IS there any ICO rating websites we can trust.

[TastyChillySauce00]

Seriously speaking,I do not have any ico rating website in mind that I consider trustworthy, they are of less importance personally off late. I do not trust any because there is no fair in what they publish, some projects pays to be ranked higher. We have seen several projects with a rating scale of 4.8 but still ended up as scam. do your research well and never trust any ico rating website.

Yeah, I usually used them only to find some project that I didn't know of before. They tend to be listed there despite the biased rating and scoring that kinda helps a little. Also, regardless the rating, still, if a project is not listed there that'd be even more shady so even just exist there will adds some kind of legitimacy in the eyes of people.

[BennyK]

Of late, it is very hard to trust these ICO or IEO rating sites because it appears most of them are just in to make money without much concern about the authenticity and capabilities of the project. The ICO or IEO rating sites are now paid by the projects in order to get listed.

[localcrypto]

I personally trust ico rating website https://icorating.com/ and https://tokenmarket.net/ both these websites provide ico rating analysis we can trust

[lobo13hf]

you should not rely the ICO rating websites most these are fake and those ICO got a perfect rating it doesn't mean they will succeed in the future and some of them are scam, better DYOR of their project.

I can count the reliable ico rating site with my hand and almost all of them are scam sites that getting paid to be listed by the scam icos. the reliable site has been driven by the community.
icodrop is the only one that can be considered as a reliable site and no more for another site.

[adibi12]

I don't really depend on the team's seriousness in running the project, because we can see on their website and see the identity of the team, a roadmap that makes sense to us, we also need to do some other research such as who is a trusted bounty manager, which is usually a bounty manager trusted to know which projects are good or not.

[killat]

That's a great question,  but unfortunately the answer is NO.

There were a few legit websites before (Icorating, Icodrops..) that were posting good ICOs, but nowadays these websites are full of worthless projects that don't deserve to waste your time on.

[guydin]

I think No, there is no trusted ICO rating websites. We have to be able to analyze by ourselves which is a good ICO by looking at the Whitepaper, Team and roadmap that will be executed in the future. Do not directly believe to provider ICO rating websites.

we  must compare our self analisys with rating site analisys.which is will give better result.personally i am prefer to use my own analisys based on experience working on bounty campaign.and its helpfull and work well.

Yes, it is the best variant. Nevertheless, you need to know these sites to check them and to compare your point of view with the rating of the ICO given by these sites.
ICOdrops is a very good resource as for me - it has been working for long and I trust it. Foundico is also cool - it updates the rating every hour, and everything is done automatically. No ICO can buy the top place here, and it is very important.

[Tarion]

The only website that I am using to track information about upcoming and ongoing project is icodrops, and as far as I know there is no rating system, just the level of hype that is showed there. On almost all other websites, you need to pay to be listed there, so you cannot expect a constructive review.

[DDante]

You can't trust ICO rating websites just use them to know any upcoming IEO project you can invest in or help promote through bounty that's all

[rdewilde]

To be frank, I find it hard trusting any ICO rating platform whatsoever because they can easily be manipulated into giving projects goo rating. I think the best rating is the one we do ourselves where we carry out our own research thus knowing if a project is worth it or not.

[CuriousGeorge]

There is and it's icodrop and so far i never feel bad with this one because icodrop was doing a lot of research to the platform from the team, whitepaper, vision and the product or minimum viable product.
So far almost more than 90% of icos were listed in icodrops are successfully ended with a lot of demand.

[sheenaedago]

Ico ratings isn't trustable because of it can be manipulated by the owner of specific ico projects. Most developers will pay enough amount of money to make their project popular through ico ratings. If we want to determine trusted project associated with an ICO, do your personal scrutiny on the project website and telegram community.

[BennyK]

Well, I don not follow ICO rating sites to choose an ICO because most of these sites are in to make profit hence ICOs can pay them to get listed on their site. Performing personal researches on the project especially paying attention to the team members and their expertise, the road map and how the team intends to execute it, the product of the project and how capable it is to attract investors are but the few things I look out for.

[libert19]

Perhaps not. These website ratings can be bought easily, only depend on your own research that's the safest bet you can make.

[DoraNile]

dont rely on ICO RATING WEBSITES without doing your own researchs on the ico projects,i use ICObench because of advisors rating on their websites,many advisors can rate peojects and drop their point of view on the projects as well

[Flor1982]

I think ICO rating sites can be bought and can be manipulated in order to attract more people to invest as after the ICO campaign ended i observed that there are other projects that the team never show up anymore and abandon their projects therefore i suggest that do not trust the project based on ICO rating only.

[khiholangkang]

This is a list of ICO rating websites that can be trusted in my view

• https://cryptodiffer.com/
• https://icodrops.com/
• http://icoanalytics.org/

Only that website that I currently use to find out whether a project is good or not

[mdenys]

Personally,I don't have any trust to any of existing Ico rating sites , all of them are greedy scammers
publishing pre-paid fake ratings of endless shitty projects.

[killerfrost]

Until now, I only trust ICODROP. This is the most popular and honest ICO review site to date. I often monitor ICOs that are often listed here and make investment decisions

[Kwansimaa]

The very main purpose of ico rating websites was to help investors make or take conclusive decisions on their investment but currently, I know only few investors even have time to check ico ratings because most of these ico rating websites have been tag with posting of fake ratings about some projects of which at the long round some even turns out to be cam projects.