Bitcoin Forum

Other => Meta => Topic started by: nutildah on August 07, 2019, 04:29:31 PM



Title: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: nutildah on August 07, 2019, 04:29:31 PM
Since TECSHARE apparently can't handle outside opinions regarding his personal feelings toward Flying Hellfish, the P&S moderator, I thought it prudent to open my own thread regarding the issue to foster an uncensored discussion about censorship.

His latest critique (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5103785.msg52085045#msg52085045) of FH reads as follows:

Now Flying Hellfish is resorting to deleting entire topics just because they embarrass him?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5065043.0

Free version of this thread:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5065324.0;all

I just want to know why you didn't mention that the topic in reference was his own. Anybody is allowed to delete their own topic in P&S; that's not against the rules, so I don't know how it would pertain to "SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP." Can you please elaborate on this and why it is worth mentioning in your locked thread about censorship?


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: Baronets on August 07, 2019, 04:38:17 PM
Self-enforcement is a logical extension to self-flagellation, and there is a lot of self-flagellation here. :)


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: tranthidung on August 07, 2019, 04:52:43 PM
It seems Meta board has never been lack of drama. In short, self-moderation is a kind of censorship, as same as post deleting by moderators. Censoships, in turn, have two sides:
- Positive: To help the forum as clean as possible by censor shitposts, off-topic posts, trolling, etc. or to help threads' owners kick out bad posters in their threads. I don't see any kind of bad effects of censorship in those cases. Someone who step in house of others, have to self-understand that they have to accept local rules of those householders. If they don't accept local rules, don't step in, just stay outside. If they don't accept local rules, but still try to step in, they will be kicked out sooner or later; and they have to accept that fact.
- Negative: bad guys can create their self-moderated threads, then use their rights of censorship to manipulate their threads in the way they originally want, such as to scam investors. In those case, posts that say facts about scam projects will be censored by threads' creators.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: The Pharmacist on August 07, 2019, 05:06:19 PM
This again?  What was the thread that got deleted?  I can't see what it was about and thus can't pass any judgement on either FH or TECSHARE--but I know those two are feuding at the moment.

I think people in P&S like to argue, which makes sense, and it doesn't surprise me that TECSHARE frequents that section.  I don't understand the draw to it or other related sections like Off-Topic, since they're mostly spam (I think; I haven't visited either one of them lately).  There are lots of other discussion boards dealing with politics, so if you don't like the moderation in that one section here....find another place to talk about that stuff, maybe? 

I've read complaints about FH before, but he doesn't seem to be doing anything other than his job.  Perhaps TECSHARE will weigh in on this.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: Coyster on August 07, 2019, 06:28:08 PM
There are lots of other discussion boards dealing with politics, so if you don't like the moderation in that one section here....find another place to talk about that stuff, maybe?
I second that, and for me  the serious discussion board is appropriate for that, i myself feel more comfortable posting real life matters and also topics on politics, philosophy etc in the SD section, the only thing is it probably doesn't get enough traffic as it will in the P&S board, but that's not a problem, few good replies is actually better than unnecessary back and forth arguments and incessant complaints on censorship.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: Zedpastin on August 07, 2019, 08:06:20 PM
Can we just stop allowing TECSHARE to continue his personal attacks on Flying Hellfish and just let them sort it out privately? This thread is not going to achieve anything and the only thing it will do is create drama here on the forum which I think we have had about enough this year.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: Harlot on August 07, 2019, 08:12:14 PM
Well it's his topic, I don't see the reason why he can't delete his own topic in the first place. Of course it would be a different story when he is using his position to screen all thread he is receiving. If I am an OP and I see one of my threads is getting out of hand I am glad that I always have a choice that I'll be able to delete the topic and all the conversation once and for all. It's like how a newbie reacts when he doesn't get the answers he wants or the topic simply gets out of hand he either abandons it or he deletes it on his own.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: Flying Hellfish on August 07, 2019, 10:20:03 PM
Now Flying Hellfish is resorting to deleting entire topics just because they embarrass him?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5065043.0

As usual the fucking trolls make an assumption and state it as fact.  I did NOT delete my thread.  Although having a locked censorship thread doesn't allow me to actually correct the stunned cunt!

Ironically I am curious which global (or admin) decided it was breaking forum rules in order to delete it.  Hopefully whoever it was will see this and chime in for me.

Having the ability to do something does not AUTOMATICALLY mean you did that thing...

In another twist, the thread as mentioned by the OP was MINE and self mod'd.  FFS I am allowed to delete any or all posts and then the thread (self mod'd) I want end of fucking story just like ANY OTHER USER, don't like it well tongue my sweaty taint!!!


...in your locked thread about censorship?



If you're looking for the trolls to understand IRONY you are pissing into a hurricane mate!

It awful convenient that a troll like TECSHARE will leave out important facts like it was a self mod'd thread so he (FH) like any other user is perfectly allowed to do this.

...

TECSHARE crying like a bitch in a locked thread of his about me (NOT) deleting my own self mod'd thread.

P&S is full of right wing conspiracy retards at the moment, the echo chamber is a full on circle jerk of retardedness, once in a while something I do will piss off one of the hard core trolls and they will cry and cry and cry, so loud everyone else MUST listen.  Once in a while it spills over to META as well, BTCT has some over achieving trolls what  are you gonna do?!


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: nutildah on August 08, 2019, 03:17:16 AM
Now Flying Hellfish is resorting to deleting entire topics just because they embarrass him?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5065043.0

As usual the fucking trolls make an assumption and state it as fact.  I did NOT delete my thread.  Although having a locked censorship thread doesn't allow me to actually correct the stunned cunt!

Ironically I am curious which global (or admin) decided it was breaking forum rules in order to delete it.  Hopefully whoever it was will see this and chime in for me.

Well, that answers that.

P&S is full of right wing conspiracy retards at the moment, the echo chamber is a full on circle jerk of retardedness

I agree with this -- the disproportionality of right and left in P&S is a bit unnerving. Its a bit daunting to post comments that aren't in line with right wing groupthink. Something about bitcoin attracts right-wing conspiracy enthusiasts. What's funny is here, I'm a big lib, but if I go to Facebook I'm on the right...

Oh well, FH you're doing the best job you can, despite the wackiness of some of your board residents..


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on August 08, 2019, 08:34:26 AM
Just because you are allowed to do it doesn't mean it does not reflect poorly on you. Thanks everyone for helping me draw more attention to these issues. Much appreciated.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: nutildah on August 08, 2019, 08:52:39 AM
Just because you are allowed to do it doesn't mean it does not reflect poorly on you. Thanks everyone for helping me draw more attention to these issues. Much appreciated.

Dude. He didn't delete his fucking thread. Can you read?

Now Flying Hellfish is resorting to deleting entire topics just because they embarrass him?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5065043.0

As usual the fucking trolls make an assumption and state it as fact.  I did NOT delete my thread.

Besides, even if he did, how does it "reflect poorly" on him? Even if in your mind it does reflect poorly on him, what does that have to do with his actions as a moderator?

You avoided my original question as well: why didn't you mention he was the one who started the topic?


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: The-One-Above-All on August 08, 2019, 09:50:18 AM
MORE DOUBLE STANDARDS FROM NUTILDAH - this Dirty Turd and his GANG who advocated giving RED TRUST for deleting posts from a self moderated thread if it is done to them LOL

BUT nobody else is even allowed to complain about it.

Nutildah just gives red trust for content you present that he does not like regarding his observable past as a scam facilitator for 0.3 BTC and demonstrating his friends are equally as dirty,  and his friends VOD, ADOLPHINWOLF AND LFC  direct give red trust for daring to self moderate your own thread.  why not complaining about that scum bag??

So nutildah prefers to give RED TRUST for words (TRUTH) that he does not like spoken. And self moderation is allowed if it fits with DT's approval. However if you self mod and delete their posts you will get a SCAM TAG??

Got to love the clear racket this board is allowing.




I just want to know why you didn't mention that the topic in reference was his own. Anybody is allowed to delete their own topic in P&S; that's not against the rules, so I don't know how it would pertain to "SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP." Can you please elaborate on this and why it is worth mentioning in your locked thread about censorship?




In another twist, the thread as mentioned by the OP was MINE and self mod'd.  FFS I am allowed to delete any or all posts and then the thread (self mod'd) I want end of fucking story just like ANY OTHER USER, don't like it well tongue my sweaty taint!!!





Well NO not really. Several DT scumbags believe self moderated threads mean you get RED TRUST for deleting their groundless off topic and irrelevant junk.

You delete something they don't like IT'S A PROBLEM. Like vod who came to our thread screaming OG is a liar 2x which we allowed, but told him he must present proof if he keeps repeating it. He then just said it again with no evidence. We deleted it and said sorry you must present evidence of this claim and he goes and gives us a scam tag.

Same for that other miscreant and untrustworthy shit stain aldophinwolf

Then Laudas Feltching Clown again gives red trust for deleting his bogus junk.


AS YOU CAN SEE YOU CAN NOT DELETE WANT YOU WANT HERE ON A SELF MODERATED THREAD.

User   Date   Reference   Comments
nutildah   2019-07-20      491 posts of pure trash talking, hatred and vitriol. Not one good-willed or even well-intentioned thought among thousands of rambling sentences. Cryptohunter is a spiteful lunatic who seemingly will not rest until the forum has been destroyed. Avoid interactions with this user, or his alt accounts, at all cost.
bitmover   2019-06-12   Reference   Rude, childish and delusional (attacking me without any reason). Not trustworth.
AdolfinWolf   2019-05-30      Self moderated threads are really the epitome of being a scammer.
Especially considering what posts you're deleting.
----
Please, do not converse with these trolls anymore.
LFC_Bitcoin   2019-05-27      Hides behind self moderated threads & deletes any posts that donít suit his narrative.
Coward & total cunt. Do not trust this person. See multiple other red trust for clarification.
Vod   2019-05-06   Reference   Deletes my words and replaces them with his own, in his censored thread. This is the last time I will interact with this coward.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

THEYMOS changed the trust system for the better but leaves a FUCKING HUGE RED SIGHN ON YOUR ACCOUNT SAYING YOU ARE FINANCIALLY DANGEROUS AND A SCAMMER if you have more negatives than positives on THE OLD SHIT SYSTEM THAT HAD TO BE CHANGED BECAUSE TRUST ABUSING DIRTY TURDS LIKE YOUR PALS LAUDA, TMAN, AND THESE OTHER STINKERS  are giving out scam tags to whistleblowers.  So just because you were trust abused under the system that was so broken it allowed this kind of abuse you are branded a scammer now for life. That's a good plan.

So yes people apparently CAN COMPLAIN IF YOU DELETE THEIR COMMENTS AND THEY ARE WELL WITHIN THEIR RIGHTS TO GIVE YOU A SCAM TAG ACCORDING TO THE BOARD RULES. We they can if they are untrustworthy shit stains that get themselves elected to DT within this broken down moronic design we have right now.

Luckily new members or those getting this trust abuse against their accounts from now on will not get that YOU ARE A SCAMMER NOTICE AT THE TOP OF EVERY THREAD THEY START.

Give the scum bag a red tag and see how he likes it. You can get a red tag here for doing ANYTHING the Dirty turds don't like. However you can not even COMPLAIN if they do the same things they give a scam tag for.

FLUSH THESE TURDS FOR FFS THEYMOS. This boards trust pool is a fucking embarrassment and they mostly all make sure they are getting paid at the highest rates here in meta to post these kind of blatant double standards turds. BAN SIGS IN META so we don't need to read their self serving garbage.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: nutildah on August 15, 2019, 02:27:20 PM
Just because you are allowed to do it doesn't mean it does not reflect poorly on you. Thanks everyone for helping me draw more attention to these issues. Much appreciated.

Funny how when tecshare is dead wrong about something he just ignores it like it never happened. This is the first thread that he's run away from as far as I can remember. Normally he can't stand not having the last word.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: The Pharmacist on August 16, 2019, 01:14:46 PM
BUT nobody else is even allowed to complain about it.
You're allowed to complain all you like, but man....when you keep writing long screeds like this one, don't expect people to even finish reading, much less give you any credibility.  Nobody is censoring dissent here.  It just happens that your arguments don't garner a lot of support, which is a fact that you keep missing.

Funny how when tecshare is dead wrong about something he just ignores it like it never happened.
In his defense, a lot of people do the exact same thing whether they're right or wrong.

This is the first thread that he's run away from as far as I can remember. Normally he can't stand not having the last word.
Maybe he's growing up.  Hey, he included me on his trust list, which is something I never expected.  But I suspect he won't stop being such a hothead.  That's apparently in his nature--and the thread isn't locked yet, so there's still time for him to come back and give his retort.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: The-One-Above-All on August 16, 2019, 07:23:42 PM
BUT nobody else is even allowed to complain about it.
You're allowed to complain all you like, but man....when you keep writing long screeds like this one, don't expect people to even finish reading, much less give you any credibility.  Nobody is censoring dissent here.  It just happens that your arguments don't garner a lot of support, which is a fact that you keep missing.

Funny how when tecshare is dead wrong about something he just ignores it like it never happened.
In his defense, a lot of people do the exact same thing whether they're right or wrong.

This is the first thread that he's run away from as far as I can remember. Normally he can't stand not having the last word.
Maybe he's growing up.  Hey, he included me on his trust list, which is something I never expected.  But I suspect he won't stop being such a hothead.  That's apparently in his nature--and the thread isn't locked yet, so there's still time for him to come back and give his retort.

1. Independently verifiable observable instances do not require the person presenting them to have ANY credibility.
2. There is NO argument, the post above demonstrates clear and undeniable double standards.
3. To "garner support" in meta for highlighting UNDENIABLE PROBLEMS with the systems of control is impossible since the people that frequent meta are those that benefit the most from preventing changes taking place, and will deny any problems exist. Like yourself.

Example.

VOD - comes to our self moderated thread and makes the same accusation 2x that OG  is a LIAR and untrustworthy . We allowed it 2x but told him he MUST present clear corroborating evidence to keep plastering the same assumption on our self moderated thread and deleted his 3rd accusation claiming THE SAME THING.  He  then gives us RED TRUST claiming this is untrustworthy?? WTF  even if we had removed ALL 3 instances of his unsubstantiated claims it would not be untrustworthy, but we allowed it to remain there the first 2 x ???

On our other self moderated threads, other idiots turn up and make ACCUSATIONS or statements again with NO corroborating evidence or even attempting to validate their claims.. We deleted those and received more RED TRUST.

WE ON THE OTHER HAND ask hhampuz a question and EVEN VALIDATE THE QUESTIONS WITH CLEAR UNDENIABLE OBSERVABLE INSTANCES THAT NOBODY EVEN ATTEMPTED TO REFUTE OR DENY BECAUSE THEY CAN NOT ....what happens?????? we get red trust for LYING??? DEFAMATION???  This is ridiculous and observably a broken system to even allow this. 

LOL  this is independently verifiable.  We don't require support for any argument. 

The FACT you are unable to still grasp this point, and still believe that one must be "credible" to present observable instances that are independently verifiable is quite amusing.

The FACT you are being paid to output this low functioning drivel is certainly something that should be questioned when being one of a tiny handful of people being paid to post at the very highest rates on the entire board. Really such campaigns should be called to explain their choices and provide explanation if these posters make far to many public posts that are debunked and of low to negative value.

We say again. These types of net negative posts are more damaging than pure spam. Those readers that are placing faith in gamed nonsense like merit may take your words to have some value when they are grossly net negative.

There is clear PRESSURE both in terms of REWARD (merits) and PUNISHMENT (double standards trust abuse) to censor and crush free speech. This has been mitigated slightly with the new trust system, however still much work to do if you really want to see a fair(er) environment for all members.




Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on August 20, 2019, 02:19:23 AM
BUT nobody else is even allowed to complain about it.
You're allowed to complain all you like, but man....when you keep writing long screeds like this one, don't expect people to even finish reading, much less give you any credibility.  Nobody is censoring dissent here.  It just happens that your arguments don't garner a lot of support, which is a fact that you keep missing.

Funny how when tecshare is dead wrong about something he just ignores it like it never happened.
In his defense, a lot of people do the exact same thing whether they're right or wrong.

This is the first thread that he's run away from as far as I can remember. Normally he can't stand not having the last word.
Maybe he's growing up.  Hey, he included me on his trust list, which is something I never expected.  But I suspect he won't stop being such a hothead.  That's apparently in his nature--and the thread isn't locked yet, so there's still time for him to come back and give his retort.

I have already explained myself and said everything that needed to be said in my op. This is just another sad cry for attention from nutilduhh.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: nutildah on August 20, 2019, 05:34:00 AM
I have already explained myself and said everything that needed to be said in my op. This is just another sad cry for attention from nutilduhh.

Actually I was genuinely curious as to why you never admitted you were wrong about FH deleting his thread. He didn't delete it, yet you continue to insist that he did. It was just a little bizarre to me.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: Flying Hellfish on August 20, 2019, 11:59:02 AM
I have already explained myself and said everything that needed to be said in my op. This is just another sad cry for attention from nutilduhh.

Actually I was genuinely curious as to why you never admitted you were wrong about FH deleting his thread. He didn't delete it, yet you continue to insist that he did. It was just a little bizarre to me.

Because TECSHARE isn't interested in what ACTUALLY happened he is ONLY interested in pushing his agenda and playing the victim card.

Having a locked thread where only he can complain about a problem isn't the act of someone who wants to discuss and understand an issue but someone who sticks his fingers in his ears and whines so he can't hear anyone else.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on August 20, 2019, 07:29:34 PM
I have already explained myself and said everything that needed to be said in my op. This is just another sad cry for attention from nutilduhh.

Actually I was genuinely curious as to why you never admitted you were wrong about FH deleting his thread. He didn't delete it, yet you continue to insist that he did. It was just a little bizarre to me.

Because TECSHARE isn't interested in what ACTUALLY happened he is ONLY interested in pushing his agenda and playing the victim card.

Having a locked thread where only he can complain about a problem isn't the act of someone who wants to discuss and understand an issue but someone who sticks his fingers in his ears and whines so he can't hear anyone else.

Nope. That is you to a T. What my post is is a log of your selective enforcement and your inability to separate your personal feelings from your job as a moderator. No discussion is required, and as you see if discussion is desired a thread such as this can be opened. What exactly is the issue?


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: suchmoon on August 20, 2019, 07:59:57 PM
What exactly is the issue?

To some people lying would be an issue but not to you apparently ;D

Gotta love a thin-skinned megatroll snowflaking into a muddy puddle.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on August 20, 2019, 11:34:34 PM
What exactly is the issue?

To some people lying would be an issue but not to you apparently ;D

Gotta love a thin-skinned megatroll snowflaking into a muddy puddle.

Oh no, don't call me names. You appropriated "our word" snowflake! I am double shook! This entire thread is just a collection of people incapable of engaging in logical debate desperately seeking attention via other means. Do you people get the impression when you collect a bunch of stupid together in a group it makes you any smarter? Learn to have a logic based discussion, then maybe you won't need to scrape the bottom of the barrel for shit like this in a pathetic attempt at retribution for logging abuse of authority by your staff buddy.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: nutildah on August 21, 2019, 01:18:49 AM
Maybe he's growing up. 

Do you people get the impression when you collect a bunch of stupid together in a group it makes you any smarter?

Oh well, kudos to The Pharmacist for giving you the benefit of the doubt, even if in vain.

Are you going to admit that you are mistaken about FH deleting his own thread or...


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on August 21, 2019, 02:40:16 AM


Maybe he's growing up. 

Do you people get the impression when you collect a bunch of stupid together in a group it makes you any smarter?

Oh well, kudos to The Pharmacist for giving you the benefit of the doubt, even if in vain.

Are you going to admit that you are mistaken about FH deleting his own thread or...

What is this - >  ?


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: nutildah on August 21, 2019, 03:04:44 AM
Are you going to admit that you are mistaken about FH deleting his own thread or...

What is this - >  ?

Its a question mark in big red font.

So just out of curiosity, why have you refused to acknowledge this information?

As usual the fucking trolls make an assumption and state it as fact.  I did NOT delete my thread.  Although having a locked censorship thread doesn't allow me to actually correct the stunned cunt!

Ironically I am curious which global (or admin) decided it was breaking forum rules in order to delete it.  Hopefully whoever it was will see this and chime in for me.

I'm genuinely curious as to what your thinking is.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on August 21, 2019, 04:02:44 AM
Are you going to admit that you are mistaken about FH deleting his own thread or...

What is this - >  ?

Its a question mark in big red font.

So just out of curiosity, why have you refused to acknowledge this information?

As usual the fucking trolls make an assumption and state it as fact.  I did NOT delete my thread.  Although having a locked censorship thread doesn't allow me to actually correct the stunned cunt!

Ironically I am curious which global (or admin) decided it was breaking forum rules in order to delete it.  Hopefully whoever it was will see this and chime in for me.

I'm genuinely curious as to what your thinking is.

I am just making sure you understand the meaning of a question mark considering it was included in your quote of mine. I presented a question, not a statement. Do you propose the fact that I posed this question was mistaken?


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: nutildah on August 21, 2019, 04:42:04 AM
Are you going to admit that you are mistaken about FH deleting his own thread or...

What is this - >  ?

Its a question mark in big red font.

So just out of curiosity, why have you refused to acknowledge this information?

As usual the fucking trolls make an assumption and state it as fact.  I did NOT delete my thread.  Although having a locked censorship thread doesn't allow me to actually correct the stunned cunt!

Ironically I am curious which global (or admin) decided it was breaking forum rules in order to delete it.  Hopefully whoever it was will see this and chime in for me.

I'm genuinely curious as to what your thinking is.

I am just making sure you understand the meaning of a question mark considering it was included in your quote of mine. I presented a question, not a statement. Do you propose the fact that I posed this question was mistaken?

Uh, what? I didn't add the question mark, it was part of your original post.

This has nothing to do with FH not being the one who deleted his thread as you claim. Even after it was pointed out to you that the answer to your "question" was "no", you still wrote this:

Just because you are allowed to do it doesn't mean it does not reflect poorly on you.

He never did it to begin with, so obviously there is zero chance of it reflecting poorly on him.

You also avoided my other question: why didn't you mention he was the one who opened the thread?

You make garbage insinuations and then try to evade responsibility for them with dodge-and-parry techniques, which is why nobody takes you seriously. Well I mean that and ridiculing people for locking their threads when you do the same thing. And, let's be honest, basically doing everything under the sun that you accuse others of doing.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on August 21, 2019, 04:02:41 PM
Are you going to admit that you are mistaken about FH deleting his own thread or...

What is this - >  ?

Its a question mark in big red font.

So just out of curiosity, why have you refused to acknowledge this information?

As usual the fucking trolls make an assumption and state it as fact.  I did NOT delete my thread.  Although having a locked censorship thread doesn't allow me to actually correct the stunned cunt!

Ironically I am curious which global (or admin) decided it was breaking forum rules in order to delete it.  Hopefully whoever it was will see this and chime in for me.

I'm genuinely curious as to what your thinking is.

I am just making sure you understand the meaning of a question mark considering it was included in your quote of mine. I presented a question, not a statement. Do you propose the fact that I posed this question was mistaken?

Uh, what? I didn't add the question mark, it was part of your original post.

This has nothing to do with FH not being the one who deleted his thread as you claim. Even after it was pointed out to you that the answer to your "question" was "no", you still wrote this:

Just because you are allowed to do it doesn't mean it does not reflect poorly on you.

He never did it to begin with, so obviously there is zero chance of it reflecting poorly on him.

You also avoided my other question: why didn't you mention he was the one who opened the thread?

You make garbage insinuations and then try to evade responsibility for them with dodge-and-parry techniques, which is why nobody takes you seriously. Well I mean that and ridiculing people for locking their threads when you do the same thing. And, let's be honest, basically doing everything under the sun that you accuse others of doing.

Why didn't I mention he is a Canadian? Why didn't I mention he is a Communist? I don't have responsibilities for your delusional attention seeking interpretations created as a pathetic attempt at retribution for exposing your inability to hold a legitimate political debate with me. I asked a question. You made interpretations, now expect me to take responsibility for them. Uh no. It is cute however seeing you struggle to put me on the defensive. Keep scraping that barrel, maybe you'll find something nutilduhhh.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: suchmoon on August 21, 2019, 04:29:58 PM
Why didn't I mention he is a Canadian? Why didn't I mention he is a Communist?

What does that have to do with him not deleting the thread?

inability to hold a legitimate political debate with me

You're reaching Quicksy's levels of projection. A lot of stuff that you're saying about others seems to be more applicable to yourself. When was the last time you were wrong?


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: nutildah on August 21, 2019, 04:59:47 PM
Why didn't I mention he is a Canadian? Why didn't I mention he is a Communist? I don't have responsibilities for your delusional attention seeking interpretations created as a pathetic attempt at retribution for exposing your inability to hold a legitimate political debate with me.

Oh brother.  ::)

I asked a question. You made interpretations, now expect me to take responsibility for them. Uh no. It is cute however seeing you struggle to put me on the defensive. Keep scraping that barrel, maybe you'll find something nutilduhhh.

I think we just found everything there is to find.

I keep forgetting that you are your own worst enemy. But at the same time I just thought it was stupid that you thought a moderator shouldn't be allowed to delete their own thread, which he didn't do anyway, so, at the very least you should edit your post to remove your high integrity journalistic investigation post about the Missing Flying Hellfish Thread Mystery. Something tells me you won't though.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on August 21, 2019, 05:58:17 PM
Why didn't I mention he is a Canadian? Why didn't I mention he is a Communist?

What does that have to do with him not deleting the thread?

inability to hold a legitimate political debate with me

You're reaching Quicksy's levels of projection. A lot of stuff that you're saying about others seems to be more applicable to yourself. When was the last time you were wrong?

Nothing, because it is a reply to the other question "why didn't I state it was his thread?" I tend to not engage in discussion of subjects of which I have little understanding. I know to some people this is a hard concept to grasp, being informed before having an opinion, but I do try.

No projection. Nutilduh is an emotionally driven stalker with the inability to argue points based in logic and is largely motivated by lack of emotional control. It is always the same thing, struggling to craft some wrongdoing in other parts of the forum because you can't argue your beliefs like an adult. It is much like yourself, only Nutilduhh just happens to be more far gone. You at least have some understanding of this dynamic by now whereas Nutilduhh doesn't even see the saddle on his back. Keep chasing that carrot.


Why didn't I mention he is a Canadian? Why didn't I mention he is a Communist? I don't have responsibilities for your delusional attention seeking interpretations created as a pathetic attempt at retribution for exposing your inability to hold a legitimate political debate with me.

Oh brother.  ::)

I asked a question. You made interpretations, now expect me to take responsibility for them. Uh no. It is cute however seeing you struggle to put me on the defensive. Keep scraping that barrel, maybe you'll find something nutilduhhh.

I think we just found everything there is to find.

I keep forgetting that you are your own worst enemy. But at the same time I just thought it was stupid that you thought a moderator shouldn't be allowed to delete their own thread, which he didn't do anyway, so, at the very least you should edit your post to remove your high integrity journalistic investigation post about the Missing Flying Hellfish Thread Mystery. Something tells me you won't though.

Maybe if you repeat it enough times I will believe it. I never said "a moderator shouldn't be allowed to delete his own threads", again this is just more projection of your own making. After Flying Hellfish flew off the handle the last time I was instructed to post anything I found abusive in the appropriate meta subforum. This is what I am doing. I am so very sorry this is not to your liking. Perhaps some salve to sooth your posterior is in order?


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: marlboroza on August 21, 2019, 08:45:57 PM
What is this - >  ?
It is rhetorical question as I can see, don't play dumb. Don't play political games here, you are not smart as you think you are.

TECHARE assumed that FH deleted thread and now they turned they eyes blind about this issue, my question is:

Are you going to remove/edit your lie/assumption or not?

Quote from: TECSHARE
Now Flying Hellfish is resorting to deleting entire topics just because they embarrass him?

I did NOT delete my thread.

Ironically I am curious which global (or admin) decided it was breaking forum rules in order to delete it.

In case TECSHARE does not want to address this because "he missed question", again:

Quote from: TECHARE
Now Flying Hellfish is resorting to deleting entire topics just because they embarrass him?

I did NOT delete my thread.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on August 21, 2019, 09:26:28 PM
What is this - >  ?
It is rhetorical question as I can see, don't play dumb. Don't play political games here, you are not smart as you think you are.

TECHARE assumed that FH deleted thread and now they turned they eyes blind about this issue, my question is:

Are you going to remove/edit your lie/assumption or not?

Quote from: TECSHARE
Now Flying Hellfish is resorting to deleting entire topics just because they embarrass him?

I did NOT delete my thread.

Ironically I am curious which global (or admin) decided it was breaking forum rules in order to delete it.

In case TECSHARE does not want to address this because "he missed question", again:

Quote from: TECHARE
Now Flying Hellfish is resorting to deleting entire topics just because they embarrass him?

I did NOT delete my thread.

Hey look who else popped out of the clown car. Good to know everyone else gets to tell me the meaning of my own words, but when I tell you the meaning of my own words it is invalid. I asked a question, then a bunch of sad saps suffering from chronic butt pain line up to try to create a circus. I don't need to delete anything. Feel free to see who else you can scrounge up with a score to settle if it makes you all feel better. I have been completely transparent and all you are doing is drawing more attention to my op with your twisting and moaning. You'd figure you people would get the point that this dog piling strategy of yours has the opposite of the intended effect by now, but keep it up, I have enough carrots and saddles for all of you.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: marlboroza on August 21, 2019, 09:31:19 PM
Hey look who else popped out of the clown car.
See? You are too stupid to see that you are addressing your own rhetorical questions. Well, that did not surprise me, after all, you scanned Rick Astley for viruses https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5158058.msg51588954#msg51588954  :D

I have been completely transparent and all you are doing is drawing more attention to my op with your twisting and moaning.
Thank you for your input. Anything about this:
Quote from: TECHARE
Now Flying Hellfish is resorting to deleting entire topics just because they embarrass him?

I did NOT delete my thread.

?


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on August 21, 2019, 09:41:58 PM
Hey look who else popped out of the clown car.
See? You are too stupid to see that you are addressing your own rhetorical questions. Well, that did not surprise me, after all, you scanned Rick Astley for viruses https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5158058.msg51588954#msg51588954  :D

I have been completely transparent and all you are doing is drawing more attention to my op with your twisting and moaning.
Thank you for your input. Anything about this:
Quote from: TECHARE
Now Flying Hellfish is resorting to deleting entire topics just because they embarrass him?

I did NOT delete my thread.

?

I already answered your question. Learn to read. Or just keep repeating yourselves, whatever you like.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: marlboroza on August 21, 2019, 09:50:10 PM
Hey look who else popped out of the clown car.
See? You are too stupid to see that you are addressing your own rhetorical questions. Well, that did not surprise me, after all, you scanned Rick Astley for viruses https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5158058.msg51588954#msg51588954  :D

I have been completely transparent and all you are doing is drawing more attention to my op with your twisting and moaning.
Thank you for your input. Anything about this:
Quote from: TECHARE
Now Flying Hellfish is resorting to deleting entire topics just because they embarrass him?

I did NOT delete my thread.

?

I already answered your question. Learn to read. Or just keep repeating yourselves, whatever you like.
You did not, look:


Are you going to remove/edit your lie/assumption or not?

Quote from: TECHARE
Now Flying Hellfish is resorting to deleting entire topics just because they embarrass him?

I did NOT delete my thread.
And you said:
I don't need to delete anything
Does not answer anything.

It is simple yes/no question.

Are you going to edit/remove your assumption/lie or not?

Ok, another question(yes/no).

Do you think it is wrong to say that "moderator removed thread" even moderator said that he didn't remove thread?

You don't need to write essay, just say simple yes/no.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: suchmoon on August 22, 2019, 01:55:10 AM
Nothing, because it is a reply to the other question "why didn't I state it was his thread?" I tend to not engage in discussion of subjects of which I have little understanding. I know to some people this is a hard concept to grasp, being informed before having an opinion, but I do try.

You have little understanding of who is an OP of a thread? That would explain quite a few of your problems.

No projection. Nutilduh is an emotionally driven stalker with the inability to argue points based in logic and is largely motivated by lack of emotional control. It is always the same thing, struggling to craft some wrongdoing in other parts of the forum because you can't argue your beliefs like an adult. It is much like yourself, only Nutilduhh just happens to be more far gone. You at least have some understanding of this dynamic by now whereas Nutilduhh doesn't even see the saddle on his back. Keep chasing that carrot.

Another bouquet of fallacies here. An average adult person would probably apologize and move on but thank internet gods you're not such a person and you'll keep entertaining us with this sanctimonious egotistical drivel.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on August 22, 2019, 04:33:36 AM
Nothing, because it is a reply to the other question "why didn't I state it was his thread?" I tend to not engage in discussion of subjects of which I have little understanding. I know to some people this is a hard concept to grasp, being informed before having an opinion, but I do try.

You have little understanding of who is an OP of a thread? That would explain quite a few of your problems.

No projection. Nutilduh is an emotionally driven stalker with the inability to argue points based in logic and is largely motivated by lack of emotional control. It is always the same thing, struggling to craft some wrongdoing in other parts of the forum because you can't argue your beliefs like an adult. It is much like yourself, only Nutilduhh just happens to be more far gone. You at least have some understanding of this dynamic by now whereas Nutilduhh doesn't even see the saddle on his back. Keep chasing that carrot.

Another bouquet of fallacies here. An average adult person would probably apologize and move on but thank internet gods you're not such a person and you'll keep entertaining us with this sanctimonious egotistical drivel.

Apologize for what? Asking a question? You people are the only ones who have any control over whether you get offended or not. I am not responsible for your fantasies and projections.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: nutildah on August 22, 2019, 05:22:42 AM
TECSHARE wetting the bed at night over his fears of liberal women?
More at 11.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: marlboroza on August 22, 2019, 08:45:42 AM
TECSHARE should apologize to flying hellfish and remove that post?


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: suchmoon on August 22, 2019, 11:58:17 AM
Apologize for what? Asking a question? You people are the only ones who have any control over whether you get offended or not. I am not responsible for your fantasies and projections.

I'm not offended. FHF likely isn't particularly offended either - he already knows that you're a grade A douchenozzle. It's all about you and your leet debating skills, AKA making shit up as you go.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on August 22, 2019, 05:26:41 PM
TECSHARE wetting the bed at night over his fears of liberal women?
More at 11.

More fantasy and projection. Tell me, what part of your cavernous anus did you pull this idea from this time?

TECSHARE should apologize to flying hellfish and remove that post?

I didn't do anything wrong. You imagine I did, but maybe you can imagine me apologizing since it offends you so much. Oh wait no one is offended. Why is this thread here?


Apologize for what? Asking a question? You people are the only ones who have any control over whether you get offended or not. I am not responsible for your fantasies and projections.

I'm not offended. FHF likely isn't particularly offended either - he already knows that you're a grade A douchenozzle. It's all about you and your leet debating skills, AKA making shit up as you go.

Yes, I am sure it is just a total coincidence Nutilduhh always starts these threads in other parts of the forum after getting his precious and frail sensibilities upset by being exposed to ideas he does not agree with in Politics and Society and not just being allowed to brow beat people into submission into his views. Tell me, what did I make up here? My language and intent was 100% transparent start to finish. While you are at it, tell me, if no one is offended, why is this thread even here?



Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: marlboroza on August 22, 2019, 09:54:26 PM
https://i.imgur.com/0oRHvi6.png

Reference link points to this post (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5173424.msg52228074#msg52228074). Can someone please tell me what does this mean:

"abuse the trust system in retribution for calling out the misbehavior of his buddies. See reference."

I am looking at reference and I can't find trust abuse  ???

Anyway, I have sent PM to TECSHARE to unlock thread so I can add something:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5103785.msg49486640#msg49486640
Quote
If you have something to add PM me to unlock the thread.

Can you unlock the thread, I have something to add regarding this post:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5103785.msg52085045#msg52085045

Thanks.
When he reopens thread I will post some important data about this matter.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on August 22, 2019, 10:41:29 PM
https://i.imgur.com/0oRHvi6.png

Reference link points to this post (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5173424.msg52228074#msg52228074). Can someone please tell me what does this mean:

"abuse the trust system in retribution for calling out the misbehavior of his buddies. See reference."

I am looking at reference and I can't find trust abuse  ???

Anyway, I have sent PM to TECSHARE to unlock thread so I can add something:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5103785.msg49486640#msg49486640
Quote
If you have something to add PM me to unlock the thread.

Can you unlock the thread, I have something to add regarding this post:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5103785.msg52085045#msg52085045

Thanks.
When he reopens thread I will post some important data about this matter.

This is an off topic conversation that belongs in the reputation subforum. I will not be unlocking the thread. The trust system is intended to help prevent theft and fraud, you are using it to fight your petty interpersonal disputes. You are certainly well within the rules to leave a neutral rating. Still it reflects poorly on you, as you feel the need to use the system designed to protect traders to serve as a tool for petty retribution for the crime of disagreeing when a discussion in an open forum fails you.


https://i.imgur.com/k9eVOWT.png

Seems like a few people have trouble with people disagreeing with them. BTW, if you are going to call me names at least be creative, don't just repeat my words back to me.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: marlboroza on August 22, 2019, 11:16:49 PM
Anyway, I have sent PM to TECSHARE to unlock thread so I can add something:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5103785.msg49486640#msg49486640
Quote
If you have something to add PM me to unlock the thread.

Can you unlock the thread, I have something to add regarding this post:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5103785.msg52085045#msg52085045

Thanks.
When he reopens thread I will post some important data about this matter.

This is an off topic conversation that belongs in the reputation subforum.
It is not off topic. It is about post(s) from this thread which is related to locked thread.

I will not be unlocking the thread.
So, you lied.

The trust system is intended to help prevent theft and fraud, you are using it to fight your petty interpersonal disputes. You are certainly well within the rules to leave a neutral rating. Still it reflects poorly on you, as you feel the need to use the system designed to protect traders to serve as a tool for petty retribution for the crime of disagreeing when a discussion in an open forum fails you.
It seems that you think that I left you this comment because of this thread. If so, my feedback is very accurate  :)


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on August 23, 2019, 01:02:42 AM
Anyway, I have sent PM to TECSHARE to unlock thread so I can add something:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5103785.msg49486640#msg49486640
Quote
If you have something to add PM me to unlock the thread.

Can you unlock the thread, I have something to add regarding this post:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5103785.msg52085045#msg52085045

Thanks.
When he reopens thread I will post some important data about this matter.

This is an off topic conversation that belongs in the reputation subforum.
It is not off topic. It is about post(s) from this thread which is related to locked thread.

I will not be unlocking the thread.
So, you lied.

The trust system is intended to help prevent theft and fraud, you are using it to fight your petty interpersonal disputes. You are certainly well within the rules to leave a neutral rating. Still it reflects poorly on you, as you feel the need to use the system designed to protect traders to serve as a tool for petty retribution for the crime of disagreeing when a discussion in an open forum fails you.
It seems that you think that I left you this comment because of this thread. If so, my feedback is very accurate  :)

I have no obligation to unlock my thread for you and made no such promises. You may feel entitled to post there but that doesn't make me a liar. More creative interpretations from the clown brigade in this sad little puppet show you are trying to run.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: suchmoon on August 23, 2019, 01:11:14 AM
It's truly amazing how this amoeba with zero reading comprehension and an ego the size of Mont Blanc was voted into DT1 and is just a few votes away from being an active member, despite having no knowledge of or interest in how the trust system actually works.

The trust system is intended to help prevent theft and fraud, you are using it to fight your petty interpersonal disputes. You are certainly well within the rules to leave a neutral rating. Still it reflects poorly on you, as you feel the need to use the system designed to protect traders to serve as a tool for petty retribution for the crime of disagreeing when a discussion in an open forum fails you.

It's a neutral rating. The explanation literally says "other comments". Which you must be aware of since you had to click that option when you posted retaliatory ratings.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: Vod on August 23, 2019, 01:44:46 AM
The trust system is intended to help prevent theft and fraud, you are using it to fight your petty interpersonal disputes. You are certainly well within the rules to leave a neutral rating. Still it reflects poorly on you, as you feel the need to use the system designed to protect traders to serve as a tool for petty retribution for the crime of disagreeing when a discussion in an open forum fails you.

So your feedback on my profile calling me mentally ill is to prevent me from stealing? 

It has nothing to do with your jealousy of me?  You don't have a interpersonal dispute with me?

lol


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on August 23, 2019, 02:09:08 AM
It's truly amazing how this amoeba with zero reading comprehension and an ego the size of Mont Blanc was voted into DT1 and is just a few votes away from being an active member, despite having no knowledge of or interest in how the trust system actually works.

The trust system is intended to help prevent theft and fraud, you are using it to fight your petty interpersonal disputes. You are certainly well within the rules to leave a neutral rating. Still it reflects poorly on you, as you feel the need to use the system designed to protect traders to serve as a tool for petty retribution for the crime of disagreeing when a discussion in an open forum fails you.

It's a neutral rating. The explanation literally says "other comments". Which you must be aware of since you had to click that option when you posted retaliatory ratings.


So are you all just going to keep lining up and repeating each other one after another? I already responded to this. Why is my rating retaliatory and his isn't? Because he left it first? Funny how definitions of words and standards are always shifting with you people. If my rating is retaliatory then it has an impact, one he should not have utilized to settle his petty dispute, but if it has no impact how can it be retaliatory? Just more of the rules for thee but not for me standard you are used to.

The trust system is intended to help prevent theft and fraud, you are using it to fight your petty interpersonal disputes. You are certainly well within the rules to leave a neutral rating. Still it reflects poorly on you, as you feel the need to use the system designed to protect traders to serve as a tool for petty retribution for the crime of disagreeing when a discussion in an open forum fails you.

So your feedback on my profile calling me mentally ill is to prevent me from stealing? 

It has nothing to do with your jealousy of me?  You don't have a interpersonal dispute with me?

lol

You tell me. Is this going to be what, the 4th time you ignore me forever now? Poor Vod always minding his own business getting called out for his harassment and cowardly attempts to use the power of the state steam roller try to harass some one who dares disagree with him on a forum.

Again, for literally the 4th time the rating was left for his abusive and doxing behavior, something Theymos himself said was reasonable.

I wish I had no relationship to you whatsoever, but you seem obsessed with me and bounce between pretending to ignore me and following me around in the community clown car.





Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: marlboroza on August 23, 2019, 02:30:20 AM
I have no obligation to unlock my thread for you and made no such promises.
So when you say:
If you have something to add PM me to unlock the thread.
...you don't really mean it.
You may feel entitled to post there but that doesn't make me a liar.
Of course not, Pinocchio.

Why is my rating retaliatory and his isn't? Because he left it first? Funny how definitions of words and standards are always shifting with you people. If my rating is retaliatory then it has an impact, one he should not have utilized to settle his petty dispute, but if it has no impact how can it be retaliatory?
Your rating is retaliatory because you left it as response to my rating which I left you after longer observation of your profile, which you think I left you because of this thread, which is wrong, but you are never wrong.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: suchmoon on August 23, 2019, 02:41:46 AM
if it has no impact how can it be retaliatory?

"Retaliatory" is not about actual impact, just your intent of an impact.

https://i.snipboard.io/f0tDpv.jpg


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: Flying Hellfish on August 23, 2019, 03:38:39 AM
...After Flying Hellfish flew off the handle the last time I was instructed to post anything I found abusive in the appropriate meta subforum. This is what I am doing.

More lies...  I didn't fly off the handle last time because I had no idea nor do I give a fuck you were instructed to do anything.  Sorry buddy you just don't matter enough!

Ironically I don't actually give any fucks about your little weird obsession with me locked thread, which is probably why I didn't open a REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE thread myself.  But since you showed up shitting lies out all over the place I felt like stopping in and saying a piece.



Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on August 23, 2019, 05:05:12 AM
if it has no impact how can it be retaliatory?

"Retaliatory" is not about actual impact, just your intent of an impact.

https://i.snipboard.io/f0tDpv.jpg

I see. So why is it my rating is retaliatory and his is just by pure coincidence on the same day? Oh right standards only matter when you can apply them to me and your friends have no obligation to treat anyone as they wish to be treated, because reasons.


...After Flying Hellfish flew off the handle the last time I was instructed to post anything I found abusive in the appropriate meta subforum. This is what I am doing.

More lies...  I didn't fly off the handle last time because I had no idea nor do I give a fuck you were instructed to do anything.  Sorry buddy you just don't matter enough!

Ironically I don't actually give any fucks about your little weird obsession with me locked thread, which is probably why I didn't open a REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE thread myself.  But since you showed up shitting lies out all over the place I felt like stopping in and saying a piece.



Oh but you did fly off the handle (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5067125.0;all). More than once. No one asked if you give a fuck, and I certainly don't care. Yeah what a weirdo who wants to have open political discussion instead of only discussion you consider valid (IE only those that agree with you).


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: Vod on August 23, 2019, 05:07:22 AM
You tell me.

OK.  You are a hypocrite for saying one thing and doing another.

You ran your little con, reselling garbage in exchange for positive DT feedback.  But that was years ago - since your opinion was deemed unimportant you have done nothing but chase after those who still have what you want.

I am more than proud that you have lumped me with the likes of FH.

:)



Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TMAN on August 23, 2019, 08:36:18 AM
I like FH, he is funny and cunty in a good way - Techspaz on the other hand is cunty in a bad way - like end of a gangbang 20 spunks in the cunt bad..

xxxx

TMAN IS BACK BITCHES


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on August 23, 2019, 07:22:15 PM
You tell me.

OK.  You are a hypocrite for saying one thing and doing another.

You ran your little con, reselling garbage in exchange for positive DT feedback.  But that was years ago - since your opinion was deemed unimportant you have done nothing but chase after those who still have what you want.

I am more than proud that you have lumped me with the likes of FH.

:)



My little con? You mean selling low priced items that no other highly trusted user wants to waste the time on because of higher workload and minimal to no profits so new users can have a comfortable introduction to trading on the forum and in Bitcoin? You mean that con? What a sneak I am using the trust system exactly as it was intended and not just pretending to be internet police like you all! I would have got away with it too if it weren't for you meddling Canukistani psychopaths. Remind me, what does any of this have to do with the op? Oh right nothing. The op was just a pathetic excuse to round up all of the featured clowns here in the clown car to throw pies in retribution for speaking up about your collective bad behavior. You sure proved me wrong!


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: OgNasty on August 23, 2019, 07:30:16 PM
Everyone knows Flying Hellfish is a liberal nut job that unfairly moderates P&S, as this has been long established already.  He's likely what is pointed at as an example of allowing alternative views to keep the guise of decentralization on this forum.  In that sense, he's filling his role as expected.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: Flying Hellfish on August 23, 2019, 08:32:00 PM

Oh but you did

That's called projection retard, you might think I "flew off the handle" but in reality I am laughing at you like everyone else is!  Meanwhile you are still an irrelevant troll (with a bunch of votes in the OFFICIAL troll poll to prove it!).

Everyone knows Flying Hellfish is a liberal nut job that unfairly moderates P&S

Everyone = OG and TESCHARE

You two cunts have been crying about me for about a year and yet theymos hasn't done anything...


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on August 23, 2019, 09:03:29 PM

Oh but you did

That's called projection retard, you might think I "flew off the handle" but in reality I am laughing at you like everyone else is!  Meanwhile you are still an irrelevant troll (with a bunch of votes in the OFFICIAL troll poll to prove it!).

Everyone knows Flying Hellfish is a liberal nut job that unfairly moderates P&S

Everyone = OG and TESCHARE

You two cunts have been crying about me for about a year and yet theymos hasn't done anything...

Careful now cupcake. You are now getting your employer involved directly in your little pie flinging fest. He didn't restore OG Nasty's post and say

"It was incorrect for OgNasty's post in that thread about the California shooting to be deleted; I restored it." (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5067125.msg47814958#msg47814958)

Seems like that is something. The really funny part is you think because "he hasn't done anything" he won't. I get the feeling he shares my sense of humor on giving people enough rope to hang themselves with.



Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TMAN on August 23, 2019, 10:09:32 PM
Reeeeeeeeeeee techcunt spends time on 4chan.

Techcunt loves OG

Flying helfish for president


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: Vod on August 23, 2019, 10:39:38 PM
My little con? You mean selling low priced items that no other highly trusted user wants to waste the time on because of higher workload and minimal to no profits so new users can have a comfortable introduction to trading on the forum and in Bitcoin? You mean that con?

If that's how you prefer to phrase it, ok.   You re-sold BTW - you didn't introduce anything new to the marketplace. 

Then you lost your ability to give users positive DT, and you decided to stop helping new users, right?


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: marlboroza on August 23, 2019, 11:23:21 PM
@Techshare, are you going to admit that you are wrong about this and unlock thread so we can have nice conversation on how wrong you are?

Hah!
~
Well look who jumped out of ponzi wagon to lecture us. Thanks God no one is taking this ponziarian seriously. This is just another example how OGNasty is unable to read thread and jumps straight ahead to reply button.

On mirror battle, who would win most "me me me" reward, OG or T?


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: OgNasty on August 24, 2019, 12:47:11 AM

Oh but you did

That's called projection retard, you might think I "flew off the handle" but in reality I am laughing at you like everyone else is!  Meanwhile you are still an irrelevant troll (with a bunch of votes in the OFFICIAL troll poll to prove it!).

Everyone knows Flying Hellfish is a liberal nut job that unfairly moderates P&S

Everyone = OG and TESCHARE

You two cunts have been crying about me for about a year and yet theymos hasn't done anything...

Careful now cupcake. You are now getting your employer involved directly in your little pie flinging fest. He didn't restore OG Nasty's post and say

"It was incorrect for OgNasty's post in that thread about the California shooting to be deleted; I restored it." (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5067125.msg47814958#msg47814958)

Seems like that is something. The really funny part is you think because "he hasn't done anything" he won't. I get the feeling he shares my sense of humor on giving people enough rope to hang themselves with.

"I view his political beliefs as ~80% insane."

LOL.  The truth hurts.  As I previously stated, he exists to serve a role, and that role isn't being a good moderator.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: marlboroza on August 24, 2019, 12:56:50 AM
LOL.  The truth hurts.  As I previously stated, he exists to serve a role, and that role isn't being a good moderator.

I did NOT delete my thread.  

Lol!


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on August 24, 2019, 02:32:16 AM
My little con? You mean selling low priced items that no other highly trusted user wants to waste the time on because of higher workload and minimal to no profits so new users can have a comfortable introduction to trading on the forum and in Bitcoin? You mean that con?

If that's how you prefer to phrase it, ok.   You re-sold BTW - you didn't introduce anything new to the marketplace. 

Then you lost your ability to give users positive DT, and you decided to stop helping new users, right?

Who said I introduced anything new to the marketplace? Oh right you. You know what I change my mind Vod, you aren't a clown. You are the sad party magician that only has a handful of tricks and just keeps recycling them over and over again, no one buying any of them, so you get resentful of everyone not buying your bullshit and just become an even sadder more bitter party magician. You do carpool in the community clown car though.

@Techshare, are you going to admit that you are wrong about this and unlock thread so we can have nice conversation on how wrong you are?

Hah!

Here we are. What is stopping you?


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: Vod on August 24, 2019, 05:58:27 AM
Who said I introduced anything new to the marketplace? Oh right you. You know what I change my mind Vod, you aren't a clown. You are the sad party magician that only has a handful of tricks and just keeps recycling them over and over again, no one buying any of them, so you get resentful of everyone not buying your bullshit and just become an even sadder more bitter party magician. You do carpool in the community clown car though.

Thanks idiot.   :)

Why do you continue to leave inappropriate feedback while posting in multiple threads that feedback should not be used for personal vendettas?  

By saying I am mentally ill, does that give your brain the shot of dopamine you need to continue existing?  Do you actually believe it stops people from getting scammed by your buddy OG?  Let other people get the same dopamine rush - stop being a hypocrite.  



Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on August 24, 2019, 01:02:22 PM
Who said I introduced anything new to the marketplace? Oh right you. You know what I change my mind Vod, you aren't a clown. You are the sad party magician that only has a handful of tricks and just keeps recycling them over and over again, no one buying any of them, so you get resentful of everyone not buying your bullshit and just become an even sadder more bitter party magician. You do carpool in the community clown car though.

Thanks idiot.   :)

Why do you continue to leave inappropriate feedback while posting in multiple threads that feedback should not be used for personal vendettas?  

By saying I am mentally ill, does that give your brain the shot of dopamine you need to continue existing?  Do you actually believe it stops people from getting scammed by your buddy OG?  Let other people get the same dopamine rush - stop being a hypocrite.  



Remind me again, what does any of this have to do with the topic? Oh right nothing.

There is no reason to give people a courtesy they do not extend to me or others. You have a lot of nerve lecturing me about using trust ratings for personal vendettas (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=915823.0). P.S. I know it is hard, but work on generating your own thoughts instead of just repeating mine back at me as if it makes you look smart.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: Flying Hellfish on August 24, 2019, 01:42:46 PM

LOL.  The truth hurts.  As I previously stated, he exists to serve a role, and that role isn't being a good moderator.


People are going to start to wonder if your role is to spread baseless conspiracy theories against theymos!

Ironically in my "mod interview" thread I don't recall any discussion about my political beliefs, it's almost as if the important thing was my ability to enforce the rules vs my political affiliation.  Digiran did try to bring in my Anti-theist beliefs into the thread but got smacked back like the retard troll he was, immediately.

You and TS should try to look beyond your blind rage against anything not HARD RIGHT.

Since the hard left trolls hate me as much as the hard right trolls do and since I'm still a mod that is left alone, then I assume on the right course.  When I am informed rationally by someone who actually matters I can and will address as needed.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on August 24, 2019, 03:18:27 PM

LOL.  The truth hurts.  As I previously stated, he exists to serve a role, and that role isn't being a good moderator.


People are going to start to wonder if your role is a to spread baseless conspiracy theories against theymos!

Ironically in my "mod interview" thread I don't recall any discussion about my political beliefs, it's almost as if the important thing was my ability to enforce the rules vs my political affiliation.  Digiran did try to bring in my Anti-theist beliefs into the thread but got smacked back like the retard troll he was, immediately.

You and TS should try to look beyond your blind rage against anything not HARD RIGHT.

Since the hard left trolls hate me as much as the hard right trolls do and since I'm still a mod that is left alone, then I assume on the right course.  When I am informed rationally by someone who actually matters I can and will address as needed.

Except I don't run away from discussions with you. If I hated everything that doesn't agree with my "hard right" (lol) views why would I even talk to people who disagreed with me? I don't hate you, I just think you are irrational, have bad ideas which I can demonstrably explain why they are bad, and you abuse your authority to target those that don't agree with you. In the end no matter how much you claim I hate you, you still have the mod buttons and all I have are words. I am just here to remind you that if you keep treating it like a toy it could get taken away.

You can all have your little circus show, if it means it helps keep FlyingHellfish in check so people can have an open discussion in one of the very few open forums left to do so, its A-OK with me.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TMAN on August 24, 2019, 03:50:26 PM
Reeeeee TS and OG tag team.. watch out young gay lads, the old hairy cunts are coming to your bedroom.

The pair of you should just fucking grow up. Just because FH isnít into either of you


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: OgNasty on August 24, 2019, 08:30:45 PM

LOL.  The truth hurts.  As I previously stated, he exists to serve a role, and that role isn't being a good moderator.


People are going to start to wonder if your role is to spread baseless conspiracy theories against theymos!

Ironically in my "mod interview" thread I don't recall any discussion about my political beliefs, it's almost as if the important thing was my ability to enforce the rules vs my political affiliation.  Digiran did try to bring in my Anti-theist beliefs into the thread but got smacked back like the retard troll he was, immediately.

You and TS should try to look beyond your blind rage against anything not HARD RIGHT.

Since the hard left trolls hate me as much as the hard right trolls do and since I'm still a mod that is left alone, then I assume on the right course.  When I am informed rationally by someone who actually matters I can and will address as needed.

Since you can't seem to read, let me extend the quote TECSHARE linked for you even further and open your eyes a bit more.  It isn't a conspiracy theory...

"While Flying Hellfish is pretty far left, I am an anarcho-capitalist; I view his political beliefs as ~80% insane. Having two diametrically opposed viewpoints here is a good combination which will hopefully prevent the formation of an echo chamber for one viewpoint or another."

You are doing a fine job of keeping people from accusing theymos of running a forum biased towards his own political beliefs.  That is all.  As a mod you are fucking terrible.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: Vod on August 24, 2019, 11:09:08 PM
Remind me again, what does any of this have to do with the topic?

Sigh.   Get a notepad or something...

You are selectively enforcing the feedback guidelines.  If you don't like someone, you'll complain about their abuse of the feedback system.

But you are free to use feedback as a personal forum.

Stop being a hypocrite and practice what you preach bozo.



Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on August 25, 2019, 01:02:35 AM
Remind me again, what does any of this have to do with the topic?

Sigh.   Get a notepad or something...

You are selectively enforcing the feedback guidelines.  If you don't like someone, you'll complain about their abuse of the feedback system.

But you are free to use feedback as a personal forum.

Stop being a hypocrite and practice what you preach bozo.



This is a thread about Flying Hellfish, and my thread regarding him here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5103785.msg49486640#msg49486640). None of what you are raving about is on topic.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: Vod on August 25, 2019, 01:25:28 AM
This is a thread about Flying Hellfish, and my thread regarding him here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5103785.msg49486640#msg49486640). None of what you are raving about is on topic.

Says right in the title - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT.   Why are you complaining about something you do regularly?

Either feedback should be based on personal issues, or it shouldn't.    Choose one.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on August 25, 2019, 03:18:36 AM
This is a thread about Flying Hellfish, and my thread regarding him here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5103785.msg49486640#msg49486640). None of what you are raving about is on topic.

Says right in the title - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT.   Why are you complaining about something you do regularly?

Either feedback should be based on personal issues, or it shouldn't.    Choose one.

This still has nothing to do with the op. Also I am not a moderator, and the OP is in regards to selective enforcement of moderator powers. Your ranting and raving is 100% off topic.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: nutildah on August 25, 2019, 04:45:01 AM
This still has nothing to do with the op. Also I am not a moderator, and the OP is in regards to selective enforcement of moderator powers.

So what does FH's decision to delete his thread ? have to do with his ability to act as a moderator? Nothing. Like most things you complain about, its nothing stacked on top of nothing, with an extra side heap of nothing. You just felt like flinging some shit in his direction from the comfort of your locked thread (about censorship, lol). So don't be surprised when others do the same to you.

Seems like the only people who have problems with FH are TS and OG. Everyone else seems to think he is doing a fine enough job. Oh, except for the occasional self-imploding lunatics like bitunlocker, I suppose.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: Vod on August 25, 2019, 09:14:53 AM
Your ranting and raving is 100% off topic.

You know Techy, you, Trump and OG should learn more/different numbers.   lol

I'd say I'm about 64.6% on topic.  You do selective enforcement based on your like or dislike of the person.   SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT is in the title....


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on August 25, 2019, 01:48:20 PM
This still has nothing to do with the op. Also I am not a moderator, and the OP is in regards to selective enforcement of moderator powers.

So what does FH's decision to delete his thread ? have to do with his ability to act as a moderator? Nothing. Like most things you complain about, its nothing stacked on top of nothing, with an extra side heap of nothing. You just felt like flinging some shit in his direction from the comfort of your locked thread (about censorship, lol). So don't be surprised when others do the same to you.

Seems like the only people who have problems with FH are TS and OG. Everyone else seems to think he is doing a fine enough job. Oh, except for the occasional self-imploding lunatics like bitunlocker, I suppose.

Yes, what would a deleted thread have to do with moderator powers, or any of the other listed abuses of moderator powers in the thread have to do with moderation? Clearly nothing because you declare is as such. Thanks for admitting this thread is all about retribution against me and has nothing to so with the OP. Don't forget your clown horn little boy.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TMAN on August 25, 2019, 02:22:50 PM
Ts.. how are your hormone levels? I seriously believe you and OG are both suffering from low testosterone, your actions on this forum are proof that you are inadequate as a male.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: nutildah on August 25, 2019, 02:30:38 PM
Yes, what would a deleted thread have to do with moderator powers, or any of the other listed abuses of moderator powers in the thread have to do with moderation?

You didn't mention that FH was the author of the thread in question. Since its something that can be done by anyone who creates their own thread in P&S, deletion of the thread clearly has nothing to do with FH's moderator powers.

Thanks for admitting this thread is all about retribution against me and has nothing to so with the OP.

LOL. When did I say any of that? I just thought it was lame that you didn't mention the fact that it was FH's own thread in question. I still do.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on August 25, 2019, 02:44:07 PM
Yes, what would a deleted thread have to do with moderator powers, or any of the other listed abuses of moderator powers in the thread have to do with moderation?

You didn't mention that FH was the author of the thread in question. Since its something that can be done by anyone who creates their own thread in P&S, deletion of the thread clearly has nothing to do with FH's moderator powers.

Thanks for admitting this thread is all about retribution against me and has nothing to so with the OP.

LOL. When did I say any of that? I just thought it was lame that you didn't mention the fact that it was FH's own thread in question. I still do.

And here we are full circle.


Just because you are allowed to do it doesn't mean it does not reflect poorly on you. Thanks everyone for helping me draw more attention to these issues. Much appreciated.



Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: nutildah on August 25, 2019, 02:51:54 PM
Yes, what would a deleted thread have to do with moderator powers, or any of the other listed abuses of moderator powers in the thread have to do with moderation?

You didn't mention that FH was the author of the thread in question. Since its something that can be done by anyone who creates their own thread in P&S, deletion of the thread clearly has nothing to do with FH's moderator powers.

Thanks for admitting this thread is all about retribution against me and has nothing to so with the OP.

LOL. When did I say any of that? I just thought it was lame that you didn't mention the fact that it was FH's own thread in question. I still do.

And here we are full circle.

Just because you are allowed to do it doesn't mean it does not reflect poorly on you. Thanks everyone for helping me draw more attention to these issues. Much appreciated.


What does FH deleting his own thread, as anybody can delete their own thread, have to do with his "moderator powers"?


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on August 25, 2019, 03:28:37 PM
Yes, what would a deleted thread have to do with moderator powers, or any of the other listed abuses of moderator powers in the thread have to do with moderation?

You didn't mention that FH was the author of the thread in question. Since its something that can be done by anyone who creates their own thread in P&S, deletion of the thread clearly has nothing to do with FH's moderator powers.

Thanks for admitting this thread is all about retribution against me and has nothing to so with the OP.

LOL. When did I say any of that? I just thought it was lame that you didn't mention the fact that it was FH's own thread in question. I still do.

And here we are full circle.

Just because you are allowed to do it doesn't mean it does not reflect poorly on you. Thanks everyone for helping me draw more attention to these issues. Much appreciated.


What does FH deleting his own thread, as anybody can delete their own thread, have to do with his "moderator powers"?


Because regular users see this when they press the delete button on the thread OP in Politics & Society.

https://i.imgur.com/cLkSvcz.png

Regular users can not just make their thread disappear, even if it is self moderated. They could perhaps manually delete everything then leave a basically empty op, but that is not what happened, the thread is gone completely (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5065043.0).


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: nutildah on August 25, 2019, 03:54:55 PM
What does FH deleting his own thread, as anybody can delete their own thread, have to do with his "moderator powers"?

Because regular users see this when they press the delete button on the thread OP in Politics & Society.

https://i.imgur.com/cLkSvcz.png

Regular users can not just make their thread disappear, even if it is self moderated. They could perhaps manually delete everything then leave a basically empty op, but that is not what happened, the thread is gone completely (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5065043.0).

I've never tried to delete a thread from P&S, so I will happily admit I didn't know that. However, FH said he didn't delete the thread, yet your post still insinuates that he did. You were corrected and you didn't change your statement. What's worse is it is open to interpretation that he deleted somebody else's thread because you didn't state it he opened it.

It's pretty obvious what your end goal is, and I still think its lame, which is why I'm glad to have opened this REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE thread to give him a chance to explain himself and counter your misinformation.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on August 25, 2019, 04:43:42 PM
What does FH deleting his own thread, as anybody can delete their own thread, have to do with his "moderator powers"?

Because regular users see this when they press the delete button on the thread OP in Politics & Society.

https://i.imgur.com/cLkSvcz.png

Regular users can not just make their thread disappear, even if it is self moderated. They could perhaps manually delete everything then leave a basically empty op, but that is not what happened, the thread is gone completely (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5065043.0).

I've never tried to delete a thread from P&S, so I will happily admit I didn't know that. However, FH said he didn't delete the thread, yet your post still insinuates that he did. You were corrected and you didn't change your statement. What's worse is it is open to interpretation that he deleted somebody else's thread because you didn't state it he opened it.

It's pretty obvious what your end goal is, and I still think its lame, which is why I'm glad to have opened this REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE thread to give him a chance to explain himself and counter your misinformation.

It is pretty obvious you are willing to attribute whatever motives you like to me regardless of what I say. Again, I posed a question, I didn't make a statement. Now asking a question you don't approve of is not allowed? Perhaps you would like to go full circle on that subject?

What is this - >  ?



Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: nutildah on August 25, 2019, 05:10:35 PM
It is pretty obvious you are willing to attribute whatever motives you like to me regardless of what I say. Again, I posed a question, I didn't make a statement. Now asking a question you don't approve of is not allowed? Perhaps you would like to go full circle on that subject?

What is this - >  ?

OK, well you've been provided with the answer to your question, and you still leave it lingering like it is unresolved. I know the plan is to besmirch Flying Hellfish but you're really just doing it to yourself.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on August 25, 2019, 05:36:45 PM
It is pretty obvious you are willing to attribute whatever motives you like to me regardless of what I say. Again, I posed a question, I didn't make a statement. Now asking a question you don't approve of is not allowed? Perhaps you would like to go full circle on that subject?

What is this - >  ?

OK, well you've been provided with the answer to your question, and you still leave it lingering like it is unresolved. I know the plan is to besmirch Flying Hellfish but you're really just doing it to yourself.

Besmirch? What are you a Victorian house maid chaperoning your charge? What is lingering unresolved exactly? I am not removing or editing my question from my thread. How much more resolution would you like?


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: nutildah on August 25, 2019, 06:00:43 PM
What is lingering unresolved exactly?

According to your thread, your question.

I am not removing or editing my question from my thread.

Even though you got an answer?

How much more resolution would you like?

You to do the right thing I suppose. But I know that you never will because your ego won't let you. That's what's entertaining about the whole thing, and why you are consistently the downfall of yourself. You demonstrate an utter lack of humility. There's got to be an ICD-9 code for that kind of behavior.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on August 25, 2019, 07:53:09 PM
What is lingering unresolved exactly?

According to your thread, your question.

I am not removing or editing my question from my thread.

Even though you got an answer?

How much more resolution would you like?

You to do the right thing I suppose. But I know that you never will because your ego won't let you. That's what's entertaining about the whole thing, and why you are consistently the downfall of yourself. You demonstrate an utter lack of humility. There's got to be an ICD-9 code for that kind of behavior.

I wasn't aware we are supposed to go back and revise post history on command upon the first complaint of anal inflammation. You and your fellow clown car inhabitants are welcome to your opinions on what the "right thing" is. I am not obligated to share it.

BTW, ICD-9, what is this 1998? I found your ICD designation in the current standard - ICD-10: N52.9.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: suchmoon on August 25, 2019, 08:12:54 PM
ICD-10: N52.9.

Bullshit as usual. Everybody knows that TMAN was born in 1881.

Quote
N52.9 is applicable to adult patients aged 15 - 124 years inclusive.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: nutildah on August 26, 2019, 09:22:00 AM
BTW, ICD-9, what is this 1998?

Actually I meant DSM. Its been a while. But look, I think I found it right off the bat.

Quote
301.0. Paranoid personality disorder

Paranoid personality disorder is characterized by a pervasive distrust of others, including even friends, family, and partners. As a result, this person is guarded, suspicious, and constantly on the lookout for clues or suggestions to validate his fears. He also has a strong sense of personal rights: He is overly sensitive to setbacks and rebuffs, easily feels shame and humiliation, and persistently bears grudges. Unsurprisingly, he tends to withdraw from others and to struggle with building close relationships. The principal ego defense in paranoid PD is projection, which involves attributing oneís unacceptable thoughts and feelings to other people.

This is pretty much you to a (low) T.

Honestly the best treatment for this is probably to spend more time on 8chan and buy more guns.

Here's a more thorough wording (https://www.theravive.com/therapedia/paranoid-personality-disorder-dsm--5-301.0-(f60.0)) of what Paranoid personality disorder is. Its amazing how much of this fits you.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on August 26, 2019, 09:55:14 AM
BTW, ICD-9, what is this 1998?

Actually I meant DSM. Its been a while. But look, I think I found it right off the bat.

Quote
301.0. Paranoid personality disorder

Paranoid personality disorder is characterized by a pervasive distrust of others, including even friends, family, and partners. As a result, this person is guarded, suspicious, and constantly on the lookout for clues or suggestions to validate his fears. He also has a strong sense of personal rights: He is overly sensitive to setbacks and rebuffs, easily feels shame and humiliation, and persistently bears grudges. Unsurprisingly, he tends to withdraw from others and to struggle with building close relationships. The principal ego defense in paranoid PD is projection, which involves attributing oneís unacceptable thoughts and feelings to other people.

This is pretty much you to a (low) T.

Honestly the best treatment for this is probably to spend more time on 8chan and buy more guns.

Here's a more thorough wording (https://www.theravive.com/therapedia/paranoid-personality-disorder-dsm--5-301.0-(f60.0)) of what Paranoid personality disorder is. Its amazing how much of this fits you.

If you are going to try to look cool by using reference material above your pay grade, at least find the right book. See everyone? This is about my politics, not about Flying Hellfish.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: mOgliE on August 26, 2019, 12:37:15 PM
You are doing a fine job of keeping people from accusing theymos of running a forum biased towards his own political beliefs.  That is all.  As a mod you are fucking terrible.

Just popping by for this sentence. Not going to swim in all the previous crap as discussing with TECSHARE is like discussing with a 3 years old child, after a moment you should understand he has no ability for logic and thus you can't discuss with him as he'll change the rules of debate as he sees fit.

So just wanted to say that P&S is certainly the most difficult section to moderate as it contains only 3% facts and 97% of beliefs and opinions mostly on sensible subjects. I've found FH to be fairly consistent in his moderation policy: you're off topic you get deleted, you're in topic you don't get deleted. As simple as that.

I've seen about a dozen of posts of mine deleted mainly when I tried to discuss against TECHSARE and to explain things to him because even if cries like a little bitch against censorship he's not the last to report a post to get it deleted. And I'm 10000 times politically closer to FH. So no his "censorship" is not selective.

Even though I'm sure he appreciates more deleting a stupid "white men are victims shut up snowflakes" post than a post trying to explain the difference between communism and dictatorship.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: nutildah on August 26, 2019, 01:05:18 PM
If you are going to try to look cool by using reference material above your pay grade, at least find the right book.

I think we learned something new about you today.

See everyone? This is about my politics, not about Flying Hellfish.

Sounds like your symptoms are manifesting themselves.

Quote
constantly on the lookout for clues or suggestions to validate his fears


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on August 26, 2019, 08:21:58 PM
You are doing a fine job of keeping people from accusing theymos of running a forum biased towards his own political beliefs.  That is all.  As a mod you are fucking terrible.

Just popping by for this sentence. Not going to swim in all the previous crap as discussing with TECSHARE is like discussing with a 3 years old child, after a moment you should understand he has no ability for logic and thus you can't discuss with him as he'll change the rules of debate as he sees fit.

So just wanted to say that P&S is certainly the most difficult section to moderate as it contains only 3% facts and 97% of beliefs and opinions mostly on sensible subjects. I've found FH to be fairly consistent in his moderation policy: you're off topic you get deleted, you're in topic you don't get deleted. As simple as that.

I've seen about a dozen of posts of mine deleted mainly when I tried to discuss against TECHSARE and to explain things to him because even if cries like a little bitch against censorship he's not the last to report a post to get it deleted. And I'm 10000 times politically closer to FH. So no his "censorship" is not selective.

Even though I'm sure he appreciates more deleting a stupid "white men are victims shut up snowflakes" post than a post trying to explain the difference between communism and dictatorship.

Amazing, I didn't think you could fit any more clowns in that clown car. Here to take retribution after I called out your pathetic attempt at using a sock m0gliE (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5129682.msg52035568#msg52035568)? This just a pathetic collection of children that feel they need revenge for making them feel stupid because they can't effectively argue their beliefs, so they desperately need to prevent their opponents from speaking by any means possible. Sorry little girls, emotion is not equivalent to logic.



Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: mOgliE on August 27, 2019, 06:39:43 AM

Amazing, I didn't think you could fit any more clowns in that clown car. Here to take retribution after I called out your pathetic attempt at using a sock m0gliE (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5129682.msg52035568#msg52035568)? This just a pathetic collection of children that feel they need revenge for making them feel stupid because they can't effectively argue their beliefs, so they desperately need to prevent their opponents from speaking by any means possible. Sorry little girls, emotion is not equivalent to logic.



Amazing how you say "call out" when you just said something without the begining of a proof but for you it's ok you've proven your point xD

I'm just here to defend FH moderation policies. Seems logical to me that if 2 dickheads are attacking someone publicly, someone can come to defend this person publicly.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on August 27, 2019, 02:17:27 PM

Amazing, I didn't think you could fit any more clowns in that clown car. Here to take retribution after I called out your pathetic attempt at using a sock m0gliE (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5129682.msg52035568#msg52035568)? This just a pathetic collection of children that feel they need revenge for making them feel stupid because they can't effectively argue their beliefs, so they desperately need to prevent their opponents from speaking by any means possible. Sorry little girls, emotion is not equivalent to logic.



Amazing how you say "call out" when you just said something without the begining of a proof but for you it's ok you've proven your point xD

I'm just here to defend FH moderation policies. Seems logical to me that if 2 dickheads are attacking someone publicly, someone can come to defend this person publicly.

Of course you would approve of his moderation, he is a self proclaimed Communist like you, and he covers for those he agrees with. This is all documented in my OP (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5103785.msg49486640#msg49486640), speaking of proof.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: mOgliE on August 27, 2019, 02:18:25 PM
Of course you would approve of his moderation, he is a self proclaimed Communist like you, and he covers for those he agrees with. This is all documented in my OP (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5103785.msg49486640#msg49486640), speaking of proof.

He covers me by deleting my posts when they're off topic? Oo


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on August 27, 2019, 06:44:46 PM
Of course you would approve of his moderation, he is a self proclaimed Communist like you, and he covers for those he agrees with. This is all documented in my OP (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5103785.msg49486640#msg49486640), speaking of proof.

He covers me by deleting my posts when they're off topic? Oo

Just because he occasionally does his job doesn't mean he also doesn't selectively enforce. Now if he did this EVERY time that would be quite obvious now wouldn't it? Also the fact is your posts are mostly composed of shit anyway as we can see here.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TMAN on August 27, 2019, 06:53:16 PM
TS whatís your real problem with FH? Did he fuck your mum or something? This total obsession is worrying, honestly human to human this is worrying, you come across as straight but Iím concerned there are some underlying issues here, perhaps your estrogen levels are high..or you are a closet. Whatever it is itís not healthy son.

Your coming across as a fucking dry lunch, you do get that donít you?


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: suchmoon on August 27, 2019, 07:20:54 PM
Now if he did this EVERY time that would be quite obvious now wouldn't it?

It would be quite obviously ridiculous if a moderator deleted EVERY post that you report.

Maybe you should ask theymos to create a nutjob board and appoint you as its moderator.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on August 27, 2019, 07:59:58 PM
Now if he did this EVERY time that would be quite obvious now wouldn't it?

It would be quite obviously ridiculous if a moderator deleted EVERY post that you report.

Maybe you should ask theymos to create a nutjob board and appoint you as its moderator.

Not what I said. I have no responsibility to defend retarded claims you make on my behalf as if I actually said them.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: suchmoon on August 27, 2019, 08:24:50 PM
Not what I said.

So you're reporting some posts that you think shouldn't be deleted? Wasting moderator's time?

Because the other meaning of your statement would be that the forum is conspiring to silence you, despite your ability to create any number of self-modded threads and post any shit you want. You can't be that dumb, can you?


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on August 27, 2019, 11:23:24 PM
Not what I said.

So you're reporting some posts that you think shouldn't be deleted? Wasting moderator's time?

Because the other meaning of your statement would be that the forum is conspiring to silence you, despite your ability to create any number of self-modded threads and post any shit you want. You can't be that dumb, can you?

Yes, keep pretending as if your dumb semantic game where you speak for me worked and keep doubling down. It is a good look for you talking to yourself.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: nutildah on October 30, 2019, 02:51:28 AM
More complaining about censorship from a locked thread by TECSHARE. This time he thinks there isn't enough censorship, however.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5103785.msg52922104#msg52922104

He is basically complaining about my posts being off-topic in my own thread. I made the thread, I get to decide what its about -- he doesn't. Pretty ironic that this is coming from a guy who considers himself to be such an astute champion of free speech. He could just move on, but instead he would rather post about how unfair the rules are in his Meta LiveJournal.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: suchmoon on October 30, 2019, 03:17:42 AM
He is basically complaining about my posts being off-topic in my own thread. I made the thread, I get to decide what its about -- he doesn't. Pretty ironic that this is coming from a guy who considers himself to be such an astute champion of free speech. He could just move on, but instead he would rather post about how unfair the rules are in his Meta LiveJournal.

It's quite amusing how he thought that his post about him being not concerned is on topic but my post isn't. That is, unless he reported his own post too but forgot to list that fact in his REEE thread.

To be fair though, I wouldn't have been shocked if a bunch of those memes ended up deleted but such action would inevitably include his "no u" meme and that would cause another whinestorm. I don't think a viable strategy exists for mods to handle TECSHARE's complaints to his satisfaction.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: The-One-Above-All on October 30, 2019, 05:41:11 AM


He is basically complaining about my posts being off-topic in my own thread. I made the thread, I get to decide what its about -- he doesn't. Pretty ironic that this is coming from a guy who considers himself to be such an astute champion of free speech. He could just move on, but instead he would rather post about how unfair the rules are in his Meta LiveJournal.

That is clearly false. We have had posts of our own deleted from our own threads. (wrongly in our own case ). Sometimes as a direct response to questions or accusations that are left there that are clearly more off topic.

However, of course you can go off topic in your own thread if they hold you to the rules as theymos has explained them. Every post should be relevant directly to the OP at least in some part of your post if not the majority of it.

So yes you can certainly be off topic in your own thread if they want to claim you are.

I would say the only context you can not be off topic at all if is they allow your thread to be derailed even after you report the offending posts and you just go with the new permitted flow the mods are permitting even after you complain.  Then to moderate it would be clear moderator abuse.

I would say in most cases the thread starter should be allowed some free reign but to let it go to extremes would of course waste other contributors effort and time addressing the original point if you were to then just veer off on a totally unrelated tangent.

Permitted flow is complex and needs to really be thrashed out and detailed guidelines brought in.

The mods really (although sometimes taking the piss imho) are left to guess what is and what is not permitted flow, so really there will be some variance in decisions taken. We do have some small sympathy for getting moderation 100% spot on because that is at this time impossible.





Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on October 30, 2019, 10:28:34 PM
He is basically complaining about my posts being off-topic in my own thread. I made the thread, I get to decide what its about -- he doesn't. Pretty ironic that this is coming from a guy who considers himself to be such an astute champion of free speech. He could just move on, but instead he would rather post about how unfair the rules are in his Meta LiveJournal.

It's quite amusing how he thought that his post about him being not concerned is on topic but my post isn't. That is, unless he reported his own post too but forgot to list that fact in his REEE thread.

To be fair though, I wouldn't have been shocked if a bunch of those memes ended up deleted but such action would inevitably include his "no u" meme and that would cause another whinestorm. I don't think a viable strategy exists for mods to handle TECSHARE's complaints to his satisfaction.

Sorry Nutilduhhh, but you can in fact be off topic in your own threads. Just because you started it doesn't mean you now dictate the rules. You are still required to maintain the discussion on the topic of the OP.

As far as Suchgoon, my reply was a direct reply about the previous comment, reaffirming that I made a logical argument including sources, which is very much on topic. Your little circle jerk snipe fest directed at me was not. Also as predicted Flying Hellfish would near instantly delete these types of comments if directed toward his left leaning friends, but since it is me they perpetually remain "unhandled".


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: suchmoon on October 30, 2019, 10:31:47 PM
Also as predicted Flying Hellfish would near instantly delete these types of comments if directed toward his left leaning friends, but since it is me they perpetually remain "unhandled".

Or perhaps FHF was off that day, or deferred the decision to other mods because you're crying about his every move. So many possibilities but it must be a conspiracy.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on October 30, 2019, 10:36:29 PM
Also as predicted Flying Hellfish would near instantly delete these types of comments if directed toward his left leaning friends, but since it is me they perpetually remain "unhandled".

Or perhaps FHF was off that day, or deferred the decision to other mods because you're crying about his every move. So many possibilities but it must be a conspiracy.

Well its been what like 4 days? If he is taking that much time off maybe he should resign. Side note, I just checked and they were all marked bad. Funny how that works he ignores it until called out then pretends they were invalid.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: Vod on October 31, 2019, 12:27:19 AM
Take it up with Theymos?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=14356.msg194511#msg194511


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: nutildah on October 31, 2019, 01:40:11 AM
Also as predicted Flying Hellfish would near instantly delete these types of comments if directed toward his left leaning friends, but since it is me they perpetually remain "unhandled".

Or perhaps FHF was off that day, or deferred the decision to other mods because you're crying about his every move. So many possibilities but it must be a conspiracy.

Well its been what like 4 days? If he is taking that much time off maybe he should resign. Side note, I just checked and they were all marked bad. Funny how that works he ignores it until called out then pretends they were invalid.

Seeing as how the entire topic was a joke to begin with, perhaps you should ease up and try not caring as much about who posts what in there. There's so much idiotic banter being bandied about in that section, to single out posts that paint you in an unfavorable light for censorship is a pretty cowardly maneuver.

Whatever point it is you think you are proving... you aren't. Now man up. Stop crying and move on with your day.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on October 31, 2019, 02:57:23 AM
Seeing as how the entire topic was a joke to begin with, perhaps you should ease up and try not caring as much about who posts what in there. There's so much idiotic banter being bandied about in that section, to single out posts that paint you in an unfavorable light for censorship is a pretty cowardly maneuver.

Whatever point it is you think you are proving... you aren't. Now man up. Stop crying and move on with your day.

You very clearly took the topic seriously previously, but then when you ran out of arguments want to pretend it is all a joke to justify being totally off topic. As usual, rules don't count for you, just for when you can use them as a cudgel against others. You and your pal beating each other off is not on topic.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: nutildah on October 31, 2019, 03:31:06 AM
Seeing as how the entire topic was a joke to begin with, perhaps you should ease up and try not caring as much about who posts what in there. There's so much idiotic banter being bandied about in that section, to single out posts that paint you in an unfavorable light for censorship is a pretty cowardly maneuver.

Whatever point it is you think you are proving... you aren't. Now man up. Stop crying and move on with your day.

You very clearly took the topic seriously previously,

Here's part of my opening post, just to get a glimpse of how "serious" I was being.

Everyone gets two votes, as it may very well be a combination of factors. For example, I think that George Soros teamed up with the Lizard People to punish Trump for not bending to their One Government / New World Order agenda. I added "Donald Trump" as a joke option at the end, because as we all know, he's probably the most perfect president America has ever had. And definitely the best.

I understand part of your mental condition is your inability to grasp sarcasm. Sorry for not adding a "/s" at the end of my post.

As usual, rules don't count for you, just for when you can use them as a cudgel against others.

 ::) ::) ::)

Care to elaborate?


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: suchmoon on October 31, 2019, 03:35:02 AM
You very clearly took the topic seriously previously

So which option did you vote for? Lizard people?


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on October 31, 2019, 04:08:11 AM
Seeing as how the entire topic was a joke to begin with, perhaps you should ease up and try not caring as much about who posts what in there. There's so much idiotic banter being bandied about in that section, to single out posts that paint you in an unfavorable light for censorship is a pretty cowardly maneuver.

Whatever point it is you think you are proving... you aren't. Now man up. Stop crying and move on with your day.

You very clearly took the topic seriously previously,

Here's part of my opening post, just to get a glimpse of how "serious" I was being.

Everyone gets two votes, as it may very well be a combination of factors. For example, I think that George Soros teamed up with the Lizard People to punish Trump for not bending to their One Government / New World Order agenda. I added "Donald Trump" as a joke option at the end, because as we all know, he's probably the most perfect president America has ever had. And definitely the best.

I understand part of your mental condition is your inability to grasp sarcasm. Sorry for not adding a "/s" at the end of my post.

As usual, rules don't count for you, just for when you can use them as a cudgel against others.

 ::) ::) ::)

Care to elaborate?

Regardless of how much you want to pretend the whole thread was a joke, your personally directed circle jerk is still not on topic. Also if you are saying it was all a joke, it belongs in Off Topic, not Politics and Society. Either way you are off topic.

Sure I can elaborate with an example.

http://web.archive.org/web/20190704162438/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1622642.0


Fixed. I've still yet to see any proof of accounts being sold to be used for 'mass propganda'.

Who cares what the person is gonna do with the account? Whatever it is, it is BULLSHIT because they are pretending to be a different person. This makes them a liar, an impostor, a bullshitter.

And here you are a staff member defending this behavior.

You guys are greedy beyond belief. What would Satoshi say if he read about this? I can't help but think he would say you destroyed the original intention of his forum and turned it into a breeding ground for scum and villainy.


I think the main rationale and reasoning for allowing accounts to be sold is because allowing them lets others know that the practice can and does go on and banning them may give people a false sense of security, not to mention banning their sale will not stop the behaviour from happening and only push it further underground and into obscurity.

This forum also doesn't moderate or ban scammers, but that doesn't mean we allow or encourage them nor do we profit from it in any way from it.


Still, you are impersonating somebody unless you disclaim that you bought their account, which never happens. So buying accounts is a 100% dishonest manuver. Its never been used for an honest purpose because pretending to be somebody you are not is lying.

I dunno, while I appreciate your explanation, it still just seems that you are sticking up for criminals at the end of the day. I really don't understand how you guys can live with yourselves knowing how many crimes are committed here on a daily basis. I certainly hope you don't actually believe you are contributing to some benevolent force in the world because you are not.

You're just telling thieves and scammers its OK to be a thief and scammer here. In the end it will decrease your revenue, not mine.

Rules are only a tool for you to apply to every one else, not for you to follow.



Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: nutildah on October 31, 2019, 04:25:56 AM
Pretty lame. All that digging and that's the best example you could find?

What you are referencing from 5 years ago has never even been a rule... It has nothing to do with "rules," only the lack thereof. After hilariousandco explained to me its not against the rules to sell accounts, I stopped giving a shit about it. And that was over 5 years ago!

Care to try again? Find an actual example of me using the rules against others while insisting they not be applied to myself.

You've been here for longer than most yet your understanding of how the forum functions remains pretty pitiful.

Edit: After scouring my post history for hours, TS is most likely now firing off long-winded PMs to theymos, cobra, satoshi, Gavin Andresen, Donald Trump, the U.N., Chuck Norris and Roger Goodell in hopes that somebody will take very seriously this egregious injustice that has been committed and bring a restorative balance of order and fairness to the universe.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on October 31, 2019, 07:53:58 AM
Pretty lame. All that digging and that's the best example you could find?

What you are referencing from 5 years ago has never even been a rule... It has nothing to do with "rules," only the lack thereof. After hilariousandco explained to me its not against the rules to sell accounts, I stopped giving a shit about it. And that was over 5 years ago!

Care to try again? Find an actual example of me using the rules against others while insisting they not be applied to myself.

You've been here for longer than most yet your understanding of how the forum functions remains pretty pitiful.

Edit: After scouring my post history for hours, TS is most likely now firing off long-winded PMs to theymos, cobra, satoshi, Gavin Andresen, Donald Trump, the U.N., Chuck Norris and Roger Goodell in hopes that somebody will take very seriously this egregious injustice that has been committed and bring a restorative balance of order and fairness to the universe.

While I am sure you would love it if we could just talk about you for hours, that is off topic. All some one has to do is look at your post history for plenty of examples. Plenty of people totally lose their reputations for doing exactly what you did and condemned others for, but you get the special rules because you fondle all the right balls. Nothing is ever a rule here, that is part of the problem. It is only a rule when people want it to be a rule, and when they don't want it to be a rule there is always some excuse why it doesn't apply to their buddy or some one who agrees with you. Again, this kind of system is what breeds chaos, conflict, and lack of respect for authority.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: nutildah on October 31, 2019, 08:29:50 AM
While I am sure you would love it if we could just talk about you for hours, that is off topic. All some one has to do is look at your post history for plenty of examples. Plenty of people totally lose their reputations for doing exactly what you did and condemned others for, but you get the special rules because you fondle all the right balls. Nothing is ever a rule here, that is part of the problem. It is only a rule when people want it to be a rule, and when they don't want it to be a rule there is always some excuse why it doesn't apply to their buddy or some one who agrees with you. Again, this kind of system is what breeds chaos, conflict, and lack of respect for authority.

Okay, so I just as I suspected. You actually have nothing to back up your claims.

How can I be the recipient of special rules if, as you just mentioned, the rules don't exist? Stop being cryptic and dancing around the issue. If you had something specific in mind, then say it.

If the rules don't exist, what are you making such a big deal out of? You're not really saying anything anymore. Its clear that you're pretty upset over not having non-rules enforced to your liking. Other than that, I have no idea what you're getting at.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on October 31, 2019, 08:34:59 AM
While I am sure you would love it if we could just talk about you for hours, that is off topic. All some one has to do is look at your post history for plenty of examples. Plenty of people totally lose their reputations for doing exactly what you did and condemned others for, but you get the special rules because you fondle all the right balls. Nothing is ever a rule here, that is part of the problem. It is only a rule when people want it to be a rule, and when they don't want it to be a rule there is always some excuse why it doesn't apply to their buddy or some one who agrees with you. Again, this kind of system is what breeds chaos, conflict, and lack of respect for authority.

Okay, so I just as I suspected. You actually have nothing to back up your claims.

How can I be the recipient of special rules if, as you just mentioned, the rules don't exist? Stop being cryptic and dancing around the issue. If you had something specific in mind, then say it.

If the rules don't exist, what are you making such a big deal out of? You're not really saying anything anymore. Its clear that you're pretty upset over not having non-rules enforced to your liking. Other than that, I have no idea what you're getting at.

I did back up my claims, you just imagine I didn't because it serves you. I am not dancing around anything, rules are selectively enforced. You pretend to be confused all you like, what I said makes perfect sense no matter how much you want to pretend it doesn't. Remind me again, speaking of being upset, why is it all of this bothers you so much if it is so completely baseless and based in nonsense? Oh right, that is just you making a pathetic attempt at marginalizing points you can't argue against as usual.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: nutildah on October 31, 2019, 08:42:01 AM
I did back up my claims, you just imagine I didn't because it serves you. I am not dancing around anything, rules are selectively enforced. You pretend to be confused all you like, what I said makes perfect sense no matter how much you want to pretend it doesn't. Remind me again, speaking of being upset, why is it all of this bothers you so much if it is so completely baseless and based in nonsense? Oh right, that is just you making a pathetic attempt at marginalizing points you can't argue against as usual.

Its hard to argue against points that are based on delusions. I can provide rational counterarguments all day long but you are so caught up in the paranoid delusion that the entire forum is against you there is no way I could get you to actually consider them.

You said this:

Quote
As usual, rules don't count for you, just for when you can use them as a cudgel against others.

What rule isn't counting for me, and how do I use it as a cudgel against others? There is no rule against account sales, so you'll have to pursue a different avenue if you want to prove your point.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: The-One-Above-All on October 31, 2019, 06:35:55 PM
I did back up my claims, you just imagine I didn't because it serves you. I am not dancing around anything, rules are selectively enforced. You pretend to be confused all you like, what I said makes perfect sense no matter how much you want to pretend it doesn't. Remind me again, speaking of being upset, why is it all of this bothers you so much if it is so completely baseless and based in nonsense? Oh right, that is just you making a pathetic attempt at marginalizing points you can't argue against as usual.

Its hard to argue against points that are based on delusions. I can provide rational counterarguments all day long but you are so caught up in the paranoid delusion that the entire forum is against you there is no way I could get you to actually consider them.

You said this:

Quote
As usual, rules don't count for you, just for when you can use them as a cudgel against others.

What rule isn't counting for me, and how do I use it as a cudgel against others? There is no rule against account sales, so you'll have to pursue a different avenue if you want to prove your point.

LOL there is no rule against account sales but your pal lauda is now starting to flag everyone he "SUSPECTS" may have sold their account or bought an account.  You were screaming you were going to make every account seller/buyer a pariah because they are facilitating scams....... bbut then you decided to sell your own for 0.3BTC ( then try to delete your history).

NOT AGAINST THE RULES YOU SAY NOW hahahaha

I see no rational countering from you. I see no delusions on TS part since he is merely presenting observable instances that can be seen as the rules being enforced selectively. Although they are certainly not the BEST nor strongest examples of selective enforcement that have taken place here recently.

I see NO RESPONSE from ANY mods over why posts that merely blurt out  " who made this cunt bleed" or " shut up you used tampon"  are marked as bad?? WHY NOT? because that scumbag mod that marks them bad and then goes and later gives merit to that kind of shit is a coward and will never dare to face me in open debate because he would be crushed and destroyed in public. So hides away meriting rule breaking posts full of bogus accusations that we debunk instantly.

You are not a rational person nutildah. You are seen screaming all over the place that account selling facilitates scamming and you are going to start your own thread to make account sellers pariahs  THEN go and offer your account for sale for 0.3 BTC.  Then do not have any clue at all why you are seen as untrustworthy or as a willing scam facilitator??  How can such a diseased mind be permitted  to even use the word rational.

Now mr willing scam facilitator how many MODS are including YOU on DT in light of this knowledge I wonder??  I wonder if those same moderators are the ones selectively enforcing the rules???

Starts to look really bad really quickly to any objective observer.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on October 31, 2019, 09:53:50 PM
I did back up my claims, you just imagine I didn't because it serves you. I am not dancing around anything, rules are selectively enforced. You pretend to be confused all you like, what I said makes perfect sense no matter how much you want to pretend it doesn't. Remind me again, speaking of being upset, why is it all of this bothers you so much if it is so completely baseless and based in nonsense? Oh right, that is just you making a pathetic attempt at marginalizing points you can't argue against as usual.

Its hard to argue against points that are based on delusions. I can provide rational counterarguments all day long but you are so caught up in the paranoid delusion that the entire forum is against you there is no way I could get you to actually consider them.

You said this:

Quote
As usual, rules don't count for you, just for when you can use them as a cudgel against others.

What rule isn't counting for me, and how do I use it as a cudgel against others? There is no rule against account sales, so you'll have to pursue a different avenue if you want to prove your point.

The entire forum isn't against me, just a small group of very vocal people such as yourself who make a habit of obsessively following me around and commenting on everything I do and say. Technically there are no official rules here period, so you could literally make that argument about any "rule" here, because there are no official rules or terms of service posted anywhere on the forum. That is my point. The rules are applied selectively, and some people are held to the letter of the unwritten law, and some people (like you) get endless excuses made for why there should be an exception made for their malfeasance because you polish the balls of anyone with any ability to do anything about it.

The entire trust system has turned into one giant protection racket. You sure worked hard to build that reputation in this sea of fraud, it would be a shame of some one were to burn it down using a system that provides you no due process wouldn't it. You'd better agree with us and do what we want you to, or we can't be responsible for what happens to your reputation. You dutifully got down on both knees and proceeded to give those balls presented to you a good lathering, and now you get to enjoy the upside of a duel tiered system.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TwitchySeal on October 31, 2019, 11:06:02 PM
Trying to get a mod to delete those posts in the impeachment thread wasn't cool - I don't think suchmoon or nutil were out of line at all considering the general tone of the thread.

How often do you report posts like that?

You gotta admit, it's kind of funny going back and reading this post (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5191667.msg52864455#msg52864455) and the following like 10 or so responses knowing that you were actually pissed off enough to try and get a mod to delete suchmoons and nutils posts.  





Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: suchmoon on October 31, 2019, 11:57:54 PM
The entire forum isn't against me, just a small group of very vocal people such as yourself who make a habit of obsessively following me around and commenting on everything I do and say.

You do realize that you're posting in a thread started by nutildah, and complaining about your unhappy participation in another thread created by nutildah?

Of course you don't. In your delusional narcissistic universe evil stalker nutildah is creating these threads to trap you and that uncontrollable urge to fight him is also totally nutildah's fault.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on November 01, 2019, 12:26:19 AM
Trying to get a mod to delete those posts in the impeachment thread wasn't cool - I don't think suchmoon or nutil were out of line at all considering the general tone of the thread.

How often do you report posts like that?

You gotta admit, it's kind of funny going back and reading this post (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5191667.msg52864455#msg52864455) and the following like 10 or so responses knowing that you were actually pissed off enough to try and get a mod to delete suchmoons and nutils posts.  

Hey look some one else who really doesn't like my political views that doesn't know how to separate their emotions from facts. I report off topic posts. I don't report posts just because they disagree with me or whatever you are trying to insinuate. Posting literally nothing but personal attacks is not on topic regardless of what you think the "tone" was, and posts like this going in the other direction are regularly and promptly removed.

The entire forum isn't against me, just a small group of very vocal people such as yourself who make a habit of obsessively following me around and commenting on everything I do and say.

You do realize that you're posting in a thread started by nutildah, and complaining about your unhappy participation in another thread created by nutildah?

Of course you don't. In your delusional narcissistic universe evil stalker nutildah is creating these threads to trap you and that uncontrollable urge to fight him is also totally nutildah's fault.

Who said I was unhappy to participate in any of this? Trap me in what exactly? I am sure you all stand around and stroke each other off over how much you "got me" with these kind of behaviors, but I can assure you I am getting what I want out of this interaction even if you are incapable of realizing how or why. Regale me some more with your tales of pwnage, just don't forget to spit first, you don't want to get rashes from jerking each other off too vigorously.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: suchmoon on November 01, 2019, 01:03:15 AM
Who said I was unhappy to participate in any of this?

If you're happy will all that then you should probably stop wasting moderator's time with the frivolous reports. You may also want to disclose your fetish when you make these public complaints because for sane people "a small group of  very vocal people [...] who make a habit of obsessively following me around" may sound like a negative.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on November 01, 2019, 01:27:03 AM
Who said I was unhappy to participate in any of this?

If you're happy will all that then you should probably stop wasting moderator's time with the frivolous reports. You may also want to disclose your fetish when you make these public complaints because for sane people "a small group of  very vocal people [...] who make a habit of obsessively following me around" may sound like a negative.

Remind me again what my personal satisfaction has to do with other people following the rules? I know you are trying to equate the two, but it is just not making any sense. I get great joy from exposing these types of behaviors. Even if it means obsessive control freaks like you and your buddies feel the need to constantly inject yourself into every action I take, or word I speak at any opportunity in a desperate effort to try to manufacture your preferred narrative around me, and send a clear message to anyone else who might think of not swearing fealty to your protection racket, I am still achieving my goal.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: suchmoon on November 01, 2019, 01:57:43 AM
Remind me again what my personal satisfaction has to do with other people following the rules? I know you are trying to equate the two, but it is just not making any sense. I get great joy from exposing these types of behaviors. Even if it means obsessive control freaks like you and your buddies feel the need to constantly inject yourself into every action I take, or word I speak at any opportunity in a desperate effort to try to manufacture your preferred narrative around me, and send a clear message to anyone else who might think of not swearing fealty to your protection racket, I am still achieving my goal.

I for one wouldn't dare to deprive you of this great joy so I'll continue to ridicule your total lack of self-awareness every time I get a chance. I hope nutildah will keep creating threads that inject themselves into your actions and I'll make sure to read the dictionary tonight to find out what kind of crime a "narrative" is so that I could do that part as well. No effort shall be spared for such noble goals.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: nutildah on November 01, 2019, 02:48:16 AM
The entire forum isn't against me, just a small group of very vocal people such as yourself who make a habit of obsessively following me around and commenting on everything I do and say. Technically there are no official rules here period, so you could literally make that argument about any "rule" here, because there are no official rules or terms of service posted anywhere on the forum. That is my point. The rules are applied selectively, and some people are held to the letter of the unwritten law, and some people (like you) get endless excuses made for why there should be an exception made for their malfeasance because you polish the balls of anyone with any ability to do anything about it.

The entire trust system has turned into one giant protection racket. You sure worked hard to build that reputation in this sea of fraud, it would be a shame of some one were to burn it down using a system that provides you no due process wouldn't it. You'd better agree with us and do what we want you to, or we can't be responsible for what happens to your reputation. You dutifully got down on both knees and proceeded to give those balls presented to you a good lathering, and now you get to enjoy the upside of a duel tiered system.

That's quite a gross picture you've painted. Yet in all of it, you still didn't manage to name one rule that doesn't apply to me that I want applied to everybody else. When my posts are deleted I don't throw a hissy fit like you do, so you don't know when it happens. But I promise you, it does.

Posts deleted by moderators: 36 (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=nutildah)

I do think its a bit humorous that you reported this post. I'm just pointing out your lack of a counterargument, don't know how that makes something off-topic.

Since you are only capable of communicating in the form of cartoons, this is what you sound like...

https://i.imgur.com/bm7BQYy.png

Funny you talk about changing the rules when you don't like them when that is all the Democrat party has been doing since 2016, including this sham impeachment. As usual, more of this...

https://i.imgur.com/6g39sr3.jpg

Thats... that's not a counterargument. That is saying "no u" while posting a meme that says "no u." You've clearly lost it by this point. Its ridiculous to think you deserve a better response than a meme.

https://i.imgur.com/dhDgSu2.png

Suchmoon and TwitchySeal, meet me on the TECSHARE CRITICS Slack later tonight. We need to rehearse our narrative. Apparently its not working because he's squashed us yet again using only evidence and rational thinking.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: suchmoon on November 01, 2019, 03:15:02 AM
Suchmoon and TwitchySeal, meet me on the TECSHARE CRITICS Slack later tonight. We need to rehearse our narrative. Apparently its not working because he's squashed us yet again using only evidence and rational thinking.

I hope Nancy and Chuck are there too. Need to make sure that peach mint thing causes maximum irritation joy for our friend. Maybe they can send him an honorary sub-peanut to make him feel important.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: PrimeNumber7 on November 01, 2019, 04:12:03 AM
Also as predicted Flying Hellfish would near instantly delete these types of comments if directed toward his left leaning friends, but since it is me they perpetually remain "unhandled".
This is a problem with having a single moderator with extremist views as a moderator of a political sub. This situation is nearly guaranteed to result in moderation that very heavily one viewpoint. Rules will either be very one sided, or will go unenforced for one viewpoint when they are strictly enforced for another.

Many polls are run by one left leaning pollster and one right leaning pollster to prevent the result from being skewed to benefit one side.

The obvious solution is to either find a moderator with more moderate views, or to find a second moderator with right leaning viewpoints who can help shift the moderation towards the middle/balanced.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: nutildah on November 01, 2019, 04:52:53 AM
Also as predicted Flying Hellfish would near instantly delete these types of comments if directed toward his left leaning friends, but since it is me they perpetually remain "unhandled".
This is a problem with having a single moderator with extremist views as a moderator of a political sub. This situation is nearly guaranteed to result in moderation that very heavily one viewpoint. Rules will either be very one sided, or will go unenforced for one viewpoint when they are strictly enforced for another.

Many polls are run by one left leaning pollster and one right leaning pollster to prevent the result from being skewed to benefit one side.

The obvious solution is to either find a moderator with more moderate views, or to find a second moderator with right leaning viewpoints who can help shift the moderation towards the middle/balanced.

Well Quickseller, you might have a point, but nobody really has a problem with FH besides you and TS. In case you hadn't noticed, TS is unhappy with all the moderators (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5196719.0). So I don't think its a FH problem.

I hope Nancy and Chuck are there too. Need to make sure that peach mint thing causes maximum irritation joy for our friend. Maybe they can send him an honorary sub-peanut to make him feel important.

That reminds me: we are having George Soros do an AMA there next week. Don't forget to stop by!


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on November 01, 2019, 02:49:47 PM
Remind me again what my personal satisfaction has to do with other people following the rules? I know you are trying to equate the two, but it is just not making any sense. I get great joy from exposing these types of behaviors. Even if it means obsessive control freaks like you and your buddies feel the need to constantly inject yourself into every action I take, or word I speak at any opportunity in a desperate effort to try to manufacture your preferred narrative around me, and send a clear message to anyone else who might think of not swearing fealty to your protection racket, I am still achieving my goal.

I for one wouldn't dare to deprive you of this great joy so I'll continue to ridicule your total lack of self-awareness every time I get a chance. I hope nutildah will keep creating threads that inject themselves into your actions and I'll make sure to read the dictionary tonight to find out what kind of crime a "narrative" is so that I could do that part as well. No effort shall be spared for such noble goals.

Not total lack of awareness, lack of giving a fuck if you or anyone else approves. You and your pal Nutillduuuh have trouble separating your emotions and opinions from facts as demonstrated quite clearly by your obsessive reply chain here repeatedly addressing politics in the Meta section. It is almost like you can barely restrain yourself.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: suchmoon on November 01, 2019, 03:10:05 PM
Not total lack of awareness, lack of giving a fuck if you or anyone else approves. You and your pal Nutillduuuh have trouble separating your emotions and opinions from facts as demonstrated quite clearly by your obsessive reply chain here repeatedly addressing politics in the Meta section. It is almost like you can barely restrain yourself.

It's a thread about you, FHF, and P&S. Would be weird if we were addressing Ethereum hard fork and Halle Berry but hey, you're the on-topicness expert around here so just tell us what we're allowed to talk about.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on November 01, 2019, 07:12:00 PM
Not total lack of awareness, lack of giving a fuck if you or anyone else approves. You and your pal Nutillduuuh have trouble separating your emotions and opinions from facts as demonstrated quite clearly by your obsessive reply chain here repeatedly addressing politics in the Meta section. It is almost like you can barely restrain yourself.

It's a thread about you, FHF, and P&S. Would be weird if we were addressing Ethereum hard fork and Halle Berry but hey, you're the on-topicness expert around here so just tell us what we're allowed to talk about.

Where is the part that is relevant to the conversation other than your claims of a tangential relationship? Oh right, there is none, you all are just frothing at the mouth for any opportunity to smite me for daring to have views you don't approve of, and thus you can't even manage to have a conversation about forum policy without injecting politics into it.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: suchmoon on November 01, 2019, 07:42:16 PM
Where is the part that is relevant to the conversation other than your claims of a tangential relationship? Oh right, there is none, you all are just frothing at the mouth for any opportunity to smite me for daring to have views you don't approve of, and thus you can't even manage to have a conversation about forum policy without injecting politics into it.

Didn't you call some users "communists" earlier in the thread? I look forward to you twisting it into totally not a political thing.

For the record, I fully approve you being a conspiracy nutjob and I don't have any intent to smite you - I'm sorry if it comes across that way.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on November 01, 2019, 07:47:26 PM
Where is the part that is relevant to the conversation other than your claims of a tangential relationship? Oh right, there is none, you all are just frothing at the mouth for any opportunity to smite me for daring to have views you don't approve of, and thus you can't even manage to have a conversation about forum policy without injecting politics into it.

Didn't you call some users "communists" earlier in the thread? I look forward to you twisting it into totally not a political thing.

For the record, I fully approve you being a conspiracy nutjob and I don't have any intent to smite you - I'm sorry if it comes across that way.

I absolutely did (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5173424.msg52225917#msg52225917), once, in the context of it being totally irrelevant to the conversation. Nice try at spin there. I don't much care what you say your intent is, your inability to separate politics from forum policy discussion does all the talking for you.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: suchmoon on November 01, 2019, 08:07:37 PM
I absolutely did (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5173424.msg52225917#msg52225917), once

Why didn't I mention he is a Canadian? Why didn't I mention he is a Communist?

Of course you would approve of his moderation, he is a self proclaimed Communist

https://i.imgflip.com/3f0m71.jpg (https://i.imgflip.com/3f0m71.jpg)



in the context of it being totally irrelevant to the conversation

How could you... report yourself for being off topic.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on November 02, 2019, 12:36:44 AM
I absolutely did (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5173424.msg52225917#msg52225917), once

Why didn't I mention he is a Canadian? Why didn't I mention he is a Communist?

Of course you would approve of his moderation, he is a self proclaimed Communist

https://i.imgflip.com/3f0m71.jpg



in the context of it being totally irrelevant to the conversation

How could you... report yourself for being off topic.

Oh jeeze, you caught me, I should have searched through the entire thread with a fine tooth comb like you did. Clearly that was a lie that I never expected anyone could have caught me in seeing as it is all a public thread an everything. Should we count how many references to my politics you, Nutilduhh, and Twitchyseal have made)? Regardless the difference between your posts and mine is it was relevant to the reasons why his moderation was bias. Your posts... are just your inability to restrain yourself from bringing politics into it for no other reason than the fact that I have ideas that you don't approve of enrages you to the point you can't separate forum policy from your emotions about your political beliefs and has no relevance to the topic.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: suchmoon on November 02, 2019, 12:58:16 AM
Regardless the difference between your posts and mine is it was relevant to the reasons why his moderation was bias.

First of all, you're arguing with yourself. I never said that politics should be banned from this thread. It's impossible to discuss the topic without referring to what an utter conspiracy nutjob and a rancid troll you are, which is one of the challenges FHF is facing on that board.

But even according to your own made-up "no politics" rule, it turns out that it's ok for you to bring up politics, once because of irrelevance, and once more because of relevance. So why don't you dispense with the facade and tell us how you really feel. Do we need a conspiracy sub-board in P&S, and appoint your buddy Quickseller as a mod? That should take care of most of the issues there I think.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on November 02, 2019, 07:40:04 PM
Regardless the difference between your posts and mine is it was relevant to the reasons why his moderation was bias.

First of all, you're arguing with yourself. I never said that politics should be banned from this thread. It's impossible to discuss the topic without referring to what an utter conspiracy nutjob and a rancid troll you are, which is one of the challenges FHF is facing on that board.

But even according to your own made-up "no politics" rule, it turns out that it's ok for you to bring up politics, once because of irrelevance, and once more because of relevance. So why don't you dispense with the facade and tell us how you really feel. Do we need a conspiracy sub-board in P&S, and appoint your buddy Quickseller as a mod? That should take care of most of the issues there I think.

I never said politics should be banned from this thread either. I pointed out that you and your circular jerk pals can not restrain yourself from puking out your pathological aversion to my political views long enough to have a discussion about forum policy. I brought up Flying Hellfish's views only in the context that it effects his bias as a moderator. Your bringing up my views over an over again is only a factor of your inability to control your revulsion with people having opinions you don't agree with and it has no relevance to the thread.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: suchmoon on November 02, 2019, 11:07:49 PM
I never said politics should be banned from this thread either. I pointed out that you and your circular jerk pals can not restrain yourself from puking out your pathological aversion to my political views long enough to have a discussion about forum policy. I brought up Flying Hellfish's views only in the context that it effects his bias as a moderator. Your bringing up my views over an over again is only a factor of your inability to control your revulsion with people having opinions you don't agree with and it has no relevance to the thread.

You're lying and projecting as usual. I don't have a problem with disagreements, in fact debate is an essential part of a forum like this. Unfortunately anyone disagreeing with you automatically becomes a "communist" and subject to sprawling conspiracy theories. Whether you truly believe that bullshit or just use it as an excuse for trolling (real or pretend "views") it's fully relevant to your constant whining about forum rules and moderation. As evidenced by this topic and the made-up story about FHF deleting his own thread.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on November 03, 2019, 11:29:09 AM
I never said politics should be banned from this thread either. I pointed out that you and your circular jerk pals can not restrain yourself from puking out your pathological aversion to my political views long enough to have a discussion about forum policy. I brought up Flying Hellfish's views only in the context that it effects his bias as a moderator. Your bringing up my views over an over again is only a factor of your inability to control your revulsion with people having opinions you don't agree with and it has no relevance to the thread.

You're lying and projecting as usual. I don't have a problem with disagreements, in fact debate is an essential part of a forum like this. Unfortunately anyone disagreeing with you automatically becomes a "communist" and subject to sprawling conspiracy theories. Whether you truly believe that bullshit or just use it as an excuse for trolling (real or pretend "views") it's fully relevant to your constant whining about forum rules and moderation. As evidenced by this topic and the made-up story about FHF deleting his own thread.

What exactly am I lying about? Please quote. You are pulling the classic Vod technique of accusing me of lying but never being able to quote this supposed lie. Of course to you, anything you don't agree with is a lie, because only you know the truth right?

The problem is your comments are just like many of the constant other examples of people who have disagreements with me in Politics & Society. Often they are the very same ones that let that emotion bleed into general forum conduct and abuse the various systems in anyway possible to play sad little games for having the audacity of not agreeing. I doubt that some of you can even separate the two issues. I don't care who is a Communist, as long as the Communist is treated the same as I am according to forum rules and policy. I have found many times that is not the case. I don't care if people disagree with me (clearly), what I care about is people taking that ill will from having open discussions on controversial subjects and abusing the forum's systems to "fight" ideas they don't like in another way.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: nutildah on November 03, 2019, 11:56:47 AM
I don't care who is a Communist, as long as the Communist is treated the same as I am according to forum rules and policy. I have found many times that is not the case. I don't care if people disagree with me

That's hilarious. When's the last time you were civil to a "communist"? You care very deeply if people disagree with you to the point where you have to insult them over their beliefs if they don't align with yours. That's the problem. You can't just let a disagreement slide. TwitchySeal, for instance, has been extremely civil toward you and humble in his approach to dealing with you, and you in turn have been a massive dick.

You demand that not only the forum be perfect but be perfectly accorded with your vision of how the universe works. Well, hate to break it to you, but that's never gonna happen.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on November 03, 2019, 12:24:47 PM
I don't care who is a Communist, as long as the Communist is treated the same as I am according to forum rules and policy. I have found many times that is not the case. I don't care if people disagree with me

That's hilarious. When's the last time you were civil to a "communist"? You care very deeply if people disagree with you to the point where you have to insult them over their beliefs if they don't align with yours. That's the problem. You can't just let a disagreement slide. TwitchySeal, for instance, has been extremely civil toward you and humble in his approach to dealing with you, and you in turn have been a massive dick.

You demand that not only the forum be perfect but be perfectly accorded with your vision of how the universe works. Well, hate to break it to you, but that's never gonna happen.

Who said anything about being civil? What does being "civil" mean? You get to define this of course. Again, thanks for making a great example of users not being able to separate their personal feelings from general forum conduct. I am not demanding anything, certainly not perfection. All I am doing is documenting publicly these interactions for review. You would be surprised how often the "universe" reacts some times to mere words alone.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: suchmoon on November 03, 2019, 07:35:23 PM
What exactly am I lying about? Please quote.

I did.

The problem is your comments are just like many of the constant other examples of people who have disagreements with me in Politics & Society. Often they are the very same ones that let that emotion bleed into general forum conduct and abuse the various systems in anyway possible to play sad little games for having the audacity of not agreeing. I doubt that some of you can even separate the two issues. I don't care who is a Communist, as long as the Communist is treated the same as I am according to forum rules and policy. I have found many times that is not the case. I don't care if people disagree with me (clearly), what I care about is people taking that ill will from having open discussions on controversial subjects and abusing the forum's systems to "fight" ideas they don't like in another way.

Utter tosh. What exactly am I abusing?


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: nutildah on November 04, 2019, 01:21:02 AM
I don't care who is a Communist, as long as the Communist is treated the same as I am according to forum rules and policy. I have found many times that is not the case. I don't care if people disagree with me

That's hilarious. When's the last time you were civil to a "communist"? You care very deeply if people disagree with you to the point where you have to insult them over their beliefs if they don't align with yours. That's the problem. You can't just let a disagreement slide. TwitchySeal, for instance, has been extremely civil toward you and humble in his approach to dealing with you, and you in turn have been a massive dick.

You demand that not only the forum be perfect but be perfectly accorded with your vision of how the universe works. Well, hate to break it to you, but that's never gonna happen.

Who said anything about being civil? What does being "civil" mean? You get to define this of course. Again, thanks for making a great example of users not being able to separate their personal feelings from general forum conduct. I am not demanding anything, certainly not perfection. All I am doing is documenting publicly these interactions for review. You would be surprised how often the "universe" reacts some times to mere words alone.

If you didn't care if people disagreed with you, you wouldn't feel the need to be a massive dick to them. That's what it comes down to.

Talking about not being able to separate personal feelings from general forum conduct: at least I don't get my panties in a bunch every time a moderator deletes one of my posts, or doesn't delete one of my adversary's posts.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TwitchySeal on November 04, 2019, 02:20:55 AM
If you didn't care if people disagreed with you, you wouldn't feel the need to be a massive dick to them. That's what it comes down to.

I think it's possible that he either A) Doesn't realize how aggressive (often passive aggressive) his posts are perceived by most or, more likely, B) Perceives any post that challenge something he said as a direct attack on his intelligence and/or honor.  He seems to consider his own opinions facts. Therefore other peoples opinions must be 'wrong', and he must prove them wrong, otherwise it will appear that he is wrong.

Or he might be just a troll I guess.  But I think B or A is much more likely. 

Gonna go prepare myself mentally now for all the mean things that are about to be said about me.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on November 04, 2019, 06:02:52 AM
What exactly am I lying about? Please quote.

I did.

The problem is your comments are just like many of the constant other examples of people who have disagreements with me in Politics & Society. Often they are the very same ones that let that emotion bleed into general forum conduct and abuse the various systems in anyway possible to play sad little games for having the audacity of not agreeing. I doubt that some of you can even separate the two issues. I don't care who is a Communist, as long as the Communist is treated the same as I am according to forum rules and policy. I have found many times that is not the case. I don't care if people disagree with me (clearly), what I care about is people taking that ill will from having open discussions on controversial subjects and abusing the forum's systems to "fight" ideas they don't like in another way.

Utter tosh. What exactly am I abusing?

Yep, classic Vod technique. Keep making claims that I lied then never quoting it or even specifying what the lie was. You are abusing anything you can get your hands on.


I don't care who is a Communist, as long as the Communist is treated the same as I am according to forum rules and policy. I have found many times that is not the case. I don't care if people disagree with me

That's hilarious. When's the last time you were civil to a "communist"? You care very deeply if people disagree with you to the point where you have to insult them over their beliefs if they don't align with yours. That's the problem. You can't just let a disagreement slide. TwitchySeal, for instance, has been extremely civil toward you and humble in his approach to dealing with you, and you in turn have been a massive dick.

You demand that not only the forum be perfect but be perfectly accorded with your vision of how the universe works. Well, hate to break it to you, but that's never gonna happen.

Who said anything about being civil? What does being "civil" mean? You get to define this of course. Again, thanks for making a great example of users not being able to separate their personal feelings from general forum conduct. I am not demanding anything, certainly not perfection. All I am doing is documenting publicly these interactions for review. You would be surprised how often the "universe" reacts some times to mere words alone.

If you didn't care if people disagreed with you, you wouldn't feel the need to be a massive dick to them. That's what it comes down to.

Talking about not being able to separate personal feelings from general forum conduct: at least I don't get my panties in a bunch every time a moderator deletes one of my posts, or doesn't delete one of my adversary's posts.

How exactly does that make logical sense? If I cared that people disagreed with me I would act like you and tell the default trust list to line up so I can wash their balls for them. I am saying what I say at the expense of people like you following me around everywhere else on the forum because you can't handle that I "was a dick to you" in Politics and Society. Your disagreement isn't the problem, its your inability to isolate it from the rest of the forum's functions. Speaking of forum policy and enforcement, seems to me mods deleting posts falls firmly under that description.


If you didn't care if people disagreed with you, you wouldn't feel the need to be a massive dick to them. That's what it comes down to.

I think it's possible that he either A) Doesn't realize how aggressive (often passive aggressive) his posts are perceived by most or, more likely, B) Perceives any post that challenge something he said as a direct attack on his intelligence and/or honor.  He seems to consider his own opinions facts. Therefore other peoples opinions must be 'wrong', and he must prove them wrong, otherwise it will appear that he is wrong.

Or he might be just a troll I guess.  But I think B or A is much more likely.  

Gonna go prepare myself mentally now for all the mean things that are about to be said about me.

Are you 12 years old? Are you chained to your keyboard? Does your mommy whip you and force you to interact with me on Politics and Society? No? I would have to conclude then if you don't like interacting with me in Politics and Society, the fact that you engage me is your own fault. I can't wipe those crocodile tears for you. Maybe some one else will.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: nutildah on November 04, 2019, 07:47:22 AM
If you didn't care if people disagreed with you, you wouldn't feel the need to be a massive dick to them. That's what it comes down to.

I think it's possible that he either A) Doesn't realize how aggressive (often passive aggressive) his posts are perceived by most or, more likely, B) Perceives any post that challenge something he said as a direct attack on his intelligence and/or honor.  He seems to consider his own opinions facts. Therefore other peoples opinions must be 'wrong', and he must prove them wrong, otherwise it will appear that he is wrong.

Or he might be just a troll I guess.  But I think B or A is much more likely.  

Gonna go prepare myself mentally now for all the mean things that are about to be said about me.

 :D

He definitely gives off trollish vibes; almost like game-protect, CH or even notbatman. Its basically characterized by an unrelenting inability to ever make a concession about being wrong about anything.

How exactly does that make logical sense? If I cared that people disagreed with me I would act like you and tell the default trust list to line up so I can wash their balls for them.

Uh, that's not the only way to express the fact that you care. If you truly didn't care that someone disagreed with you, you would ignore them. I don't think you've ever done that before.

I am saying what I say at the expense of people like you following me around everywhere else on the forum because you can't handle that I "was a dick to you" in Politics and Society.

It's actually not my fault that you are wrong so often, in so many different ways and places.

Your disagreement isn't the problem, its your inability to isolate it from the rest of the forum's functions. Speaking of forum policy and enforcement, seems to me mods deleting posts falls firmly under that description.

The mods' job is to delete posts that are deemed off-topic. Seems to me you're the one that has a problem distinguishing your opinion from forum functions. Feel free to post your "No U" meme that you love so much. I'm sure that will turn the tide of the argument in your favor.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: suchmoon on November 04, 2019, 04:31:42 PM
Yep, classic Vod technique. Keep making claims that I lied then never quoting it or even specifying what the lie was. You are abusing anything you can get your hands on.

Fair enough. I think I should allow the possibility that you're dumb enough to be unable to read the quote in the post you were replying to. It's also possible that you genuinely believe the shit you make up so I will refrain from calling it "lies", I'll just call you a moron instead.

For example your assertion "You are abusing anything you can get your hands on" is totally not a lie, you're just being a moron.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: nutildah on November 04, 2019, 05:00:07 PM
For example your assertion "You are abusing anything you can get your hands on" is totally not a lie, you're just being a moron.

What would that be like if one were to actually abuse anything they can get their hands on?

Someone hands you a Mickey Mantle rookie card and you immediately draw a smiley face on it with a magic marker.

You pick up a pair of chopsticks and shove them up your nostrils.

You walk into a crowded elevator and press the fire alarm button.

God forbid you should come in contact with a family member's pet, suchmoon.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TwitchySeal on November 04, 2019, 06:11:55 PM
For example your assertion "You are abusing anything you can get your hands on" is totally not a lie, you're just being a moron.

What would that be like if one were to actually abuse anything they can get their hands on?

Someone hands you a Mickey Mantle rookie card and you immediately draw a smiley face on it with a magic marker.

You pick up a pair of chopsticks and shove them up your nostrils.

You walk into a crowded elevator and press the fire alarm button.

God forbid you should come in contact with a family member's pet, suchmoon.

Going to the bathroom would suck.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: suchmoon on November 04, 2019, 07:25:19 PM
For example your assertion "You are abusing anything you can get your hands on" is totally not a lie, you're just being a moron.

What would that be like if one were to actually abuse anything they can get their hands on?

Given that my hands are usually on a keyboard when I'm trolling making valuable and insightful posts on this glorious forum, it must be the poor old Corsair K65 bearing the brunt of my abuse. To be fair, it's been waterboarded in various drinks over the years so TECSHARE might be on to something here.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: Foxpup on November 04, 2019, 07:57:59 PM
Given that my hands are usually on a keyboard when I'm trolling making valuable and insightful posts on this glorious forum, it must the poor old Corsair K65 bearing the brunt of my abuse.
Yeah, she's a tough little item, isn't she? She sure can take a pounding. Oh, that reminds me, I've got a party to plan in the foxhole. Excuse me. ;)


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on November 04, 2019, 08:20:13 PM
Yep, classic Vod technique. Keep making claims that I lied then never quoting it or even specifying what the lie was. You are abusing anything you can get your hands on.

Fair enough. I think I should allow the possibility that you're dumb enough to be unable to read the quote in the post you were replying to. It's also possible that you genuinely believe the shit you make up so I will refrain from calling it "lies", I'll just call you a moron instead.

For example your assertion "You are abusing anything you can get your hands on" is totally not a lie, you're just being a moron.

=
You just quoting a whole paragraph isn't identifying anything. The whole paragraph is a lie? I found your lies too, going back years. They are all here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=234771;sa=showPosts). If you can't read your lies you are dumb. See what I did there?

If you didn't care if people disagreed with you, you wouldn't feel the need to be a massive dick to them. That's what it comes down to.

I think it's possible that he either A) Doesn't realize how aggressive (often passive aggressive) his posts are perceived by most or, more likely, B) Perceives any post that challenge something he said as a direct attack on his intelligence and/or honor.  He seems to consider his own opinions facts. Therefore other peoples opinions must be 'wrong', and he must prove them wrong, otherwise it will appear that he is wrong.

Or he might be just a troll I guess.  But I think B or A is much more likely. 

Gonna go prepare myself mentally now for all the mean things that are about to be said about me.

 :D

He definitely gives off trollish vibes; almost like game-protect, CH or even notbatman. Its basically characterized by an unrelenting inability to ever make a concession about being wrong about anything.

How exactly does that make logical sense? If I cared that people disagreed with me I would act like you and tell the default trust list to line up so I can wash their balls for them.

Uh, that's not the only way to express the fact that you care. If you truly didn't care that someone disagreed with you, you would ignore them. I don't think you've ever done that before.

I am saying what I say at the expense of people like you following me around everywhere else on the forum because you can't handle that I "was a dick to you" in Politics and Society.

It's actually not my fault that you are wrong so often, in so many different ways and places.

Your disagreement isn't the problem, its your inability to isolate it from the rest of the forum's functions. Speaking of forum policy and enforcement, seems to me mods deleting posts falls firmly under that description.

The mods' job is to delete posts that are deemed off-topic. Seems to me you're the one that has a problem distinguishing your opinion from forum functions. Feel free to post your "No U" meme that you love so much. I'm sure that will turn the tide of the argument in your favor.

You sure like to tell me what I think and feel a lot don't you? You should be working for Mrs. Cleo, not wasting those fine psychic abilities here. So now me being wrong = me being a dick? I Thought I was bad because I was a dick, now I am not allowed to be wrong either, and you get to decide what is right or wrong do you?

Mods deleting posts also falls well within forum policy and enforcement. Your butthurt ramblings over some one not sharing your political views do not.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: suchmoon on November 04, 2019, 09:25:16 PM
You just quoting a whole paragraph isn't identifying anything. The whole paragraph is a lie? I found your lies too, going back years. They are all here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=234771;sa=showPosts). If you can't read your lies you are dumb. See what I did there?

No, I don't see what you did. Probably because I'm dumb or maybe you forgot to turn the webcam on.

Come on, sparky. If you don't know (or pretend to not know) which parts of that paragraph you made up then what difference is it going to make if I quote or highlight it in some way? You'll just find a 100 new reasons why your fantasies are facts.

Just take the win. I concede that technically you're not lying when you make shit up. I apologize for calling it a lie. Friends?


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: DaveF on November 04, 2019, 10:08:44 PM
Given that my hands are usually on a keyboard when I'm trolling making valuable and insightful posts on this glorious forum, it must the poor old Corsair K65 bearing the brunt of my abuse. To be fair, it's been waterboarded in various drinks over the years so TECSHARE might be on to something here.

I'm still using an IBM model M with a PS2 port on back.
You can have it when you pry it from my carpal tunnel bent fingers.

Nothing to really add to the rest of the rest of the post but figured I would chime in with the discussion of indestructible keyboards.

-Dave


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: Vod on November 05, 2019, 12:15:34 AM
Yep, classic Vod technique. Keep making claims that I lied then never quoting it or even specifying what the lie was.

Typical TECHSHARE.  Makes claims against others without providing evidence.

Proof in quote above.  :)


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on November 05, 2019, 01:41:13 AM
Yep, classic Vod technique. Keep making claims that I lied then never quoting it or even specifying what the lie was.

Typical TECHSHARE.  Makes claims against others without providing evidence.

Proof in quote above.  :)

I documented your pattern of lies and abuse over years very well here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=915823.0). You will also notice your inability to do the same.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: Vod on November 05, 2019, 01:44:10 AM
I documented your pattern of lies and abuse over years very well

Classic TECHSHARE.  Explaining how he always provides proof, without any proof.   8)


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: OgNasty on November 05, 2019, 02:31:45 AM
Typical TECHSHARE.  Makes claims against others without providing evidence.

If thatís not the pot calling the kettle black, I donít know what is.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: nutildah on November 05, 2019, 06:21:49 AM
So now me being wrong = me being a dick? I Thought I was bad because I was a dick, now I am not allowed to be wrong either, and you get to decide what is right or wrong do you?

No, you're obviously allowed to be a dick as much as you are wrong. Just as I am allowed to tell you you're being a dick, and that you are wrong, which is often. They are two separate things. You do have a propensity to be a dick while you are being a wrong, but that is just an overlap of statistical likelihood and not the result of a causative effect.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TwitchySeal on November 05, 2019, 06:33:28 AM
Typical TECHSHARE.  Makes claims against others without providing evidence.

If thatís not the pot calling the kettle black, I donít know what is.

Hey look, it's the guy who told everyone Game-Protect and I were the same person as if he knew it for a fact, calling someone out for calling out someone else for making shit up about other people.




Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on November 05, 2019, 08:15:16 AM
So now me being wrong = me being a dick? I Thought I was bad because I was a dick, now I am not allowed to be wrong either, and you get to decide what is right or wrong do you?

No, you're obviously allowed to be a dick as much as you are wrong. Just as I am allowed to tell you you're being a dick, and that you are wrong, which is often. They are two separate things. You do have a propensity to be a dick while you are being a wrong, but that is just an overlap of statistical likelihood and not the result of a causative effect.

So then, what exactly does any of this have to do with enforcing forum policy or the topic whatsoever?


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: nutildah on November 05, 2019, 08:17:46 AM
So now me being wrong = me being a dick? I Thought I was bad because I was a dick, now I am not allowed to be wrong either, and you get to decide what is right or wrong do you?

No, you're obviously allowed to be a dick as much as you are wrong. Just as I am allowed to tell you you're being a dick, and that you are wrong, which is often. They are two separate things. You do have a propensity to be a dick while you are being a wrong, but that is just an overlap of statistical likelihood and not the result of a causative effect.

So then, what exactly does any of this have to do with enforcing forum policy or the topic whatsoever?

You asked me a question and I answered it.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on November 05, 2019, 08:21:48 AM
So now me being wrong = me being a dick? I Thought I was bad because I was a dick, now I am not allowed to be wrong either, and you get to decide what is right or wrong do you?

No, you're obviously allowed to be a dick as much as you are wrong. Just as I am allowed to tell you you're being a dick, and that you are wrong, which is often. They are two separate things. You do have a propensity to be a dick while you are being a wrong, but that is just an overlap of statistical likelihood and not the result of a causative effect.

So then, what exactly does any of this have to do with enforcing forum policy or the topic whatsoever?

You asked me a question and I answered it.

Cool story bro. Thanks for the demonstration of your inability to separate the two issues.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: nutildah on November 05, 2019, 08:29:01 AM
Cool story bro. Thanks for the demonstration of your inability to separate the two issues.

That doesn't even make sense. Now you're just repeating stuff you've already said but it no longer fits into the context of the current discussion.

So now me being wrong = me being a dick? I Thought I was bad because I was a dick, now I am not allowed to be wrong either, and you get to decide what is right or wrong do you?

No, you're obviously allowed to be a dick as much as you are wrong. Just as I am allowed to tell you you're being a dick, and that you are wrong, which is often. They are two separate things. You do have a propensity to be a dick while you are being a wrong, but that is just an overlap of statistical likelihood and not the result of a causative effect.

So then, what exactly does any of this have to do with enforcing forum policy or the topic whatsoever?

You asked me a question and I answered it.

I think you need to sleep and recharge your brain for another, more focused outpouring of incel-driven angst tomorrow.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on November 05, 2019, 08:44:18 AM
Cool story bro. Thanks for the demonstration of your inability to separate the two issues.

That doesn't even make sense. Now you're just repeating stuff you've already said but it no longer fits into the context of the current discussion.

So now me being wrong = me being a dick? I Thought I was bad because I was a dick, now I am not allowed to be wrong either, and you get to decide what is right or wrong do you?

No, you're obviously allowed to be a dick as much as you are wrong. Just as I am allowed to tell you you're being a dick, and that you are wrong, which is often. They are two separate things. You do have a propensity to be a dick while you are being a wrong, but that is just an overlap of statistical likelihood and not the result of a causative effect.

So then, what exactly does any of this have to do with enforcing forum policy or the topic whatsoever?

You asked me a question and I answered it.

I think you need to sleep and recharge your brain for another, more focused outpouring of incel-driven angst tomorrow.

It makes plenty of sense. If it is not related to the op, then what are you rambling on about other than the fact you don't like what I say? What relevance to the op does this have at all? It is really simple.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TwitchySeal on November 05, 2019, 09:40:15 AM
It makes plenty of sense. If it is not related to the op, then what are you rambling on about other than the fact you don't like what I say? What relevance to the op does this have at all? It is really simple.

OP is about you being a dick and bitching about off topic posts.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TECSHARE on November 05, 2019, 07:05:03 PM
It makes plenty of sense. If it is not related to the op, then what are you rambling on about other than the fact you don't like what I say? What relevance to the op does this have at all? It is really simple.

OP is about you being a dick and bitching about off topic posts.

In that case it belongs in Reputation or Off Topic. Thanks for arguing my point that none of this belongs here.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: OgNasty on November 05, 2019, 07:56:19 PM
Typical TECHSHARE.  Makes claims against others without providing evidence.

If thatís not the pot calling the kettle black, I donít know what is.

Hey look, it's the guy who told everyone Game-Protect and I were the same person as if he knew it for a fact, calling someone out for calling out someone else for making shit up about other people.

You and others spent years defending the Game-Protect account while I called him a scammer.  Talk about horrible judgement.  I did get a laugh out of seeing how long it took you and your window licking crew to get up to speed.  I look forward to 5 years from now when you same morons start complaining about Vod's behavior. 

Addressing the topic at hand...  It's pretty clear Flying Hellfish is a snowflake and moderates as such.  I don't think the powers that be really care, so long as he deletes spam.


Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: TwitchySeal on November 05, 2019, 09:29:18 PM
Typical TECHSHARE.  Makes claims against others without providing evidence.

If thatís not the pot calling the kettle black, I donít know what is.

Hey look, it's the guy who told everyone Game-Protect and I were the same person as if he knew it for a fact, calling someone out for calling out someone else for making shit up about other people.

You and others spent years defending the Game-Protect account while I called him a scammer.  Talk about horrible judgement.  I did get a laugh out of seeing how long it took you and your window licking crew to get up to speed.  I look forward to 5 years from now when you same morons start complaining about Vod's behavior. 

Addressing the topic at hand...  It's pretty clear Flying Hellfish is a snowflake and moderates as such.  I don't think the powers that be really care, so long as he deletes spam.

I didn't defend him much, and neither did anyone else, but yeah It was horrible judgment to not realize he was a scammer sooner.  It was an honest error in judgement. 





Title: Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
Post by: Vod on November 06, 2019, 01:01:25 AM
I look forward to 5 years from now when you same morons start complaining about Vod's behavior. 

I won't be here in five years.  Can you rewrite your story for 18 months?