FatFork, Stalker22 and all other DT2 users (which are eligible to be part of DT1) to do the same, for normality



And this should be enough reason for anybody to distrust TimeLord:



The village idiot just makes blunder after blunder, showing again and again he has no idea about the correct use of Marketplace Trust system. He wrote 2 identical feedbacks, one negative and one neutral (so for him same accusation is to be considered once as a negative thing and once as a neutral thing)!!! And he did the same for 2 different users!

There is no reason in the world for this idiot to be part of DT! Nor DT1, nor DT2!

Is there needed any stronger reason to distrust him? With those feedbacks it seems that he is not even capable to make a decision even for himself about how he sees a user's action -- he does not know if he should consider it neutral or negative, lol! So excepting the fact that the feedbacks themselves are pure imbecilities, the lunatic is also unable to decide what he thinks! So he makes an accusation and uses a negative feedback, then repeats the accusation, but using a neutral feedback. And does it twice!

[examplens]

The village idiot just makes blunder after blunder, showing again and again he has no idea about the correct use of Marketplace Trust system. He wrote 2 identical feedbacks, one negative and one neutral (so for him same accusation is to be considered once as a negative thing and once as a neutral thing)!!! And he did the same for 2 different users!

I added him to my distrust list.
I really tried to give him space to think and still make a rational decision, but he decided on the strangest move, adding another neutral feedback, while leaving controversial negatives. Obviously not understanding the trust system, or knowingly violating it.
As such, he cannot be selected in DT.

[holydarkness]

Yes, he was downgraded. But he left red trust on my feedback (why?) and added another trust (neutral, accusing me again).
This is a bad, bad thing.

If I may offer any consolation, since he's no longer on DT, be it DT1 or DT2, his feedback will not appear on your profile or anyone looking at your profile, unless for those who put him on their trust list. As you can see on the screenshots below, for the public and most members' eyes, his feedback is "hidden" by the "untrusted feedback" button and your trust score only reflect those on current DT system.

[babo]

So Timelord was downgraded to DT Strength -4

Make that DT2 Strength -5. I try to be conservative with Trust exclusions (and negative feedback), but this guy has shown to be unfit to be on DefaultTrust far too often. He's built a forum carreer linking alt accounts, and it turned out he doesn't understand the difference between an exchange and a wallet. Unbelievable!

ah really?
I've reached a point in life where nothing surprises me anymore

a few days ago received slaps from a person to whom I directly did a lot of good (here in the forum of course) for no real reason

no wonder he doesn't understand the difference between wallet and exchange
but i don't care either
everyone is the architect of his own destiny and if he prefers so well, his problems

what I always say is `not your keys, not your coins`

[FatFork]

I must admit that I wasn't aware of this case before, as I'm not a regular on the Lending board. However, after reviewing the evidence presented, I couldn't find enough convincing proof to support the claim that these are alt accounts of the same user. Therefore, I don't believe that the flag against these users is justified. In my opinion, it's important to give users the benefit of the doubt unless there is substantial proof indicating otherwise. False accusations can harm individuals and their reputation, so it's crucial to exercise caution when making judgments.

While I opposed the flags, I don't want to lose trust in Timelord2067 just yet. I truly appreciate his dedication to the forum and his efforts in combating fraudulent activities, and I believe that he will ultimately do what is right and consider removing the negative trust.