Would you participate in new project if it is not listed in ICO rating websites?

[Kwansimaa]

Participation in new projects has nothing got to do with their rating on ico rating scale. Currently, only few investors even have time to consider rating from ico websites because most of these ico rating websites are not genuine and do not pot real ratings of new projects. I will participate in a new project if it is not listed on any ico rating website but legit based on my research.

[Chrystora123]

not all ICOs listed on ICO rating websites are promising and vice versa.  I will definitely participate in the new project even though it is not registered and get a good rating on the ICO rating website but the ICO project must be really interesting, the team is real, and the concept is very good.

sometimes ICO projects that keep on appearing make us like playing gambling, which we believe will be successful it turns out to be a failure and what we believe will fail it turns out to be a success 

[BitTraderCute]

in fact, not all projects that don't have an ico rating are bad, but as a benchmark in my opinion, it's better to look for those who have ratings other than we can compare our analysis with people we can be more sure, but if you want to try that doesn't have a rating site as long as you are sure try it but very risky if the research you tried is wrong.

projects that not rated in any ico site doesn't mean they have no good quality.usually they just not registered yet or maybe lazy to contact ico site admin.but so far almost all projects reviewed and rarely to see projects have no review, cause its very usefull to attract their investors.

[konflikkastil]

in my opinion it doesn't really matter but because now indeed new projects are becoming popular registered on several ICO sites so many do that, I see projects not because they have good ratings but I still see products, teams and communities on telegram

[Misshi]

ICO rating websites provides us the summary of every good ICO based on their perspective. Though they cannot cover all since there are many projects launching almost every day so they may overlook some good projects. And we never know maybe they are paid to have a high rate on a certain project. But before I invest in a project, one thing that I do is to look in ICO rating websites to have an idea which they gave higher ratings. That gives me a lesser time to find good projects.

[CuriousGeorge]

If the platform doesn't even list in the ico rating site is not a big problem as long as it was having a big community and i heard that a project like sero never get listed in various icorating site and icodrop is the only one that listed and it was making a huge profit for investors. Listed in a lot of ico rating site doesn't give a lot of guarantees if that platform will succeed.

[lumierre]

For me, checking other sites or reviews about the project is important to reduce chances of it being a scam or bad project. I would personally check a number of things to somehow make me sure of joining a campaign.

I have the same position. These sites that publish information about the project rating exist for a long time, and many of them have proved that they are trusted resources. Therefore, I would stay away from the projects that are not mentioned and rated there, or if their rating is very low. It will be too risky to lose hundreds believing that you can finally earn thousands.

[Kwansimaa]

participation in a new project has got nothing really to do with listing on an ICO rating website. Even though that can be a source or add up to your research being done on the particular project but most importantly, participation in a bounty is based on a vivid research of many factors and I will participate in a new project if it is not listed but my research proves me right to participate.

[umbara ardian]

Maybe no. Because if that project is good and there are many investors, it will definitely be listed on the ICO ranking site. I will never risk my money to invest in those projects

[spydee1522]

i will participate in a new project if it is not listed in any ICO rating website because I personally do not trust any ico rating website again since I just heard a rumor some projects pay these websites for high ratings. Participation in a new ico project is about what I have researched about the project and come out with and also the team behind it not purposely whether it is listed or not on any ico rating website.

[Chemcrier]

I have invested in some projects that are not listed in any ICO websites this is basically because some of those projects do not even have an ICO website to begin with, these doesn't mean that they are not cool... Just do your due diligence on every investment opportunity.

[SquallLeonhart]

I have invested in some projects that are not listed in any ICO websites this is basically because some of those projects do not even have an ICO website to begin with, these doesn't mean that they are not cool... Just do your due diligence on every investment opportunity.

There are so many great projects that has been performing well ever since they were invented and never for once listed on these ICO rating sites that I don’t trust that much, iCO rating site too does not have any special technique that they use other than the research they make like you and I while we have some other sites that will take money from projects for them to be listed.

The success of our project investment is in our hands, we are the one to decide if we want a very good project or not and not rating sites, we just have to do like every one of them does, like Binance does too in selecting their IEO projects, they make a very solid research first on the project and the team before accepting to promote whatever is of them if we can also do this, then we are good to go.

[toydoll]

Nowadays there are many projects, it is not easy to judge on new project, good or not, some people think the ico rating websites may help to take your decision, others think this ICO rating websites provide fake rating due to new project can pay fees to this ICO websites and get high rating.
SO, If you find good project, is it important to you this new good project should be listed in ICO rating websites?

To be honest,for me it is absolutely not important,when choosing a project, I try to look at other things that characterize the project.

[Menawi12]

Nowadays there are many projects, it is not easy to judge on new project, good or not, some people think the ico rating websites may help to take your decision, others think this ICO rating websites provide fake rating due to new project can pay fees to this ICO websites and get high rating.
SO, If you find good project, is it important to you this new good project should be listed in ICO rating websites?

Appreciate your participation

Even though a project is reviewed by a rating website, in the end we will still do our own research. Projects that are not listed on the website do not mean that they are not good, they may not be known by reviewers. As good as any rating on a website, it only becomes our second opinion and not a reference for us to invest

[jyotianand01]

We cannot fully rely on ICO rating websites as some ratings are manipulated as these are given by taking money from ICO companies. We have to do our own research before joining any ICO as listing on ICO rating site is not a guarantee of  any type.

[judeafante]

Nowadays there are many projects, it is not easy to judge on new project, good or not, some people think the ico rating websites may help to take your decision, others think this ICO rating websites provide fake rating due to new project can pay fees to this ICO websites and get high rating.
SO, If you find good project, is it important to you this new good project should be listed in ICO rating websites?

Appreciate your participation

I don't even recommend ICO to list their coin in ICO rating, they should just concentrate on bounty hunting and building their community, it's costly to list in ICO rating sites, but building your community and communicating with them is not.

After reading about one report on ICOBENCH I stopped looking on ICObench.

[dzhan]

I can't rely only on ICO rating sites to judge the project, I check these ranking websites, but I first do my own careful research about the project before making the decision of participating in its bounty campaigns (or even investing in the ICO/IEO). The ICO rating sites are only a helpful factor, after you make your own research.

[senin]

I very rarely visit ICO rating sites because I don’t really trust them. I look through new projects myself and decide whether or not to participate in their ICO bounty campaigns. I developed my own criteria for participation, according to which I work. Rating sites are sometimes worth reading for a general idea of projects, but I am not completely guided by their opinions. They do not reflect the real situation in this market.

[ALLAH 1]

I always check projects on such sites, for me it is very important! but not to all sites need to believe, I dissapointed in ICObench

[gundala]

Registered on ICO rating websites is not a guarantee that ICO will succeed but of course, it would be better if the project was listed on ICO rating websites. But for me, it all depends on their vision and mission, if their vision and mission are good then I will participate.

Because ICO website rating is not the main parameter of project success. I used to believe in ICO rating, but after several failures due to being fooled by high ratings but it turned out to be a scam, like Hashcards, Myriads, etc., finally, I decided to not stick to ICO rating website again. I prioritize independent analysis and consult with more experienced friends.