REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP

[nutildah]

What does FH deleting his own thread, as anybody can delete their own thread, have to do with his "moderator powers"?

Because regular users see this when they press the delete button on the thread OP in Politics & Society.



Regular users can not just make their thread disappear, even if it is self moderated. They could perhaps manually delete everything then leave a basically empty op, but that is not what happened, the thread is gone completely.

I've never tried to delete a thread from P&S, so I will happily admit I didn't know that. However, FH said he didn't delete the thread, yet your post still insinuates that he did. You were corrected and you didn't change your statement. What's worse is it is open to interpretation that he deleted somebody else's thread because you didn't state it he opened it.

It's pretty obvious what your end goal is, and I still think its lame, which is why I'm glad to have opened this REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE thread to give him a chance to explain himself and counter your misinformation.

[TECSHARE]

What does FH deleting his own thread, as anybody can delete their own thread, have to do with his "moderator powers"?

Because regular users see this when they press the delete button on the thread OP in Politics & Society.

https://i.imgur.com/cLkSvcz.png

Regular users can not just make their thread disappear, even if it is self moderated. They could perhaps manually delete everything then leave a basically empty op, but that is not what happened, the thread is gone completely.

I've never tried to delete a thread from P&S, so I will happily admit I didn't know that. However, FH said he didn't delete the thread, yet your post still insinuates that he did. You were corrected and you didn't change your statement. What's worse is it is open to interpretation that he deleted somebody else's thread because you didn't state it he opened it.

It's pretty obvious what your end goal is, and I still think its lame, which is why I'm glad to have opened this REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE thread to give him a chance to explain himself and counter your misinformation.

It is pretty obvious you are willing to attribute whatever motives you like to me regardless of what I say. Again, I posed a question, I didn't make a statement. Now asking a question you don't approve of is not allowed? Perhaps you would like to go full circle on that subject?

What is this - >  ?

[nutildah]

It is pretty obvious you are willing to attribute whatever motives you like to me regardless of what I say. Again, I posed a question, I didn't make a statement. Now asking a question you don't approve of is not allowed? Perhaps you would like to go full circle on that subject?

What is this - >  ?

OK, well you've been provided with the answer to your question, and you still leave it lingering like it is unresolved. I know the plan is to besmirch Flying Hellfish but you're really just doing it to yourself.

[TECSHARE]

It is pretty obvious you are willing to attribute whatever motives you like to me regardless of what I say. Again, I posed a question, I didn't make a statement. Now asking a question you don't approve of is not allowed? Perhaps you would like to go full circle on that subject?

What is this - >  ?

OK, well you've been provided with the answer to your question, and you still leave it lingering like it is unresolved. I know the plan is to besmirch Flying Hellfish but you're really just doing it to yourself.

Besmirch? What are you a Victorian house maid chaperoning your charge? What is lingering unresolved exactly? I am not removing or editing my question from my thread. How much more resolution would you like?

[nutildah]

What is lingering unresolved exactly?

According to your thread, your question.

I am not removing or editing my question from my thread.

Even though you got an answer?

How much more resolution would you like?

You to do the right thing I suppose. But I know that you never will because your ego won't let you. That's what's entertaining about the whole thing, and why you are consistently the downfall of yourself. You demonstrate an utter lack of humility. There's got to be an ICD-9 code for that kind of behavior.

[TECSHARE]

What is lingering unresolved exactly?

According to your thread, your question.

I am not removing or editing my question from my thread.

Even though you got an answer?

How much more resolution would you like?

You to do the right thing I suppose. But I know that you never will because your ego won't let you. That's what's entertaining about the whole thing, and why you are consistently the downfall of yourself. You demonstrate an utter lack of humility. There's got to be an ICD-9 code for that kind of behavior.

I wasn't aware we are supposed to go back and revise post history on command upon the first complaint of anal inflammation. You and your fellow clown car inhabitants are welcome to your opinions on what the "right thing" is. I am not obligated to share it.

BTW, ICD-9, what is this 1998? I found your ICD designation in the current standard - ICD-10: N52.9.

[suchmoon]

ICD-10: N52.9.

Bullshit as usual. Everybody knows that TMAN was born in 1881.

N52.9 is applicable to adult patients aged 15 - 124 years inclusive.

[TECSHARE]

BTW, ICD-9, what is this 1998?

Actually I meant DSM. Its been a while. But look, I think I found it right off the bat.

301.0. Paranoid personality disorder

Paranoid personality disorder is characterized by a pervasive distrust of others, including even friends, family, and partners. As a result, this person is guarded, suspicious, and constantly on the lookout for clues or suggestions to validate his fears. He also has a strong sense of personal rights: He is overly sensitive to setbacks and rebuffs, easily feels shame and humiliation, and persistently bears grudges. Unsurprisingly, he tends to withdraw from others and to struggle with building close relationships. The principal ego defense in paranoid PD is projection, which involves attributing one’s unacceptable thoughts and feelings to other people.

This is pretty much you to a (low) T.

Honestly the best treatment for this is probably to spend more time on 8chan and buy more guns.

Here's a more thorough wording of what Paranoid personality disorder is. Its amazing how much of this fits you.

If you are going to try to look cool by using reference material above your pay grade, at least find the right book. See everyone? This is about my politics, not about Flying Hellfish.

[mOgliE]

You are doing a fine job of keeping people from accusing theymos of running a forum biased towards his own political beliefs.  That is all.  As a mod you are fucking terrible.

Just popping by for this sentence. Not going to swim in all the previous crap as discussing with TECSHARE is like discussing with a 3 years old child, after a moment you should understand he has no ability for logic and thus you can't discuss with him as he'll change the rules of debate as he sees fit.

So just wanted to say that P&S is certainly the most difficult section to moderate as it contains only 3% facts and 97% of beliefs and opinions mostly on sensible subjects. I've found FH to be fairly consistent in his moderation policy: you're off topic you get deleted, you're in topic you don't get deleted. As simple as that.

I've seen about a dozen of posts of mine deleted mainly when I tried to discuss against TECHSARE and to explain things to him because even if cries like a little bitch against censorship he's not the last to report a post to get it deleted. And I'm 10000 times politically closer to FH. So no his "censorship" is not selective.

Even though I'm sure he appreciates more deleting a stupid "white men are victims shut up snowflakes" post than a post trying to explain the difference between communism and dictatorship.

[TECSHARE]

You are doing a fine job of keeping people from accusing theymos of running a forum biased towards his own political beliefs.  That is all.  As a mod you are fucking terrible.

Just popping by for this sentence. Not going to swim in all the previous crap as discussing with TECSHARE is like discussing with a 3 years old child, after a moment you should understand he has no ability for logic and thus you can't discuss with him as he'll change the rules of debate as he sees fit.

So just wanted to say that P&S is certainly the most difficult section to moderate as it contains only 3% facts and 97% of beliefs and opinions mostly on sensible subjects. I've found FH to be fairly consistent in his moderation policy: you're off topic you get deleted, you're in topic you don't get deleted. As simple as that.

I've seen about a dozen of posts of mine deleted mainly when I tried to discuss against TECHSARE and to explain things to him because even if cries like a little bitch against censorship he's not the last to report a post to get it deleted. And I'm 10000 times politically closer to FH. So no his "censorship" is not selective.

Even though I'm sure he appreciates more deleting a stupid "white men are victims shut up snowflakes" post than a post trying to explain the difference between communism and dictatorship.

Amazing, I didn't think you could fit any more clowns in that clown car. Here to take retribution after I called out your pathetic attempt at using a sock m0gliE? This just a pathetic collection of children that feel they need revenge for making them feel stupid because they can't effectively argue their beliefs, so they desperately need to prevent their opponents from speaking by any means possible. Sorry little girls, emotion is not equivalent to logic.

[mOgliE]

Amazing, I didn't think you could fit any more clowns in that clown car. Here to take retribution after I called out your pathetic attempt at using a sock m0gliE? This just a pathetic collection of children that feel they need revenge for making them feel stupid because they can't effectively argue their beliefs, so they desperately need to prevent their opponents from speaking by any means possible. Sorry little girls, emotion is not equivalent to logic.

Amazing how you say "call out" when you just said something without the begining of a proof but for you it's ok you've proven your point xD

I'm just here to defend FH moderation policies. Seems logical to me that if 2 dickheads are attacking someone publicly, someone can come to defend this person publicly.

[TECSHARE]

Amazing, I didn't think you could fit any more clowns in that clown car. Here to take retribution after I called out your pathetic attempt at using a sock m0gliE? This just a pathetic collection of children that feel they need revenge for making them feel stupid because they can't effectively argue their beliefs, so they desperately need to prevent their opponents from speaking by any means possible. Sorry little girls, emotion is not equivalent to logic.

Amazing how you say "call out" when you just said something without the begining of a proof but for you it's ok you've proven your point xD

I'm just here to defend FH moderation policies. Seems logical to me that if 2 dickheads are attacking someone publicly, someone can come to defend this person publicly.

Of course you would approve of his moderation, he is a self proclaimed Communist like you, and he covers for those he agrees with. This is all documented in my OP, speaking of proof.

[mOgliE]

Of course you would approve of his moderation, he is a self proclaimed Communist like you, and he covers for those he agrees with. This is all documented in my OP, speaking of proof.

He covers me by deleting my posts when they're off topic? Oo

[TECSHARE]

Of course you would approve of his moderation, he is a self proclaimed Communist like you, and he covers for those he agrees with. This is all documented in my OP, speaking of proof.

He covers me by deleting my posts when they're off topic? Oo

Just because he occasionally does his job doesn't mean he also doesn't selectively enforce. Now if he did this EVERY time that would be quite obvious now wouldn't it? Also the fact is your posts are mostly composed of shit anyway as we can see here.

[TMAN]

TS what’s your real problem with FH? Did he fuck your mum or something? This total obsession is worrying, honestly human to human this is worrying, you come across as straight but I’m concerned there are some underlying issues here, perhaps your estrogen levels are high..or you are a closet. Whatever it is it’s not healthy son.

Your coming across as a fucking dry lunch, you do get that don’t you?

[suchmoon]

Now if he did this EVERY time that would be quite obvious now wouldn't it?

It would be quite obviously ridiculous if a moderator deleted EVERY post that you report.

Maybe you should ask theymos to create a nutjob board and appoint you as its moderator.

[TECSHARE]

Now if he did this EVERY time that would be quite obvious now wouldn't it?

It would be quite obviously ridiculous if a moderator deleted EVERY post that you report.

Maybe you should ask theymos to create a nutjob board and appoint you as its moderator.

Not what I said. I have no responsibility to defend retarded claims you make on my behalf as if I actually said them.

[suchmoon]

Not what I said.

So you're reporting some posts that you think shouldn't be deleted? Wasting moderator's time?

Because the other meaning of your statement would be that the forum is conspiring to silence you, despite your ability to create any number of self-modded threads and post any shit you want. You can't be that dumb, can you?

[TECSHARE]

Not what I said.

So you're reporting some posts that you think shouldn't be deleted? Wasting moderator's time?

Because the other meaning of your statement would be that the forum is conspiring to silence you, despite your ability to create any number of self-modded threads and post any shit you want. You can't be that dumb, can you?

Yes, keep pretending as if your dumb semantic game where you speak for me worked and keep doubling down. It is a good look for you talking to yourself.

[nutildah]

More complaining about censorship from a locked thread by TECSHARE. This time he thinks there isn't enough censorship, however.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5103785.msg52922104#msg52922104

He is basically complaining about my posts being off-topic in my own thread. I made the thread, I get to decide what its about -- he doesn't. Pretty ironic that this is coming from a guy who considers himself to be such an astute champion of free speech. He could just move on, but instead he would rather post about how unfair the rules are in his Meta LiveJournal.