Game Protect flag

[bones261]

I don't think we need this nincompoop here. Their posts and threads tend to lack common sense and dumb down conversations, and help make scam accusations more confuse.

As Game Protect is since 3,5 years active with over 500 cases handled and never scammed anyone, the confusing part is to believe that anyone dealing with Game Protect is at a high risk of losing money!

To understand this requires a functioning brain though and the confused believer likely have none!

     Where are these 500+ satisfied clients of yours? I would think with that kind of exemplary record, I would see many more people coming on this thread and vouching for you, either first hand or from friends that they told about their experience with your service.  Perhaps this is like the Fermi paradox. Statistics would suggest that we are not alone in the universe, but very little concrete evidence verifies that they are out there.   I'll call it the game-protect paradox. So many satisfied clients. Yet few are willing to come forward and vouch for you.

[1714924103]

1714924103

[1714924103]

1714924103

[1714924103]

1714924103

[1714924103]

1714924103

[game-protect]

I don't think we need this nincompoop here. Their posts and threads tend to lack common sense and dumb down conversations, and help make scam accusations more confuse.

As Game Protect is since 3,5 years active with over 500 cases handled and never scammed anyone, the confusing part is to believe that anyone dealing with Game Protect is at a high risk of losing money!

To understand this requires a functioning brain though and the confused believer likely have none!

Where are these 500+ satisfied clients of yours?

Where did I say 500+ satisfied clients?

I said: "with over 500 cases handled"

I would think with that kind of exemplary record, I would see many more people coming on this thread and vouching for you, either first hand or from friends that they told about their experience with your service.

According to your "logic", I would think that if everyone dealing with Game Protect is at a high risk of losing money since 3,5 years, there already would have been some victims reported it on bitcointalk.org???  

I'll call it the game-protect paradox. So many satisfied clients. Yet few are willing to come forward and vouch for you.

I will call it the extremely mentally ill paradox: Allegedly so many victims who lost money when dealing with Game Protect since 3,5 years, yet no one was willing to come forward and post it on bitcointalk.org?!?

[bones261]

I don't think we need this nincompoop here. Their posts and threads tend to lack common sense and dumb down conversations, and help make scam accusations more confuse.

As Game Protect is since 3,5 years active with over 500 cases handled and never scammed anyone, the confusing part is to believe that anyone dealing with Game Protect is at a high risk of losing money!

To understand this requires a functioning brain though and the confused believer likely have none!

Where are these 500+ satisfied clients of yours?

Where did I say 500+ satisfied clients?

I said: "with over 500 cases handled"

Do you have cases with no clients? Or do have have clients with multiple cases? I would think each case has at least one client. Some would have multiple clients. I would think having at least 500 clients that you represented in 500 cases is a conservative estimate. Also, as I mentioned before, you recently claimed to have a 100% success rate. Therefore, if you are successful, chances are pretty good the client is at least "satisfied."

I'll call it the game-protect paradox. So many satisfied clients. Yet few are willing to come forward and vouch for you.

I will call it the extremely mentally ill paradox: Allegedly so many victims who lost money when dealing with Game Protect since 3,5 years, yet no one was willing to come forward and post it on bitcointalk.org?!?

I don't believe that you have many clients. Therefore, I don't believe that you have many "victims." I also don't see any proof that you are indeed qualified to pursue this line of business. I'm as convinced that someone is likely to piss their money away on your services as they would if they went to a wishing well and deposited their money there, in hopes to get their case solved.

[game-protect]

None of the below listed bitcointalk accounts ever used Game Protect and therefore can not give a feedback based on facts!

marlboroza alleges: Due largely to the factors mentioned in this topic, I believe that anyone dealing with game-protect is at a high risk of losing money, and guests would be well-advised to avoid doing so. This determination is based on concrete red flags which any knowledgeable & reasonable forum user should agree with, and it is not based on the user's opinions.

Support: actmyname, AdolfinWolf, alexrossi, arwin100, Astargath, asu, babo, BitMastery, bob123, bones261, cabalism13, Captain Corporate, casinobru, CASIO, crwth, CryptoCheckk, CryptopreneurBrainboss, Csmiami, DaveF, DeathAngel, DireWolfM14, dragonvslinux, eaLiTy, eternalgloom, Foxpup, Hhampuz, iasenko, IMadeYouReadThis, Initscri, jimmyhate, Joel_Jantsen, JSRAW, Quickseller, Kevinn22, Lafu, legendster, leowonderful, LFC_Bitcoin, lighpulsar07_alt, Lutpin, marlboroza, Mauser 98, micgoossens, morvillz7z, mu_enrico, NeuroticFish, nutildah, o_e_l_e_o, pandukelana2712, RHavar, rhomelmabini, Royse777, ryzaadit, Stedsm, subSTRATA, suchmoon, suzanne5223, SyGambler, TwitchySeal, WinRateCasino, xtraelv, yahoo62278, yogg, Zwei

[actmyname]

Prove that we are mentally ill.

To believe something that is disproven since 3,5 years and never happened indicates the extreme mental illness!

marlboroza alleges: Due largely to the factors mentioned in this topic, I believe that anyone dealing with game-protect is at a high risk of losing money, and guests would be well-advised to avoid doing so. This determination is based on concrete red flags which any knowledgeable & reasonable forum user should agree with, and it is not based on the user's opinions.

Support: Foxpup, alexrossi, suchmoon, babo, yahoo62278, LFC_Bitcoin, RHavar, SyGambler, bones261, yogg, nutildah, actmyname, Lutpin, DeathAngel, marlboroza, Lafu, subSTRATA, AdolfinWolf, Hhampuz, crwth, bob123, xtraelv, micgoossens, ryzaadit, o_e_l_e_o, iasenko, pandukelana2712, mu_enrico, DireWolfM14, morvillz7z, NeuroticFish, Quickseller, Stedsm, eternalgloom, Joel_Jantsen, legendster, Astargath, arwin100, Initscri, asu, TwitchySeal, Royse777, CASlO, Captain Corporate, Csmiami, dragonvslinux, JSRAW, rhomelmabini, CryptoCheckk, BitMastery, WinRateCasino, IMadeYouReadThis, jimmyhate

Right... so what license is your lottery page operating under? After all, that is something that contributes to your riskiness.

You've avoided this question many times.

Do you have a license or not? Are you hosting a casino that is unlicensed, or will you reveal what license it has?

Do you have a license or not? Are you hosting a casino that is unlicensed, or will you reveal what license it has?

[AdolfinWolf]

None of the below listed bitcointalk accounts ever used Game Protect and therefore can not give a feedback based on facts!

I don't think there even is a fallacy or paradox to describe what you just said.
(If there is, i'm just in general curious to know if anyone knows what fallacy resembles the "You can't critique me unless you're involved/have used my service"-esque, so let me know..)


I can also give you personal feedback on you calling me a child rapist, if you'd like: i did not appreciate that.

You're a simple fool, and so is your "business model" of blackmailing companies.

[game-protect]

@ AdolfinWolf

Every child reading your extremely mentally ill beliefs is mentally abused!

Therefore, public beliefs belong into the church and not on a public Bitcoin chat forum!

Publicly claiming that Game Protect's "business model" is blackmailing companies is the criminal offense of defamation!

Despite of this, this false and misleading claim is disproven by bitcointalk forum moderator:

I've had lots of complaints about this guy over the years and he sure seems shady but there's never really been anything concrete presented other than him being annoying. It's likely his business model is to just harass companies in the hope that they'll pay him something to leave them alone, and people have accused him of extortion before, which is what that would be if it was the case, but when I asked for proof of extortion ie has he explicitly asked them for money then nothing has really been given.

[AdolfinWolf]

@ AdolfinWolf

Every child reading your extremely mentally ill beliefs is mentally abused!

Therefore, public beliefs belong into the church and not on a public Bitcoin chat forum!

[suchmoon]

I don't think there even is a fallacy or paradox to describe what you just said.
(If there is, i'm just in general curious to know if anyone knows what fallacy resembles the "You can't critique me unless you're involved/have used my service"-esque, so let me know..)

Seems like a variation of genetic fallacy, i.e. dismissing a claim based on where/whom it came from.

[Quickseller]

None of the below listed bitcointalk accounts ever used Game Protect and therefore can not give a feedback based on facts!

[...]

- Quickseller
[...]

I don't have to use your service to see what you are doing. It is clear you are merely extorting businesses and providing nothing of actual value except the promise to not smear the business.

[game-protect]

I don't have to use your service to see what you are doing. It is clear you are merely extorting businesses and providing nothing of actual value except the promise to not smear the business.

You claim it is clear but you joined a believe flag.

Do you know what the difference between clear and believe is?

In the real world clear is the total opposite of believe!

[Csmiami]

Therefore, public beliefs belong into the church and not on a public Bitcoin chat forum!

So we can not think that you are a scammer because we "lack facts" and have not dealt/used your services, and thus, we are believing something (your own words). BUT you can call as all child rapists, I'm going to guess that with some hard evidence so that you stick to your own rules, and there is no problem to that? I believe we all want to know that evidence you had to call us rapists; because otherwise you should have left that opinion in Gods' house

Do you know what the difference between clear and belief is?

Please; make it CLEAR

[Quickseller]

I don't have to use your service to see what you are doing. It is clear you are merely extorting businesses and providing nothing of actual value except the promise to not smear the business.

You claim it is clear but you joined a believe flag.

Do you know what the difference between clear and believe is?

In the real world clear is the total opposite of believe!

No problem. I will continue to support the flag. Feel free to rebut my points and anyone considering doing business with you is free to come to their own conclusions.

[actmyname]

Prove that we are mentally ill.

To believe something that is disproven since 3,5 years and never happened indicates the extreme mental illness!

marlboroza alleges: Due largely to the factors mentioned in this topic, I believe that anyone dealing with game-protect is at a high risk of losing money, and guests would be well-advised to avoid doing so. This determination is based on concrete red flags which any knowledgeable & reasonable forum user should agree with, and it is not based on the user's opinions.

Support: Foxpup, alexrossi, suchmoon, babo, yahoo62278, LFC_Bitcoin, RHavar, SyGambler, bones261, yogg, nutildah, actmyname, Lutpin, DeathAngel, marlboroza, Lafu, subSTRATA, AdolfinWolf, Hhampuz, crwth, bob123, xtraelv, micgoossens, ryzaadit, o_e_l_e_o, iasenko, pandukelana2712, mu_enrico, DireWolfM14, morvillz7z, NeuroticFish, Quickseller, Stedsm, eternalgloom, Joel_Jantsen, legendster, Astargath, arwin100, Initscri, asu, TwitchySeal, Royse777, CASlO, Captain Corporate, Csmiami, dragonvslinux, JSRAW, rhomelmabini, CryptoCheckk, BitMastery, WinRateCasino, IMadeYouReadThis, jimmyhate

Right... so what license is your lottery page operating under? After all, that is something that contributes to your riskiness.

You've avoided this question many times.

Do you have a license or not? Are you hosting a casino that is unlicensed, or will you reveal what license it has?

Do you have a license or not? Are you hosting a casino that is unlicensed, or will you reveal what license it has?

It's unfortunate that you don't like answering simple yes/no questions.

[Initscri]

Prove that we are mentally ill.

To believe something that is disproven since 3,5 years and never happened indicates the extreme mental illness!

marlboroza alleges: Due largely to the factors mentioned in this topic, I believe that anyone dealing with game-protect is at a high risk of losing money, and guests would be well-advised to avoid doing so. This determination is based on concrete red flags which any knowledgeable & reasonable forum user should agree with, and it is not based on the user's opinions.

Support: Foxpup, alexrossi, suchmoon, babo, yahoo62278, LFC_Bitcoin, RHavar, SyGambler, bones261, yogg, nutildah, actmyname, Lutpin, DeathAngel, marlboroza, Lafu, subSTRATA, AdolfinWolf, Hhampuz, crwth, bob123, xtraelv, micgoossens, ryzaadit, o_e_l_e_o, iasenko, pandukelana2712, mu_enrico, DireWolfM14, morvillz7z, NeuroticFish, Quickseller, Stedsm, eternalgloom, Joel_Jantsen, legendster, Astargath, arwin100, Initscri, asu, TwitchySeal, Royse777, CASlO, Captain Corporate, Csmiami, dragonvslinux, JSRAW, rhomelmabini, CryptoCheckk, BitMastery, WinRateCasino, IMadeYouReadThis, jimmyhate

Right... so what license is your lottery page operating under? After all, that is something that contributes to your riskiness.

You've avoided this question many times.

Do you have a license or not? Are you hosting a casino that is unlicensed, or will you reveal what license it has?

Do you have a license or not? Are you hosting a casino that is unlicensed, or will you reveal what license it has?

It's unfortunate that you don't like answering simple yes/no questions.

He's clearly avoiding the question because he knows he's licensed under the JAZ license.

[xtraelv]

None of the below listed bitcointalk accounts ever used Game Protect and therefore can not give a feedback based on facts!

How would you know ? You have only listed usernames. How would you know if they used a different username at casinos or using your "service" ?

[game-protect]

None of the below listed bitcointalk accounts ever used Game Protect and therefore can not give a feedback based on facts!

How would you know ? You have only listed usernames. How would you know if they used a different username at casinos or using your "service" ?

Because no one who dealed with Game Protect lost money!

[marlboroza]

May I suggest everyone not to reply to game-protect's posts until they respond to these questions:

Right... so what license is your lottery page operating under? After all, that is something that contributes to your riskiness.

You've avoided this question many times.

Do you have a license or not? Are you hosting a casino that is unlicensed, or will you reveal what license it has?

Unless they don't want to answer question regarding their service, well, if that is the case there is nothing else to discuss with game protect.

[actmyname]

Right... so what license is your lottery page operating under? After all, that is something that contributes to your riskiness.

You've avoided this question many times.

Do you have a license or not? Are you hosting a casino that is unlicensed, or will you reveal what license it has?

Unless they don't want to answer question regarding their service, well, if that is the case there is nothing else to discuss with game protect.

If game-protect refuses to identify the type of license they have then we have no reason to assume they are not hosting an unlicensed casino, while hypocritically disparaging other unlicensed casinos for being illegal.

[Initscri]

Right... so what license is your lottery page operating under? After all, that is something that contributes to your riskiness.

You've avoided this question many times.

Do you have a license or not? Are you hosting a casino that is unlicensed, or will you reveal what license it has?

Unless they don't want to answer question regarding their service, well, if that is the case there is nothing else to discuss with game protect.

If game-protect refuses to identify the type of license they have then we have no reason to assume they are not hosting an unlicensed casino, while hypocritically disparaging other unlicensed casinos for being illegal.

I've already identified the license:

The revolution is here!

https://lottery.game-protect.com Play Casino + Lottery with no scam guarantee | anonym + instant | all countries

smh

Even I am surprised you sank so low.

Well, that's not a conflict of interest LMAO

Honestly, was just a matter of time. The best part:

The license that site is operating under: https://validator.antillephone.com/validate?domain=www.gamblingtec.com&seal_id=42bf94aaaa150582baf59a053d86e412df84d614a7207457d8f2e4f5c866995c0585bd8701a40875320ba271f2e492fa&stamp=95b67aa4176f6ed22e8c97ee6d54f5df
Notice how it's 8048/JAZ

Well, low and behold:
In order to be considered a scam by Game-Protect, you need to hold the license: 8048/JAZ, as per: https://game-protect.com/curacao-license-scam/

@Game-Protect, when are you going to add your own casino service to the list?

He's just avoiding it because he know it directly goes against what he's been saying about license being a scam for years.