Multiple Round ICOs?

[Tylev]

Have you heard of ICOs with multiple rounds? Like they raise a certain amount of money now, use that money for primary aims and goals, and then a few months/years down the line (as part of their original plan) launch a second round to fund additional goals and further project development? Just wondering if this is a thing, if so please provide me with some links to projects that have done so.

In general, I normally belong to several rounds in ICO projects. This is sometimes a necessary measure, which is now associated with the poor state of the cryptocurrency market. Even good ICO projects now often do not raise sufficient, even minimal funds, and therefore such a measure may be the only one so that this project can still be launched.
However, as elsewhere, there may be abuse. This is not always good for bounty hunters, because sometimes the ICO project teams do not allocate additional tokens for subsequent rounds, in fact, forcing them to continue working for free, especially if it is impossible to exit the bounty without saving previously earned tokens.

[1714624320]

1714624320

[Polar91]

Have you heard of ICOs with multiple rounds? Like they raise a certain amount of money now, use that money for primary aims and goals, and then a few months/years down the line (as part of their original plan) launch a second round to fund additional goals and further project development?

It's normal thing in ICO since in every round, the price becomes morr expensive which make since and beneficial for thr earlier investors. The only cautious in this system is when the stated period per round were adjusted and moved. It happens many time when the project doesn't meet the expectation and preparation they expect to the investors.

[NewRanger]

Have you heard of ICOs with multiple rounds? Like they raise a certain amount of money now, use that money for primary aims and goals, and then a few months/years down the line (as part of their original plan) launch a second round to fund additional goals and further project development?

It's normal thing in ICO since in every round, the price becomes morr expensive which make since and beneficial for thr earlier investors. The only cautious in this system is when the stated period per round were adjusted and moved. It happens many time when the project doesn't meet the expectation and preparation they expect to the investors.

investors will loss their trust if developers team decided to run multiple ico.we have multiple opinion with their decision why collecting money again ,first round investors will be very disappointed more over if developers team didnt reach roadmap at all. ,they affraid market will have different response with developers team thinking.i am sure if it happen ,they were mismanaged fund from 1st ico.

[Natalim]

Have you heard of ICOs with multiple rounds? Like they raise a certain amount of money now, use that money for primary aims and goals, and then a few months/years down the line (as part of their original plan) launch a second round to fund additional goals and further project development?

It's normal thing in ICO since in every round, the price becomes morr expensive which make since and beneficial for thr earlier investors. The only cautious in this system is when the stated period per round were adjusted and moved. It happens many time when the project doesn't meet the expectation and preparation they expect to the investors.

The team has an option on what to do based on their strategy while still selling the project, all they want is just to raise as much as they can so they will have a decent amount to develop the project, I think the more crucial part is after the ICO as that's the stage where we will know if they deliver or not.

[cvasy]

Ico usually only does one round of their sales, but the policy can change if the income develop get is not in accordance with the minimum target (sotfcap), of course the team will try to do ico for the second time so that the collected funds can reach their target, because the more funds are obtained from ico, the easier it is for them to develop their project according to the roadmap, but if there are project developers who repeatedly make an ico even though they have received a lot of funds and reached the target (hardcap), I thought that was a fraud and only targets money from investors.

[cotton ball]

Have you heard of ICOs with multiple rounds? Like they raise a certain amount of money now, use that money for primary aims and goals, and then a few months/years down the line (as part of their original plan) launch a second round to fund additional goals and further project development? Just wondering if this is a thing, if so please provide me with some links to projects that have done so.

Multiple round for ICO selling make many investor tired with ICO investment, almost ICO have more than ten phase for selling their ICO which each phase take time more than two or three weeks, I invested with ICO and waiting moe than three months for selling coin in the exchange market, I dislike with procedure of ICO have multiple phase for selling their coin, why not take short time for selling ICO coin.

[Wysi]

Have you heard of ICOs with multiple rounds? Like they raise a certain amount of money now, use that money for primary aims and goals, and then a few months/years down the line (as part of their original plan) launch a second round to fund additional goals and further project development? Just wondering if this is a thing, if so please provide me with some links to projects that have done so.

Multiple round for ICO selling make many investor tired with ICO investment, almost ICO have more than ten phase for selling their ICO which each phase take time more than two or three weeks, I invested with ICO and waiting moe than three months for selling coin in the exchange market, I dislike with procedure of ICO have multiple phase for selling their coin, why not take short time for selling ICO coin.

It's a pure greed from the developers to pool in more money and these various phase of IEOs are not communicated to us when we initially invest in their projects and then it's really a tiring procedure before we get our tokens or money back and then we gotta either sell it off immediately which causes investor's dump or else take the hit as most of the coins go through pump for first few days of listing then takes a hit.

I know we cannot blame the developers or investor's alone because sometimes bounty hunters dump the tokens and sometimes market doesn't favor. It's good to avoid ICOs for a while.

[kaneki007]

investors will loss their trust if developers team decided to run multiple ico.we have multiple opinion with their decision why collecting money again ,first round investors will be very disappointed more over if developers team didnt reach roadmap at all. ,they affraid market will have different response with developers team thinking.i am sure if it happen ,they were mismanaged fund from 1st ico.

But the reason they held multiple ICOs in addition to being afraid was because the funds obtained were not enough and on the other hand to get the maximum funds. Of course, if investors in the first round will get a big bonus or discount and give bonuses for each round

[llecrf]

The longer the ICO runs it will reduce investor confidence because they certainly see that apparently not many people are interested in investing in the project. I am pretty sure that right now there are projects that can be fast if they make sales and also about bonuses, it shouldn't be too big to avoid DUMP when entering the market

Investor confidence will continue to grow if the projects that run ICO have good goals and products, I have seen several new projects, for example, QDAO which runs ICO for more than 5 rounds, with prices that continue to rise at each round and the tokens they sell continue to run out sold every round.

[FanEagle]

It's a pure greed from the developers to pool in more money and these various phase of IEOs are not communicated to us when we initially invest in their projects and then it's really a tiring procedure before we get our tokens or money back and then we gotta either sell it off immediately which causes investor's dump or else take the hit as most of the coins go through pump for first few days of listing then takes a hit.

I know we cannot blame the developers or investor's alone because sometimes bounty hunters dump the tokens and sometimes market doesn't favor. It's good to avoid ICOs for a while.

I think that it was when raising of fund through ico started becoming too difficult that they introduced that Multiple round of ico, unlike before that a project could even raise the whole project moment within 2 weeks but now, I dint think that even works again. Some of them don't even pass the first round talk less of going to the second phase and I think it is not right for you to put much blame on hunters dumping a project.

When it comes to a project to dump, it would take millions of dollars to be taken out of the project marketcap for it to be qualified as dumping, then ask me, how much exactly do these people allocate for hunters, and how many hunters really worked for them for it to have had major impact. The people dumping their project are still their investors that they have allocated thousands of the tokens to as gift.

[TinaK]

Mostly to increase the growth of the investment for their project they bring the different phases of ICO investment.

So we need to be careful and check whether the project is achieving its cap As they planned and now what is their development improvement as time goes.
If everything is going correct we don't need to be worry about and make the investment as we wish.

[DeathProxy]

Its normal for some project to do multiple ICO round, simple reason is due to the fact that most project that holds multiple round of ICO do that to meet up with the hardcap set target,  so sometimes they split such Ico in diffrent rounds with diffrent bonus percentage so as to attract and encourage more investors to join in the ICO.  And some project holds multiple ICO rounds so as to raise funds to meet up developing plans of the project

[Lizzylove1]

Miracle Tele did that and they were successful but ended up scamming we the investors.  Although there are some project that do carry this out without scamming anyone, they usually have it on their road map. I don't like the ideology though.

[dainoran]

in my opinion it is a normal thing, more precisely like raising funds in the Pre-ICO and collecting funds at the time of the ICO, which provides their respective benefits.

[the rise]

Its normal for some project to do multiple ICO round, simple reason is due to the fact that most project that holds multiple round of ICO do that to meet up with the hardcap set target,  so sometimes they split such Ico in diffrent rounds with diffrent bonus percentage so as to attract and encourage more investors to join in the ICO.  And some project holds multiple ICO rounds so as to raise funds to meet up developing plans of the project

You will realize if they start announcing two sentences: "the next round because of softcaps that have not yet been reached", and "the next round because at this time the team is still focused on developing / there are technical problems". And it all ends with "waiting for the next announcement" and not realizing that a year has passed with a group filled with promotional spam.

all the reasons that arise are because they cannot see the direction of the project in accordance with market conditions, in the end they run away with the money obtained from the previous phase.

[Darlingtona]

I know of some coins that had done this on Exchange and still couldn't meet up and some that have done in sever exchanges. Truth is, many investors are kind of scared of investing which calls for regulation.

[Coin BTC]

Have you heard of ICOs with multiple rounds? Like they raise a certain amount of money now, use that money for primary aims and goals, and then a few months/years down the line (as part of their original plan) launch a second round to fund additional goals and further project development? Just wondering if this is a thing, if so please provide me with some links to projects that have done so.

Yes, I often see ICO that has finished the first round, but they continue the second round. In fact, they changed the name of the token in the second round, while in the first round it was finished. LUCRE (LCR) is an ICO that has been completed in the first stage. Now they change the symbols from LCR to LCRT, and the LCR tokens they have shared are not working. I don't understand what they are doing right now.

This type of token is nothing but a pure scam, because if you have finished raising fund from the first sales, why come the second time again to raise the second time, and then changing name, this is how most scammer do operate. I know we have some projects that are do raise fund twice, but those ones make their intention known to the public and they never finish raising fund at the initial stage.

The initial stage is what they use to raise the fund that they will use temporarily to sort out some things that requires development while they pause to act based in the  first fund that they receive and then come back the second time to raise fund that will complete the project for them, and most of these ones are usually very serious projects with real use case.

Yes, I see that the project is close to the element of scams. But I can not be sure that it is true or not. But according to my analysis that will lead to scams. I hope this can be processed to ensure certainty about the project, so it will not take a lot of victims.

[magneto]

Nope. And I think this isn't that common due to the fact that ICOs want to achieve their primary goal before anything else - which is to act as a vessle to funnel funds to the founders.

There is no way around that. Having multiple rounds means meaningful roadmaps, and that is the one thing that most scam ICOs absolutely despise.

However, it's not a bad idea at all if community demands this type of structure, whereby you essentially get what you pay for each round. If one round fails, then obviously there won't be a whole lot of demand for the next round of investments.

[gielbier]

Yes I have heard that 1-2 years ago many projects launched more than 2 rounds, for now most projects launch only until round 2 but the duration is extended.

[Bitbtc8]

Multiple rounds of ICO and IEO doesn't guarantee the success of any project, the quality of their real use cases is what will determine their out comes in terms of high demands