Investors are impatient and too quick to judge projects

[dimastegar]

It usually surprise me when I see investors complaining about a good project that didn't increase  or providing returns immediately it got listed on the exchange and they term it scam or say different things like rekted.
But the truth is, are these investors investing in the project because they believe in it or are they just in it for the immediate profit and move on?  Because if you are investing in a project because you believe in it then you should be willing to HODL the tokens and wait for the team to gradually deliver the project and meet its necessary roadmap before you judge it and not condemn it on its first listing.

I can conclude that only big investors are serious about an ICO / IEO project. The rest are mostly only small investors or people who are new to investing. And usually, people who are new to investing have not been mentally tested immediately panic when the investment decreases in value. And that is a natural thing because all is just a matter of profit.

[1714999379]

1714999379

[fuer44]

It usually surprise me when I see investors complaining about a good project that didn't increase  or providing returns immediately it got listed on the exchange and they term it scam or say different things like rekted.
But the truth is, are these investors investing in the project because they believe in it or are they just in it for the immediate profit and move on?  Because if you are investing in a project because you believe in it then you should be willing to HODL the tokens and wait for the team to gradually deliver the project and meet its necessary roadmap before you judge it and not condemn it on its first listing.

psychologically, investors lately want direct or instant profits because the fall of the market last year made confidence decline slightly. so now with an investment in a good project, they will still consider it a scam if it is not immediately listed on the exchange.

[Twinkledoe]

Most people that I know of are restless and impatient nowadays. Gone are the investors of early days where they invest into something and watch it grow after many years and then reap handsome profits after waiting for 10 or 15 years for their investments to increase in value. I think the lesson here is that investors should expect that getting handsome profits is not an overnight affair but rather a calculated move that takes years before it bears fruit.

You can't blame them because most of them are victims of projects that were abandoned after getting money from their investors. Though some are considered to be legit, but it doesn't assure that they will not be abandoned later on. If the dev team has no sufficient funds to proceed, most of them die down naturally. So how can you hodl a coin for long term even if they have good intentions but there are no resources to materialize their objectives?

[michellee]

But the truth is, are these investors investing in the project because they believe in it or are they just in it for the immediate profit and move on? 

In these situations, I think some investors want to make an immediate profit because they are not making the profit from a long time ago. Every time they invest in a project, it ends up by scamming or delay, or the project does not continue, so they feel desperate while some of them don't have much money. I still see some of my friends invest in some project, although I already tell them not to invest in the project which they don't believe that the project can grow in the future. I let them decide to make the final decision to invest or not, and I only advise them to be careful.

[pinkpanther03]

This is sad that most of them are after only for profit, they're not after with long term profit. I think 5% are the investors who are not just after with it, they are go with a long term. Well anyway, they are free to think whatever they want to say, but sometimes we shouldn't be like that honestly speaking.

[Kimonoe]

But the truth is, are these investors investing in the project because they believe in it or are they just in it for the immediate profit and move on? 

In these situations, I think some investors want to make an immediate profit because they are not making the profit from a long time ago. Every time they invest in a project, it ends up by scamming or delay, or the project does not continue, so they feel desperate while some of them don't have much money. I still see some of my friends invest in some project, although I already tell them not to invest in the project which they don't believe that the project can grow in the future. I let them decide to make the final decision to invest or not, and I only advise them to be careful.

at least that is the reality, many do not make money in a long time, even many have experienced fraudulent projects, so that their money is lost, so with the current IEO, those who are somewhat relieved, because they are able to make money back, but indeed many are not hold it in the long run. this is done perhaps to restore the psychology of those who have been damaged

[coaprotet]

If you look at the market, you can probably mention that holding won't bring you profit. Only people that have bought BTC for 3k are now having some additional cash, but there is no altcoin that have made x3 science 2018.

[Kwansimaa]

I wonder what most investors read about projects before jumping into it to invest. Why invest in a project you have read about and still complain within few months of progress without gaining any interest and start judging the projects with bad comments. Investors are supposed to read the projects whitepaper, know of the roadmap and follow accordingly than being impatient and quick in judging project.

[Jenkins33]

It usually surprise me when I see investors complaining about a good project that didn't increase  or providing returns immediately it got listed on the exchange and they term it scam or say different things like rekted.
But the truth is, are these investors investing in the project because they believe in it or are they just in it for the immediate profit and move on?  Because if you are investing in a project because you believe in it then you should be willing to HODL the tokens and wait for the team to gradually deliver the project and meet its necessary roadmap before you judge it and not condemn it on its first listing.

People invest in order to raise bucks, and not to masturbate for years on the project price and wait for it to grow. Many developers hammer a dick on a project over time and waiting for the price to rise is silly.
That is why investors do not want to wait long and they are interested in quick profits. If you want to wait a long time - wait, but do not force others.

[akirasendo17]

We can't control investors also they risk their money on investing in some projects
the best we can do is to encourage them to stay, also this is the job of the campaign managers and
head of the project the project to prove to them that their money is really will get profit in the
long run since what we really want is to take profit as an investors
we can't blame them, specially they saw a lot of scam projects before

[SirLancelot]

We are dealing with humans that are emotionless, and we are dealing with humans that has series of needs on a daily basis, and they want to do everything possible to quickly make money that will enable them meet up with those pressing needs at any point in time with a quick money, so I must tell you that majority of people, you see invest in all these altcoins are investing for a quick profit and none of them cares about the project, they don’t even sometimes knows what the project product is, and all they care more about is actually the profit that they can get from it.

This is why you see a lot of projects collapsing now, because the moment that they hit an exchange, majority of the investors has already placed a sell order down when it reaches a certain point which gets executed at exactly that and they are satisfied with it, go away and never come back.

[dudusix9]

This is true for almost all people in the crypto community, they easily get impatient with projects that don't deliver good results in terms of ROI. But they don't understand that these projects take time to explode so it's good to invest in quality coins that has their strategic investors help them by extending the lockup of their tokens for the long-term development of the project. Bitcoin didn't go to thousands right away, it definitely took a long time and had a lot of doubters.

[Mpamaegbu]

It usually surprise me when I see investors complaining about a good project that didn't increase  or providing returns immediately it got listed on the exchange and they term it scam or say different things like rekted.
But the truth is, are these investors investing in the project because they believe in it or are they just in it for the immediate profit and move on?  Because if you are investing in a project because you believe in it then you should be willing to HODL the tokens and wait for the team to gradually deliver the project and meet its necessary roadmap before you judge it and not condemn it on its first listing.

Simply put - Investors are like the electorate. We are always eager and anxious to see our elected officials churn out results as soon as we vote them into elective positions. What is there to dilly dally for again? Campaigns and electioneering are over just like ICOs are, we want the promises fulfilled. So, don't blame any anxious investors because they want the promised ROI as soon as possible.

[shooleh]

Too quickly sell coins and want profit results quickly. Of course, this will make the project difficult to develop. New investors should have patience and they should read the Roadmap project. So know that this project has a developer that keeps working. So if the project has a large volume, of course, you do trade will be very easy and make a profit.

[Bossfidelity]

We can't control investors also they risk their money on investing in some projects
the best we can do is to encourage them to stay, also this is the job of the campaign managers and
head of the project the project to prove to them that their money is really will get profit in the
long run since what we really want is to take profit as an investors
we can't blame them, specially they saw a lot of scam projects before

One of the reasons why investors could appear impatient is as a result of what has been happening in the industry. We hear stories of developers abandoning the project and dumping on the investors. This is quite unfair as it discourages other investors from holding for long term.

[TheBusstop]

It usually surprise me when I see investors complaining about a good project that didn't increase  or providing returns immediately it got listed on the exchange and they term it scam or say different things like rekted.
But the truth is, are these investors investing in the project because they believe in it or are they just in it for the immediate profit and move on?  Because if you are investing in a project because you believe in it then you should be willing to HODL the tokens and wait for the team to gradually deliver the project and meet its necessary roadmap before you judge it and not condemn it on its first listing.

This is typically true for 80% of all new coins to launch, project legitimacy, how "good" it is and various of other factors are directly correlated with how much profit they bring investors. While crypto markets are a good sign of how successful a project is, it isn't the be-all end-all consideration for how successful a project is currently or can be.

But regardless, if a project is failing on the markets, it typically is for good reasons; generally, how they executed on the launch of their coin and what exchanges/strategies that have immediately after distribution of coins and years to come. If projects have high goals post-sale that can be reasonably met with good solid evidence of how the teams execute and still drop, then yes you're 100% correct. If teams are executing and are meeting all deadlines and visions they set out with, then their failures are on how effective their marketing team is.

Almost all the time, it's due to poor execution and lack of understanding behind crypto teams. More importantly, there are only a few select exchanges that are even still operating on a profit or have actually real traders/users behind their platform, an added typical factor most seek out, what is the exchange?

Ultimately, there are many many factors to consider the successes and failures of projects, leading up to the finalization/listing to continued and ongoing development. As expressed, if a coin has been existing for several months without any crypto "pump," then their marketing and communication team is a failure. If the project is not succeeding in returning a profit (in the business) or not acquiring adoption/integration, then that crypto is a failure. If a coin dumps immediately after exchange listings, then it is all summed up above.

Your opinion is okay to you. The destiny of any project relays on the hands of investors. if you can convince your investors to trust your project Now and den. believe me, you project will last. No matter how good your project is, if you failed to convince the community behind the project and investors, your project will dissappear within seconds. i have seen great projects dissppear just because developers choose to work silently without passing out informations and Updates.

Update everyone with your current status. progress made and disappointment and the rest. it is a good marketing strategy. 

[fortunecrypto]

The price of the token isn't the most important thing if the project is valuable, having its attractive product, the price will go up surely in the future. Many newbies with ICO investing just expecting high returns in a short period of time, which is almost impossible in crypto trading. Patience and long term holding are always required.

I agree all coins suffer from dumping and crashing of prices, but if the project is good it will pass the test of time, you cannot expect some investors to be patient and wait for the price to increase.
This is the real scenario in the crypto world, it's a big gamble but the pay is great if you wait for the project to move and wait for the price to increase.

[bering]

Some of tokens or altcoins indeed cannot be profitable for instantly and it took time to get the best price to sold and get decent profit so hold those tokens might be good option to do so but we cannot force people to hold their tokens because some of them are more likely want short term profit and don't have more patience to wait and they will judge early the projects failure so all of it back again from the investors habit themself

[mr_random]

Yes indeed, that is right there are a lot of impatient investors. Generally speaking, it happens because they want to earn money very quickly. Sometimes it can be successful, but true investors have to be patient while investing, these kinds of investors know good projects sometimes can take a long time. Thinking long term has a positive return on the investment if the investor made the right choice unless the scam projects appear and steal from us. Quick money making illness spread all the crypto world and the quick result seekers have the same end. Failed investors can confirm this if you can ask these questions after the end of the bull market. Human psychology also has gaps which can be observed with small market research.

[Kwansimaa]

This problem will continue to happen and happen only because most of these investors are not ready to learn. Why choose to be an investor if you are not ready to learn. These investors find it difficult to ascertain and know whether the project they are investing in is going to bring short or long term profit and if it happens the other way round, they become impatient and quick judging the project negatively.