Stake vs Fixed bounty allocation

[#Darren]

Right now, doing a fixed allocated bounty programmes make absolutely no sense. 95 percent of all bounties are ending scam or you will get peanuts at the very end. Stakes are much better, because they are giving a chance for the most creative ones to earn more.

[BlackFor3st]

With stake allocation you can get more tokens based on the stake and how many participants join the bounty but that's that, the reason why I choose fixed allocation over stake is because right from the start you've know how much tokens you will get and the fact is merely looking or comparing bounties from one to another fixed bounty allocation performs better,they pays most times and no single participants is left out,what do you guys say about this?

At first, I love fixed bounty allocation as you can directly compute how much you are going to earn in the whole bounty campaign period and your share will not reduce even if the participants will increase rapidly unlike stake base.

But right now, there are very few campaigns that offer this kind of campaign so we don't have a choice but to join the stake base campaign especially if the project is very attractive.

[TrevorS]

Right now, doing a fixed allocated bounty programmes make absolutely no sense. 95 percent of all bounties are ending scam or you will get peanuts at the very end. Stakes are much better, because they are giving a chance for the most creative ones to earn more.

I agree with you. A stake system gives at least some chance of equal distribution and fair payment. But going public is not known how much a coin will cost.
As practice shows, coins are listed on the exchange with a price of 0.1 from the selling price. In this case, it is better to get a percentage of the total pool than the fixed part.

[Youghoor]

With stake allocation you can get more tokens based on the stake and how many participants join the bounty but that's that, the reason why I choose fixed allocation over stake is because right from the start you've know how much tokens you will get and the fact is merely looking or comparing bounties from one to another fixed bounty allocation performs better,they pays most times and no single participants is left out,what do you guys say about this?

There are no specific differences between fixed allocation and stakes. Both are good for a specific situation. But I think stakes is better than fixed allocation when hunters for.a stake bounty are not many,  each hunter is assured of getting extra tokens. With huge number of hunters on one bounty, fixed allocation is far better than stakes. You are assured to have specific amount of the tokens even if the number exceed what was expected.

[jmigdlc99]

With stake allocation you can get more tokens based on the stake and how many participants join the bounty but that's that, the reason why I choose fixed allocation over stake is because right from the start you've know how much tokens you will get and the fact is merely looking or comparing bounties from one to another fixed bounty allocation performs better,they pays most times and no single participants is left out,what do you guys say about this?

I'd also go for fixed bounty allocation.

With stakes, it's easy for the bounty campaign manager to simply add fake accounts to the participants list and then as a result see a decrease in everyone's payouts. There is simply too much trust placed upon the bounty creators when stakes are used. Better to join fixed bounties where you at least are guaranteed reward you are amenable to.

[Aabcde]

I think that's part of the marketing strategy. The fact is if the developer puts a fixed amount, then the campaign participants will automatically be limited according to the number of allocations. but if it applies to stakeholders, that's why the developer will get a lot of participants. And it benefits them because more and more people are promoting them. But I prefer the fix allocation.

[concnepornurage]

It seems to me that it makes sense to invest only in projects that bring coins i.e. to coins with PIC mining. I prefer to invest in coins with the POS algorithm. Since only such coins can make a profit in the period of depression as it is now. By the way, the other day I found a new YUSRA GLOBAL coin (https://yusra.global) with a POS-mine. Now mining has just started and you can earn up to 30% per month. This is cooler than masternodes!

[asder250]

It is hard to predict which campaign will be more profitable for you.
You can participate in many stake based campaign and at the end you will receive less than working for fixed amount of money.

[Bonenx14]

It is hard to predict which campaign will be more profitable for you.
You can participate in many stake based campaign and at the end you will receive less than working for fixed amount of money.

it is very difficult to know whether the project will be profitable or not. but as said you can participate in several projects in social media or articles then you will see which projects will be profitable, but this way I think is quite bad because you only work without analyzing the project correctly when you want to join

[GREENch]

A fixed rate has its pros and cons. Of course, the fact that you can calculate how many tokens you get in the end is good. However, if you participate in a bounty campaign where the value of the bet in tokens will be determined at the end of the company, there is always the opportunity to earn more, as someone may be banned or a duplicate will be detected, etc.

[Katashi]

I still go for stake allocation since i could get more tokens at the end of the campaign instead of a fixed allocation but it depends on the bounty hunters on which they prefer because i always do some calculation first on how much i could get before participating on any bounty campaigns.

[mirakal]

I still go for stake allocation since i could get more tokens at the end of the campaign instead of a fixed allocation but it depends on the bounty hunters on which they prefer because i always do some calculation first on how much i could get before participating on any bounty campaigns.

For me it depends on the market situation and the project itself, if the project is not so popular, I would go for stake allocation as for sure they will not sell at the IEO price when traded in exchange, so with better stake, you'll get a better price.

For project that are likely to sell at a good price, it's alright for me to get a fixed allocation as its less risky and there's a chance that I will be payed with the amount I expected after the bounty period.

[minairia3]

Fixed allocation are done to reward participants in a fair way but still some higher of course based on youre tier. Like in signature, if youre rank is higher the higher fixed tokens you will get. I think I'll settle with stake allocation since you can take advantage with a campaign if youre a high rank and bonus if only few got in.

[Sithara007]

With stake allocation you can get more tokens based on the stake and how many participants join the bounty but that's that, the reason why I choose fixed allocation over stake is because right from the start you've know how much tokens you will get and the fact is merely looking or comparing bounties from one to another fixed bounty allocation performs better,they pays most times and no single participants is left out,what do you guys say about this?

The stake system is better, however sometimes the campaign managers implement maximum thresholds for payments. For example, if only a few users are signing up for the bounty campaign, then with the stake method they will be getting very high payouts. But the campaign managers don't want to do that and they will set a condition that the maximum payouts can't exceed a certain threshold.

However, another type of threshold needs to be set if they are going with the fixed payment system. There should be a limit on the total number of participants. Else, if too many people sign up for the campaign, the manager won't be able to honor the promises. With stake system, he doesn't need to worry about that, as the total pool is fixed.

[k@suy]

Fixed allocation are done to reward participants in a fair way but still some higher of course based on youre tier. Like in signature, if youre rank is higher the higher fixed tokens you will get. I think I'll settle with stake allocation since you can take advantage with a campaign if youre a high rank and bonus if only few got in.

I would like to have a fixed allocation, because it will be base on your current rank whild in stake, many members of this forum will join the campaign, also we dont know it they are really true, it is hard to join to a campaign that have many hunters , many members will lead to few tokens because the amount of token to be given away will be divided to all the participants.

[Republikcoin.com]

I still go for stake allocation since i could get more tokens at the end of the campaign instead of a fixed allocation but it depends on the bounty hunters on which they prefer because i always do some calculation first on how much i could get before participating on any bounty campaigns.

For me it depends on the market situation and the project itself, if the project is not so popular, I would go for stake allocation as for sure they will not sell at the IEO price when traded in exchange, so with better stake, you'll get a better price.

For project that are likely to sell at a good price, it's alright for me to get a fixed allocation as its less risky and there's a chance that I will be payed with the amount I expected after the bounty period.

I have the same opinion. For projects that do not yet have a market, and are still doing IEO, I choose to be paid based on stake. it might be more profitable, especially when we choose the right project. however, for projects that already have a market, it is best to choose Fix allocation, because it is clearer and makes us comfortable enough at work.

[asus09]

I like bounty manager always update stake every week without asking from bounty participants, big or not reward depend on bounty campaign rule and how many participants will give higher or lower value after coin distribution for bounty participants, I joined with bounty campaign give alloaction about 2% to 5%.

[Beparanf]

Staking is way better in part of bounty hunters, especially now that only few are able to join in campaigns due to some rules and elimination of Newbies and Red Trust account and the idea that it is hard to analyze now which campaign is good that only few participants joins now. While in fixed allocation its a  fair way to calculate what we will able to earn from the start to end it is much favor in developers team since not all their budget in bounty might not all used since some might be late in joining or only few can have a chance to join. Whatever the allocation mode is, what important is that they will pay the bounty hunters fair and in time.

[lunnatic]

I like bounty manager always update stake every week without asking from bounty participants, big or not reward depend on bounty campaign rule and how many participants will give higher or lower value after coin distribution for bounty participants, I joined with bounty campaign give alloaction about 2% to 5%.

but now very rarely a project gives a large allocation of 2% -5% like Crypterium, Titanium which is managed by Aerys,
you know that now projects rarely use signature campaigns, and that makes me worry

[Zeke_23]

Fixed allocation are done to reward participants in a fair way but still some higher of course based on youre tier. Like in signature, if youre rank is higher the higher fixed tokens you will get. I think I'll settle with stake allocation since you can take advantage with a campaign if youre a high rank and bonus if only few got in.

I would like to have a fixed allocation, because it will be base on your current rank whild in stake, many members of this forum will join the campaign, also we dont know it they are really true, it is hard to join to a campaign that have many hunters , many members will lead to few tokens because the amount of token to be given away will be divided to all the participants.

Having a fixed bounty allocation is good, you can count already the possible earnings you can get until the end of the campaign, than stake which will depends on how much the project will accumulate through their ico. Sometimes stake is only 2% of the accumulate fund where it will be divided to different kinds of bounty campaigns and it will be too small for every participant.