Stake vs Fixed bounty allocation

[auntyjmary]

The two are basically the same, they are just two words that can be used interchangeably. Bounty mangers can decide to use fixed tokens or stake based. At the end of the day, it is just a way or means to divide or distribute tokens to participants of a bounty campaign.

[EmmaBen]

The both have their advantages and disadvantages, however, I will personally choose stake bounties over token based bounties. This is simply because with a stake bounty, there is always a great chance of earning more if the level of participation is low. The more stakes you accumulate as a hunter, the greater your earnings and vice versa. This doesn't apply to token based bounties.

[bitcoinst]

It is unlikely that one can say that we are in that position from which we can make some kind of choice regarding the preferred way of calculating payments. Rather, we are forced to choose from what is.
Fixed payments are a good choice when it comes to coins that are already being traded and are worth something, such as bitcoin. The best bounties with payment in Bitcoin have fixed payments.

[mr_random]

The both have their advantages and disadvantages, however, I will personally choose stake bounties over token based bounties. This is simply because with a stake bounty, there is always a great chance of earning more if the level of participation is low. The more stakes you accumulate as a hunter, the greater your earnings and vice versa. This doesn't apply to token based bounties.

Stake based bounty campaigns have more disadvantages compared to the fixed bounty token allocation campaigns. The token-based campaigns usually pay the bounty hunters with the rewards that diversified among the participants of the campaign.  The participant cap has decided by the team in order to prevent the misunderstandings during the token distribution in the fixed token bounties. The lower rewards in the fixed bounty campaigns are the reason why bounty participants prefer to stay out of the profitable bounty campaigns. Day by day the priority of the stake bounty allocation increase in my opinion due to the declared judgments.

[kissme09]

Fixed bounty allocation is suitable for projects that provide a small number of tokens for the entire campaign in a short time. With Stake, I often participate in projects that last for months with a more significant amount of tokens distributed. Based on the timing of each different campaign, I chose different options to fit.

[SolarWindMiningCompany]

From my experience, stake based bounty allocation is my choice any day any time. In fixed bounty, when allocation pool is not exhausted, the team keeps the tokens to them selves but in stake, all allocation is exhausted irrespective of how little the participants are and this means more rewards unlike in fixed

[Distinctin]

From my experience, stake based bounty allocation is my choice any day any time. In fixed bounty, when allocation pool is not exhausted, the team keeps the tokens to them selves but in stake, all allocation is exhausted irrespective of how little the participants are and this means more rewards unlike in fixed

We will be able to maximize our earning if the project succeed and there are only few participants that will divide the bounty pool.

I like stake based since I experience in the past that I receive a good reward, but that was a long time ago, it was last 2017 where ICO have most of its success but lately, I only saw a few projects that are successful and the reward is not that so generous, but anyway, we have the spirit of a bounty hunter so we will not stop finding the best one until we can earn a great amount here, when altcoins season will come, things will be better.

[BennyK]

Most of the time stakes allocations on bounties gives you a high percentage earning than the fixed one.
however if you joined some trash bounties that allocation is meaningless you will not gain anything.
so it's the same whether in stakes or fixed allocation if the bounty is bad the stakes are no good.

This comes down to the fact that the being a stake or fixed bounty does not really matter although one of them gives higher number of tokens to the bounty participants. What is necessary here and must be look out for by all bounty hunters before investing is the potentials of the project. If the project hosting the bounty project does not has any capability of becoming successful, the whatever strategy adopted for its bounty program will be in vain.

[valuater]

If I choose bounties, I usually don't think too much about stake and fixed bounty issues, but look at the potential of the project. If I think there is something good, whether it's stake or fixed allocation, I will follow it, only at this time that I observe fixed allocation is interesting.

[kram31]

With stake allocation you can get more tokens based on the stake and how many participants join the bounty but that's that, the reason why I choose fixed allocation over stake is because right from the start you've know how much tokens you will get and the fact is merely looking or comparing bounties from one to another fixed bounty allocation performs better,they pays most times and no single participants is left out,what do you guys say about this?

I will choose depends on what is the fix stake value!
For me in general i will always choose the staking for all the participants and equally divide it base on the stake earned.
Though if the fix stake per week is good to see and value much, they i might consider it.

[cherryganda]

IF we are talking abount bitcoin or ethereum bounty the fixed stake will be the best and i will definitely join that if the price is good.
If we are about to have a token payment of the bounty project then it is always okay for staking that will be total at the end to maximize the prize and equally divided to participants.

[jozymens7]

I think with fixed allocation, people get much higher tokens than that of stake based system in a sense that if say, in a signature campaign of stakes from member to legendary as 1, 2, 10, 20 and 30 respectively, a legendary member that join for just 2 weeks gets much higher total stake than that of a member who even does for 30 weeks. Suppose it were a fixed allocation, one does not care about the higher ranks that join later to make the coin distribution skewed to higher staked ranks.

[freedomgo]

I think with fixed allocation, people get much higher tokens than that of stake based system in a sense that if say, in a signature campaign of stakes from member to legendary as 1, 2, 10, 20 and 30 respectively, a legendary member that join for just 2 weeks gets much higher total stake than that of a member who even does for 30 weeks. Suppose it were a fixed allocation, one does not care about the higher ranks that join later to make the coin distribution skewed to higher staked ranks.

If it's gonna be a fixed allocation, we can still expect that higher rank will receive a better pay compared to the lower rank, that's the norm here.
The advantage of the high rank if they join a signature campaign is they can wait and see if the project is close to success then they can join even in the last stage of the campaign.

other managers are making capping the number of participants which is a good idea, usually, they cap to 150 to 200 participants in the campaign, so this will prevent from those high rank who are taking advantage to join in the later period.

[magnum cyber]

if the calculation through stake allocation is something that is not liked by Jr. ranking because the distribution of tokens will be very different from other ranks because it takes into account the number of weekly bets through the ranking, but different from the calculation through fixed allocation, at least the average participant receives a good token payment.

[kak uli]

With stake allocation you can get more tokens based on the stake and how many participants join the bounty but that's that, the reason why I choose fixed allocation over stake is because right from the start you've know how much tokens you will get and the fact is merely looking or comparing bounties from one to another fixed bounty allocation performs better,they pays most times and no single participants is left out,what do you guys say about this?

I prefer to take part in a bounty project that does the stake allocation method rather than using the fixed allocation method ... because many projects that use fixed allocation do not pay according to their allocation ... and I have followed the fixed allocation but not according to the bounty allocation. and it was very disappointing ... so now I only follow bounty projects that allocate coins according to the stake we get ...

[nutriagrigia]

With stake allocation you can get more tokens based on the stake and how many participants join the bounty but that's that, the reason why I choose fixed allocation over stake is because right from the start you've know how much tokens you will get and the fact is merely looking or comparing bounties from one to another fixed bounty allocation performs better,they pays most times and no single participants is left out,what do you guys say about this?

I prefer to take part in a bounty project that does the stake allocation method rather than using the fixed allocation method ... because many projects that use fixed allocation do not pay according to their allocation ... and I have followed the fixed allocation but not according to the bounty allocation. and it was very disappointing ... so now I only follow bounty projects that allocate coins according to the stake we get ...

projects that use stakes are also not always honest. very often they reduce rewards and as a result, you get several times less than you expected

[10c]

With stake allocation you can get more tokens based on the stake and how many participants join the bounty but that's that, the reason why I choose fixed allocation over stake is because right from the start you've know how much tokens you will get and the fact is merely looking or comparing bounties from one to another fixed bounty allocation performs better,they pays most times and no single participants is left out,what do you guys say about this?

On the one hand, it’s good when you get a certain rate in tokens for the work done, but on the other hand, we still won’t know what price will ultimately be for one token. Now there are practically no projects that accept only a certain number of participants and pay a reward in the form of a fixed rate.

there are such projects, but there are very few of them and, as a rule, the reward there is not at all high. but if you constantly participate in the bounty, then you have great chances to catch a very good project

[qomariah95]

because it is clearer from the beginning of the total prize that will be allocated large or small. 

The same thing that I like. It is better to know from the beginning how much the allocation for the bounty is, of course what will affect is the number of participants. Unless BM has made the maximum number of participants for each campaign, it will be even better that we will get later.

[gunhell16]

Stakes based allocation is the best way in bounty campaign i think. I don't think everyone dosen't the same effort to promote in the projects.

There is no effect if one is putting more effort and the other does not, this is base on the task you will do and complete for the week.
The manager are the one who is giving the task individually. so there is no effect.

So, that i recommend stakes bounty allocation even here big opportunity to earn more tokens. In fixed bounty allocation real hard workers will not be get expected rewards in my opinion. Both methods isn’t the same of course something different calculation.

AS  i said! if the one completed the task then he or she will get the payment if the others put an effort but didn't finish the task then there is no payment or stake

I think you are misunderstanding the fix and stake based.
Stake based- even the other participants did not get a weekly stake at the end of the campaign every single token will be distributed to participants according to their shares.
Fixed base- you will get the fixed stake(payment) weekly or at the end of the campaign according to the task you complete weekly. on this, the budget is not stretch and there will be some tokens that will not be distributed.

The best to have is the stake based!

[mcnocon2]

With stake allocation you can get more tokens based on the stake and how many participants join the bounty but that's that, the reason why I choose fixed allocation over stake is because right from the start you've know how much tokens you will get and the fact is merely looking or comparing bounties from one to another fixed bounty allocation performs better,they pays most times and no single participants is left out,what do you guys say about this?

Yes you are right, fixed bounty allocation got the assurance of how many tokens you will get from the start. Unlike in stakes you will not know how many tokens you will get after the end of the campaign because there are so much factors to be consider like number of participants, number of total stakes and total stakes you get.