Spendulus
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1386
|
 |
September 28, 2019, 11:38:22 PM |
|
^^^ Or when all the people realize that they want to carry guns for protection.  There are times I have had to carry gun for protection. But now I'm worried. Should it have been "guns?" Maybe so. If one is good three is better... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
bluefirecorp_ (OP)
|
|
October 13, 2019, 03:25:53 PM |
|
So, impeachment gonna happen soonish.
I'm assuming October 22nd or November 22nd.
|
|
|
|
|
Astargath
|
|
October 17, 2019, 08:37:02 PM |
|
So, impeachment gonna happen soonish.
I'm assuming October 22nd or November 22nd.
Wanna bet on that? |
|
|
|
|
bluefirecorp_ (OP)
|
|
October 20, 2019, 05:55:12 PM |
|
So, impeachment gonna happen soonish.
I'm assuming October 22nd or November 22nd.
Wanna bet on that? What ratio are we talking? 2 days specifically should have a ROI of like 1000 or so. |
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1367
|
|
October 20, 2019, 09:20:20 PM |
|
There won't be any Trump impeachment! |
|
|
|
|
bluefirecorp_ (OP)
|
|
November 06, 2019, 12:36:03 AM |
|
November 22nd perhaps? For impeachment. Let's see.
|
|
|
|
|
bluefirecorp_ (OP)
|
|
November 09, 2019, 12:16:10 AM |
|
November 22nd perhaps? For impeachment. Let's see.
Before then, with the public airings of the impeachment trial around the world. Should be an open and shut case. |
|
|
|
Spendulus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1386
|
|
November 09, 2019, 03:30:16 AM |
|
November 22nd perhaps? For impeachment. Let's see.
What would be quite interesting would be if the House voted for impeachment, and did not reach a majority. |
|
|
|
|
|
bluefirecorp_ (OP)
|
|
November 16, 2019, 06:25:04 PM |
|
November 22nd perhaps? For impeachment. Let's see.
What would be quite interesting would be if the House voted for impeachment, and did not reach a majority. I think the vote will look similar to the impeachment inquiry. Overall, it'll pass in the House but Republicans don't give a shit about the laws Trump breaks on a daily basis. |
|
|
|
Spendulus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1386
|
|
November 17, 2019, 02:43:41 PM |
|
November 22nd perhaps? For impeachment. Let's see.
What would be quite interesting would be if the House voted for impeachment, and did not reach a majority. I think the vote will look similar to the impeachment inquiry. Overall, it'll pass in the House but Republicans don't give a shit about the laws Trump breaks on a daily basis. Has anyone figured out what the charges for impeachment might be? For a long time it was supposed to be Russia Collusion, but I heard that was gone. Then I heard it was going to be Tit-For-Tat, but that's been not mentioned for some time now. How about impeach the guy just for Being Trump? |
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1367
|
|
November 17, 2019, 10:54:12 PM |
|
November 22nd perhaps? For impeachment. Let's see.
What would be quite interesting would be if the House voted for impeachment, and did not reach a majority. I think the vote will look similar to the impeachment inquiry. Overall, it'll pass in the House but Republicans don't give a shit about the laws Trump breaks on a daily basis. Has anyone figured out what the charges for impeachment might be? For a long time it was supposed to be Russia Collusion, but I heard that was gone. Then I heard it was going to be Tit-For-Tat, but that's been not mentioned for some time now. How about impeach the guy just for Being Trump? Or just to see if the impeachment process still works. |
|
|
|
TwitchySeal
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2520
Merit: 2014
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
|
|
November 17, 2019, 11:49:00 PM |
|
Has anyone figured out what the charges for impeachment might be? For a long time it was supposed to be Russia Collusion, but I heard that was gone. Then I heard it was going to be Tit-For-Tat, but that's been not mentioned for some time now.
It's pretty clear they are primarily trying to impeach him for abusing his power to influence the election. Are you really only paying attention to media sources that point out why he shouldn't be impeached? They will probably tack on a couple obstruction articles for ordering everyone he can to not cooperate and also attacking the witness on twitter last week mid-testimony. |
|
|
|
Spendulus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1386
|
|
November 18, 2019, 01:59:04 AM |
|
Has anyone figured out what the charges for impeachment might be? For a long time it was supposed to be Russia Collusion, but I heard that was gone. Then I heard it was going to be Tit-For-Tat, but that's been not mentioned for some time now.
It's pretty clear they are primarily trying to impeach him for abusing his power to influence the election. Are you really only paying attention to media sources that point out why he shouldn't be impeached? They will probably tack on a couple obstruction articles for ordering everyone he can to not cooperate and also attacking the witness on twitter last week mid-testimony. I do admit it would be very interesting to see a United States President impeached for a tweet. Do it. Please, just do it. |
|
|
|
|
|
bluefirecorp_ (OP)
|
|
November 20, 2019, 01:25:18 AM
Last edit: November 20, 2019, 01:37:27 AM by bluefirecorp_ |
|
Has anyone figured out what the charges for impeachment might be? For a long time it was supposed to be Russia Collusion, but I heard that was gone. Then I heard it was going to be Tit-For-Tat, but that's been not mentioned for some time now.
It's pretty clear they are primarily trying to impeach him for abusing his power to influence the election. Are you really only paying attention to media sources that point out why he shouldn't be impeached? They will probably tack on a couple obstruction articles for ordering everyone he can to not cooperate and also attacking the witness on twitter last week mid-testimony. I do admit it would be very interesting to see a United States President impeached for a tweet. Do it. Please, just do it. Doesn't really matter the medium of the crime. Plenty of people have been convicted for posts online historically. Nothing new there... However we got him on about 50+ charges non-internet related  Gonna be good once he's removed from office and then criminally liable for everything he's done. |
|
|
|
Spendulus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1386
|
|
November 20, 2019, 12:42:27 PM |
|
Has anyone figured out what the charges for impeachment might be? For a long time it was supposed to be Russia Collusion, but I heard that was gone. Then I heard it was going to be Tit-For-Tat, but that's been not mentioned for some time now.
It's pretty clear they are primarily trying to impeach him for abusing his power to influence the election. Are you really only paying attention to media sources that point out why he shouldn't be impeached? They will probably tack on a couple obstruction articles for ordering everyone he can to not cooperate and also attacking the witness on twitter last week mid-testimony. I do admit it would be very interesting to see a United States President impeached for a tweet. Do it. Please, just do it. Doesn't really matter the medium of the crime. Plenty of people have been convicted for posts online historically. Nothing new there... However we got him on about 50+ charges non-internet related Gonna be good once he's removed from office and then criminally liable for everything he's done. And that's "good." Interesting point of view. I guess then the POTUS Ivanka will just take care of that annoyance. Don't you think at some point people will tire of the hate? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spendulus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1386
|
|
November 21, 2019, 01:41:35 AM |
|
I guess then the POTUS Ivanka will just take care of that annoyance.
Don't you think at some point people will tire of the hate?
Ahahaha, It's funny because you people attacked Clinton for years. Literally years. But yeah, it's really funny you support another criminal for president. Ivanka isn't even qualified to run a charity, let alone a country. https://www.cnbc.com/2018/12/18/trump-foundation-agrees-to-dissolve-under-judicial-supervision-.htmlBut yeah, keep electing criminals into office, good move Ivanka isn't qualified, or she's another criminal? |
|
|
|
|
|
bluefirecorp_ (OP)
|
|
November 21, 2019, 02:00:57 AM |
|
Ivanka isn't qualified, or she's another criminal?
Yes. Read the article. Shut down for charity fraud. Kinda crazy she can't even run a legit non-profit yet people think she can run a country. Amazing that people are so blind. A bunch of sheep. |
|
|
|
TwitchySeal
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2520
Merit: 2014
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
|
|
November 21, 2019, 02:15:55 AM |
|
Ivanka isn't qualified, or she's another criminal?
Yes. Read the article. Shut down for charity fraud. Kinda crazy she can't even run a legit non-profit yet people think she can run a country. Amazing that people are so blind. A bunch of sheep. It's a stretch to call Ivanka a criminal. The Trump foundation was obviously a fraudulently run charity though. |
|
|
|
Spendulus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1386
|
|
November 21, 2019, 03:00:35 AM |
|
Ivanka isn't qualified, or she's another criminal?
Yes. Read the article. Shut down for charity fraud. Kinda crazy she can't even run a legit non-profit yet people think she can run a country.... Hmm... that's not quite what the article says... But just to put this in focus, I'm very biased and suspicious of "charities," period. So don't look for me to praise this one. |
|
|
|
|
|
