Game Protect flag

[game-protect]

@ 1982dre, actmyname, addarmstrong, alexrossi, asphyxiate, asu, Astargath, Avirunes, babo, BayAreaCoins, BigBoy89, bL4nkcode, blurryeyed, bob123, bones261, cabalism, Captain Corporate, CASIO, ChiBitCTy, crwth, CryptopreneurBrainboss, DaveF, DiamondCardz, DireWolfM14, DreamerBT, eckmar, efialtis, examplens, Foxpup, Hakorede, HCP, Hhampuz, hopenotlate, iasenko, iluvbitcoins, Initscri, jimmyhate, JSRAW, Kalemder, Kevinn22, kruglikov, LeGaulois, LeonGhibli, LFC_Bitcoin, lighpulsar07, Lutpin, marlboroza, mindrust, Mirae, mocacinno, morvillz7z, mosprognoz, mu_enrico, NeuroticFish, nutildah, o_e_l_e_o, Pamoldar, pandukelana2712, PassThePopcorn, passwordnow, RHavar, rhomelmabini, robelneo, Rodeo02, Royse777, ScamViruS, sheenshane, Slow death,  squatz1, stompix, subSTRATA, suchmoon, SyGambler, TECSHARE, The Parmasist, TheUltraElite, TMAN, TwitchySeal, whitcher_sense, WinRateCasino, xtraelv, yahoo62278, yazher, yogg, Zwei

Please show the written contract?

h4ns alleges: game-protect violated a written contract, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced here. game-protect did not make the victims of this act roughly whole, AND it is not the case that all of the victims forgave the act. It is not grossly inaccurate to say that the act occurred around July 2019. No previously-created flag covers this same act, unless the flag was created with inaccurate data preventing its acceptance.

Your emails are a legally binding contract.

Your email exchange with h4ns satisfies all legal requirements for it to be considered a legally binding contract within the eyes of the law.

The theme is written contract and not "legally binding agreements"!

Judgements by extremely mentally ill and or brain dead bitcointalk accounts do not have any validity in the real world!

Please show the judgement by a real world court that my emails are a legally binding agreement

Are you actually serious. I just did in the other thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5183189.msg52971823#msg52971823

Golden Ocean Group Ltd v Sagacor Mining Industries PVT Ltd and another [2012] EWCA Civ 265, UK.

Do you suffer a brain deadness in the highest possible degree?

Neither Golden Ocean Group Ltd nor Sagacor Mining Industries PVT Ltd is Game Protect!

I asked you to show me the judgement by a real world court where it says that emails sent by Game Protect are a legally binding agreement?

[1715298015]

1715298015

[1715298015]

1715298015

[Initscri]

@ 1982dre, actmyname, addarmstrong, alexrossi, asphyxiate, Astargath, Avirunes, BigBoy89, bL4nkcode, bob123, bones261, cabalism, Captain Corporate, CASIO, ChiBitCTy, crwth, CryptopreneurBrainboss, DaveF, DiamondCardz, DireWolfM14, DreamerBT, eckmar, efialtis, examplens, Foxpup, Hakorede, HCP, Hhampuz, hopenotlate, iasenko, iluvbitcoins, Initscri, jimmyhate, JSRAW, Kalemder, Kevinn22, kruglikov, LeGaulois, LeonGhibli, LFC_Bitcoin, lighpulsar07, Lutpin, marlboroza, mindrust, Mirae, mocacinno, morvillz7z, mosprognoz, mu_enrico, NeuroticFish, nutildah, o_e_l_e_o, Pamoldar, pandukelana2712, PassThePopcorn, passwordnow, RHavar, rhomelmabini, robelneo, Rodeo02, Royse777, ScamViruS, sheenshane, Slow death,  squatz1, stompix, subSTRATA, suchmoon, SyGambler, TECSHARE, The Parmasist, TheUltraElite, TMAN, TwitchySeal, whitcher_sense, WinRateCasino, xtraelv, yahoo62278, yazher, yogg, Zwei

Please show the written contract?

h4ns alleges: game-protect violated a written contract, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced here. game-protect did not make the victims of this act roughly whole, AND it is not the case that all of the victims forgave the act. It is not grossly inaccurate to say that the act occurred around July 2019. No previously-created flag covers this same act, unless the flag was created with inaccurate data preventing its acceptance.

Your emails are a legally binding contract.

Your email exchange with h4ns satisfies all legal requirements for it to be considered a legally binding contract within the eyes of the law.

The theme is written contract and not "legally binding agreements"!

Judgements by extremely mentally ill and or brain dead bitcointalk accounts do not have any validity in the real world!

Please show the judgement by a real world court that my emails are a legally binding agreement

Are you actually serious. I just did in the other thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5183189.msg52971823#msg52971823

Golden Ocean Group Ltd v Sagacor Mining Industries PVT Ltd and another [2012] EWCA Civ 265, UK.

Do you suffer a brain deadness in the highest possible degree?

Neither Golden Ocean Group Ltd nor Sagacor Mining Industries PVT Ltd is Game Protect!

I asked you to show me the judgement by a real world court where it says that emails sent by Game Protect are a legally binding aghreement?

OMG LMAO.

Alright man, go to court and see for yourself

[game-protect]

@ 1982dre, actmyname, addarmstrong, alexrossi, asphyxiate, asu, Astargath, Avirunes, babo, BayAreaCoins, BigBoy89, bL4nkcode, blurryeyed, bob123, bones261, cabalism, Captain Corporate, CASIO, ChiBitCTy, crwth, CryptopreneurBrainboss, DaveF, DiamondCardz, DireWolfM14, DreamerBT, eckmar, efialtis, examplens, Foxpup, Hakorede, HCP, Hhampuz, hopenotlate, iasenko, iluvbitcoins, Initscri, jimmyhate, JSRAW, Kalemder, Kevinn22, kruglikov, LeGaulois, LeonGhibli, LFC_Bitcoin, lighpulsar07, Lutpin, marlboroza, mindrust, Mirae, mocacinno, morvillz7z, mosprognoz, mu_enrico, NeuroticFish, nutildah, o_e_l_e_o, Pamoldar, pandukelana2712, PassThePopcorn, passwordnow, RHavar, rhomelmabini, robelneo, Rodeo02, Royse777, ScamViruS, sheenshane, Slow death,  squatz1, stompix, subSTRATA, suchmoon, SyGambler, TECSHARE, The Parmasist, TheUltraElite, TMAN, TwitchySeal, whitcher_sense, WinRateCasino, xtraelv, yahoo62278, yazher, yogg, Zwei

Please show the written contract?

h4ns alleges: game-protect violated a written contract, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced here. game-protect did not make the victims of this act roughly whole, AND it is not the case that all of the victims forgave the act. It is not grossly inaccurate to say that the act occurred around July 2019. No previously-created flag covers this same act, unless the flag was created with inaccurate data preventing its acceptance.

Your emails are a legally binding contract.

Your email exchange with h4ns satisfies all legal requirements for it to be considered a legally binding contract within the eyes of the law.

The theme is written contract and not "legally binding agreements"!

Judgements by extremely mentally ill and or brain dead bitcointalk accounts do not have any validity in the real world!

Please show the judgement by a real world court that my emails are a legally binding agreement

Are you actually serious. I just did in the other thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5183189.msg52971823#msg52971823

Golden Ocean Group Ltd v Sagacor Mining Industries PVT Ltd and another [2012] EWCA Civ 265, UK.

Do you suffer a brain deadness in the highest possible degree?

Neither Golden Ocean Group Ltd nor Sagacor Mining Industries PVT Ltd is Game Protect!

I asked you to show me the judgement by a real world court where it says that emails sent by Game Protect are a legally binding aghreement?

OMG LMAO.

Alright man, go to court and see for yourself

Ok, give me the reference number for the judgement by a real world court that the emails Game Protect sends are a written contract?  

[actmyname]

Reminder: this deflection hinges not on the actual substance of the flag but rather is an argument of semantics.

Pragmatically meaningless.

[Initscri]

@ 1982dre, actmyname, addarmstrong, alexrossi, asphyxiate, Astargath, Avirunes, BigBoy89, bL4nkcode, bob123, bones261, cabalism, Captain Corporate, CASIO, ChiBitCTy, crwth, CryptopreneurBrainboss, DaveF, DiamondCardz, DireWolfM14, DreamerBT, eckmar, efialtis, examplens, Foxpup, Hakorede, HCP, Hhampuz, hopenotlate, iasenko, iluvbitcoins, Initscri, jimmyhate, JSRAW, Kalemder, Kevinn22, kruglikov, LeGaulois, LeonGhibli, LFC_Bitcoin, lighpulsar07, Lutpin, marlboroza, mindrust, Mirae, mocacinno, morvillz7z, mosprognoz, mu_enrico, NeuroticFish, nutildah, o_e_l_e_o, Pamoldar, pandukelana2712, PassThePopcorn, passwordnow, RHavar, rhomelmabini, robelneo, Rodeo02, Royse777, ScamViruS, sheenshane, Slow death,  squatz1, stompix, subSTRATA, suchmoon, SyGambler, TECSHARE, The Parmasist, TheUltraElite, TMAN, TwitchySeal, whitcher_sense, WinRateCasino, xtraelv, yahoo62278, yazher, yogg, Zwei

Please show the written contract?

h4ns alleges: game-protect violated a written contract, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced here. game-protect did not make the victims of this act roughly whole, AND it is not the case that all of the victims forgave the act. It is not grossly inaccurate to say that the act occurred around July 2019. No previously-created flag covers this same act, unless the flag was created with inaccurate data preventing its acceptance.

Your emails are a legally binding contract.

Your email exchange with h4ns satisfies all legal requirements for it to be considered a legally binding contract within the eyes of the law.

The theme is written contract and not "legally binding agreements"!

Judgements by extremely mentally ill and or brain dead bitcointalk accounts do not have any validity in the real world!

Please show the judgement by a real world court that my emails are a legally binding agreement

Are you actually serious. I just did in the other thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5183189.msg52971823#msg52971823

Golden Ocean Group Ltd v Sagacor Mining Industries PVT Ltd and another [2012] EWCA Civ 265, UK.

Do you suffer a brain deadness in the highest possible degree?

Neither Golden Ocean Group Ltd nor Sagacor Mining Industries PVT Ltd is Game Protect!

I asked you to show me the judgement by a real world court where it says that emails sent by Game Protect are a legally binding aghreement?

OMG LMAO.

Alright man, go to court and see for yourself

Ok, give me the reference number for the judgement by a real world court that the emails Game Protect sends are are written contract?  

Well, buddy, you see, the way the court system works is that in order for there to be a reference number there actually has to be a case with you involved.

Because you're a fake lawyer, I don't think that'll ever be the case.

However, the way laws are often defined for society is by high court judgements (in the UK for example) where-by other judges can take those cases by example. You'd know this if you weren't a fraud

Reminder: this deflection hinges not on the actual substance of the flag but rather is an argument of semantics.

Pragmatically meaningless.

Correct, he's over analyzing verbiage from the site. Meaningless.

At the end of the day, he scammed h4ns. Contract or no contract.

[game-protect]

At the end of the day, he scammed h4ns.

At what day and how did the scam happen?

Contract or no contract.

Killed or not killed, it does not matter, he is a killer, period!

Please show the written contract?

h4ns alleges: game-protect violated a written contract, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced here. game-protect did not make the victims of this act roughly whole, AND it is not the case that all of the victims forgave the act. It is not grossly inaccurate to say that the act occurred around July 2019. No previously-created flag covers this same act, unless the flag was created with inaccurate data preventing its acceptance.

Support: Initscri

You publicly support that Game Protect violated a written contract, resulting in damages, around July 2019, so by publicly stated and applicable laws you are obligated to show this written contract, otherwise you commit the criminal offense of intentionally participating in a public defamation campaign!

[actmyname]

There are two paths that we can foresee:

1) referencing the thread -> deflection -> tirade about a different subject -> "please show the written contract"
2) changing to a different topic -> deflection -> "please show the written contract"

But this is a false dichotomy.

3) refusing to humor game-protect -> end

[Initscri]

At the end of the day, he scammed h4ns.

At what day and how did the scam happen?

Contract or no contract.

Killed or not killed, it does not matter, he is a killer, period!

Please show the written contract?

h4ns alleges: game-protect violated a written contract, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced here. game-protect did not make the victims of this act roughly whole, AND it is not the case that all of the victims forgave the act. It is not grossly inaccurate to say that the act occurred around July 2019. No previously-created flag covers this same act, unless the flag was created with inaccurate data preventing its acceptance.

Support: Initscri

You publicly support that Game Protect violated a written contract, resulting in damages, around July 2019, so by publicly stated and applicable laws you are obligated to show this written contract, otherwise you commit the criminal offense of intentionally participating in a public defamation campaign!

I have already stated that the email exchanges displayed by h4ns are your written contract.

If you don't believe me, fine. But that, according to the law, is valued as your written contract/agreement.

There are two paths that we can foresee:

1) referencing the thread -> deflection -> tirade about a different subject -> "please show the written contract"
2) changing to a different topic -> deflection -> "please show the written contract"

But this is a false dichotomy.

3) refusing to humor game-protect -> end

Right, I'm not humouring the "contract" thing anymore. Although, I don't know if refusing to humour him will work.

I tried that before (quite a long time ago, months and months back). I stopped responding. He kept posting, and someone got scammed. So I'm unsure if keeping the spotlight on him and his stupidity is a bad thing, because letting him stagnate and speak to himself kind of pushes back the criticism further back into the thread, making it easier for people to not be aware.

[game-protect]

At the end of the day, he scammed h4ns.

At what day and how did the scam happen?

Contract or no contract.

Killed or not killed, it does not matter, he is a killer, period!

Please show the written contract?

h4ns alleges: game-protect violated a written contract, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced here. game-protect did not make the victims of this act roughly whole, AND it is not the case that all of the victims forgave the act. It is not grossly inaccurate to say that the act occurred around July 2019. No previously-created flag covers this same act, unless the flag was created with inaccurate data preventing its acceptance.

Support: Initscri

You publicly support that Game Protect violated a written contract, resulting in damages, around July 2019, so by publicly stated and applicable laws you are obligated to show this written contract, otherwise you commit the criminal offense of intentionally participating in a public defamation campaign!

I have already stated that the email exchanges displayed by h4ns are your written contract.

Judgements by extremely mentally ill and or brain dead bitcointalk accounts do not have any validity in the real world!

Please show the judgement by a real world court that emails sent by Game Protect are a written contract

But that, according to the law, is valued as your written contract/agreement.

Ok, please quote the applicable law where it says that emails sent by Game Protect are a written contract?

[yogg]

Please show the judgement by a real world court that emails sent by Game Protect are a written contract

We can't, because you are not based in the real world !

If you are, in which jurisdiction are you based ? What is your company registration number ?
Also, please share the details to your lawyers, your sollicitor or both;
this is a pre-requisite to start the process of a real-world, legal lawsuit and you'll see very soon a judgement by a real world court !

If you are right in what you do, there is no problem and you will win in court, maybe even collect damages for defamation !

Ok, please quote the applicable law where it says that emails sent by Game Protect are a written contract?

Shit, so in your "real world" there are law texts regulating game protect's communication ?

[game-protect]

Ok, please quote the applicable law where it says that emails sent by Game Protect are a written contract?

Shit, so in your "real world" there are law texts regulating game protect's communication ?

Correct. In the real world everything is regulated by laws!

Imagine what a chaos it would be if extremely mentaly ill and or brain dead bitcointalk accounts would decide what is right and what is wrong!

[yogg_alt]

Correct. In the real world everything is regulated by laws!

Imagine what a chaos it would be if extremely mentaly ill and or brain dead bitcointalk accounts would decide what is right and what is wrong!

Too bad that you missed the first part of my post.

Can you read ?!

Please show the judgement by a real world court that emails sent by Game Protect are a written contract

If you are, in which jurisdiction are you based ? What is your company registration number ?
Also, please share the details to your lawyers, your sollicitor or both;
this is a pre-requisite to start the process of a real-world, legal lawsuit and you'll see very soon a judgement by a real world court !

If you are right in what you do, there is no problem and you will win in court, maybe even collect damages for defamation !

You don't want a judge to act the fact h4ns owes you 20.000€ for defamation ?

[Initscri]

Ok, please quote the applicable law where it says that emails sent by Game Protect are a written contract?

Shit, so in your "real world" there are law texts regulating game protect's communication ?

Correct. In the real world everything is regulated by laws!

Imagine what a chaos it would be if extremely mentaly ill and or brain dead bitcointalk accounts would decide what is right and what is wrong!

The pure fact that you understand what he was saying proves you have no fucking clue how the law works.

You keep suggesting that laws & rulings don't apply to you because they weren't specifically ruled against YOU individually in a court of law.

That's like saying "I didn't commit the crime of murder, because a judge didn't say I individually committed the crime of murder, therefore murder is ok".

It's completely irrelevant. If, in a case, a judge in a high court (or supreme court) rules that emails can be contractual without signatures, then those rules apply to you as well, regardless of if you have actually gone to court or not.

[game-protect]

Shit, so in your "real world" there are law texts regulating game protect's communication ?

Correct. In the real world everything is regulated by laws!

Imagine what a chaos it would be if extremely mentaly ill and or brain dead bitcointalk accounts would decide what is right and what is wrong!

Too bad that you missed the first part of my post.

Missing parts by extremely mentally ill and or brain dead bitcointalk accounts is irrelevant for Game Protect!

You don't want a judge to act the fact h4ns owes you 20.000€ for defamation ?

Please translate to readable English?

h4ns does not owe me 20,000€ for defamation!

[xtraelv]

Ok, please quote the applicable law where it says that emails sent by Game Protect are a written contract?

Shit, so in your "real world" there are law texts regulating game protect's communication ?

Correct. In the real world everything is regulated by laws!

Imagine what a chaos it would be if extremely mentaly ill and or brain dead bitcointalk accounts would decide what is right and what is wrong!

Fortunately in the real world the majority of people recognize that game-protect is a scammer and have tagged him accordingly.

Game Protect does not make contracts and never intent to be legally bound by such.

Fortunately in the real world Online Gaming Consumer Protection services that make agreements that they break are held accountable and tagged as scammers.

Now back to game-protect bingo. Where the answers are random and every one else is insane.

I got bored last night waiting for some bets to come in, so i made...

Game protect bingo!





Fun for all the family

[game-protect]

Game Protect is proven scam artist and thanks god he's flagged.

Who did I scam and how and where is the proof?

[marlboroza]

Game Protect is proven scam artist and thanks god he's flagged.

Who did I scam and how and where is the proof?

You scammed h4ns in 2019., click trust for proofs.

Anyway, I have found very interesting article, read it @gp, it might help you with brain issue and just maybe you won't forget things that often.

[yogg]

You publicly support that Game Protect violated a written contract, resulting in damages, around July 2019

Yes.

Please show the WRITTEN CONTRACT?

No.

Please tell at what day and how the scam happened?

No.


Eat my short.

[yogg]

Why are not you able to show it?
Why are not you able to tell it?

I replied to you on your other thread :

Why are not you able to show it?

Why are not you able to tell it?

What makes you believe that we have to fulfill your requests ?

I personally do not care about this feedback system, as everyone can state what ever nonsense he like.

Allright, do not care then.
We took care of it.

Why do you complain since you don't care ?
Just leave the flags right where they are, no ?

Please keep making duplicate posts !! More opportunities to grow that pile of reports about you.

[game-protect]

Please show the WRITTEN CONTRACT?

No.

Why are not you able to show it?

Please tell at what day and how the scam happened?

No.

Why are not you able to tell it?

Creating or supporting a scammer flag is actively affirming a set of pretty clear fact-statements. If someone knowingly supports a flag containing incorrect fact-statements, then that is crystal-clear abuse, and I will seek to have such people removed from DT ASAP. People who are habitually wrong, even not knowingly, should also be removed.

The below extremely mentally ill and or brain dead bitcointalk accounts persist to abuse the trust system with knowingly supporting the incorrect fact-statement that Game Protect violated a written contract, resulting in damages, around July 2019, but are not able to show the alleged written contract!

h4ns alleges: game-protect violated a written contract, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced here. game-protect did not make the victims of this act roughly whole, AND it is not the case that all of the victims forgave the act. It is not grossly inaccurate to say that the act occurred around July 2019. No previously-created flag covers this same act, unless the flag was created with inaccurate data preventing its acceptance.

Support: 1982dre, actmyname, addarmstrong, alexrossi, Alveus, asphyxiate, asu, Astargath, Avirunes, babo, BayAreaCoins, BigBoy89, bL4nkcode, blurryeyed, bob123, bones261, cabalism, Captain Corporate, CASIO, ChiBitCTy, crwth, CryptopreneurBrainboss, DaveF, DiamondCardz, DireWolfM14, DreamerBT, eckmar, efialtis, examplens, Foxpup, Game-Protects, Hakorede, HCP, Hhampuz, hopenotlate, iasenko, iluvbitcoins, Initscri, jimmyhate, JSRAW, Kalemder, Kevinn22, kruglikov, LeGaulois, LeonGhibli, LFC_Bitcoin, lighpulsar07, Lutpin, marlboroza, mindrust, Mirae, mocacinno, morvillz7z, mosprognoz, mu_enrico, NeuroticFish, nutildah, o_e_l_e_o, Pamoldar, pandukelana2712, PassThePopcorn, passwordnow, RHavar, rhomelmabini, robelneo, Rodeo02, Royse777, ScamViruS, sheenshane, Slow death,  squatz1, stompix, subSTRATA, suchmoon, SyGambler, TECSHARE, The Parmasist, TheUltraElite, TMAN, TwitchySeal, whitcher_sense, WinRateCasino, xtraelv, yahoo62278, yazher, yogg, Zwei