tvplus006 Scam User

[SpectreSecurity]

This is is a scammer. They call every project a scam project and have their circle of friends endorse it. They make no contact, ask no questions, and then report as scam. If you research this user you will see he is banned across a few platform for scamming. But here they seem to have a great welcoming home. This user needs to be booted from the platform as i believe they are doing massive damage to not only the platform but to honest projects and investors.

[1715517709]

1715517709

[1715517709]

1715517709

[1715517709]

1715517709

[1715517709]

1715517709

[numanoid]

Just my curiousity, do you created this this because you are angry? tvpuls006 was reported you as plagiarsm (he has solid proofs anyway) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5167536.0

This is is a scammer. They call every project a scam project ...

If i calling a site is scam with proofs, does it mean i also a scammer?

[The Cryptovator]

Most likely OP is going to increase his red tag, although I am not going to leave retailonary feedback. I know posting behaviour of tvplus006, he always tried to add evidence as much as possible on his post. Seems he have tag you due to plagiarized whitpaper which valid enough to me. So this thread is just retaliatory, if he did scam anywhere else then prove it with evidence. Make a post against any user doesn't mean he is a scammer.

[CryptopreneurBrainboss]

The user is just looking for a way to get back at @tvplus006 for exposing their projects shady behavior, plagiarized work of others via their whitepaper. The user has already left retaliation feedbacks for all those who tagged his account for plagiarism (including myself) but I guess that wasn't enough. That's why the user is now coming up with a made-up story.

The project is a joke so don't take any misleading information he writes here seriously. Next time you will always give reference to those that deserve it instead of copy pasting others work or maybe come up with write ups that are yours.

[blurryeyed]

If i calling a site is scam with proofs, does it mean i also a scammer?

Only if you are promoting that scam in your profile. Like you are.

@SpectreSecurity: Give it up - you've been busted. Get over it.

[tvplus006]

The user is just looking for a way to get back at @tvplus006 for exposing their projects shady behavior, plagiarized work of others via their whitepaper. The user has already left retaliation feedbacks for all those who tagged his account for plagiarism (including myself) but I guess that wasn't enough. That's why the user is now coming up with a made-up story.
...

He cannot stop on his own. He created a flag against me https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1311641;page=iflags See who supported this flag. These are mainly Brand new accounts that are registered today in order to support this flag.
The accusation of SpecterSecurity whitepepper plagiarism has been proven and archived.

[The Cryptovator]

He created a flag against me https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1311641;page=iflags See who supported this flag. These are mainly Brand new accounts that are registered today in order to support this flag.

Don't worry about their flags. All are newbie, created by newbie and supported by newbie. It should not reflect on your profile as a trusted flags. It will reflect as inactive flag and you should not worry about that.



It's not new that you will be attacked by scammer. I was attacked multiple time at the beginning of scam expose. So avoid it and keep up your work of scam expose.

[TalkStar]

He cannot stop on his own. He created a flag against me https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1311641;page=iflags See who supported this flag. These are mainly Brand new accounts that are registered today in order to support this flag.
The accusation of SpecterSecurity whitepepper plagiarism has been proven and archived.

You don't need to be worry for this. Its pretty much common that those guys will show their cheap mentality after getting tagged for committing scam or fraudulent work. One thing is looking really interesting to me that this guy is very much faster in opening alts . let them waste their time.

Achievement from this flag: Bunch of alts caught together.

[bones261]

This is is a scammer. They call every project a scam project and have their circle of friends endorse it. They make no contact, ask no questions, and then report as scam. If you research this user you will see he is banned across a few platform for scamming. But here they seem to have a great welcoming home. This user needs to be booted from the platform as i believe they are doing massive damage to not only the platform but to honest projects and investors.

   Please advise how tvplus006 is a scammer for finding that your whitepaper is plagiarized? The whitepaper is an important document that you present to potential investors to persuade them to invest in your project. Presenting them with a plagiarized whitepaper suggest highly that your team is not up to the task to present a valid solution. It's not professional.
    Also, you accuse tvplus006 of being banned from several platforms for "scamming." Please provide proof. Your word is just not good enough, especially when you flagged tvplus006, apparently in retaliation.
    

[SpectreSecurity]

Neg. This user started a scam thread of old outdated information. We are a fork of stipend, and he did no research on anything. He used old outdated information. In addition user made no contact with anyone, never asked about anything, just repeated old wrong information. Its pretty simple. User did 0 research, made zero effort to sort out facts. Each one of you supported him in this. And you all did the same, you took old incorrect information and treated it as fact. Simple. You did no research either. None. So in that effect, your just as wrong as he is. Simple. And all these accounts are real accounts that have showed up to tell you your wrong. Go look at each person, you will see they have a crypto, they have a community, and they disagree with you. I guess you cant accept the fact that your wrong and completely unprofessional.

[SpectreSecurity]

Also its funny, you people are shilling sites in your footer that have many user complaints as scams.

https://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/sportsbooks-industry/3492681-scammed-sportsbet-io.html
http://bittrust.org/sportsbetio
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2482179.0

Also no license to operate?
https://game-protect.com/curacao-license-scam/

And there are a bunch more.. So really who is the scammers? In addition since you clearly do not understand what our use case is let me explain it to you in a way that you understand. I looked at each of the sites in your sigs. You are running wordpress websites with outdated plugins to run betting sites? Crazyness...  You do not even have HSTS on your SSL, this is bad for what your shilling. If i can tell your webserver that i do not support your level of ssl and it downgrades to meet what i say i support that opens you up to a whole lot of attacks. You also need to use those X-Frame Options. Learn what it is. You also don't understand to delete the PHPINFO files from your site which tells everyone in the world about your backend. This sports bet site doesn't even run mod security on it with owasp top 10 rules. In addition these services and sites are not even firewalled. This is very poor all they way around. Also you use insecure cookies. Little bit about this.

When a cookie is set by the server (sent the header of an HTTP response) there are several flags that can be set to configure the properties of the cookie and how it is to be handled by the browser.
One of these flags is known as the secure flag. When the secure flag is set, the browser will prevent it from being sent over a clear text channel (HTTP) and only allow it to be sent when an encrypted channel is used (HTTPS).

But you want to sit here and call everyone scammers while you , yourselves shill sites that suffer from click hjacking, many other issues including scamming users of funds. Maybe you should look at your own stuff first instead of robo scam call everything. The amount of money that is lost by people using this service is not ok. But you people sit here and say that everyone else will lose money buy investing in our coin. Do you not think that is a double standard?

At least your using cloudflare. butt.. lol.. Also understand what cloudbunny does. It bypasses cloudflare to get your real ip address of your hosting. So yea we have looked at that too.

Also your using github to store your files and sync them over. you should prob remove .git folders... just saying...

And what are those? NoSQL Injections? Yea i would run from this site and anyone that shills it in the footer.. Totally unsafe for anything...
    
Little bit about that one...

A NoSQL injection occurs when a value originating from the client’s request is used within a NoSQL call without prior sanitisation.

This can allow cyber-criminals to execute arbitrary NoSQL code and thus steal data, or use the additional functionality of the database server to take control of further server components.




Next we looked at bitwings.org
This site does not even use cloudflare. It leaks all the site data to the internet. And again this is a wordpress site with outdated plugins. No HSTS, X Frame Options again. Click Jacking, insecure cookies, etc... But your running a money site off this.. hummm.. Did the same person set these up?

213.136.67.13
m4693.contaboserver.net
Contabo GmbH
Added on 2019-08-04 09:18:54 GMT
[Germany] Germany

HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently
Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2019 09:20:37 GMT
Server: Apache/2.4.10 (Debian)
X-Pingback: http://bitwings.org/xmlrpc.php
Set-Cookie: pll_language=en; expires=Mon, 03-Aug-2020 09:20:37 GMT; Max-Age=31536000; path=/
X-Redirect-By: WordPress
Location: http://bitwings.org/
...

Yummy Apache 2.4.10 thats nice and exploitable...

Here are the CVE for this version
https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-45/product_id-66/version_id-177881/Apache-Http-Server-2.4.10.html

Ok nice.. look at this .. open ssh and telnet... thats real safe...

Nmap scan report for m4693.contaboserver.net (213.136.67.13)
Host is up (0.097s latency).

PORT     STATE  SERVICE
21/tcp   closed ftp
22/tcp   open   ssh
23/tcp   closed telnet
80/tcp   open   http
110/tcp  closed pop3
143/tcp  closed imap
443/tcp  open   https
3389/tcp closed ms-wbt-server

Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 0.31 seconds



Next we looked at Wolf.bet
Same stuff it seems...


So basically your sitting here railing on a honest group of crypto people, while at the same time promoting sites that users can be robbed, and frauded on. These sites have alot of user complaints on them. But you call me the scammer? Have you even read our white paper?

[SpectreSecurity]

Oh yea i forgot this..


Google the rest yourself. You will see issues with each of his supporters. These range from status abuse by them, to fraud, to false reporting and doctoring information. Everything that has been reported by them needs validated and verified, and if this forum cannot do so , it has no business allowing anyone to do anything with trust. As the people have clearly abused this system, and the people that do business here.

[CryptopreneurBrainboss]

The user is just looking for a way to get back at @tvplus006 for exposing their projects shady behavior, plagiarized work of others via their whitepaper. The user has already left retaliation feedbacks for all those who tagged his account for plagiarism (including myself) but I guess that wasn't enough. That's why the user is now coming up with a made-up story.
...

He cannot stop on his own. He created a flag against me https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1311641;page=iflags See who supported this flag. These are mainly Brand new accounts that are registered today in order to support this flag.
The accusation of SpecterSecurity whitepepper plagiarism has been proven and archived.

Seen and just opposed the false flag. Those supporters are just alts, hope you don't mind bringing up another accusation against the account for abusing the flag & trust system by registering alts just to support a false flag against you. Seems the account need more negative feedbacks.

To the accused (@SpectreSecurity), if you feel you have be wrongly accused (which i doubt it's the case) you appeal by bringing out valid evidence to support your claims and not being an asshole by abusing the flag & trust system.

[SpectreSecurity]

The user is just looking for a way to get back at @tvplus006 for exposing their projects shady behavior, plagiarized work of others via their whitepaper. The user has already left retaliation feedbacks for all those who tagged his account for plagiarism (including myself) but I guess that wasn't enough. That's why the user is now coming up with a made-up story.
...

He cannot stop on his own. He created a flag against me https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1311641;page=iflags See who supported this flag. These are mainly Brand new accounts that are registered today in order to support this flag.
The accusation of SpecterSecurity whitepepper plagiarism has been proven and archived.

Seen and just opposed the false flag. Those supporters are just alts, hope you don't mind bringing up another accusation against the account for abusing the flag & trust system by registering alts just to support a false flag against you. Seems the account need more negative feedbacks.

To the accused (@SpectreSecurity), if you feel you have be wrongly accused (which i doubt it's the case) you appeal by bringing out valid evidence to support your claims and not been an asshole by abusing the flag & trust system.

You seem to be a fan of someone doing little research and point out old incorrect information. Again did you even read the white paper? Prob not. You also seem to like to cuss, so here ill give it back to you. Next time you want to label someone as a scam do your own research, reach out the the group and address anything you find, then if they do not want to work with you , then do the scam part. But you did not. Its simple. Your a band wagon riding bitch.. BTW fix your fucking site before people get robbed you asshole.

In additiuon all the alts you keep saying. Do you have proof that they are alts? did you reach out to them and go to their projects? Nope. You did not, you have 0 proof, your just making false statements. So simple. Your lying to try and make it seem like i created a bunch of accounts to defend against you. Again your lying and a fraud.

And as far as for proof? My whole project is online.. al my partners are online, do look at them pedro. Do your own research you lazy fuck. And the rest of you. Do you have any idea what it takes to run a crypto currency? I bet not. I bet your just little fractional holders who think they understand everything about crypto. So if there is a issue with one part, the whole project is a scam? That is really thin. I could say that our friend here mr pedro is making false statements without any amount of proof shown,. So by your own standard, that means your a scammer. You offer no proof. no evidence one way or another. Its pretty simple to me.  And just like your friend you offer no answers when you are questioned.

[SpectreSecurity]

If i calling a site is scam with proofs, does it mean i also a scammer?

Only if you are promoting that scam in your profile. Like you are.

@SpectreSecurity: Give it up - you've been busted. Get over it.

Oh and here he is himself. The master of alts and bad rep. How many alts you up too now? How many of the hero accounts are you? Your a lame ass scammer who has gotten busted here more than anyone. Nice of you to show your face to seal the deal.