Stake vs Fixed bounty allocation

[Apes]

I think it depends, Fixed bounty allocation is more suitable for campaign types where a lot participants are cheating, like sosial media & article campaign because the honest participant payment stake doesn't cut by them. And the signature campaign is more suitable to use the stake payment method because it's hard to cheat and trick the manager on this campaign. So I think this is the most ideal method.

[Pearls Before Swine]

There's a fundamental mistake being made with the choice given here.  Instead of *any* stake, bounty hunters should be demanding that they get paid in bitcoin or some other crypto that isn't going to be worthless once the bounty is over.  These project devs are taking advantage of participants in a big way by offering them stakes which cost them absolutely nothing to give out, and it doesn't matter if its a fixed amount or not.

Does anyone actually hold onto their tokens once they're done with the bounty?  I highly doubt recipients actually care much for the projects they help to advertise.  That being the case, they ought to be paid in another currency as I said.  There are a lot of other things that need changing with respect to bounties, but this is a major one. 

Escrow would help reduce scams, but that can't be done with tokens that aren't on the market yet.  And yep, devs are taking advantage of that fact as well.  You bounty hunters need to smarten up to the tricks being played on you.

[Mighty_crypt]

Most new projects are misusing bounty hunters this days and after bounty ends no payment will be received, the ball is in your court spend time to choose wisely, as a bounty hunter you can't rely on research alone, sometimes you can find clues from other existing projects too

[Lanatsa]

Fixed bounty allocation would be much more preferred plus having a limit into its participants.Majority of them would tend to get max number of people who would join but they should be true to their words on having a fixed payment.For some this kind of arrangement isn't ideal for some bounters.

Stake is good but only if only few participants yet you can possibly earn huge allocations basing on what they had budgeted but on the opposite side
the more people would join the smaller tokens would be getting.

[foxincoin]

Pay by bitcoin is the most way we void scam project, if the project pay with bitcoin this mean it is good project and the team believes of the project.

[krb91]

Although staked bounties seem more lucrative,  bounty hunters may lose out eventually in the case of large influx of hunters.  Also,  the project may choose to reduce the allocation to a particular campaign if the number of hunters are fewer than they expected.  I think fixed campaigns are still a better option, but all in all VIP campaigns with limited participants and staked pool take the cake. 

[Kotone]

Both works for me actually. If youre joining with signature campaign the rates will still depend on youre rank actually so the higher youre rank is, the higher the tokens you will grab regardless its stake or fixed allocation. But many prefer stake allocation since they can get many tokens in the end if not many joined a project campaign. Also, some prefer bitcoin payment to be sure already of profit but only few got in this campaign due to limited slots.

[DarkIT]

Fixed bounty allocation would be much more preferred plus having a limit into its participants.Majority of them would tend to get max number of people who would join but they should be true to their words on having a fixed payment.For some this kind of arrangement isn't ideal for some bounters.

Stake is good but only if only few participants yet you can possibly earn huge allocations basing on what they had budgeted but on the opposite side
the more people would join the smaller tokens would be getting.

Well, whichever one is good for now, but I might prefer to fix allocation over the stake. maybe it's more worth it, and calmer when we do the task. in addition, we can also calculate tokens that we get every week, unfortunately, at this time, there are so few bounties that have an allocation fix.

[bryant.coleman]

I also chose fixed allocation. Because this is safer for me than every bounty I follow. There is a greater feeling of security here than having to follow a stake system.Because just following the bounty is now very difficult to get a project that really works. So I want to risk the time I spend with a little more certainty.

Same here. Stake system is advantageous for the bounty hunter where the number of participants is low. But in case the number of participants is low, then there is a very high chance that the project is a scam and irrespective of whether you get the tokens or not, ultimately you will not be able to cash out your rewards. Because the tokens from scam projects are worthless. If a project is really good, a lot many participants will enroll and therefore the bounty hunter will get more tokens if they follow a fixed allocation system.

[arimamib]

Pay by bitcoin is the most way we void scam project, if the project pay with bitcoin this mean it is good project and the team believes of the project.

sometimes getting a project that pays btc can indeed ensure a stable income, but the project will be hard to find. so you have to get used to when projects pay with their tokens, and practice your analysis so you can find projects that pay according to their tokens. You have to develop with the situation if there are no projects that pay btc

[NewRanger]

I also chose fixed allocation. Because this is safer for me than every bounty I follow. There is a greater feeling of security here than having to follow a stake system.Because just following the bounty is now very difficult to get a project that really works. So I want to risk the time I spend with a little more certainty.

Same here. Stake system is advantageous for the bounty hunter where the number of participants is low. But in case the number of participants is low, then there is a very high chance that the project is a scam and irrespective of whether you get the tokens or not, ultimately you will not be able to cash out your rewards. Because the tokens from scam projects are worthless. If a project is really good, a lot many participants will enroll and therefore the bounty hunter will get more tokens if they follow a fixed allocation system.

sometimes low participants didnt rellafed with scam.maybe only few people that knew about that projects.using stakes system sometimes give us more chance to get more reward if this projects not scam.but it also have high possibility to dump in market while every hunter get alot token.we dont know how much reward when projects finish.meanwhile in fix calculation we could set it based how long we joined.

[Bitfling]

With stake allocation you can get more tokens based on the stake and how many participants join the bounty but that's that, the reason why I choose fixed allocation over stake is because right from the start you've know how much tokens you will get and the fact is merely looking or comparing bounties from one to another fixed bounty allocation performs better,they pays most times and no single participants is left out,what do you guys say about this?

I think this depends on the large number of bounty participants. If there are many bounty participants, fixed allocation is more profitable than stake allocation. But the bounty manager certainly has a reason to have a stake or fixed allocation

[nonbody]

I like the bounty activities that are distributed by shares, because of uncertainties, usually the profits of the activities are higher.

[Ken_terrance]

Many new bounties have low bounty allocation and yet project team want many to promote the project, it's really not fair, that is why many bounty hunters got nothing in the end, bounty rewards will easily turn to airdrop reward when the are too many bounty hunters promoting them

[Bezobraznike]

Many new bounties have low bounty allocation and yet project team want many to promote the project, it's really not fair, that is why many bounty hunters got nothing in the end, bounty rewards will easily turn to airdrop reward when the are too many bounty hunters promoting them

   When a team tries to save some money on advertising that is not a good thing. Today good marketing is needed for everything,
without it the projects don't have chance to be noticed. In the way you described the situation the team decided to pay very low
to many participants, they sacrifice good promoters for quantity, for them it's better to be more then good. It's on us to choose a
campaign that worth our time.

[sayaya17]

For me, stakes or fixed bounty allocation remain the same, even though there is actually a difference between stake and fixed allocation. The most important thing is I get paid from the bounty results, it makes me satisfied, especially if stakes I get are very large after being sold on the market because of the pump factor, and I've experienced them. For fixed allocation is also very tempting, especially if the allocation is large enough.

[Sanitough]

For me, stakes or fixed bounty allocation remain the same, even though there is actually a difference between stake and fixed allocation. The most important thing is I get paid from the bounty results, it makes me satisfied, especially if stakes I get are very large after being sold on the market because of the pump factor, and I've experienced them. For fixed allocation is also very tempting, especially if the allocation is large enough.

For now that is really the most important because bounty is not as profitable as before, last year if we focus on bounty, it's like we are wasting most of our time as most of the bounty last year are scams, so that is not really attractive and although the reward is high, but if people will realize they won't be able to monetize it based on their expectation, they won't join.

[Byakuga]

Stake rewards are utterly useless nowadays since many bounties don't live up to their ICO fixed values, in this area fixed allocation still have better chance, limited bounty hunters higher reward and everyone will be happy

[milewilda]

Stake rewards are utterly useless nowadays since many bounties don't live up to their ICO fixed values, in this area fixed allocation still have better chance, limited bounty hunters higher reward and everyone will be happy

I'd rather believe that everyone would be happy if bounty rewards would be in form of BTC or ETH or other top alts but for an another altcoins that doesnt have a sure value? I dont see for any reason to be happy
yet as usual when bounty rewards are given neither stake or fixed ones, if the value is still low then its still useless.Talking back generally on whats better if we disregard the value between staking and fixed?
Then i would go for fixed ones yet no matter how many the participants would be you do still have the fair share.

[shoreno]

Stake rewards are utterly useless nowadays since many bounties don't live up to their ICO fixed values, in this area fixed allocation still have better chance, limited bounty hunters higher reward and everyone will be happy

I'd rather believe that everyone would be happy if bounty rewards would be in form of BTC or ETH or other top alts but for an another altcoins that doesnt have a sure value? I dont see for any reason to be happy
yet as usual when bounty rewards are given neither stake or fixed ones, if the value is still low then its still useless.Talking back generally on whats better if we disregard the value between staking and fixed?
Then i would go for fixed ones yet no matter how many the participants would be you do still have the fair share.

same here . id go for the fix ones but is it still called stake when you are waiting for your reward  ? example when you completed a week of work you have x amount of stake  . 

meanwhile i also agree that bounty should be payed by btc , eth or other top cryptos because i will be more happy with that and it does not matter for me if the reward is fix or unfix but atleast we still have an assurance that our top cryptos will grow if we hodl them in the long run  .