Would you participate in new project if it is not listed in ICO rating websites?

[masterusd]

Nowadays there are many projects, it is not easy to judge on new project, good or not, some people think the ico rating websites may help to take your decision, others think this ICO rating websites provide fake rating due to new project can pay fees to this ICO websites and get high rating.
SO, If you find good project, is it important to you this new good project should be listed in ICO rating websites?

Appreciate your participation

[1715632167]

1715632167

[1715632167]

1715632167

[1715632167]

1715632167

[Yudhisthir]

Nowadays there are many projects, it is not easy to judge on new project, good or not, some people think the ico rating websites may help to take your decision, others think this ICO rating websites provide fake rating due to new project can pay fees to this ICO websites and get high rating.
SO, If you find good project, is it important to you this new good project should be listed in ICO rating websites?

Appreciate your participation

I would if the project is good. But most of the ICO rating sites provide fill up forms to list the project and why wouldn't a good project be listed on such sites?
The ICO rating sites may ask money for promotion or better rating but they also provide detailed information in a predictable format which is easy to access for interested people for every listed project. They even contact the team members for KYC that makes investors more secure knowing who people are actually operating the project.

[jessyj48]

ICO rating websites aren't all true on their jobs ,they sometimes get paid for rating from developers ,I won't rely on them if I were you , project listing in ICO rating websites or not doesn't state the fact that its not a scam project, there are some good signs that good projects used to have.

1) professional teams
They always have past histories of achievements ,this kind of teams will be able or capable to handle any fuck up wannabe that might show up when the production is on.

2) Are the teams who they claim to be?
I've came across projects when hunting for bounties that the teams are fake,the scammer used some kind of software to swap peoples faces off and merge another pic ,they name the teams any names they want. I detected by using picture search engines .

3) shady business
Some projects are liars in disguise, they aren't straight and careless about their investors ,keeping secrets and the most important one is they always work in the shadows ,anonymously, no office address ,no LinkedIn accounts ,no teams ,nothing

If a project is a real project then they won't have anything to hide ,they always tend to come out plain in the open

[Vinalians]

Me personally, I don't tolerate this kind of projects that is not listed on legitimate ICO reviews because they are more likely just to turned out to be scam because they even don't have the money to promote their ICO on some review ICO's so I guess they will be just gone in the future. They are not fully ready, that's what I mean.
If ICO project is listed on some legitimate review ICO website there is an assurance for all investors because someone said it is legit and true.

[rosezionjohn]

You won't see ICOs not being listed in any of these ICO review sites as long as they have ANN here. These rating sites will "review" them for free and give them low to average scores. They then go to these ICO telegrams and post something like "Hello, your ICO has been listed at xxxxxxx.com". With that being said, I would not really much on these rates when planning to invest.

[sujonali1819]

I will if the project will very known to me and vision and product will good. I Don't trust any review by any ico review sit. Because   most of the case the reviews can be paid. So first investigate Own self  then try to see any review to find out  more information.

[JuliaJi]

I always check projects on such sites, for me it is very important! but not to all sites need to believe, I dissapointed in ICObench

[spydee1522]

Most ICO projects pay money to these ICO rating websites to be rated high and there has been a lot of projects that rated high on these websites but ended as scam projects. I choose to participate in new projects based on my personal research on the project, the team behind it and how things are done at their social media sites.

[fallensky7]

I have never used ICO rating. I have my own criteria for choosing projects such as white paper, a roadmap, a project team ... but I don’t trust rating sites. I believe more in my strength and well done research.

[akitha]

if the project is worth to invest why not,, those ico review website are paid by those dev team to promote their project and gain more investors. not knowing mostly project that are listed on ico review website are scam or fraud or  after their ico no intention to  continue their project.. now the new trend is the IEO much better than ico

[Lan75]

ICO rating from guys we don't know is insane. Guys can be paid to make positive remarks about the project even if it is not, it happened to a lot of projects i followed already. So for me it is useless for me to have an ICO rating before participating in an ICO. I just do a research on the project and see to it that it had a very good use case as that is one of my criteria in selecting a good project.

[Kiefner]

I don't care about that. I certainly pay attention to the rating of the project, but this is not an essential condition that affects my decision. Basically, I myself conduct my research and if I like the project and I see a prospect in it, then I do not pay attention to whether it is on the rating ICO site.

[tracyhayley]

Of course iwon't invested in that ico. I will invest my money into a good project that has been rated and has a good review. But, i prefer invest my money into STO or IEO project than ICO project. STO is trustworthy and IEO is profitable for me.

[masterusd]

ICO rating websites aren't all true on their jobs ,they sometimes get paid for rating from developers ,I won't rely on them if I were you , project listing in ICO rating websites or not doesn't state the fact that its not a scam project, there are some good signs that good projects used to have.

1) professional teams
They always have past histories of achievements ,this kind of teams will be able or capable to handle any fuck up wannabe that might show up when the production is on.

2) Are the teams who they claim to be?
I've came across projects when hunting for bounties that the teams are fake,the scammer used some kind of software to swap peoples faces off and merge another pic ,they name the teams any names they want. I detected by using picture search engines .

3) shady business
Some projects are liars in disguise, they aren't straight and careless about their investors ,keeping secrets and the most important one is they always work in the shadows ,anonymously, no office address ,no LinkedIn accounts ,no teams ,nothing

If a project is a real project then they won't have anything to hide ,they always tend to come out plain in the open

Very useful information, i would like you to post more information that guide others to choose the project

[mersal]

Nowadays there are many projects, it is not easy to judge on new project, good or not, some people think the ico rating websites may help to take your decision, others think this ICO rating websites provide fake rating due to new project can pay fees to this ICO websites and get high rating.
SO, If you find good project, is it important to you this new good project should be listed in ICO rating websites?

Appreciate your participation

ICO ratings are nothing related to the quality of the project because they just can be bought by giving the enough money to the rating sites so don't trust those and there are lot of projects even more profitable without even listing on those sites.

[masterusd]

You won't see ICOs not being listed in any of these ICO review sites as long as they have ANN here. These rating sites will "review" them for free and give them low to average scores. They then go to these ICO telegrams and post something like "Hello, your ICO has been listed at xxxxxxx.com". With that being said, I would not really much on these rates when planning to invest.

I totally agree with you, this rating websites looking for money what ever the project will be.

[robelneo]

Nowadays there are many projects, it is not easy to judge on new project, good or not, some people think the ico rating websites may help to take your decision, others think this ICO rating websites provide fake rating due to new project can pay fees to this ICO websites and get high rating.
SO, If you find good project, is it important to you this new good project should be listed in ICO rating websites?

Appreciate your participation

It's been proven and I've participated on one project that has a very high rating in ICO only to end up scamming investors, a good project should do away with ICO rating, it's an open secret that they are paid to get good reviews and rating, this makes them conniving with dubious and scam project.

[masterusd]

I always check projects on such sites, for me it is very important! but not to all sites need to believe, I dissapointed in ICObench

Unfortunately  some ico rating websites list a scam project even the team pass KYC.

[waynechong1995]

5 stars for many projects but look where they are now, slaghtered from trends and other big coins. Do wake up and realize that market is over saturated and there simply isn't that much ETH to move after to ICO's era. The only viable stuff over these sites are quick Infos, or slightly lighter analysis on their project's nature, they do not comply any of your loses so why do you trust them solely.

[masterusd]

Nowadays there are many projects, it is not easy to judge on new project, good or not, some people think the ico rating websites may help to take your decision, others think this ICO rating websites provide fake rating due to new project can pay fees to this ICO websites and get high rating.
SO, If you find good project, is it important to you this new good project should be listed in ICO rating websites?

Appreciate your participation

It's been proven and I've participated on one project that has a very high rating in ICO only to end up scamming investors, a good project should do away with ICO rating, it's an open secret that they are paid to get good reviews and rating, this makes them conniving with dubious and scam project.

It is not a secret ICO rating websites charge a fees to increase the rating.