🐺WOLF.BET - Advanced Dice Game 🎲 Sportsbook 🏟️ Slots 🎰

[Haunebu]

As we previously mentioned, there are a lot, and I repeat, a lot, of abusive farmers, the price fluctuations also didn't help us, so we think a stable coin such as USDT is the most convenient way to reward users from now, this change is definitive.  VIP members will still get their rewards normally, and the Wolf Race will still continue to pay in BTC.

Have noticed many of these farmers on a regular basis begging in chat-rooms etc. With the rising BTC and altcoin rates, they seem to be rising in number. Good to see USDT being utilised to tackle these issues despite the controversies surrounding it.

I hope you guys don't end up following Roobet in this regard by implementing mandatory KYC etc which is the worst possible solution in my opinion.

[Applesoda]

 Don't forget, there is a $5000 race currently live! 

[iv4n]

As we previously mentioned, there are a lot, and I repeat, a lot, of abusive farmers, the price fluctuations also didn't help us, so we think a stable coin such as USDT is the most convenient way to reward users from now, this change is definitive.  VIP members will still get their rewards normally, and the Wolf Race will still continue to pay in BTC.

Have noticed many of these farmers on a regular basis begging in chat-rooms etc. With the rising BTC and altcoin rates, they seem to be rising in number. Good to see USDT being utilised to tackle these issues despite the controversies surrounding it.

I hope you guys don't end up following Roobet in this regard by implementing mandatory KYC etc which is the worst possible solution in my opinion.

Because of that KYC I am not active on Roobet anymore... I don't even plan to do give them my documents, hopefully, I have just a few dollars left there and I don't need them! I hope Wolf will not go this way... for me, mandatory KYC is also the worst possible solution for the crypto casinos!

Well, now the rain is not interesting as before! I understand this move, but I generally don't like USDT, I just stopped claiming them!

Don't forget, there is a $5000 race currently live! 

The race is live, but it's not so easy to compete with the wolf pack! Good luck all!

[LUCKMCFLY]

As we previously mentioned, there are a lot, and I repeat, a lot, of abusive farmers, the price fluctuations also didn't help us, so we think a stable coin such as USDT is the most convenient way to reward users from now, this change is definitive.  VIP members will still get their rewards normally, and the Wolf Race will still continue to pay in BTC.

Have noticed many of these farmers on a regular basis begging in chat-rooms etc. With the rising BTC and altcoin rates, they seem to be rising in number. Good to see USDT being utilised to tackle these issues despite the controversies surrounding it.

I hope you guys don't end up following Roobet in this regard by implementing mandatory KYC etc which is the worst possible solution in my opinion.

Because of that KYC I am not active on Roobet anymore... I don't even plan to do give them my documents, hopefully, I have just a few dollars left there and I don't need them! I hope Wolf will not go this way... for me, mandatory KYC is also the worst possible solution for the crypto casinos!

Well, now the rain is not interesting as before! I understand this move, but I generally don't like USDT, I just stopped claiming them!

Don't forget, there is a $5000 race currently live! 

The race is live, but it's not so easy to compete with the wolf pack! Good luck all!

Well what happens is that with KYC it is a way to protect yourself, there are many frauds and with KYC it is the best way to prevent, but the rewards for VIP members are still maintained with BTC, you say that you do not like USDT on the network so congested? for fees and others? I think that at the moment being BTC or USDT it does not matter, what really matters is that the casino keeps the reward and above all plays.

In some sites they complain because they receive their rewards in terms of ETH, but when ETH2 comes into force all these problems will be solved, there is nothing to worry about, rather if they remove the rewards if they can claim, but as long as they continue in execution they continue having the same value.

[Haunebu]

Well what happens is that with KYC it is a way to protect yourself, there are many frauds and with KYC it is the best way to prevent

If you are trying to say that providing KYC is the best way to secure our accounts, I think you are wrong and I completely disagree with you. Providing KYC implies that we are sacrificing our privacy rendering the anonymity factor of crypto gambling sites useless.

If I had zero problems with providing my KYC, I would have stuck with FIAT gambling sites instead.

[Raflesia]

Well what happens is that with KYC it is a way to protect yourself, there are many frauds and with KYC it is the best way to prevent

If you are trying to say that providing KYC is the best way to secure our accounts, I think you are wrong and I completely disagree with you. Providing KYC implies that we are sacrificing our privacy rendering the anonymity factor of crypto gambling sites useless.

If I had zero problems with providing my KYC, I would have stuck with FIAT gambling sites instead.

That's as a difference of opinion, actually I also don't agree with KYC, it will indeed sacrifice our privacy, but what can we do for them, maybe it is much safer with KYC but in my opinion not, as long as KYC is not safe this means it won't be a problem until whenever we like anonymity which is covered therefore all gambling in crypto is mostly not recommended KYC has been widely used around us.

[LUCKMCFLY]

Well what happens is that with KYC it is a way to protect yourself, there are many frauds and with KYC it is the best way to prevent

If you are trying to say that providing KYC is the best way to secure our accounts, I think you are wrong and I completely disagree with you. Providing KYC implies that we are sacrificing our privacy rendering the anonymity factor of crypto gambling sites useless.

If I had zero problems with providing my KYC, I would have stuck with FIAT gambling sites instead.

No, obviously for us players it is not feasible to always have to do KYC in order to have all the relevant benefits, I mean from the point of view of the platform, they are required to have clarity in all plays and deposits and Withdrawals, if a casino handles a considerable volume of crypto, this transforms to FIAT and it is a lot of money, I think that is where they want to cover their backs so that they do not get sanctioned or get into trouble, possible lawsuits among others.

I see this from a point of view where I understand the casinos that for the most part do not want to require KYC, but if they do not comply with the regulations they can be in danger of even closing or having to go to court, a money laundering accusation or another thing is not pleasant.

[asrinur]

Well what happens is that with KYC it is a way to protect yourself, there are many frauds and with KYC it is the best way to prevent

If you are trying to say that providing KYC is the best way to secure our accounts, I think you are wrong and I completely disagree with you. Providing KYC implies that we are sacrificing our privacy rendering the anonymity factor of crypto gambling sites useless.

If I had zero problems with providing my KYC, I would have stuck with FIAT gambling sites instead.

No, obviously for us players it is not feasible to always have to do KYC in order to have all the relevant benefits, I mean from the point of view of the platform, they are required to have clarity in all plays and deposits and Withdrawals, if a casino handles a considerable volume of crypto, this transforms to FIAT and it is a lot of money, I think that is where they want to cover their backs so that they do not get sanctioned or get into trouble, possible lawsuits among others.

I see this from a point of view where I understand the casinos that for the most part do not want to require KYC, but if they do not comply with the regulations they can be in danger of even closing or having to go to court, a money laundering accusation or another thing is not pleasant.

the basic idea of crypto is that there is no attachment to central power, which decides everything in a community is a member of the community itself. Of course this is still a problem today, and KYC is not really a pleasant solution for some people. Especially gambling players.

[beerlover]

the basic idea of crypto is that there is no attachment to central power, which decides everything in a community is a member of the community itself. Of course this is still a problem today, and KYC is not really a pleasant solution for some people. Especially gambling players.

That is the key point here, the decentralization of the crypto world versus the centralization of what governments require clash and that causes all this chaos. When you are an unregulated casino that only has like a curacao license or maybe not even a license, you are at risk of both doing something illegal and also not getting any trust from any gambler in that position as well. Whereas if you do get a license and register as a casino and pay your taxes from it, then it means you have to ask KYC eventually as well.

So casinos do not really know what to do, some do require KYC and some don't and some only require it in certain cases and so forth but there is really no right answer. The correct answer for many is "do KYC and apply with law no matter what gamblers say" because that way at least you are doing something legit but that will come with some bad taste.

[Applesoda]

Who's joining today? 

[Haunebu]

I see this from a point of view where I understand the casinos that for the most part do not want to require KYC, but if they do not comply with the regulations they can be in danger of even closing or having to go to court, a money laundering accusation or another thing is not pleasant.

I have not heard of any popular crypto gambling site that got closed down due to not enforcing mandatory KYC so far primarily because it's not that easy for authorities to screw them over.

These sites smartly allow gamblers only from countries where these risks are minimal. For example, a scam site like 1xbit is still operating currently without any sort of mandatory KYC requirement.

The correct answer for many is "do KYC and apply with law no matter what gamblers say" because that way at least you are doing something legit but that will come with some bad taste.

Actually, the correct answer for many is to include KYC in the TOS and only enforce it when they detect something shady or if a huge amount is being withdrawn.

[sana54210]

the decentralization of the crypto world versus the centralization of what governments require clash and that causes all this chaos. When you are an unregulated casino that only has like a curacao license or maybe not even a license, you are at risk of both doing something illegal and also not getting any trust from any gambler in that position as well. Whereas if you do get a license and register as a casino and pay your taxes from it, then it means you have to ask KYC eventually as well.

So casinos do not really know what to do, some do require KYC and some don't and some only require it in certain cases and so forth but there is really no right answer. The correct answer for many is "do KYC and apply with law no matter what gamblers say" because that way at least you are doing something legit but that will come with some bad taste.

There was a point back before 2017 hype was created where the crypto world was all about "fuck the system" type of people, it was filled with those people and that was the reason why I joined crypto world as well because I hated banking and I hated the government of my nation and I wanted to come here and change something.

Over the course of years more and more regulations came, it was received great because we were no longer doing something illegal, it wasn't technically illegal before but it wasn't legal neither, it wasn't a law and it was uncertain what we were doing, so making it legal and regulated became popular here and many new people joined because of that which increased the price, first it was 20k in 2017 and now we peaked at 64k this year. However during that road we forgot that "fuck the system" ways and now people are seeing these KYC stuff as something that should be followed.

[LUCKMCFLY]

the decentralization of the crypto world versus the centralization of what governments require clash and that causes all this chaos. When you are an unregulated casino that only has like a curacao license or maybe not even a license, you are at risk of both doing something illegal and also not getting any trust from any gambler in that position as well. Whereas if you do get a license and register as a casino and pay your taxes from it, then it means you have to ask KYC eventually as well.

So casinos do not really know what to do, some do require KYC and some don't and some only require it in certain cases and so forth but there is really no right answer. The correct answer for many is "do KYC and apply with law no matter what gamblers say" because that way at least you are doing something legit but that will come with some bad taste.

There was a point back before 2017 hype was created where the crypto world was all about "fuck the system" type of people, it was filled with those people and that was the reason why I joined crypto world as well because I hated banking and I hated the government of my nation and I wanted to come here and change something.

Over the course of years more and more regulations came, it was received great because we were no longer doing something illegal, it wasn't technically illegal before but it wasn't legal neither, it wasn't a law and it was uncertain what we were doing, so making it legal and regulated became popular here and many new people joined because of that which increased the price, first it was 20k in 2017 and now we peaked at 64k this year. However during that road we forgot that "fuck the system" ways and now people are seeing these KYC stuff as something that should be followed.

This is a delicate issue, because on the one hand there is the legal basis of the casino and if the casino wants to grow it must comply with the regulations, the licenses give much more freedom for the casino to grow more, but the only restriction is that it falls within the theme of "KYC" And already that way many players leave, and it is understandable, nobody likes to leave their data, if the basis is all so that they can play with more freedom, and for that cryptocurrencies were also created.

The downside is that many see it as an obligation to comply with the KYC, but there will come a time when there will be no casinos that do not require KYC, and those that do not ask will not have the trust of authentic and reputable sites.

[arwin100]

the decentralization of the crypto world versus the centralization of what governments require clash and that causes all this chaos. When you are an unregulated casino that only has like a curacao license or maybe not even a license, you are at risk of both doing something illegal and also not getting any trust from any gambler in that position as well. Whereas if you do get a license and register as a casino and pay your taxes from it, then it means you have to ask KYC eventually as well.

So casinos do not really know what to do, some do require KYC and some don't and some only require it in certain cases and so forth but there is really no right answer. The correct answer for many is "do KYC and apply with law no matter what gamblers say" because that way at least you are doing something legit but that will come with some bad taste.

There was a point back before 2017 hype was created where the crypto world was all about "fuck the system" type of people, it was filled with those people and that was the reason why I joined crypto world as well because I hated banking and I hated the government of my nation and I wanted to come here and change something.

Over the course of years more and more regulations came, it was received great because we were no longer doing something illegal, it wasn't technically illegal before but it wasn't legal neither, it wasn't a law and it was uncertain what we were doing, so making it legal and regulated became popular here and many new people joined because of that which increased the price, first it was 20k in 2017 and now we peaked at 64k this year. However during that road we forgot that "fuck the system" ways and now people are seeing these KYC stuff as something that should be followed.

This is a delicate issue, because on the one hand there is the legal basis of the casino and if the casino wants to grow it must comply with the regulations, the licenses give much more freedom for the casino to grow more, but the only restriction is that it falls within the theme of "KYC" And already that way many players leave, and it is understandable, nobody likes to leave their data, if the basis is all so that they can play with more freedom, and for that cryptocurrencies were also created.

The downside is that many see it as an obligation to comply with the KYC, but there will come a time when there will be no casinos that do not require KYC, and those that do not ask will not have the trust of authentic and reputable sites.

If they don't comply they will became illegal so people should really look at it as good basis and we are seeing Wolfbet doing good about this business so we should trust them since for sure there's valid reason on why they implement that, If they are not comfortable on it better they play on casino who doesn't require KYC but mostly those casino who doesn't have that are small casino which we don't know if they are legitimate and will not scam our money.

[dezoel]

If they don't comply they will became illegal so people should really look at it as good basis and we are seeing Wolfbet doing good about this business so we should trust them since for sure there's valid reason on why they implement that, If they are not comfortable on it better they play on casino who doesn't require KYC but mostly those casino who doesn't have that are small casino which we don't know if they are legitimate and will not scam our money.

They won't become illegal just because they do not ask KYC, it is a crypto website, you can literally keep it as anon as it gets, nobody needs to know who you are and who owns the website and the worst thing any government can do would be to block access from their nation to wolf.bet and that's it.

Plus, there are soooo many places that allow you to start headquarters and basically do anything illegal you want, there are literal mafia bosses that kill people who have headquarters stationed there, they never really go there but the hq is there for legal reasons, if a terrible person can do that, and if trillions of dollars was stolen from tax payers and sent to panama by corporations, I do not see how a casino could not just stay anon and be registered in some island off humanity somewhere and just not ask KYC. Obviously that is work and I understand why they may not do it, but it is not impossible neither.

[Emitdama]

I would like to tell everyone that support at wolf.bet is excellent as I recall an incident recently that happened with me. So basically I was betting and managed to win a good amount and even reach the VIP I think master level. Then as I went to the withdraw page but there I was asked to enable 2FA before I can withdraw and I thought like no problem let's do it.

Now once I went to the 2FA page, the image (QR code) was just not loading for me and I contacted live support and talked to him like a mad man because he was unable to understand what actually happened and I was a little frustrated. He remained polite and guided me to enter the code manually as it was given nearby the broken image. I even apologized to him later so it was all good, but a really nice memory for me which I wanted to share.

So really nice support but please fix the 2FA thing if not already .

[Furious 7]

If they don't comply they will became illegal so people should really look at it as good basis and we are seeing Wolfbet doing good about this business so we should trust them since for sure there's valid reason on why they implement that, If they are not comfortable on it better they play on casino who doesn't require KYC but mostly those casino who doesn't have that are small casino which we don't know if they are legitimate and will not scam our money.

What's wrong if the gambling site we use has implemented the KYC system for years, is it safe? Are you sure? I think this is fine because they also run the business seriously and want to do their users better so the implementation of KYC will not be a problem because this has become a new rule that must be implemented if we don't think it will be labeled illegal by the site for not following the FAQ.
Even if Wolfbet does it for me it won't be a problem.

[Applesoda]

Have you seen our latest youtube video?

[arwin100]

If they don't comply they will became illegal so people should really look at it as good basis and we are seeing Wolfbet doing good about this business so we should trust them since for sure there's valid reason on why they implement that, If they are not comfortable on it better they play on casino who doesn't require KYC but mostly those casino who doesn't have that are small casino which we don't know if they are legitimate and will not scam our money.

What's wrong if the gambling site we use has implemented the KYC system for years, is it safe? Are you sure? I think this is fine because they also run the business seriously and want to do their users better so the implementation of KYC will not be a problem because this has become a new rule that must be implemented if we don't think it will be labeled illegal by the site for not following the FAQ.
Even if Wolfbet does it for me it won't be a problem.

I understand the sentiment of others about this implementation since I myself is skeptical on providing my details to any platform but also I understand that sometimes we need to provide it to continuously avail some services or others, so we should be selective on this we will not get a problem if we go on good platforms like wolfbet.

But eventhough how good they if others don't feel to provide their details better they should stay out since gaining stress for worrying about this is totally not good.

[Haunebu]

What's wrong if the gambling site we use has implemented the KYC system for years, is it safe? Are you sure? I think this is fine because they also run the business seriously and want to do their users better so the implementation of KYC will not be a problem because this has become a new rule that must be implemented if we don't think it will be labeled illegal by the site for not following the FAQ.
Even if Wolfbet does it for me it won't be a problem.

It isn't a problem for you, but it will be a problem for many people including me who prefer staying anonymous on crypto gambling sites. I don't gamble on Roobet anymore primarily because of this issue.

The main advantage of crypto gambling sites is the ability to gamble anonymously. If this advantage disappears, this makes them far less appealing in my opinion.