Would you participate in new project if it is not listed in ICO rating websites?

[odukoyaewatomi27]

I usually do not depend on ico rating websites and i make decision based on my own personal research and not because a ico site rank it high. it is good to know that these ico websites cannot be trusted, as they collect money from most projects before they can rank them well.

[coin-investor]

I stop using these ICO rating sites after I've found out that they are giving a fake rating in exchange for payment, they are blind and conniving to scam projects, that is why so many people got scammed because of these fake ICO rating sites, they are part of the problem.

[Golstrim]

Definitely yes, because I hate rating agencies, those are shillers and nothing valuable they can't bring to crypto industry.
no one believe their ratings except newbies and it is disaster

[fvb]

I will participate.  At the moment, already taking part in one such project.  In the past, also made projects that are not listed in the rating sites.  And they brought me income for my work.  So, the main thing is that the project was useful and of high quality.

[sandra_x]

I can contribute to a good project even if it is not listed on ICO rating site (there are thousands liste there and many turn out to be scams), but it should have some sort of media presence or publication on reputable outlets. Those are more reliable. And do not think any smart investor makes an investment decision solely on the merits of an ICO listing site

[Maslate]

I can contribute to a good project even if it is not listed on ICO rating site (there are thousands liste there and many turn out to be scams), but it should have some sort of media presence or publication on reputable outlets. Those are more reliable. And do not think any smart investor makes an investment decision solely on the merits of an ICO listing site

Ain't no matter of how many thousands of adds you been made if that certain project hasn't too seen any market potential, it still is drowning down.
ICO rating is just baseless if it is all just paid reviews. People would love to see their performance rather than relying on reviews/feedbacks.

[terencio]

Absolutely, I would invest in them if they have a good product and getting a lot of traction. ICO rating websites should not be basis alone, in analyzing the project. It's a good place to gather some information, but don't rely too much on them.

[DarkDays]

I don't give a damn about ICO rating websites. They are trying to position themselves as the absolute statue of the authority on the matter.

However in reality these review aggregation platforms are all complete trash, and most indirectly try to blackmail projects into paying for promotion in return for a better score or more exposure.

If a project is likely to succeed, it doesn't need the minimal traffic brought in by these sites.

[Nasonn]

ICO rating sites are not the regulators of crypto, their rating literally mean nothing on the viability of any project so I won't participate on a project because it is listed on ICO rating site and as well because a project is not listed doesn't mean it isn't a great project.

[JuliaJi]

I always check projects on such sites, for me it is very important! but not to all sites need to believe, I dissapointed in ICObench

Unfortunately  some ico rating websites list a scam project even the team pass KYC.

I saw such projects, but on such sites some guarante we have! Not every scam will be on rating sites with KYC!  But sometimes scam projects buying places on sites, unfortunately

[dedocry]

Personally, I am not participating in the ICO anymore.
I believe that you can buy coins later, after they be listed  on the exchange

[BADBITCH]

For me, ico rating websites do not judge my involvement in ico or ieos
My focus before investing is the project and the product they aim to produce

For a good investment, you need to go for zero privacy tokens , blockchain products amongst others

[BeginToMine]

I would never ever consider investing in a project that did not list in an ICO rating site, this is not because I trust the ratings themselves, it's more because I would feel that the team behind the project has not done sufficient marketing for the project, there are few exception though... Like if the project is a Korean project, many of them tend to prefer investors from their region.

[Kwansimaa]

yes I will participate in an ICO if it is not listed in any ICO rating website and be proud participating in it because not all projects are willing to pay to be rated on such ico rating websites knowing most projects pays these websites for higher ranking which is highly not fair to the crypto industry or market in general. Participating in such an ico is personal and I will as an individual because off late ico websites have no influence over investors.

[WalkerIVIV]

there are only a few trusted ico list and i thought that the good ico should not always be listed on any of rating site. as long as it has created by a trusted or very well known the developer and that doesn't need a lot of publicity.

[sidkz]

I would look at the project team and what it offers and whether they have a finished product
if there seems to me a project interesting, I would participate in it

[cak imin]

I would look at the project team and what it offers and whether they have a finished product
if there seems to me a project interesting, I would participate in it

there are a number of new projects that have indeed brought attention to the crypto market this year. I see that there is harmony that has finished doing their IEO and success with the increase in the price of their tokens, I feel fortunate to be one of the IEO participants who can benefit from the new project. and now it starts again. but it is not a problem because this new project must be experienced, it needs gradual development to strengthen their markets.

[LogitechMouse]

Nowadays there are many projects, it is not easy to judge on new project, good or not, some people think the ico rating websites may help to take your decision, others think this ICO rating websites provide fake rating due to new project can pay fees to this ICO websites and get high rating.
SO, If you find good project, is it important to you this new good project should be listed in ICO rating websites?

Appreciate your participation

Even the ICO is listed on different ICO rating websites, I will not invest on it because getting listed on that websites doesn't mean that it will be a successful project in the future. The ratings on these sites are getting paid by different project developers. The higher the payment, the higher the rating and vice versa.

I'm not an investor in ICO but as an advice, don't use those ICO rating websites as your only basis in investing. Do some in depth research on every project and you must have a basis whenever you invest.

[Mr.Spreadthehamster]

It is fair to note that the success of a project does not depend only on the rating. Often the project’s fate depends on many factors, which, given the volatility of the market behavior and various manipulations with them, turn any rating into a temporary forecast.

[Mulann2]

This rating sites are not 100% accurate or most of them are highly influenced somehow so it is very hard to rely on the ratings of this sitr to measure any project success, between i have seen some real serious project that don't care much about rating sites but more concerned about putting out a solid project.