REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP

[TECSHARE]

your "log of Trump memes" belongs in Off Topic, not in a section made for political discussion.

I disagree.

Memes are an interesting way to have a discussion and aren't against the rules. 
In fact, in the Politics & Society Introduction and Rules - READ BEFORE POSTING thread it says:

Make us laugh (or mad!), add something of value, something new or something interesting to the discussion.

The memes you post that get deleted by mods is bc the memes are off topic, not because they are memes.

https://i.gyazo.com/948d290eaee937f353b7b88f308e5a51.png

Is it a log of memes or a discussion? You two work out your bullshit story among yourselves and try again.

[nutildah]

The memes you post that get deleted by mods is bc the memes are off topic, not because they are memes.

Is it a log of memes or a discussion? You two work out your bullshit story among yourselves and try again.

You're continuing to focus on matters that are wholly irrelevant to this thread. The meme you are whinging about wasn't deleted from my meme log. It was, however, off-topic.

The reason why it was off-topic has already been explained to you, and you haven't rebutted the explanation. I don't understand why you insist on veering this discussion off-topic.

[TECSHARE]

That is a thread title. That doesn't explain what the topic is. What is the topic, or would you prefer it remain amorphous and just call the parts you don't like off topic?

Yet another off-topic response.

Its both the title and the topic. The title of a thread is traditionally meant to encompass the gist of the topic, as if you didn't know that already.

Care to rebut my points about why your meme is off-topic and TwitchySeal's isn't, or do you just want to play semantics games all day?

As I expected, you would like to keep the meaning of this thread amorphous as possible. Harder to keep your story straight later if you commit to one now isn't it Nutilduhh?

[TwitchySeal]

TECSHARE, have you entertained the possibility that the reason you have so many posts deleted (I see 8 recently, that's a lot) is not because the mods are out to get you, but rather because in their opinion you are consistently making off topic/troll posts?

I bet if you started checking the OP and asking yourself 'am I actually contributing anything to this topic right now?' before clicking 'Post', you'll have much less to complain about.

Off-topic replies have become a big problem. From now on, I will be deleting such replies without notice, forum-wide. If your replies disappear, this is probably why.

All replies must respond to the topic's original post in some way, even if they are replying to an on-topic reply. If your reply has nothing to do with the topic post, either add some content that is relevant or create a new topic.

Please report off-topic posts as soon as you see them.

[nutildah]

As I expected, you would like to keep the meaning of this thread amorphous as possible. Harder to keep your story straight later if you commit to one now isn't it Nutilduhh?

The meaning of this thread is incredibly straight-forward and self-evident, as well as provided in the title. That part has never changed, nor has the meaning.

Of course "the meaning of the thread" is to discuss whether there is any merit to your claims of SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP in FH's moderation. You won't allow for debate in your thread, which is why this one exists.

Anything else I can help you understand?

[TECSHARE]

As I expected, you would like to keep the meaning of this thread amorphous as possible. Harder to keep your story straight later if you commit to one now isn't it Nutilduhh?

The meaning of this thread is incredibly straight-forward and self-evident, as well as provided in the title. That part has never changed, nor has the meaning.

Of course "the meaning of the thread" is to discuss whether there is any merit to your claims of SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP in FH's moderation. You won't allow for debate in your thread, which is why this one exists.

Anything else I can help you understand?

Yes, why is your thread about me in Meta and not in the Reputation section where it belongs?

[nutildah]

Anything else I can help you understand?

Yes, why is your thread about me in Meta and not in the Reputation section where it belongs?

Because its not about you -- its about whether or not SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP by FH is taking place, which is clearly a discussion that belongs in Meta.

[TECSHARE]

Anything else I can help you understand?

Yes, why is your thread about me in Meta and not in the Reputation section where it belongs?

Because its not about you -- its about whether or not SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP by FH is taking place, which is clearly a discussion that belongs in Meta.

For a thread not about me... you didn't wait very long obsessing over me.

"Since TECSHARE..."

Sure looks like it belongs in META to me! Just remember kids to not masturbate too obsessively, or you will chaff your dicks circle jerking.

[TECSHARE]

Anything else I can help you understand?

Yes, why is your thread about me in Meta and not in the Reputation section where it belongs?

Because its not about you -- its about whether or not SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP by FH is taking place, which is clearly a discussion that belongs in Meta.

For a thread not about me... you didn't wait very long obsessing over me.

"Since TECSHARE..."

You're the one who locked the thread and won't have a conversation about the topic, which is clearly a meta topic, so yes, "since you."

Care to rebut my points about why your meme is off-topic and TwitchySeal's isn't, or are you content to keep giving us tips on masturbation?

I never stopped you from having a conversation. I am here. Let's converse.

[TECSHARE]

I never stopped you from having a conversation. I am here. Let's converse.

Care to rebut my point about why your meme is off-topic and TwitchySeal's isn't? My point was this:

The difference between your comment and his is you didn't include anything relevant to the topic of discussion, whereas TwitchySeal did.

Subject: Coronavirus Outbreak
"[imagines this entire tirade with a German accent and burning books in the background]" + off-topic meme = off-topic

Subject: VOD should be removed from default trust for systematic abuse of his position
"TECSHARE has been getting abused for over 5 years now and you all are just turning your backs to look busy doing other things! I hope this puppy gif makes you feel better, TECSHARE." + off-topic meme = on-topic

TOAA learned to cleverly insert just one or two on-topic sentences in his post before unleashing his usual hate-filled spiel about this-and-that, thus his posts stopped being deleted. If you managed to do the same, I don't think your posts would be deleted.

No, not really. See! We are conversing.

[nutildah]

I never stopped you from having a conversation. I am here. Let's converse.

Care to rebut my point about why your meme is off-topic and TwitchySeal's isn't? My point was this:

The difference between your comment and his is you didn't include anything relevant to the topic of discussion, whereas TwitchySeal did.

Subject: Coronavirus Outbreak
"[imagines this entire tirade with a German accent and burning books in the background]" + off-topic meme = off-topic

Subject: VOD should be removed from default trust for systematic abuse of his position
"TECSHARE has been getting abused for over 5 years now and you all are just turning your backs to look busy doing other things! I hope this puppy gif makes you feel better, TECSHARE." + off-topic meme = on-topic

TOAA learned to cleverly insert just one or two on-topic sentences in his post before unleashing his usual hate-filled spiel about this-and-that, thus his posts stopped being deleted. If you managed to do the same, I don't think your posts would be deleted.

No, not really. See! We are conversing.

Great, well I'm glad we got to the bottom of that.

I'm leaving this thread open in case anyone else has anything to add.

[Vod]

I had a free topic deleted by FH in P&S, about crime.

It's OK though, cause Techy recognized it was about his threat and quoted it in his trust abuse thread - page 31.  I am the bigger man there and let him have the last word. 

I also received the answer in PM, so I am satisfied.

Although I don't like having a fresh topic deleted, I can understand the reasoning behind it.  I thank FH for his non-biased moderation and the difficult job he must have to not take sides.

[TECSHARE]

I had a free topic deleted by FH in P&S, about crime.

It's OK though, cause Techy recognized it was about his threat and quoted it in his trust abuse thread - page 31.  I am the bigger man there and let him have the last word. 

I also received the answer in PM, so I am satisfied.

Although I don't like having a fresh topic deleted, I can understand the reasoning behind it.  I thank FH for his non-biased moderation and the difficult job he must have to not take sides.

That is a interesting excuse to not substantiate any of your accusations Vod, also very off topic.

[TwitchySeal]

I would also like to thank FH for his non-biased moderation and the difficult job he must have to not take sides.

[Flying Hellfish]

For the record,

As with most of the claims in the locked thread about me this is not my doing (this being the latest as of this post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5103785.msg53786636#msg53786636 )

The deleted post by TS was in a self mod'd thread, it wasn't deleted by me.  I rarely (if ever) moderate a self mod'd thread.  By definition a self mod'd thread allows the OP to decided what is on or off topic.

Of course as usual TS isn't interested in facts, context or any kind of discussion that doesn't agree with his insane conspiracy theories.

Another mod or more likely the OP was the one that deleted the post but hey it looks WAY better he puts it in a locked thread about a mod he hates.

Oh well theymos has all the actual facts, I assume he has verified my claims and TS claims and since I haven't had any discussions with him about my alleged abuse I will continue as I have been.

Thanks to all in this thread with the kind words and support.

[TECSHARE]

For the record,

As with most of the claims in the locked thread about me this is not my doing (this being the latest as of this post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5103785.msg53786636#msg53786636 )

The deleted post by TS was in a self mod'd thread, it wasn't deleted by me.  I rarely (if ever) moderate a self mod'd thread.  By definition a self mod'd thread allows the OP to decided what is on or off topic.

Of course as usual TS isn't interested in facts, context or any kind of discussion that doesn't agree with his insane conspiracy theories.

Another mod or more likely the OP was the one that deleted the post but hey it looks WAY better he puts it in a locked thread about a mod he hates.

Oh well theymos has all the actual facts, I assume he has verified my claims and TS claims and since I haven't had any discussions with him about my alleged abuse I will continue as I have been.

Thanks to all in this thread with the kind words and support.

Funny, usually when people delete posts in a self moderated thread it doesn't say "A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator."

[Flying Hellfish]

Funny, usually when people delete posts in a self moderated thread it doesn't say "A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator."

Funny how that still doesn't mean I did it you stupid fucking cunt.

Feel free to poll all the other mods or theymos to find out who did it.  Feel free to shove a cactus up your ass.  But for someone who thrives on proof you have zero of it that proves I did it.

I'm done responding to your ridiculousness.

[TECSHARE]

Funny, usually when people delete posts in a self moderated thread it doesn't say "A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator."

Funny how that still doesn't mean I did it you stupid fucking cunt.

Feel free to poll all the other mods or theymos to find out who did it.  Feel free to shove a cactus up your ass.  But for someone who thrives on proof you have zero of it that proves I did it.

I'm done responding to your ridiculousness.

Even if you didn't do it, it still very clearly wasn't a self moderated thread. I don't know why you feel the need to make stuff up that is clearly untrue.

[Flying Hellfish]

Funny, usually when people delete posts in a self moderated thread it doesn't say "A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator."

Funny how that still doesn't mean I did it you stupid fucking cunt.

Feel free to poll all the other mods or theymos to find out who did it.  Feel free to shove a cactus up your ass.  But for someone who thrives on proof you have zero of it that proves I did it.

I'm done responding to your ridiculousness.

Even if you didn't do it, it still very clearly wasn't a self moderated thread. I don't know why you feel the need to make stuff up that is clearly untrue.

Jesus your are fucking stupid.  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5201316.msg53780581#msg53780581
That is the post from your locked fucking thread. It clearly links to a self mod'd thread.

I don't know why you feel the need to make stuff up that is clearly is proven by your own evidence.

[Vod]

I don't know why you feel the need to make stuff up that is clearly is proven by your own evidence.

I do.   His goal is to disrupt the forum as much as possible.   If his word can't be trusted by default, then no-one's should!

(No one is supporting him in these false accusations.   You're doing a great job!)