Would you participate in new project if it is not listed in ICO rating websites?

[Innocant]

Well i would be participate in the new project if the project was trusted and have some good future on it.
As of now ill think it was only few of projects are totally trusted to participate, Because in this year their are to many scam project and the platform are all the same if we look at it.

[r_delossa]

Not all of those websites deserve your trust, for example the most promoted projects on ICOBench are very likely to fail to meet their soft cap. On the other hand, the most reviews from ICOdrops seem very informative and help to understand the project better. Only my opinion 

[BeginToMine]

Of course, have participated in a lot of ICOs that are not listed on any ico rating site, meanwhile most of the ico rating sites are not to be trusted, i usually do my due diligence before I invest in any project I can't even trust those sites anyway.

[riyadmozu19]

I have never followed ICO rating websites yet before joining in a bounty campaign. Every ICO rating website are fake they don't use google ad or ay other ads so how they able to make money? They take money from ico project owner to give high rating on their project.

[RDNX]

Yeah, I think it's important for the ICO project should be listed on ICO rating websites.
The concept is simple, if the Project got a high score, then many investors will try to invest in it.

[dirgayeah]

Over time, we can do our own analysis for some project (ICO). I will be good on future or not. If some project listed in famous ico rating website can be a good value but for ensuring the future of that project absolutely not. And how about your perspective. Did you really care about project vision and mission? or just taking opportunities for profit. 😊

[Sithara007]

As if investing in an ICO with multiple reviews is not risky enough. 

For the past 1-2 years, I am staying away from the ICOs. The reason is that no matter whatever precautions we take, it is not possible to separate the scam ICOs from the good ones. The scammers have got very innovative now. They are spending a lot of money in building websites, social media channels and white papers. Even if you spend a lot of time in studying the project, the chances are that you will not get any hint to prove that it is a scam project. And if independent third party reviews are not available for the project, then the task becomes even more difficult.

[tenakha]

I joined many bounty campaign and always check how trusting the ICO on rating website, have reached good rating ICO or not before join and doing the bounty campaign task, rating website give me other information for an ICO to know good or not about their product and how many respond from investors.

You need to think about it again. Do not rely on ICOrating sites to find out whether the project is good or bad. It is good for information about projects and a safe transition to the site, but their reviews about projects are not real. I even saw that they gave 8 stars to scam project. After someone mocked them, the coin was removed from the list.

[crypoco]

Only if i can be sure it is good project, or the project is IEO, i think i can participate.

[Ferris419]

Those days are over now when people invested by seeing high ratings from the Icobench, Icodrop or other ICO rating websites! No one cares about ICO rating anymore. Because Ico ratings all are a lie, the even gave high rating to the scam projects. Icobench gave very negative ratings to the Tokoin and SERO project but they gave one of the highest ROI of the year when Icobench gave 4 ratings to the Neluns, who are claimed 112 million USD in the bear market!

Just do your vigilance, research as much as you can! Verify a project's whitepaper, products, most important partners, media news and community activities! If a project passed these circumstances, you may invest there. Use icobench or other ico rating websites only to find the latest project information.

[Aabcde]

In my experience, ICO rating does not affect anything even if a project gets a good rate there. Because they only judge in terms of time, I mean, the assessment is done only at that time and not for the future. Many ICOs that I followed through the advice of the ICO rating but the fact that when the coin was launched and entered the exchange, it did not give me an advantage for the purchase of their coins at ICO. In fact, if I Hold the coin, a big loss instead. I'm done with ICOs.

Ico reviews coming from such sites are not liable anymore, most of the time they are just getting paid to promote a project which we cant guarantee to be legit. Its actually better to make a research by yourself and use the site only if we need some basement when choosing a project. But I cant consider to follow everything what they said.

Yeah, That's right. Sometimes we are too consumed with hype, so we ignore the research we have gone through for a project. Personally, I no longer want to do research to see which ICO is good or not, because I have enough with ICO. I only buy top 10 coins according to Coinmarketcap. It the best I can do to keep my money safe.

Yes indeed, we cannot be fooled by such developers anymore. besides that, I have saved several coins as portfolios including ETH, XLM, ADA, and XRP. Bitcoin too of course. I don't want ICO and IEO either, I will never follow it again. it's better to put money in a clear place.

[Twinkledoe]

In my experience, ICO rating does not affect anything even if a project gets a good rate there. Because they only judge in terms of time, I mean, the assessment is done only at that time and not for the future. Many ICOs that I followed through the advice of the ICO rating but the fact that when the coin was launched and entered the exchange, it did not give me an advantage for the purchase of their coins at ICO. In fact, if I Hold the coin, a big loss instead. I'm done with ICOs.

Ico reviews coming from such sites are not liable anymore, most of the time they are just getting paid to promote a project which we cant guarantee to be legit. Its actually better to make a research by yourself and use the site only if we need some basement when choosing a project. But I cant consider to follow everything what they said.

Yeah, That's right. Sometimes we are too consumed with hype, so we ignore the research we have gone through for a project. Personally, I no longer want to do research to see which ICO is good or not, because I have enough with ICO. I only buy top 10 coins according to Coinmarketcap. It the best I can do to keep my money safe.

Yes indeed, we cannot be fooled by such developers anymore. besides that, I have saved several coins as portfolios including ETH, XLM, ADA, and XRP. Bitcoin too of course. I don't want ICO and IEO either, I will never follow it again. it's better to put money in a clear place.

I guess that is a smart decision after all the hullabaloo in ICOs and IEOs. You can't really trust people in cyberspace. You will find that only few people have their genuine intentions. And most of these projects listed in ICO rating websites are paid. So how can you trust a paid service?

[zeze18]

Nowadays there are many projects, it is not easy to judge on new project, good or not, some people think the ico rating websites may help to take your decision, others think this ICO rating websites provide fake rating due to new project can pay fees to this ICO websites and get high rating.
SO, If you find good project, is it important to you this new good project should be listed in ICO rating websites?

Appreciate your participation

I would if.. the hype of the project is high. The telegram group has high participant and all of them are active. Also if the team members are experienced so they don't have to pay ICO rating websites to list them because they're famous enough to advertise theirself.

[Fappanu]

Nowadays there are many projects, it is not easy to judge on new project, good or not, some people think the ico rating websites may help to take your decision, others think this ICO rating websites provide fake rating due to new project can pay fees to this ICO websites and get high rating.
SO, If you find good project, is it important to you this new good project should be listed in ICO rating websites?

Appreciate your participation

Such ICOs today are beyond credible and this is probably a scam! These are fake and they only provide fake ratings to get people to invest in their ICO. It is now unbelievable so we better know what a legit ICO is and let's not rely on such fake websites.

[masterrex]

If the project that conducting and ICO was legitimate then why not? At first when i use to invest in some ICO's before in 2018 precisely! I'm not consider to look on any ICO rating site, Since those ICO rating sites are just after the money thats why its not reliable at all. I was remember when one of the project that i was invested turn into a scam despite the truth that it has earned a good rating on the most ICO listing site how ironic!

[d3nz]

I would not recommend participating on project that is listed on ICO websites since some of them are scam and promoting just to make money and those are paid listing.

And it would be much better to check and analyze it by yourself and if its legit. Some of the whitepaper, technical paper, overview and token/coin code are just a copy-cat from another project and also creating a fake linkedIn account for the team.

[shoreno]

yes why not ? if i sense that they are legit i wont hesitate to jump imediately before its too late and start regretting at the end  .  ico rating websites are not the basis of the success or the failure of the ico and also there are lots of them so not all will list every project  . other have a requirements before listing  .but whats obvious is that every ico project will always have thier own ann thread on this forum , if not then they are considered shady and i wont trust them

[carriebee]

We don't need to depend in rating reviews site because not all reviews is fair much better to make your own review and research. Maybe ratings of review site is helpful but not all will give exact details about the project. There's some project is good and not listed in review site but look at them they growing and proving their project/product is good, we as a community will be decide in the end.

[armanhusni]

if i find a good project then i will definitely join it because a good project will give a big profit.. the ICO web rating does indeed influence the judgment to determine whether a project is good or not, and even if the project that I see is good is not listed on the ICO rate website then I will still join it .. because the ICO rating website cannot guarantee the success of a project will be successful or not..

[DeathProxy]

Yes off course. To start with ICO rating website prediction and rating of ICO project are now reliable and influential to the success of crypto project.  Reason because most Ico rating site collect funds from project to give them high rating not minding if the project its top notch or not. So the judgment of the present Ico rating sites are not to be taken seriously when investing in an IEO or ICO.  Ad an investor take out time to research on your own and see if the ICO or IEO meets your standards and requirement before investing in it.