Would you participate in new project if it is not listed in ICO rating websites?

[DabsPoorVersion]

In my experience, ICO rating does not affect anything even if a project gets a good rate there. Because they only judge in terms of time, I mean, the assessment is done only at that time and not for the future. Many ICOs that I followed through the advice of the ICO rating but the fact that when the coin was launched and entered the exchange, it did not give me an advantage for the purchase of their coins at ICO. In fact, if I Hold the coin, a big loss instead. I'm done with ICOs.

Ico reviews coming from such sites are not liable anymore, most of the time they are just getting paid to promote a project which we cant guarantee to be legit. Its actually better to make a research by yourself and use the site only if we need some basement when choosing a project. But I cant consider to follow everything what they said.

[Aabcde]

In my experience, ICO rating does not affect anything even if a project gets a good rate there. Because they only judge in terms of time, I mean, the assessment is done only at that time and not for the future. Many ICOs that I followed through the advice of the ICO rating but the fact that when the coin was launched and entered the exchange, it did not give me an advantage for the purchase of their coins at ICO. In fact, if I Hold the coin, a big loss instead. I'm done with ICOs.

Ico reviews coming from such sites are not liable anymore, most of the time they are just getting paid to promote a project which we cant guarantee to be legit. Its actually better to make a research by yourself and use the site only if we need some basement when choosing a project. But I cant consider to follow everything what they said.

Yeah, That's right. Sometimes we are too consumed with hype, so we ignore the research we have gone through for a project. Personally, I no longer want to do research to see which ICO is good or not, because I have enough with ICO. I only buy top 10 coins according to Coinmarketcap. It the best I can do to keep my money safe.

[cutesgirl]

Some time yes some time not, if I check many investor joined at some IEO or ICO I will join without care how rating trust on website? Its no more important without checking how much their coin sold to the public on pre sale or main sale, looking with their planning is according of road map or not,

[Sithara007]

I think that there is no need to trust anyone and sites. Only yourself and verified information. It is better to study the project, documents and technical side well than to trust the rating from the site. I'm sure these ratings are easy to buy.

While investing in any IEO or ICO, you are actually trusting the team members. You expect them to honor the promises and the commitments they made, and you hope that they will finish the various stages of development work within the timelines that they have specified. If you don't trust these people, then you won't be investing in these projects.

Now it is not very easy to study the hundreds of ICO projects out there and select two or three for investment. Because doing research on them takes a lot of time and effort. And that is where the ICO review sites comes handy. They do the research for you and hand pick a few of the good projects for you. But you need to do some of your own research, before finalizing on a particular project.

[Zeke_23]

In my experience, ICO rating does not affect anything even if a project gets a good rate there. Because they only judge in terms of time, I mean, the assessment is done only at that time and not for the future. Many ICOs that I followed through the advice of the ICO rating but the fact that when the coin was launched and entered the exchange, it did not give me an advantage for the purchase of their coins at ICO. In fact, if I Hold the coin, a big loss instead. I'm done with ICOs.

Ico reviews coming from such sites are not liable anymore, most of the time they are just getting paid to promote a project which we cant guarantee to be legit. Its actually better to make a research by yourself and use the site only if we need some basement when choosing a project. But I cant consider to follow everything what they said.

Yeah, That's right. Sometimes we are too consumed with hype, so we ignore the research we have gone through for a project. Personally, I no longer want to do research to see which ICO is good or not, because I have enough with ICO. I only buy top 10 coins according to Coinmarketcap. It the best I can do to keep my money safe.

It is a wise decision to go for developed coins or those crypto which is already circulating in the market than investing in ICO's. In ICO's there's no guarantee that your money will make a profit since most of the projects are scam. If you invest it in a popular crypto such as ETH or so on, you have the better chance to make a profit out of your investments.

[Aabcde]

In my experience, ICO rating does not affect anything even if a project gets a good rate there. Because they only judge in terms of time, I mean, the assessment is done only at that time and not for the future. Many ICOs that I followed through the advice of the ICO rating but the fact that when the coin was launched and entered the exchange, it did not give me an advantage for the purchase of their coins at ICO. In fact, if I Hold the coin, a big loss instead. I'm done with ICOs.

Ico reviews coming from such sites are not liable anymore, most of the time they are just getting paid to promote a project which we cant guarantee to be legit. Its actually better to make a research by yourself and use the site only if we need some basement when choosing a project. But I cant consider to follow everything what they said.

Yeah, That's right. Sometimes we are too consumed with hype, so we ignore the research we have gone through for a project. Personally, I no longer want to do research to see which ICO is good or not, because I have enough with ICO. I only buy top 10 coins according to Coinmarketcap. It the best I can do to keep my money safe.

It is a wise decision to go for developed coins or those crypto which is already circulating in the market than investing in ICO's. In ICO's there's no guarantee that your money will make a profit since most of the projects are scam. If you invest it in a popular crypto such as ETH or so on, you have the better chance to make a profit out of your investments.

Yes, I think it should be like that. Because what we use in investment is personal money that might one day be used for urgent needs. Like the cost of living, children, electricity, hospitality, or others. So it's better to put it in the right place rather than put it in a place that we don't know yet. Putting money in ICO is like turning the palm of the hand. The ratio is 50:50 between loss and profit.

[Argoo]

Recently, I have looked little at rating sites regarding the assessment of the prospects of ICO projects there. I choose the ICO at my discretion. First of all, I’m already looking at what the ICO team will do and whether there is a real product. I look more at practical projects, even if they do not promise high profits from their tokens and have a small pool. In ICO bounty campaigns, I now regard the promise of high earnings as a sign of fraud. In the current state of the altcoin market, big earnings are now impossible.

[Williams_Leo]

i prioritize participating in projects that I think are potential and trusted. in my opinion project listing site is actually not neutral, not completely honest in making articles, even seen selling spot page,and sell rating,so it cannot be used as a benchmark,
great projects don't require excessive promotion. but their coin sale quickly sold out.

Agree, web sites evaluate or rank, they are the only people who receive money to do advertising, their honesty is relatively low, even a lot of people reflect on how accurate they are for projects, so if some of the projects aren't listed here, it might be a bad project but it could still be a project that doesn't spend money on advertising. And with the authenticity and research on this issue, we will know where is the project with potential, even if it is not listed, investing in it is still good, trust on one side will be wrong

[DaMut]

Agree, web sites evaluate or rank, they are the only people who receive money to do advertising, their honesty is relatively low, even a lot of people reflect on how accurate they are for projects, so if some of the projects aren't listed here, it might be a bad project but it could still be a project that doesn't spend money on advertising. And with the authenticity and research on this issue, we will know where is the project with potential, even if it is not listed, investing in it is still good, trust on one side will be wrong

Usually, those rating websites do not ask you any money to list your project on their site, but some of them will ask you money if you want to be rated as a good ICO on their website. Just like what happened with ICOBench so many times before. On the other hand, if any ICOs do not get listed on those rating websites.
it explains the project lacks popularity and the probability for the ICO to fail is high. Then it is not a good thing participating in this kind of project, because it is worse than choosing any ICO that is listed and get rated high on those exchanges.

[djselery]

Yes, sure, if the project looks legitimate and promising I would participate or even invest in the project, even if it is not listed in ICO rating websites. In fact, most of these websites are paid from the devs and their ranking isn't really trustworthy. I use to do my own research about the project before taking the decision of participating or investing.

[red4slash]

Yes, sure, if the project looks legitimate and promising I would participate or even invest in the project, even if it is not listed in ICO rating websites. In fact, most of these websites are paid from the devs and their ranking isn't really trustworthy. I use to do my own research about the project before taking the decision of participating or investing.

as bounty participants / investors must have their own research and not just trust a site because it can be detrimental. as you said that some projects pay to get a good rating but experienced people will usually not easily believe the research and rating results of a site

[concnepornurage]

These rating sites mean nothing. The rating there will be such for which they will pay. Therefore, take similar information. for the criterion for investing, I would not. I myself am looking for coins in which I invest my money. The other day I found a new YUSRA GLOBAL coin (https://yusra.global) with a POS-mine. Now mining has just started and you can earn up to 30% per month. Really cool profit!

[cutesgirl]

I joined many bounty campaign and always check how trusting the ICO on rating website, have reached good rating ICO or not before join and doing the bounty campaign task, rating website give me other information for an ICO to know good or not about their product and how many respond from investors.

[leea-1334]

i prioritize participating in projects that I think are potential and trusted. in my opinion project listing site is actually not neutral, not completely honest in making articles, even seen selling spot page,and sell rating,so it cannot be used as a benchmark,
great projects don't require excessive promotion. but their coin sale quickly sold out.

Of course project listing is not neutral, not these days anymore. Back in the old days projects were listed because they were popular and exchanges recognize that they were gaining traction.

Now it is all about bounties and fees. Exchanges are the ultimate bounty hunters now, even bigger than ICO rating websites!

[dcomomal]

A listing on ICO rating website, does not guarantee any success. On the contrary, usually the best rated projects are very likely to fail after the token sales. Sharpay ICO was the most rated ICO on ICOBench in their history with over 50 ratings of 4,9 stars. Right now, this coin is dead

[spngebob]

If project is good and they have strong and experienced team why not, but so far I didn't see new project which has not been listed there. ICO rating sites and their ratings are only opinions by people who think they are experts and many times money talks. Investor should use ICO rating sites to find new projects, not to use it as investment guidelines.

[Redemption59]

gone were the days that ICO rating websites were found of doing great and amazing but not this current crypto world where these rating websites receive money before they do their work giving out poor rating values to deceive investors and traders. For me, I will definitely participate in a new project if not listed on any ico rating website.

[HabiebRiziq]

Nowadays there are many projects, it is not easy to judge on new project, good or not, some people think the ico rating websites may help to take your decision, others think this ICO rating websites provide fake rating due to new project can pay fees to this ICO websites and get high rating.
SO, If you find good project, is it important to you this new good project should be listed in ICO rating websites?

Appreciate your participation

I think everyone has their own way of choosing a project before participating in it, some people make the ICO rating a good or bad consideration for the ICO project, but it is true that you say sometimes there is a fake ICO rating. For me personally, this can sometimes be taken into consideration but I also make observations on the project that was brought and the team behind it to make decisions later.

[Bitfling]

gone were the days that ICO rating websites were found of doing great and amazing but not this current crypto world where these rating websites receive money before they do their work giving out poor rating values to deceive investors and traders. For me, I will definitely participate in a new project if not listed on any ico rating website.

It is common knowledge that rating websites receive payment for good ratings. A new project that is not on the website rating does not mean that the project is bad, maybe because of a small marketing budget that cannot pay the website rating. Many factors of a project are feasible as an investment tool and in my opinion cannot be assessed simply because they are not listed on the website's rating

[kayvie]

Nowadays there are many projects, it is not easy to judge on new project, good or not, some people think the ico rating websites may help to take your decision, others think this ICO rating websites provide fake rating due to new project can pay fees to this ICO websites and get high rating.
SO, If you find good project, is it important to you this new good project should be listed in ICO rating websites?

Appreciate your participation

I think everyone has their own way of choosing a project before participating in it, some people make the ICO rating a good or bad consideration for the ICO project, but it is true that you say sometimes there is a fake ICO rating. For me personally, this can sometimes be taken into consideration but I also make observations on the project that was brought and the team behind it to make decisions later.

Yes, and ico rating in websites does not guarantee the success of an ico. Most of them are still failing and being a scam project in the end.
The legitimacy of the project is still in the hands of its developers, ico ratings are just being paid to advertise the new launch project.
We should not use it as a basement to choose a project whether it is legit or not.