Gubkat
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 2
|
|
July 20, 2019, 06:11:01 PM |
|
Has homomorphic encryption been used before in other projects?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Even in the event that an attacker gains more than 50% of the network's
computational power, only transactions sent by the attacker could be
reversed or double-spent. The network would not be destroyed.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
VerDinr
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 62
Merit: 1
|
|
July 20, 2019, 08:05:57 PM |
|
Has homomorphic encryption been used before in other projects?
This is a very interesting direction in encryption and it has several stages of development. Look Wiki. Some members of the team are real experts in homomorphic encryption and that's cool!
|
|
|
|
gaerisk
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 1
|
|
July 21, 2019, 07:36:00 AM |
|
The team of this project is very experienced, because there are some team members and advisors from famous technology companies, such as Apple, Microsoft, Amazon... This concept is interesting mix between data cloud and cryptocurrency. Good luck fellows!
|
|
|
|
Gubkat
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 2
|
|
July 21, 2019, 09:03:20 AM |
|
Using encryption should increase processing time, right? So usual clouds are better.
|
|
|
|
Filatenw
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 140
Merit: 1
|
|
July 21, 2019, 05:35:09 PM |
|
Using encryption should increase processing time, right? So usual clouds are better.
Devs said that performance will be comparable to centralized clouds, let’s see how it will be in real life
|
|
|
|
Valeriiko
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 140
Merit: 2
|
|
July 22, 2019, 12:19:29 PM |
|
I can’t understand why transaction fees don’t help with combating DDoS and spam attacks? It is like entry threshold, isn’t it?
|
|
|
|
storecoindev (OP)
Copper Member
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
|
|
July 22, 2019, 04:33:21 PM |
|
I can’t understand why transaction fees don’t help with combating DDoS and spam attacks? It is like entry threshold, isn’t it?
A DDoS attack can be launched with a large number of legitimate requests or simply sending garbage to overwhelm the server capacity. In 2018, a 1.3Tbps DDoS attack was launched on GitHub for a duration of about 15-20 minutes. The motive of attackers in cases like this is to simply overwhelm the servers and more often than not, they don't care about sending *legitimate* requests. From the architecture perspective, you need to be prepared for the worse. So, we concluded that while transaction fees may *theoretically* combat spam, a determined attacker may not even care about sending real transactions to the network. So, a better defense mechanism must be built anyways, so why even pretend that transaction fees eliminate spam? In addition, micro transactions are possible on the Storecoin network, so it is possible that the network experiences an influx of large number of requests from time to time. We call this legal spam because the *traffic pattern* is that of spam, but the transactions are all legal. We have captured our research on DDoS and spam protection here. - Storecoindev.
|
|
|
|
gaerisk
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 1
|
|
July 22, 2019, 05:06:47 PM |
|
I can’t understand why transaction fees don’t help with combating DDoS and spam attacks? It is like entry threshold, isn’t it?
I thought it’s only for dWorkers. Also, Storecoin addresses DDoS and spam attack concerns with a request rate-limiting design, which protects Storecoin nodes from such attacks.
|
|
|
|
Filatenw
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 140
Merit: 1
|
|
July 22, 2019, 06:16:43 PM |
|
Why did the creator decide that democracy will rule the world in the future? I think the world is going to the monarchical system, in which the project will not be relevant.
|
|
|
|
Valeriiko
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 140
Merit: 2
|
|
July 23, 2019, 09:20:04 AM |
|
Why did the creator decide that democracy will rule the world in the future? I think the world is going to the monarchical system, in which the project will not be relevant.
This is a political issue that is difficult to predict. But at the moment democracy prevails in most developing countries
|
|
|
|
gaerisk
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 1
|
|
July 23, 2019, 04:34:05 PM |
|
“One entity, one vote” can be a real revolution. What will the government answer to the non-use of such technologies in the elections?
|
|
|
|
Filatenw
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 140
Merit: 1
|
|
July 23, 2019, 04:50:20 PM |
|
“One entity, one vote” can be a real revolution. What will the government answer to the non-use of such technologies in the elections?
Do they have an agreement with any country about using this system? Sounds interesting
|
|
|
|
Valeriiko
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 140
Merit: 2
|
|
July 24, 2019, 09:40:25 AM |
|
“One entity, one vote” can be a real revolution. What will the government answer to the non-use of such technologies in the elections?
Do they have an agreement with any country about using this system? Sounds interesting There is nothing about testing “One entity, one vote” in roadmap
|
|
|
|
Gubkat
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 2
|
|
July 24, 2019, 01:23:46 PM |
|
“One entity, one vote” can be a real revolution. What will the government answer to the non-use of such technologies in the elections?
Do they have an agreement with any country about using this system? Sounds interesting There is nothing about testing “One entity, one vote” in roadmap They said that their approaches are hence, practical. But I did not find evidence of this
|
|
|
|
Filatenw
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 140
Merit: 1
|
|
July 24, 2019, 04:06:50 PM |
|
The financial aspect is also very important here. The larger the country, the more voters. The more voters, the greater the cost of providing KYV.
|
|
|
|
gaerisk
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 1
|
|
July 25, 2019, 05:47:01 AM |
|
The financial aspect is also very important here. The larger the country, the more voters. The more voters, the greater the cost of providing KYV.
Yeah, that’s why they rejected any technical architecture that is economically impractical (the cost is many multiples of traditional cloud computing services) or gravitate towards centralization on governance (like Plutocratic voting power)!
|
|
|
|
Gubkat
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 2
|
|
July 25, 2019, 06:12:01 PM |
|
The financial aspect is also very important here. The larger the country, the more voters. The more voters, the greater the cost of providing KYV.
Yeah, that’s why they rejected any technical architecture that is economically impractical (the cost is many multiples of traditional cloud computing services) or gravitate towards centralization on governance (like Plutocratic voting power)! This concept is very interesting though and very effective. A good team and Advisor board with a quite innovative product and a great vision. The user experience must be good as well. I think there is some potential on this.
|
|
|
|
gaerisk
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 1
|
|
July 26, 2019, 05:27:43 AM |
|
The team appreciates all the support they get, really happy to see people so enthusiastic about the future and potential of the project, the team is set to achieve all their milestones and have this out soon. Thank you! 😉
|
|
|
|
Valeriiko
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 140
Merit: 2
|
|
July 26, 2019, 01:01:40 PM |
|
Does anyone know when the bounty will start?
|
|
|
|
Filatenw
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 140
Merit: 1
|
|
July 26, 2019, 03:39:07 PM |
|
Great initiative. Your project is promising and has good planning. I think this business will benefit many people. hopefully for a smooth development and many people who are interested in your idea.
|
|
|
|
|