Would you participate in new project if it is not listed in ICO rating websites?

[Tarion]

I do not see the point in rating websites, because they are offering a paid promotion to all projects. The more you pay, the better rating you are going to get, so yes I would definitely participate in a project that is not listed on rating websites if it is legit.

[dat.ho12492]

I do not see the point in rating websites, because they are offering a paid promotion to all projects. The more you pay, the better rating you are going to get, so yes I would definitely participate in a project that is not listed on rating websites if it is legit.

it's up to you to join the campaign project from the aspect you are judging. but what you say is true, the website doesn't really assess the project in a color perspective. they are paid like an advertising service.

Most people say that review sites are paid to advertise projects, although I don't know if this is real or fake but if everything is really fair, people don't need to complain but the truth and too many complaints proved that these review sites are having problems, so if I am a person who has read a lot about discussions about the fairness of these websites, I will certainly still participate in a good project even if it is not appreciated. Because our comments and searches will be more accurate, others' assessments are very objective and not detailed

[Karlinz]

The ICO experience of 2017/2018 have made a lot of persons wiser, personally I have suspended from investing in ICO's due to some ugly experiences and would rather buy when already listed on exchanges, Of course, certain ICO certain validations from ICO rating sites go a long way to give the hype and some details about a particular project but it does not determine how successful it would be, infact recently I have discovered that it is not those that have had so much publicity and ratings that eventually end up being very successful

[Coyster]

Whether the project is on such rating or not, I personally would not invest in any. ICOs in the last year has been a complete failure and mere ratings isn't going to change anything, scammers have infiltrated the ICO makets and finding a good project is quite an uphill task.

And to think if it, most websites give distorted and fake ratings, as they are paid to do so, I cannot put my money into an ICO simply cos one website rates it good.
I only choose well established altcoins and put a little fraction of my fund into them.

[andra73]

For me personally the ICO rating website will be a consideration for me to participate in an ICO project. As you say, there are now lots of projects and it's hard to know which ones are good and not, so for me personally many factors are taken into consideration before I decide to participate in it, I need to observe and analyze some of the things that determine my decision later.

it depends on the website that released the project. most sites only come from ranking projects that pay them. it is indeed helpful, because one form of advertising is good and it shows if the developer is also serious about promoting.

[arimamib]

Nowadays there are many projects, it is not easy to judge on new project, good or not, some people think the ico rating websites may help to take your decision, others think this ICO rating websites provide fake rating due to new project can pay fees to this ICO websites and get high rating.
SO, If you find good project, is it important to you this new good project should be listed in ICO rating websites?

Appreciate your participation

For me personally the ICO rating website will be a consideration for me to participate in an ICO project. As you say, there are now lots of projects and it's hard to know which ones are good and not, so for me personally many factors are taken into consideration before I decide to participate in it, I need to observe and analyze some of the things that determine my decision later.

sites that provide a rating on ICO are indeed widely used to find some basic information about the ICO project. before registering I will usually analyze more deeply about the project. and for projects that are not registered on the site, maybe I personally will find it difficult to analyze. because i have to keep looking for some information before doing research

[Argoo]

Nowadays there are many projects, it is not easy to judge on new project, good or not, some people think the ico rating websites may help to take your decision, others think this ICO rating websites provide fake rating due to new project can pay fees to this ICO websites and get high rating.
SO, If you find good project, is it important to you this new good project should be listed in ICO rating websites?

Appreciate your participation

I almost never visit sites with ICO project ratings. I just rate them almost independently or make a decision taking into account the information that I receive here on the forum. Of course, I cannot say that my choice is always good, however, there will always be a part of unsuccessful and even fraudulent ICO projects that we will join. This should be optimistic.

[BitcoinPanther]

As for me, all the ICO I used to joined were listed to an ICO review, though the ratings has no effect for me on choosing a project to support. I would rather choose a project that is listed to a good review sites because this indicate that they are willing to give their details necessary for double checking of their authenticity and identity.

[goigiacmove]

As for me, all the ICO I used to joined were listed to an ICO review, though the ratings has no effect for me on choosing a project to support.

Ratings given by third party websites should only be used (if actually used) as additional information, and not an essential one, for investors. Personally, I do my own research, and make my own ratings first, scan my ratings, and research results many times. When I felt satisfied with what I finished, I will look at ratings from other sources, and find out which factors cause differences between mine and those ratings.

[OasisDre]

No I won't invest in any project that's not listed on ICO rating websites,new project should have enough to get listed on ICO rating websites and it doesnt mean that i rely on ICO rating websites to find good projects but it's a must

[waichi]

It depends actually. I do not literally depend on the ICO website for their ratings because it might be biased in some other ways, we never know. So if you want to invest your earned money, better to do your own homework. Search on your own and based your judgment only on yourself. But of course, ICO website helps us in ways they summarized all the ICOs and picked the best among the rest.

[Vaskiy]

There are websites that haven't got listed on these rating sites, but have good potential. Even with ICO rating website there are paid services. It is always good to go through the project details and do your own research before making an investment. Even much rated projects have failed, so making ones own decision seems to be better than following ICO rating websites. From my view those websites can be kept as a reference.

[Nihal6443]

This is a good question rating website loosing there reputation day by day they providing fake rating and the whole system is running on money.
and many people not recommend this kind of website but it is still a need to make presence on online platform that's why many good project also need to list there project. every investor should do research on the project like i always do research and mostly of time i invest in good project currently i found Moozicore this project is very good project and it full fill my expectation that i want from every project.

https://tokensale.moozicore.com/   

[magicrypto]

Nowadays there are many projects, it is not easy to judge on new project, good or not, some people think the ico rating websites may help to take your decision, others think this ICO rating websites provide fake rating due to new project can pay fees to this ICO websites and get high rating.
SO, If you find good project, is it important to you this new good project should be listed in ICO rating websites?

Appreciate your participation

Maybe some of the rating sites are providing fake rating, but not all, ICODrops trying to make an objective score and most of the projects are without any score on their website. Of course if project is good, it is not necessary rule to be listed on such websites, but in practice - if project is good it appears in all media immediately.

[goigiacmove]

At first i think it only rumour, but since a lot of people discuss it maybe it is right that ICO rating site give their ratings depends on how project pay them and not be independent. If me since first i never see ICO rating site and sometime look from it's bounty rewards.

That's it. And I would prefer to call those ratings as subjective ratings. Subjective because those ratings mostly given based on money paid to third-party rating websites, and not based on quality of projects. Such subjective ratings contain so many biases and should not be used as componental indicators to assess quality of projects.

[Kwansimaa]

Honestly talking I do not trust any ICO rating website, not now or ever will I do so. Most of these ico rating websites are more than scam websites and mostly post what the projects wants them to post and that has made their ratings not reliable or dependable for investing. So if the project is promising but not listed in any ico website, I will still participate.

[J1mb0]

Nowadays there are many projects, it is not easy to judge on new project, good or not, some people think the ico rating websites may help to take your decision, others think this ICO rating websites provide fake rating due to new project can pay fees to this ICO websites and get high rating.
SO, If you find good project, is it important to you this new good project should be listed in ICO rating websites?

Appreciate your participation

Yes, I am participating in Temtum project, When I am interested in this project and search for it on google. But there is no clear information, and I continue to join it. Until now this project has surpassed my expectations

[DmitFomin]

We all know that rating sites charge projects for placing them on their platform, but I doubt that they make an objective assessment of the projects that they placing. Therefore, I use rating sites only as an additional source of information about a project, but ratings have never been a decisive factor for me when choosing a project for investment.

[Denongels]

in fact, not all projects that don't have an ico rating are bad, but as a benchmark in my opinion, it's better to look for those who have ratings other than we can compare our analysis with people we can be more sure, but if you want to try that doesn't have a rating site as long as you are sure try it but very risky if the research you tried is wrong.

[FireBallex]

Few projects are listed on ICObench that you can't find on other ICOrating websites and that doesn't mean they are bad projects,what you need is getting better at doing research