Stake vs Fixed bounty allocation

[Firefoxx]

I don't have problems with both types of bounties but personally I prefer the staking bounties to the fixed bounty allocation. Many fixed bounties are most cases the worst bounty to be in.

[1714709812]

1714709812

[1714709812]

1714709812

[1714709812]

1714709812

[1714709812]

1714709812

[aji567]

I also choose the one you choose, fixed allocation is certain and we can predict the tokens or coins that I will get. Bounty allocations remain more consistent and convince bounty hunters like me.

[masterusd]

The most advantage of fixed bounty is that you know exactly what you will receive, this help you decide from the beginning to participate or no.

[tenakha]

Stakes have better advantages than fixed bounty allocation,the only advantage fixed allocation has is fair payment across all  bounty hunters but stakes are based on how hardworking you are

Stake is not that profitable if you are low rank participant and as long as high rank members keep joining the campaign they keep diluting the reward and low rank member keep losing their reward to them. Also for fixed reward the low number of participants is not beneficial but it is very good for low rank bounty participants, they have guaranteed reward without sharing with anyone

It depends on bounty. Even those who pay a fixed amount mostly pay less. Stake-based payers like this too. So before joining campaign doing proper research about payment saves you from the disappointment.

[xiboothrezi]

Fixed is usually employed to control the amount of tokens a participant can likely get an also enable free sharing among participants but the best rewarding type has to be Stake bounty allocation as the amount of tokens acquired by each participant now depends on its competing strength

But bounty with fixed allocation always limit the number of participants. Participants can also estimate the range of rewards that will be obtained. Bounty with stakes system is indeed beneficial for those who have a high rank, but it will become less if the number of participants is large, because most bounties with stakes systems do not limit the number of participants. Well, both have their advantages and disadvantages. Depending on the allocation, depending on the project, and depending on our luck.

[Mulann2]

Fixed is usually employed to control the amount of tokens a participant can likely get an also enable free sharing among participants but the best rewarding type has to be Stake bounty allocation as the amount of tokens acquired by each participant now depends on its competing strength

But bounty with fixed allocation always limit the number of participants. Participants can also estimate the range of rewards that will be obtained. Bounty with stakes system is indeed beneficial for those who have a high rank, but it will become less if the number of participants is large, because most bounties with stakes systems do not limit the number of participants. Well, both have their advantages and disadvantages. Depending on the allocation, depending on the project, and depending on our luck.

i actually agree with you, bounty with fixed allocation have a limit to number of participants which means your effort will actually get good reward at the end, but in the case where bounty is base on stakes, there is no limit to participants and rest assured that the high rank members will have the larger stakes at the end some participants will end up with very little reward, fixed allocation seems more better.

[cassavachips]

Stake does make payments to bounty hunters fairer, but I prefer projects that limit participants, especially for signature campaigns because this will increase people more diligently to update about new projects. And of course, what is found bounty hunter is not very low even though the work is quite heavy

[bastian466]

Most participants in the signature campaign are looking for projects that make payments using stake calculations because they can be paid more if the calculation is fixed. The participant gets a little payment because the amount each week has been determined according to the rank

[Ken_terrance]

Stake allocation bounties always paid more than fixed allocation,you will get more reward based on how many participants join the stake allocation bounty but with fixed bounties you will know how many tokens you will get right from the begining of the bounty

[bitstalker]

for bounties with stake now most are a lucky factor because projects that use bounties with a stake system are mostly not good projects even some of them are scam projects, for bounties fixed allocation in my opinion good only bounties like this offer rewards that can be said to be quite a bit compared to bounty stake it's just that I think it's more guaranteed

[Golftech]

Stake allocation bounties always paid more than fixed allocation,you will get more reward based on how many participants join the stake allocation bounty but with fixed bounties you will know how many tokens you will get right from the begining of the bounty

due this reason most of bounty hunter prefer to join on campaign that used stakes allocation.they think could earn money , but i think it depend on market mechanism too.in fixed allocation have stronger resistance to price dumping.

always depends from each projects and bounty developers how they will provide rewards, every managers have its own ways  both staking and fixed bounties will be depends from what will be the actual value of certain projects after being available inside the market and be ready for traders to exchange
and trade for the certain projects.

[Rustamm]

The reward must be fair, so that all who work honestly have the opportunity to receive a decent reward. The stakes system is good enough, but the problem is that it is not clear at the beginning of the work how much we can earn for a certain amount of work. The fixed system is also good and more transparent, but the team needs to limit the number of participants depending on the amount allocated to the campaign and, if necessary, extend the campaign, they will not be able to do this without increasing the budget. Therefore, each system has its pros and cons.

[hongus]

The reward must be fair, so that all who work honestly have the opportunity to receive a decent reward. The stakes system is good enough, but the problem is that it is not clear at the beginning of the work how much we can earn for a certain amount of work. The fixed system is also good and more transparent, but the team needs to limit the number of participants depending on the amount allocated to the campaign and, if necessary, extend the campaign, they will not be able to do this without increasing the budget. Therefore, each system has its pros and cons.

I think if all the projects will go over to the feksirovanoy payment will be good. The fact is that a stable income for the hunter is much more important. Than the payment is 1-5 times a year.

[babysweetTiger0401]

With stake allocation you can get more tokens based on the stake and how many participants join the bounty but that's that, the reason why I choose fixed allocation over stake is because right from the start you've know how much tokens you will get and the fact is merely looking or comparing bounties from one to another fixed bounty allocation performs better,they pays most times and no single participants is left out,what do you guys say about this?

Stakes is much better if the participants in every bounty campaign are few only, I think in this way you can have a chance to get good profit in the end even you are in low rank only. But for fixed bounty allocation its not to me especially if the amount total is suitable for the task you are going to make in the campaign.

[Jenkins33]

With stake allocation you can get more tokens based on the stake and how many participants join the bounty but that's that, the reason why I choose fixed allocation over stake is because right from the start you've know how much tokens you will get and the fact is merely looking or comparing bounties from one to another fixed bounty allocation performs better,they pays most times and no single participants is left out,what do you guys say about this?

I like it better when the reward is installed directly. So I can estimate how much I make money for the bounty campaign.
If the reward is set in stacks, then the more people will be accepted in the bounty campaign, the less will be the reward for each participant

[AlaEhBTC]

Stake allocation is better than fixed because in stake, giving of rewards may vary on different factors like ranks and your hard work. Another disadvantage of fixed if the reward is crypto currency is you will get less fiat after change if the price of that crypto currency goes down.

[Cheesus]

I like the fixed allocation too. It gives a proper idea about your earning. By this process, you know After the bounty period end, how many tokens you will receive. Though stake allocation also good, it can give you more reward sometimes but yet I prefer fixed allocation!

[flemmings02]

Stake based allocations is a bit better than fixed allocations for bounty particpants because stake based allocations will reward consistent and higher ranked users than inconsistent or lower ranked ones.

[freedomgo]

Stake based allocations is a bit better than fixed allocations for bounty particpants because stake based allocations will reward consistent and higher ranked users than inconsistent or lower ranked ones.

Most campaign would prefer to accept higher ranks, if they can get higher member, they will have bigger exposure of the signature they wear, so that is the basis aside from seniority in the forum. Some signature campaign now that are paying BTC are looking for Hero and Legendary members only, but most of them still stick with member to Legendary, but then like I said, higher rank still get the higher pay, that's the norms that I know.

[junkerr]

I think everything is the same because it depends on the price of the token in the market and the allocation that is obtained. sometimes with a stake system, we can see the number of participants so much and we have to share it with any number of participants who join.

but in the allocation system that has been provided for each job we will get the amount of reward that we already know, especially if tokens or coins can already be traded. and any number of participants who join will not affect the reward we will get.