Do you think advisors help new projects?

[darewaller]

Depends on the quality of the adviser. If you can get Vitalik as your adviser then of course its going to help with a new project, he will be able to give you a lot of insights on crypto and help your project out plus it would create a big advertisement opportunity as he is your adviser and he wouldn't pick your coin to help out if he didn't believe it but he has no time to run it all by himself so he is just advising. That would actually cause your new coin to get funded in 10 seconds.

However, of course not all can get a good adviser like Vitalik so when it comes down to literally a person only 100 people may know or basically only his own circle knows, a dude from totally different nation who has nothing to do with him will not care about seeing him as the adviser. You may be the CEO of your bank if you want but as long as its local, dude from china will not know the CEO of German bank which means its useless.

[Xclusive5]

I think this is a Yes and No question. It is yes because some projects have flourish in the past with the help of advisors and it is NO because some advisor are not relevant to some project and they only receive coin without contributing any meaningful thing to the project. This issue of adviser depend largely on the choice of the project management itself. If wrong advisors were chosen then they won't help the project buy if the right ones were chosen then it will make the project flourish.

[CryptoAlphaStar]

I think most of the advisors do nothing. They are just getting paid, so their name and reputation can be used.
I think they do research the project that they agree to be associated with, but they rarely do any contribution.

[Drai]

I do not think advisors really helps projects at all, people have woken up to the fact that most advisors for project are just doing it for the financial gain and this has made people not even check the advisory team when considering the projects they want to invest in.  Most of these advisors do not contribute positively to the project, they are just added there to look good and make the project seem more credible.

[funcryptoco]

I think advisors with past successful projects help new projects very well by give the new projects trust, only if this advisors did not participate before in previous scam projects.
So i will look to advisors first.

[Neovitadi]

We see every day a new ICO project launch, but it is very hard to take the decision, the project may be a scam, or even this new projects  not a scam no guarantee the project will succeed, the question here do you think the advisors can help new projects to success, do you think the advisors give the new projects trust?
Note that there are many successful projects without any advisors.

The purpose of this post to help others to take a decision when invest, so do not forget to vote.

A new or old project, when lifting a new advisor must be based on experience. And I think, with the experience of a new advisor, it will provide fresh blood and also new thoughts about the project. I think the new advisor will help the project to reach the roadmap target

I feel that it would depend on the jobs that the adviser worked on before as well. A well-established person could make the project stand out a lot.

[robelneo]

We see every day a new ICO project launch, but it is very hard to take the decision, the project may be a scam, or even this new projects  not a scam no guarantee the project will succeed, the question here do you think the advisors can help new projects to success, do you think the advisors give the new projects trust?
Note that there are many successful projects without any advisors.

The purpose of this post to help others to take a decision when invest, so do not forget to vote.

It depends who the advisor is or are, the advisor should have a good reputation and should have expertise on the project that he is supporting, he will give advice, instructions, and guide that is why the advisors know that the project he is working with is legit because he will extend the trust to this project by his followers.

[khiholangkang]

Not too influential in my opinion, it all depends on the project itself, if the project is good without any famous advisor the project can be successful, and vice versa even though there are advisors who are already well-known but the project is bad definitely not going to succeed

[Redemption59]

Personally I think advisors are key to the progress of new projects but most importantly, advisors with long term experience in the crypto industry. Experienced advisors are guide to new projects and it's success. Though some projects made it without advisors does not mean every project can make it without advisors. Advisors are truly helpful in the progress of new projects.

[Vispilio]

Most of these so called "advisors" are just paid shills. Even if they were somehow visionary experts able to predict future value in the Crypto

Space, which is a doubtful possibility in itself, their judgement would still be impaired by the monetary incentive they receive from the project

they are promoting, which almost goes without saying in the vast majority of the cases they review...

[tippytoes]

Paid advisors are there for making money with advisor allocation altcoins, nothing more value they bring to the table. Some people like to follow blindly the suggestions of these paid advisors but it doesn't make sense to me.

Advisors are not only able to help the project recover, they are also an indicator of how much the project has a chance of successful development in the future. Of course, provided that the advisers have a good reputation and sufficient experience.

But honestly, most of them are just using their name in the industry to gain attention from the users. Sometimes the project will ask to use their name in the list of Advisors but the truth is they are not hands on with the project. And some of them are just after for the paycheck that they will get from the project. Let's admit such fact.

[Mysteryla]

The work of an advisor, just as the name implies, mainly is to give technical advises to the project CEO. An advisor most times, is someone who has knowledge in that chosen field, most especially on blockchain technology. So if they give good advise, then they are very useful.

[Saisher]

I don't see the advisor's impact on the project they are just an invited guest for the project to make it looks legit but it still goes down to the main developers, I have seen a lot of projects that have a lot of popular advisors but still failed to come out a legit project.

[ariyzt]

at the first times it will help the project a lot. Got advisors that have a big name really helping to promote new project, that mean give more trust to investor to buy that coin/token. but at the end its all depend on the project it self

[stoat]

depends who they are and who they know. sometimes they can be useful to help you make connections with other industries and usually they know a lot of people that can make things happen for the project.

[Borisov]

Personally I think advisors are key to the progress of new projects but most importantly, advisors with long term experience in the crypto industry. Experienced advisors are guide to new projects and it's success. Though some projects made it without advisors does not mean every project can make it without advisors. Advisors are truly helpful in the progress of new projects.

that's it, they're promoting the project. And most of them are sold, people are driven into the Scam projects, then they say that they have nothing to do. this is Good if you are not the first year on the market and do not listen to anyone but yourself. But many people really blindly believe and listen to the so-called adviser.

[cryptonewbie]

All advisors are not the same, some are just there for cosmetics, to.make the project look good but do not add any real value to the project.. and there are some advisors that actually contributes positively to the project so we cannot group all of them into the same category because all individuals and projects are not the same.

[CryptoIyke]

I have seen a lot of projects that have failed but they all portrayed to have consisted of good advisors with vast experience in related fields. It is not a prerequisite to having a successful outcome after all bitcoin itself doesn't have such plethora of team but it is the most successful cryptocurrency

[cytpoway121]

I believe the influence of an advisor to a crypto currency projectt cannot be undermined
The advisors guide the path of the project towards success
Such as timely announcement, listing platforms, crowdfunding, supervision of development of project
Blockchain creation and handling without hassle

And many more; even sometimes, advisors drive up the potentials of projects

[Eildosa]

It seems to me that not always every member of the team contributes to the promotion of the project. Sometimes it may just be a list of people who don't really have any function. If the project is a success, then the team is working on it and each of its members is involved.