ICO & IEO at the same time possible?

[Perfect35]

Hello Bitcointalk Community,

i wondered if it is possible to do an ICO and an IEO at the same time.
...

There is no need to do that. You should choose one that will be more effective for your project, depending on your feasibility study.
These days, most projects prefer IEO, but I will suggest you do that on a good exchange, in order to attract investors.

[forexandcryptoauditor]

Recently I came across one project which started ICO and later as part of phase 2, held IEO.
I am wondering how the total fund raising mechanism was managed by these both systems.

[marks1976]

Recently I came across one project which started ICO and later as part of phase 2, held IEO.
I am wondering how the total fund raising mechanism was managed by these both systems.

The total amount that already raised in the ICO will be added with the total amount that will have raised through the IEO and i thought that the exchange site will try to cut some money as a fees and will try to send it the rest to the team. This is what im thinking of this kind of fundraising.

[fortunecrypto]

Hello Bitcointalk Community,

i wondered if it is possible to do an ICO and an IEO at the same time?

Can i spread the total supply for fundraising and use half of it for an IEO and the other one for an ICO ?

I am looking forward to an response.


Kind Regards


Marian

It's possible but it will not guaranty success, Dexage has done that they fist held ICO then when they failed to get more funds they shift to IEO, possibly using a portion of the ICO funds to get listed in IEO, they are lucky to get funded on both but it's still will go to the kind of project and the credibility of the team, ICO and IEO can succeed or fail if they do not have a good platform to back them of.

[hulla]

Hello Bitcointalk Community,

i wondered if it is possible to do an ICO and an IEO at the same time?

Can i spread the total supply for fundraising and use half of it for an IEO and the other one for an ICO ?

I am looking forward to an response.


Kind Regards


Marian

It's possible but it will not guaranty success, Dexage has done that they fist held ICO then when they failed to get more funds they shift to IEO, possibly using a portion of the ICO funds to get listed in IEO, they are lucky to get funded on both but it's still will go to the kind of project and the credibility of the team, ICO and IEO can succeed or fail if they do not have a good platform to back them of.

It possible to run both ICO and IEO at the same time but it will make the investors believe the project team doesn't know what they are doing or believe in the concept they implemented in the project and for Dexage which you used as an example don't actually run ICO and IEO at the same time cause they run it simultaneously which still better than running the two once.

[Fredomago]

Hello Bitcointalk Community,

i wondered if it is possible to do an ICO and an IEO at the same time.
...

There is no need to do that. You should choose one that will be more effective for your project, depending on your feasibility study.
These days, most projects prefer IEO, but I will suggest you do that on a good exchange, in order to attract investors.

Although it's possible but likewise better to focus with the one which really can help you to develop your projects, the demands of starting with IEO's from big well known exchange already getting it's way for more investors to support projects, you need to make a concrete plans to bring something with all investors to trust your projects and support you when you begin talking with the exchange, it's not a small money but if you are serious with your projects you must be willing to do the first move with your own expense.

[_IRMAN]

What is the purpose of doing IEO and ICO together? why not just sell it together at IEO with clear security and investors will trust more, if you do ICO and IEO together it will only reduce investor interest

[VIP BTC]

I think you have done wise actions, and are very careful in investing, as we know that IEO and ICO have weaknesses, so to anticipate these weaknesses, we have to invest in both, I think you are a hesitant investor, according to I you must have the courage to determine your attitude and invest fully in ICO or IEO.

[bitcon]

It is possible that the developers of the project did not get the desired result from ico company and therefore used the plan B. IEO is much higher, because investors will trust the project due to the exchange rating.

In fact, there are not so many cardinal differences, except for the absence of certain risks. Now the ICO is called IEO, and it will be conducted exclusively on cryptocurrency exchanges. I do not think that in the future they will make a special distinction between traditional and cryptocurrency trading platforms. Both familiar and assets created on the basis of blockchain technologies will be presented on all platforms.

[kramat]

I've never seen a project that does ICO&IEO simultaneously and I think it's not possible and most projects will do IEO if their ICO does not reach the target

[sandra_x]

There are no restrictions are regard the number of avenues you can explore to raise funds for project, in as much as your project is worthwhile, however, IEO seem to be more effective these day, you can leverage on the reputation of a good exchange to do your sales

[jhonjhon]

There are no restrictions are regard the number of avenues you can explore to raise funds for project, in as much as your project is worthwhile, however, IEO seem to be more effective these day, you can leverage on the reputation of a good exchange to do your sales

Still depending on the capability of IEO and how it impresses investors to have some investment. IEO is spreading as well and the competition seems to be growing just like it happen to ICO before. If we could have them both IEO and ICO provided that it looks promising and can really be trusted to have good market returns.

[torrantz]

I've never seen a project that does ICO&IEO simultaneously and I think it's not possible and most projects will do IEO if their ICO does not reach the target

Even the majority of the IEOs that already listed on exchange sites are doing both at the same time. You can see that how perlin was doing a pre-sale on its ICO before it has listed on the binance exchange site.
Almost all of IEOs did ICO and then after they have cooperated with some exchange sites and they have started to allocate a little amount for IEO.

[guoyu78]

Recently I came across one project which started ICO and later as part of phase 2, held IEO.
I am wondering how the total fund raising mechanism was managed by these both systems.

The only reason that would have made the project conduct part 2 project on IEO is probably because they did not meet up with their hardcap on ICO, and if you look at ICO really, it is extremely difficult nowadays to meet up with hardcap because there are no much investors that wants to deal with ICO again because of the high rate of scamming over there, but we still have people that would take the risk of trusting such project which their money is little compared to what thee project need.

Therefore, they sometimes change along the way to close the ICO after they must-have approached IEO to continue with the remaining funding over there, but I believe the will not start raising fund all over on IEO, they will simply just continue from whatever amount they have raised on ICO.

[Barracuda]

It could actually be a project to do ICO & IEO simultaneously. But it is not effective to do, people will be confused as to where to invest. To the ICO or IEO, each project will therefore do one of the two options. Because now the trend is IEO, So now more projects do that.

[Farma]

It could actually be a project to do ICO & IEO simultaneously. But it is not effective to do, people will be confused as to where to invest. To the ICO or IEO, each project will therefore do one of the two options. Because now the trend is IEO, So now more projects do that.

in the end, both ways of selling will be assessed by the project. if the project is worth, of course it will produce positive feedback. however, in this case, sometimes IEO becomes superior depending on where the token is traded. for example like binance. of course there will be very many people interested in the IEO project selling there. it might be superior to ICO.

[nikogluttonym]

I must say right away that I saw how companies conducted ICOs and IEOs, but this was not at the same time. At first there was an ICO and then IEO went on exchanges. And that was at the beginning when the market switched from ICO to IEO. Now it is better to conduct only IEO if you are not a popular company.

[Caishen_Project]

Well in my own personal view, I think you should focus on IEO, nowadays IEO has an edge over ICO, most investors believe the day of ICO has gone and the new way to invest now is in IEO. Try to apply for host on good exchange with quality volume that can attract Investors. It's much better than splitting into ICO and IEO