In the end, the developer who made the token becomes junk!

[masterrex]

now prize hunters face a harsh reality .. that most projects end in fraud and some of them might make a profit but not big, on the other hand the bounty hunter must also be patient to wait for their tokens to be listed on the exchange or at least have a sale value in the market ...
but seeing the unstable market situation, it is also very risky for new tokens generated from the project. Why?
because it all depends on the project developer !!!
I see that many developers no longer care about their project work map and if the developer cannot run their project correctly, the token will become junk !!!

Greed of money is the primary cause why these project will ended up nothing, Because most of ICO projects are not truly founded by the experts of such field that they want to establish or to disrupt the existing services to fix something, as we see it today its very common that the so called team are just only source from nowhere just to show that the team is complete and after that nothing will follow, its just after the money raise from ICO so technically the tokens are worthless.

[1715550163]

1715550163

[1715550163]

1715550163

[1715550163]

1715550163

[DDante]

now prize hunters face a harsh reality .. that most projects end in fraud and some of them might make a profit but not big, on the other hand the bounty hunter must also be patient to wait for their tokens to be listed on the exchange or at least have a sale value in the market ...
but seeing the unstable market situation, it is also very risky for new tokens generated from the project. Why?
because it all depends on the project developer !!!
I see that many developers no longer care about their project work map and if the developer cannot run their project correctly, the token will become junk !!!

There will still come a time all weak coins and tokens will be dealt with and coinmarketcap will be free of many useless tokens but for now its investors duty to rely more on their research before investing in any project,the truth is many new projects are been created for pump and dump,fraud and scams,its one of the reasons i think regulations is the answer

[DoublerHunter]

on the other hand the bounty hunter must also be patient to wait for their tokens to be listed on the exchange or at least have a sale value in the market ...

this is actually the only reason why when they changed C to E (ICO to IEO) they gained a moderate popularity for a short time. it was because everyone had a place to dump their junk tokens before they even started. but since they are junk, they got dumped but this time a lot faster and harder because everyone had a quick place to dump.

^ Aside from that if the project has no real concept and no use by the community or even the investors. They are just creating a project because they want their own profit after crowdfunding done. From the start, the dev did not intend to have progress on their project as long as they can be earned a profit they will junk or also known as an exit scam.

[magnum cyber]

their initial plan was like that, developers who are not serious about developing their projects certainly don't care about anything and all they care about is investor money and then taking it, blokchain technology is getting more advanced and scamers can easily make tokens through platforms to fool investors including us. I'm just saying about developers who don't have experience in this field.

[Ss4sukE]

the problem is that when the coins that we earned in the bounty campaign get listed on the exchange, they fall in price and 10-20 times and the tokens that we earned in a few months cost $ 10. it's all terrible

yes most of the tokens generated from the ERC20 platform when entering the market go down prices are very sharp and don't match the prices on their road maps. this happens because the market situation has not improved, ethereum prices are still at low prices and also many cases of project fraud. before joining the project, first make sure what products they make, team clarity, and of course all the content in their project.

[Pelana vreo]

Good new projects are also many, but the developers need a lot of time to run their ideas according to the road map, scam and fraud projects are detrimental to investors, but before we join and invest, make sure we see they have real team members and office addresses.

[Mighty_crypt]

now prize hunters face a harsh reality .. that most projects end in fraud and some of them might make a profit but not big, on the other hand the bounty hunter must also be patient to wait for their tokens to be listed on the exchange or at least have a sale value in the market ...
but seeing the unstable market situation, it is also very risky for new tokens generated from the project. Why?
because it all depends on the project developer !!!
I see that many developers no longer care about their project work map and if the developer cannot run their project correctly, the token will become junk !!!

Since new projects takes lot of time to get into exchanges for trading its better to promote projects that have been around for awhile and already trading on exchanges but bounties for old projects are not common,i actually like promoting new projects and im already used to the long term waiting but its a shame that after holding for too long and the token get listed finally it got dumped so fast

[laptrang01041993]

now prize hunters face a harsh reality .. that most projects end in fraud and some of them might make a profit but not big, on the other hand the bounty hunter must also be patient to wait for their tokens to be listed on the exchange or at least have a sale value in the market ...
but seeing the unstable market situation, it is also very risky for new tokens generated from the project. Why?
because it all depends on the project developer !!!
I see that many developers no longer care about their project work map and if the developer cannot run their project correctly, the token will become junk !!!

It takes about 1 year for the project to be successful, but investors are not patient

[pandanaran]

Many things affect why so many projects fail. therefore a big challenge if indeed we want to invest. where we have to check many key aspects such as the development of the project and also the volume of trade so that it does not become a garbage token that has no value

I think some of the reasons that caused the project to fail were because the team could not run the project well, usually if the product they offered was of high quality it would certainly attract the attention of investors plus if the team's background had a good reputation the project would automatically attract many new investors.

[Tarion]

Unfortunately it is impossible to track people who cannot do the right things with huge sums that were collected during their token sale. It is just unpredictable and no one can guarantee that project would be successful, even with 100 million dollars collected.

[aprilnot]

yeah right the developer is the main reason why the project cannot survive. if they are serious about developing a platform, that will never happen. we take the example of BNB tokens, everyone knows a while ago this token was very low. but because they have professional developers they can put their token prices back on. this is proof that if a serious developer works, the project will definitely have a future.

[Ghenjer]

sometimes new tokens startle and even vice versa. they can't be predicted correctly, but what causes tokens to become junk is because they don't have users or nobody trades them and that's because the team can't offer their tokens correctly.

[Golftech]

I stopped understanding the logic of most people who create their projects. they absolutely do not care that the price of their token drops a huge number of times after listing on the exchange. they think this is a normal situation and do nothing to fix it

The very problem of every developers who doesn't get any supports from the market after being listed to exchange most of them stop working and allow the flow to run by it's own, whatever the traders chooses the path the team will just ignore it even it being dumped completely, the team who's really
concern about the success of their projects have many alternatives and will continue to workout even in the bearish conditions, there's should be no
stopping until they provide the very use of the project and not to turned being a pumped and dumped project.

[senin]

now prize hunters face a harsh reality .. that most projects end in fraud and some of them might make a profit but not big, on the other hand the bounty hunter must also be patient to wait for their tokens to be listed on the exchange or at least have a sale value in the market ...
but seeing the unstable market situation, it is also very risky for new tokens generated from the project. Why?
because it all depends on the project developer !!!
I see that many developers no longer care about their project work map and if the developer cannot run their project correctly, the token will become junk !!!

Of course. So it was, is and will be. The direction of the project development and the effective use of funds collected as a result of the ICO almost entirely depends on the team of developers of this project. Many of them do not have the appropriate experience, and because of their mistakes, they often actually destroy their own project, no matter how promising it is. The very idea and the money raised for the successful work of the project is not enough. Still need to properly dispose of the collected funds.
Therefore, even many good projects eventually become inoperative and are credited to fraudulent ones.

[coin-investor]

now prize hunters face a harsh reality .. that most projects end in fraud and some of them might make a profit but not big, on the other hand the bounty hunter must also be patient to wait for their tokens to be listed on the exchange or at least have a sale value in the market ...
but seeing the unstable market situation, it is also very risky for new tokens generated from the project. Why?
because it all depends on the project developer !!!
I see that many developers no longer care about their project work map and if the developer cannot run their project correctly, the token will become junk !!!

It really depends on the developer, this is the reason why the reputation of the developer should be one of the factors, his last project, who he is and the composition of the team that he builds.
There are so many fake and photoshopped personality being included to the team composition, they make up the expertise and the credentials.
We're lucky that we have good members of the community, who are doing extensive research on every project that does ICO

[digitalblock]

In today's realities, the project will not be able to enter the stock exchange and feel good there if it does not receive various financial flows. This must be concerned about the investors and the developers. Most often, little-known coins use the help of large financial investment centers. But before achieving this support, the organizers of the ico are obliged to interest the management of this financial center - this is often impossible.

[Ben Shedly]

now prize hunters face a harsh reality .. that most projects end in fraud and some of them might make a profit but not big, on the other hand the bounty hunter must also be patient to wait for their tokens to be listed on the exchange or at least have a sale value in the market ...
but seeing the unstable market situation, it is also very risky for new tokens generated from the project. Why?
because it all depends on the project developer !!!
I see that many developers no longer care about their project work map and if the developer cannot run their project correctly, the token will become junk !!!

Developers never cared about anything but money. The situation with the fact that in a project that has absolutely nothing but beautifully framed sites and pieces of paper carry a large amount of money has spoiled many people. Developers of new projects see that previous projects have collected a lot of money and do nothing and they understand why to do something if you can get a lot of money.
This is the main problem of investing in the crypto market. Because of this, investors lose their money, and bounty hunters spend time empty and do not receive their rewards.

[atjiat]

In today's realities, the project will not be able to enter the stock exchange and feel good there if it does not receive various financial flows. This must be concerned about the investors and the developers. Most often, little-known coins use the help of large financial investment centers. But before achieving this support, the organizers of the ico are obliged to interest the management of this financial center - this is often impossible.

I believe that everything should happen exactly like you said.  The fact is that if investors and developers in tandem contribute to the development of their project, then it will be easier to solve all sorts of problems with access to the exchange.  If the team and investors work on the project, then this already excludes the possibility of fraud or theft funds.

[PuertoLibre]

now prize hunters face a harsh reality .. that most projects end in fraud and some of them might make a profit but not big, on the other hand the bounty hunter must also be patient to wait for their tokens to be listed on the exchange or at least have a sale value in the market ...
but seeing the unstable market situation, it is also very risky for new tokens generated from the project. Why?
because it all depends on the project developer !!!
I see that many developers no longer care about their project work map and if the developer cannot run their project correctly, the token will become junk !!!

You talk about the shitcoins which has no meaning of existence except feeding pump&dump traders. Running a quality project have several steps and only some project achieve this level of popularity by the investors.  The devs have a plan, roadmap, whitepaper of the project, if they don't care about the development process of their own project, comparing their project to similar projects is useless.

[Eildosa]

That's right. If the team continues to work on the project, their token will be in demand. If not, then the result will be appropriate. But if the developers are focused on achieving the goals and fulfill the points prescribed in the roadmap, then in the future their token will still be in demand. Not everyone takes the time to maintain a stable value of the coin, but we cant say that this is bad.