Would you participate in new project if it is not listed in ICO rating websites?

[Wipangga]

in my opinion, I will invest in the ICO project that I am taking part in, because they are also provided in a good exchange, so I think that is also a good way to hold it in the long run.

[ALLAH 1]

You won't see ICOs not being listed in any of these ICO review sites as long as they have ANN here. These rating sites will "review" them for free and give them low to average scores. They then go to these ICO telegrams and post something like "Hello, your ICO has been listed at xxxxxxx.com". With that being said, I would not really much on these rates when planning to invest.

[Mulann2]

ico rating sites has no influence on the overall success of a project, i know some people place much value to ratings and that gives them a bit of assurance to support the project,
i have personally ask this question on a project i found interesting in their telegram and the admin told me only their work will speak not some fake review and ratings, and true to his words the project did exceptionally well.

[aditasetia123]

ico rating not fully true about their analisys to some projects.we know they could be paid if we want to get high rating in their site.the projects successfull depend on their own team,if they could deliver and build good product to market ofcourse investors will happy to hold their token / coin and even could add their stock again.personally ico rate didn't give significant influence to me.i am prefer to use my own analisys and feeling.

[Kwansimaa]

Participation in a new project on my side has got nothing to do with listing on Ico rating websites with reasons been that, there are a lot of projects that these Ico rating sites rated high and at the end of it all came out as scam projects. Why would you then trust such a rating website if they come out again with ratings on new projects. Do your own research and decide whether to promote the project or not.

[odukoyaewatomi27]

I participate in projects based on my own opinion and research about the project and don't really consider the opinion of ico rating websites.
And this is because most of these ICOs website are not that trustworthy and their rating are often influenced by money.

[Duzter]

More websites were into usage to give ratings and review the ICO'S and new projects that are getting added to the cryptocurrency network. Same as that of the paid service to list tokens and altcoins to the exchanges now ico rating websites have paid services to rate the projects. This way there are more and more possibilities for low grade projects get good ratings. Better is to analyze and do the investment.

[gunhell16]

2016 and 2017 ICO rating website is a big deal to any project doing an ICO!
But these years? who cares about that RATING SITE? it is a PAID ICO RATING WEBSITE now!
The bigger the amount you will pay the better the rate you will get, and it is not new! many people already know that!

[jacafbiz]

With the recent SEC release about ICO rating, this just shows that most if not all these rating websites can't give one an objective analysis. Ho many projects on these rating websites that has high rating ended being a scam, many. This is my advice to you, do you own research, I don't know what would be given to BTC in 2009 by these rating websites because nobody would give them money

[MaiQwaN]

Either now no good projects are conducting their ICO, or rating sites do not notice any good projects. There is absolutely nothing to choose.

[Mila52]

After analyzed the project, I always make the decision myself. Even if these are unsuccessful investments, I will answer for this myself without blaming others for this.

[laskybok]

I do not need ICO rating sites to approve and list a project, most especially these days that so many of them cannot be trusted. They are just there to make publicity, which I now feel that is what they are meant for.
I have seen a lot of such projects, that succeeded tremendously, without listing on such sites.

[spydee1522]

Many have participated in several projects that were not listed in ico rating websites but yet benefited from promotion the project since the project succeeded. The success of any project is not limited to the rate it gets from these ico rating websites and this makes up my decision to participate in any project even if it is not listed on any ICO rating website.

[retnocintaku]

Nowadays there are many projects, it is not easy to judge on new project, good or not, some people think the ico rating websites may help to take your decision, others think this ICO rating websites provide fake rating due to new project can pay fees to this ICO websites and get high rating.
SO, If you find good project, is it important to you this new good project should be listed in ICO rating websites?

Appreciate your participation

Not all ICO and IEO projects present at ICO ranking sites can be successful. I often check the ICO rankings, in the ranking list of those projects getting good grades. After I checked directly into the project site does not correspond to that in the ICO rankings. We should directly review the project and do some research and so we can certainly get great results.

[DU18]

I will not invest in a project, if the project has some discrepancies both from the team, Roadmap, website or their social media, we know that investing in an ico or ieo has a high enough risk, so, we really need some references about how the project.
And currently many sites are indeed reviewing an ongoing ico or ieo, but it all depends on ourselves in determining the choice to invest or not in an ico or ieo  project.

[drumamat]

One of the first actions that I take after making a decision about investing is checking the project on all rating sites.Then I make my own analysis.Maybe someone is either deceiving or adding an estimate to the project, but they can’t lie absolutely everything.Right? The average denominator still exists.

[dongosquad]

I do not make ICO rating website as a reference to join IEO / ICO even bounty. I have had a bad experience with ICO rating, I was stuck with a scam even though the project has an almost perfect rating since then I ignored the ICO rating. I am more interested if the advertisement of the project appears on several large influential websites such as coinmarketcap. I also joined one of the trusted channels that provide reviews on IEO and ICO for investment, I think that's better.

[Gi01]

This will only depend on the basic purpose of this new project in the crypto ecosystem and how relevant the project will be to the entire world's ecosystem. Once this project has these characteristics, I will surely invest in even though it is not listed on any ICO rating website. With these characteristics, it will definitely make it on an ICO rating website.  With such projects, you are definitely assured of them having a mass adoption in no time.

[poodle63]

I used only a reliable crypto rating site and i never try to believe any other crap rating site just like icobench and icorating and both are total bullshit. I will participate in ico which was listed in my reliable ico rating site based on how much successful project that already listed in in that site.
Only a few sites that can be marked as good sites and so far more than 90% ico rating sites are craps and can't be trusted.

[Kwansimaa]

My participation in new projects has got nothing to do with whether it has been listed on any ico rating websites or not. These ICO rating sites are not trustworthy in the sense that some even rate scam projects higher on the rating scale and these projects at last are revealed or considered scam projects. I do my own research and take a decision to whether participate or not but not considering whether listed or not on these ico rating websites.