Game Protect flag

[babo]

~snip~

The schizophrenia of some bitcointalk accounts is surely limitless!

a person who writes false accusations is normal then?

you're just a piece of shit

you accuse for false 'child abuse' and talk of schizophrenia? REALLY?


you're just a piece of shit, and piece of shit will be erased

[xtraelv]

Here is an example posted in a support ticket:

We agreed I pay you after the court. I also read a lot of negative things about game protect (he refers to bitcointalk.org). I do not care if I threw away the 4,5k. If you are making problems about the 1k then do not investigate it anymore and our coorporation will end here. bye

It appears that his clients struggle with grammar and spelling the same way that game-protect does. It is like it was written by the same person.

[Stedsm]

Here is an example posted in a support ticket:

We agreed I pay you after the court. I also read a lot of negative things about game protect (he refers to bitcointalk.org). I do not care if I threw away the 4,5k. If you are making problems about the 1k then do not investigate it anymore and our coorporation will end here. bye

It appears that his clients struggle with grammar and spelling the same way that game-protect does. It is like it was written by the same person.

You don't have to be a brain dead to see their brains are just both mentally ill and they have brain dead brains. They should have to take a brain test before writing, it might come back positive for brain death! 


Think I might have to nominate myself for biggest troll.

Heck, that's too many of those "brain dead" here!  
I find it silly on GP's part to collaborate with the community with such idiotic arguments and that "child abuse" thing was still my favorite one. But, he believes we must contact him if we were scammed by an online casino? Why the fuck? He's got a delusional that he got such an Authority that he wants to help everyone and do public welfare jobs maybe? Go, join a Charity GP!

And very sorry nutlidah, but you still didn't beat GP here and he wins the "Troll of the Era Award".

[game-protect]

Also u have read information online that suggests gameprotect itself if a scam (refers to bitcointalk.org).

[yogg]

Also u have read information online that suggests gameprotect itself if a scam (she refers to bitcointalk.org).

That "victim" may not be that wrong here !
There is a lot of informations suggesting game-protect is a scam; starting with the flag every new user and guest will see.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=435

If you like that read, wait until you get to the part where someone paid game-protect upfront a percentage of the "scammed amount" to represent the player.
(or "gave a donation", sorry me no talk coocoo fluently)

Guess what ? Money gone, no investigation, victim got slandered twice.

Do you really think some shady 3rd party service can protect you from your lacks of due diligence ?

[marlboroza]

Also u have read information online that suggests gameprotect itself if a scam (she refers to bitcointalk.org).

Then you won't mind sharing lawyer's contact details so someone could contact lawyer and ask them about full flush poker litigation, which, according to your website, started 3 years ago (http://archive.is/fhi5x)?

Why don't you address this:

Why don't you contact lawyer, I suppose you got contact info of lawyer which is running your case.

No i don't have any contact detail's for anyone other than Game Protect - and that's just an e-mail address. No name, number, post address at all.

I have kept all the e-mails i have including one from Game Protect confirming they have received the 5% of my claim up front and would start with "legal proceedings". I suppose i will just have to keep on waiting...

You edited your post:

1) You did not send anything from your pocket.

2) As soon as there is an update you will be instantly informed. If there is no update, you will not be informed, simple. I understand that you see only your case, but we handle hundreds of cases.

3) In legal proceedings 3 months is nothing and enforce claims from Curacao fake licensed casinos can be time-consuming.

Unedited post: http://archive.is/hFglD



Is this how your service works, someone sends you money and they can't talk to lawyer who represents their case?

[game-protect]

There is a lot of informations suggesting game-protect is a scam; starting with the flag every new user and guest will see.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=435

Definition suggestion: An idea or plan put forward for consideration.

A suggestion is not a fact and therefore the suggestion that game-protect is a scam confirms that game-protect is not a scam!

Though to understand this requires a functioning brain and the extremely mentally ill bitcontalk accounts who believe that anyone dealing with Game Protect is at high-risk of losing money, even though we are since 3,5 years active with over 500 cases and never scammed anyone, obviously can not withhold!

Despite of this, if it was a fact that game-protect is a scam, the liars and attackers simply would put the facts on the table and get 5 BTC instead of spamming signatures for cents! Logical?

Get 5 BTC for proof who Game Protect scammed and for how much?

[yogg]

There is a lot of informations suggesting game-protect is a scam; starting with the flag every new user and guest will see.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=435

Definition suggestion: An idea or plan put forward for consideration.
A suggestion is not a fact and therefore the suggestion that game-protect is a scam confirms that game-protect is not a scam!

This is why you have a type 1 flag.
Type 2 and type 3 are for contract violation :

Use-case #1 is the old trust system, but I made the descriptions on the rating types a bit more general and removed the concept of a trust score. You should give these ratings for anything which you think would impact someone's willingness to trade with the person, but you should not use trust ratings to attack a person's opinions or otherwise talk about things which would not be relevant to reasonable prospective traders.

Use-cases 2 and 3 will be handled by a new system of flags. You can create a flag using a link on a person's trust page.

A newbie-warning flag is active if there are more people supporting such a flag than opposing it. It shows a banner on topics started by the flagged user for guests and for users with less than 7 days of login time. For all users, a "#" is shown next to their trust scores.

For contractual violations only, a scammer flag can be created.

You don't have a scammer flag.
You have one where people massively say they believe you are a scam and this is different.

Unfortunately, I'm afraid words have different meanings for you, and for the rest of the forum.

How is your protection racket doing lately ?

[game-protect]

This is why you have a type 1 flag.

You don't have a scammer flag.

You have one where people massively say they believe you are a scam and this is different.

Where do I have a type 1 flag?

My trust page states: This user has inactive flags, which may be totally inaccurate.

Unfortunately, I'm afraid words have different meanings for you, and for the rest of the forum.

I always quote public definitions = real world definitions of words.

But I have noticed that some extremely mentally ill bitcointalk accounts have their own separate fantasy dream world definition for words!

However, their own separate fantasy dream world definition does not apply for Game Protect as we operate in the real world.

[yogg]

This is why you have a type 1 flag.

You don't have a scammer flag.

You have one where people massively say they believe you are a scam and this is different.

Where do I have a type 1 flag?

My trust page states: This user has inactive flags, which may be totally inaccurate.

Hey bozo, check your thread when being logged out of the forum.
This is how it appears to everyone that is logged out or that has less than 7 days of "Total time logged in" :

http://archive.fo/Tfqij#selection-71.9-75.0

You can change your own trust list settings so it appears that you have an inactive flag, but you cannot change the defaults settings for the forum and all the users.
If you see it as an inactive flag, this is only your custom view of the forum. Because you don't see the flag doesn't mean it's not here.

their own separate fantasy dream world definition does not apply for Game Protect.

You are right, keep denying the current situation and keep acting as if nothing has happened.
You're gonna go far.




Please keep negging me.
You didn't put enough on here.

Criminal offense of stating that you have a type 1 flag ? There's no lie since you have one but you keep denying it, that will certainly help you.  
According to what jurisdiction ? Shitholistan ? My extremely ill brain can't tell.

[game-protect]

Bitcointalk says Insufficient support: https://imgur.com/a/IxU290r

So if marlboroza's belief has insufficient support, how can the flag be active?

[actmyname]

Bitcointalk says Insufficient support: https://imgur.com/a/IxU290r

So if marlboroza's belief has insufficient support, how can the flag be active?

Welcome to "customizable trust lists". You have changed your trust list from DefaultTrust. Unfortunately for you, 99% of the forum still has a trust list that is only DefaultTrust and a large number of the 1% who have modified their lists have something similar to DefaultTrust.

[Foxpup]

So if marlboroza's belief has insufficient support, how can the flag be active?

Because covering your eyes so you cannot see anyone else does not, in fact, make you invisible to others. Most children figure this out by the age of 2, but apparently some are slow learners.

[nutildah]

So if marlboroza's belief has insufficient support, how can the flag be active?

Because covering your eyes so you cannot see anyone else does not, in fact, make you invisible to others. Most children figure this out by the age of 2, but apparently some are slow learners.

Perhaps they have a seriously mentally ill or dead brain!

Somebody should probably tell Vod about this, BPIP currently lists game-protect as DT2 in the "least trusted" member list:

https://bpip.org/report.aspx?r=leasttrusted

along with some other users who definitely aren't on DT2...

For about half a second I thought WTF? Then of course, according to LoyceV's lists, nobody has game-protect as "trusted." 25 people do have him as "distrusted," however.

[game-protect]

A normal functioning brain obviously is not able to understand how the bitcointalk.org warning system works!

Because believing means not knowing and not knowing that Game Protect is a scammer confirms that it is not a scammer!

But instead of recommending Game Protect, the bitcointalk.org system warns about it  

Does bitcointalk.org use reverse brain logic?

Warn about honest operators and recommend scammers?

[actmyname]

Does bitcointalk.org use reverse brain logic?

If you think the flag is abuse then you should report it to theymos. He will blacklist anyone that is improperly using the flag system.

Remember... you're not flagged as a scammer, you're flagged as high-risk. For someone who's so caught-up in semantics when it comes to scams, you appear to be selectively distinguishing certain definitions.

[game-protect]

Does bitcointalk.org use reverse brain logic?

If you think the flag is abuse then you should report it to theymos.

To publicly judge someone based on beliefs is a serious violation of human rights!

He will blacklist anyone that is improperly using the flag system.

Bitcointalk is improperly using the flag system and I highly doubt that theymos will blacklist himself.

Remember... you're not flagged as a scammer, you're flagged as high-risk.

What is the difference between "believe is a scammer" and "believe is at high risk of losing money"?

What does "is at high risk of losing money" mean?

[suchmoon]

What does "is at high risk of losing money" mean?

Which word are you finding difficult to understand, Big Brain?

[Initscri]

What does "is at high risk of losing money" mean?

Which word are you finding difficult to understand, Big Brain?

Oh, don't get him started on that one. I had a debate with him one time where he was suggesting that BTC isn't considered money.
That's probably where he's going with this.

Big brain, Big brain!

[game-protect]

What does "is at a high risk of losing money" mean?

Which word are you finding difficult to understand, Big Brain?

"is at high risk of losing money"