President Trump signs the 9/11 first responders bill

[BADecker]

It's like admitting that there were other things going on in 911 than what we have been told. Watch the video.


Video: President Trump signs the 9/11 first responders bill

President Trump signs a bill that ensures compensation the 9/11 first responders. Jon Stewart has been advocating for a bill that helps them them with the medical problems from the 9/11 terrorist attack.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ajE3-WCoPZw

[squatz1]

What the hell are you on about?

When the towers came down there was a mass amount of asbestos filled walls in the building. When the walls came down, and all the dust went into the air. For most people this isn't an issue though, as they didn't have to inhale all of this. But for the police, fire department, emt, etc who ran into this then they're going to OBVIOUSLY have some problems with their lungs, cancer, etc.

Just thank the President and Congress for doing this, and thank Jon Stewart for bringing attention here. These people deserve funds and shouldn't be left to die by the US government.

[BADecker]

What the hell are you on about?

When the towers came down there was a mass amount of asbestos filled walls in the building. When the walls came down, and all the dust went into the air. For most people this isn't an issue though, as they didn't have to inhale all of this. But for the police, fire department, emt, etc who ran into this then they're going to OBVIOUSLY have some problems with their lungs, cancer, etc.

Just thank the President and Congress for doing this, and thank Jon Stewart for bringing attention here. These people deserve funds and shouldn't be left to die by the US government.

Not sure if that is directed at me, or what it means.


Essentially, the safety certification people say that the 3 buildings shouldn't have come down. They were built easily strong enough to take the punishment on 9/11, and remain standing. Yet there is something missing, that doesn't seem to let this certification knowledge pass to the people in authority so that they do something.

Trump is starting the "doing something." In addition, there is a special court that is evaluation everything about 9/11.


9/11 Whistleblowers: Kevin Ryan

“But someone would have talked,” say the self-styled skeptics who believe the government’s official conspiracy theory of 9/11. “After all, every major conspiracy has its whistleblowers, doesn’t it?”

But there’s a problem with this logically fallacious non-argument. “Someone” did talk. In fact, numerous people have come out to blow the whistle on the events of September 11, 2001, and the cover-up that surrounds those events.

These are the stories of the 9/11 Whistleblowers.

...

And they made that clear. NIST made this clear, that the pancake theory was not supported. So that left us all at that time with no explanation, in 2004, three years later. Having invaded Iraq, having done so much to invest in the official account that the World Trade Center had been destroyed by these planes. And that was a difficult situation for NIST and for everyone.

Watch the video.





EDIT: Another whistleblower, and one who whistleblowing in a way that is related to the OP - http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/267735-2019-09-07-9-11-whistleblowers-cate-jenkins.htm.

[ChiBitCTy]

I know OP is a massive troll and off their rocker, but there’s substantial evidence that 9/11 did not play out like the government says it did. One of the easiest tell tale signs imo is how the towers fell down. Towers are simply not going to perfectly crash to the ground like a well established demolition, unless they were wired as such. There are many reports of bystanders having stated hearing perfectly synced explosions when they fell.

Here’s one of my favorites..so the pentagon, the center of defense for the worlds most advanced military, doesn’t have security cameras out the ass? They released a photo of the plane crashing in to it..but a blurry non-telling one at that. Again..the most advanced military in history, doesn’t have complete security surveillance in and outside every part of that building?! Also, why were the local gas stations forced to forfeit their video surveillance that day to authorities, which have never seen the light of day?

This is one conspiracy that very controversial but too many are too quick to dismiss it without having done any homework. Lots of shit that doesn’t make a lick of sense with this one.

[Virtualis Games]

I know OP is a massive troll and off their rocker, but there’s substantial evidence that 9/11 did not play out like the government says it did. One of the easiest tell tale signs imo is how the towers fell down. Towers are simply not going to perfectly crash to the ground like a well established demolition, unless they were wired as such. There are many reports of bystanders having stated hearing perfectly synced explosions when they fell.

Here’s one of my favorites..so the pentagon, the center of defense for the worlds most advanced military, doesn’t have security cameras out the ass? They released a photo of the plane crashing in to it..but a blurry non-telling one at that. Again..the most advanced military in history, doesn’t have complete security surveillance in and outside every part of that building?! Also, why were the local gas stations forced to forfeit their video surveillance that day to authorities, which have never seen the light of day?

This is one conspiracy that very controversial but too many are too quick to dismiss it without having done any homework. Lots of shit that doesn’t make a lick of sense with this one.

And more than 3000 architects and engineers called for a new investigation into the destruction of WTC.

[Jet Cash]

One result of the the 9/11 disaster is the law that bans the use of gas cutting torches by the emergency services. It resulted in the development of an oxygen fed petrol cutting torch, and I have seen these in action. They are fantastic, and generate massive heat for the cutting, but keep the metal cool when it is only a few inches away from the flame.

[BADecker]

Another whistleblower. The Corbett Report is video. But lately James has offered a transcript of the video. Read the rest of the transcript at the link.


9/11 Whistleblowers: Michael Springmann

That so many of the 9/11 visas were issued from a single office—the US Consulate in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia—may seem like a minor footnote at first glance, but it is not. In fact, the Jeddah Consulate is not just another US Consular Office. It has a history of issuing visas to terrorists at the request of the CIA. Just ask Michael Springmann. This is his story.

To watch the full 9/11 Whistleblowers series, please CLICK HERE.

TRANSCRIPT

In the days after September 11th, 2001, while the toxic dust was still settling on Lower Manhattan, details began to emerge about the terrorists who had allegedly hijacked the fateful 9/11 flights. Names and pictures were released to the public and broadcast around the world. Ziad Jarrah. Hani Hanjour. Marwan al Shehhi. Mohammad Atta. Even before the official story had begun to coalesce, the foreign faces and unfamiliar names flashing across the screens seared themselves into the consciousness of a traumatized public and left little doubt: This attack was the work of Muslim terrorists.

But at the same time, information began to come out that created problems for this narrative. Reports of these devout Muslim fundamentalists drinking alcohol and partying in strip clubs. Revelations that two of the suspects had been allowed into the US after being identified as Al Qaeda agents. Confirmation that these same agents lived with an FBI asset while in the US. And even the testimony of a senior military intelligence official that a counter-terror program had been specifically warned not to investigate Mohammad Atta in the lead up to 9/11.

WYATT ANDREWS: According to Congressman Kurt Weldon, it was a secret Pentagon intelligence unit code named Able Danger that knew a year before 9/11 that lead hijacker Mohammed Atta was in the United States and connected to Al Qaeda.

CONGRESSMAN KURT WELDON: And as you can see, they identified Mohamed Atta's cell.

ANDREWS: In the summer of 2000, he says, the Pentagon's special ops command had identified two terrorist cells inside the US, and knew of the connection between Atta and three other men who became hijackers. When the agents recommended telling the FBI, Weldon says Clinton administration lawyers said "No," because Atta was in the country legally and could not be targeted by military intelligence.

WELDON: And their recommendation to bring the FBI in, to take that cell out, which was ignored, and they were told you can't do that.

ANDREWS: So a year before 9/11 they had their picture—they had the picture of Mohamed Atta—

WELDON: Yes.

ANDREWS: And they knew roughly where he was?

WELDON: Yes.

But of the many bizarre pieces of the alleged 9/11 hijacker puzzle, none gets closer to the heart of the mystery than the seemingly innocuous revelation that 14 of the alleged hijackers' visas to enter the United States had been issued at the same office: the US Consulate in Jeddah. That so many of the visas were issued from a single office may seem like a minor footnote at first glance, but it is not. In fact, the Jeddah Consulate is not just another US Consular Office. It has a history of issuing visas to terrorists at the request of the CIA.