Or member of
Foxpup's Merit Cycling Club And hey, now I've the first cryptocunt accusation here, that might bring me some street credibility.
Indeed it does. And just when I was beginning to think he'd lost interest.
I've still the hope he'll find something useful to do instead of harassing forum members...
snip
What's so hard to understand? Please read my feedback again:
Tried to ruin the reputation of forum members - failed badly. However, I would not trust a single word of this user.
It's clear to me that the only intention of that post was to ruin the reputation of Hhampuz, nothing else. That's a pattern of your posts everywhere, you are always trying to make up accusations and throw some mud where people have not your opinion.
You have made many more posts where you show that you are not interested in a healthy discussion and your only goal is defamation of trusted users with unproven allegations. People should know this when they deal with you that you are dishonest and obviously retarded.
You have proven to be dishonest multiple times and I would not trust you with any amount of money because you are either a malicious troll or completely braindead.
And it's extremely sad to have the warning "Trade with extreme caution!" removed because it would fit very well to your account.
You are 100% net negative and always derailing discussions with your utter nonsense. Please think about it if Newbies read you comments and they will turn off the forum because they don't want to fight here, they want information about Bitcoin.
I would appreciate it if you change your mind and start to be useful for the community.
This Lafu issue just adds weight to our claims you are too stupid to be a merit source. How is asking him if he thinks we should believe that he did not have knowledge cryptopia were about to vanish with everyones money a LIE, 1, how can it be a lie if it is a question ? and 2, how can YOU PROVE if it were a statement that it was not true?
Because your question implies he would be involved. You know how to phrase things that people get a wrong impression of the situation although you didn't make a statement.
And please, lern how to quote. While reading your post I feel like I'm in shitposting wonderland.
@1miau
You should try this :
it's so quiet here.
Maybe that would be better. Let's see if you are right and I should just ignore him or if he's interested to stop his net negative posts.
Well then you have demonstrated
EXACTLY WHY you can NOT be a merit source. Your post clearly demonstrates you are low functioning.
Watch how I will pull you apart in public here as a lesson to other low functioning dregs of your type. You simply do not have the capacity to allocate merit to posts of value.
1. Present the observable instances that are FALSE and tell me how YOU can prove they ARE FALSE. These instances are not opinions these are events that took place. We have presented clearly an observable instance that demonstrates lying and scamming and several other instances that provide a strong case with regard clear financially motivated wrong doing. That is not slinging mud and opinions they are clear instances that are independently verifiable. Prove them ALL to be FALSE. If you can not then you are WRONG.
2. We are ASKING.. HHampuz if HE KNOWINGLY is employing these types of people in his campaigns. (subsequent to this HHampuz ADMITTED that he would NOT be transparent about this rules for employing or refusing to employ people for sig campaigns that he controls on behalf of projects - which as we explained leaves him wide open and his projects wide open to a lot of valid criticism and questions). That is a question we wanted answered. Your opinion of the intention means nothing noob trash. If he was knowingly employing these types of people then he WAS if he was NOT then he could answer on thread. If he could refute the observable instances then he was free to do that too.
3. Any other "OPINIONS" you have reached are your own problem. Screaming "defamation and lies" is actually simply FALSE ACCUSATIONS on your part. Only someone as dumb as yourself can not see that. Well done moron.
4. Now you further dig yourself further in to a corner by claiming. WE HAVE BEEN PROVEN dishonest MULTIPLE times. PRESENT 1 instance of being PROVEN dishonest. PROOF is what we want to see. Not your opinion of others speculations.
You see what is "clear to you" means NOTHING. Failure to see that is exactly why you are not fit to be a merit source. What is the point of having low functioning ass kissing fools like 1miua giving out merit? you simply do NOT have the capacity to recognize a post of value.
What you are suggesting is this.
That a person like hhmapuz who's actions are lately
1. refusing to be transparent in his campaign selection process (seems very shady)
2. supporting the dox and placing at risk the forum treasurer and the boards funds.
3. it appears that he may be stealing btc from his campaign projects
should not be asked QUESTIONS based on observable instances? Observable instances you are saying are clearly incorrect but NOBODY tried to refute or deny took place? Instances that several senior members believe are dishonest and shady and some that are undeniable evidence of lying and scamming?
The person asking the questions is "dishonest" LOL
How can this poor confused dumb piece of ass feltching dirt be a merit source? Boot this fool off DT also.
Noob trash who didn't find out about btc until last year have no place as merit sources/dt. Who knows what you may find out about next... "The wheel" LOL . The board is surely not this hard up that we need noob trash that are also heavily retarded in positions of trust handing out merit.
I wonder where your "merit " all came from CHIPMIXER SIG SPAMMER?
Remove your sig and then we may believe you are here as a real enthusiast not just some euro skank begging for btc crumbs because you were too dumb to notice btc 9 yrs earlier LOL