Your opinions on IEOs

[SomeCryptoDude]

In my opinion, IEO's are being more trusted by all because of what happened with ICO's from the previous years where a lot of the projects turning out to be scams, even other investors prefer participating in an IEO rather than an ICO tbh. But at the same time, there are setbacks with some IEO's such as it being expensive to join in at minimum and risk is still there. This new offering, however, is designed to mitigate the problems associated with IEOs and deliver the improved solution using a separate ecosystem which offer discounted tokens at a much lower risk than that associated with IEOs.

[bitcampaign]

IEO is far better than ICO, IEO keeps investor money safe of course by using a strict system that requires KYC and other IEO participants, I think this is quite interesting compared to ICO held by the project team to invite investors to invest through their sites, I think we all know that there are almost a lot of ICO scams and most of them carry investors' money even the products launched are not as expected, I think the IEO is better than the ICO

[robaya]

All press has positive feedback for initial exchange offer. Only Binance exchange IEO is successful, others doing hold their exchange renown.

actually not only good binance for the IEO. we can see exchanges that have a fairly high trade after binance. if they do the IEO. the most important thing is to avoid latoken because I don't believe in this exchange.

[Vargu]

IEO has been a revolutionary means used by start-ups to raised fund after lots of ico scams which leads to people swaying from buying ICO tokens. Some exchange such as binance and gate has gathered a successful reputation for conducting IEO..

IEO has proven that there's lot potential and futere for cryptocurrency adoption

[J1mb0]

It is true that the IEO is a good investment, but exchange companies should not create too many projects, it will be like the previous ICO. Too many projects and will make projects no longer quality as before

Of course there will not be many good projects to implement the IEO. They need to pass the tests of exchanges in order to achieve IEO requirements. I believe the IEO will not be the same as ICO, except exchange collapsed

[Kevlar]

I believe that the IEO topic is becoming irrelevant - at first, yes, the projects gave great profit, but if you look at the latest projects - it is very hard to get and there is almost no profit (even losses) - people will soon stop participating. Better to return the ICO format!

[whtchocla7e]

Similar topics like this have been discussed a lot on forums. The IEO has the trust of investors because it is linked to listing of exchanges. I think it's only safe on large, secure trading platforms like binance, houbi, okex. For small and medium trading platforms such as latoken, emarket, ... should not participate in IEO programs here. Evidence shows that in successful large exchanges, the IEO has a very strong selection of the IEO project. But platforms like Latoken and Emarket have no choice, I think they just need to spend a little money to list IEO on this platform.

[bitkanu]

I believe that the IEO topic is becoming irrelevant - at first, yes, the projects gave great profit, but if you look at the latest projects - it is very hard to get and there is almost no profit (even losses) - people will soon stop participating. Better to return the ICO format!

Considering what happened with ICOs and lack of the interest in investing in them, I don't think it's a good idea. I still think that IEO is better than ICO however there are still lots of problems. Instead of returing to the old format, creating a new format might be necessary. 

yes, that is the consideration that I have made now, in my opinion the IEO is a new breakthrough for investment other than ICO, honestly the reason I switched investment with the IEO is because the IEO has provided benefits to me and has covered my losses when investing in ICO. ICO has made me lose, many of them are fraudulent and this is a fact.

Many of them are fraudulent because they don't undergo review like what most of IEO project did, kinda makes sense because so many incompetent people are trying their fortune there aswell, but doesn't hinder the fact that there are some of them that are as legit as IEO but still IEO just guarantee more safety.

[bitladen]

Now IEO is very popular among people, because participation in IEO brings a very large income and in time coins can be sold on the exchange

[wack slacker]

The IEO creates a limit for that investor that you want to join the IEO and you need to follow the rules of the IEO exchange.  As the Binance or Houbi floor you have to keep the BNB or HT token for a long time.  This makes your money imprisoned.  I agree that the profits of IEOs on these exchanges are large but not everyone is eligible to join the IEO.

[cepot9]

IEO is more suitable for long-term investment because not all new projects are not always successful quickly, all projects certainly require not fast time. And the IEO is a good collaboration that creates a mutually beneficial ecosystem for the project and exchange.

[muhhentuhhen]

I feel more at home with IEOs simply because they are properly checked and analysed by the team of analysts that represent the exchange platform, only if the project passes their tests only then a project is listed so that gives major confidence boost to investors and that is why i like IEOs too.

At the beginning of 2017, there was an ICO boom, and many people were deceived. Now, IEO has come to replace ICO, which should reduce the number of scam projects. IEOs are checked by the exchanges, therefore, the possibility to be involved in the fraud is minimized. I am sure that now, people will be more opened to these projects and start making money on them.

[key4co.in]

In as much as you stated the disadvantages of IEOs mainly because they give more power to centralized exchanges running them, IEOs have done more good to crypto. Some blockchain start-ups who did IEO were very successful, which would have been a failed token sale with ICO. IEO to me is cool, since we are sure of listing and also there is some level of trust for the team since they must have been verified by the exchange.

[Saisher]

It's more like a domino effect, people are posting how good IEO's are and how they are making a quick profit on it, and of course, everybody wants quick profit, we all know DEX's  are good but the lack of volume is not attractive to investors, we really need to educate people about how good and the many benefits of these DEX's

[axel2078]

In my own opinion, IEOs has come to stay because when you study their growth, it is evident they are doing well and thus attracting more investors. Also, since exchanges contributes a lot we need to be sure of the exchange before getting involved.

[yvesp110]

I believe that the IEO topic is becoming irrelevant - at first, yes, the projects gave great profit, but if you look at the latest projects - it is very hard to get and there is almost no profit (even losses) - people will soon stop participating. Better to return the ICO format!

I do not think people around are foolish enough to return to the ICO stuff. They have lost enough money and gained enough wisdom to stay away from ICO. The success of a project in IEO depends on one thing and that is the project itself. If the project is good, it will gain value and will give back returns. In addition, do not go for IEOs on the weak exchanges and target Binance.

[AlaEhBTC]

I think it is better than ICO seeing the coins in the exchange and circulating rather than having the coin but not having listed on an exchange and not having value.

[minersday]

IEO is currently the best way crypto projects can raise funds in the form of crowdfunding. It presents investors with enough information regarding the amount of coins or tokens made available for investors to purchase and the possible profit margin they can gain if they invest in the project. With IEO, exchange platforms are in charge of the tokens or coins distribution which eliminates the potential of investors getting scammed.  IEO eliminates scams. It is the perfect method for crowdfunding activities.

[joromz1226]

I see two big reasons why ICO is now replaced by IEO. One, there is more trust here compared to the usual ICOs because the exchange (assuming that it is reputable as well because there are now many exchanges springing almost everyday and many of them are just here for the money) can be providing additional layer of security as long as the exchange is doing its job of vetting on the project and the people behind it so that we can be sure that it is real, genuine and would have less chance to run once they have the money on the bag. Two, this is providing a better liquidity for token buyers because the coins/tokens are automatically taken in by the exchange. We know that there were so many ICO projects in the past that failed to get into even just one exchange.

As to the concern that exchanges can be getting more powerful...that can be true only because maybe we are just concentrating on Binance but when there can be more reputable exchanges doing the same thing, then the so-called power can easily be diluted or minimized. We have to remember that even without the IEOs, in my opinion, exchanges have their own inherent power as they can decide which projects they would like to be on board and which to reject.

How can you say that ICO now is replaced by IEO? as far as I know there are still ico that are running good now.
It just need research well, it is through that majority of the ico became not good in the sight of many community here, but
compared to 2018 ico, 2019 ico now are much better and good unto it.

[olamidey]

I know IEOs are just a phase and may be replaced soon will h another format. Ico was population about 2-3 years back. Cure most exchanges hold IEO with some making gains while some makes loss. Not all IEO are successful. Those successful are crazily nipped up on the day of trading.