Investors are impatient and too quick to judge projects

[DabsPoorVersion]

The problem here is that 10% of those who said they will developed the project isn't really developing the project. Are you familiar with Github? If they really developing and improving it, they can upload development in their github source. Most people checked there too see if devs are really working for the project or not. I can see that only few projects are true to themselves so I cannot blame these people judging maybe they are really frustrated or already know the tactics of the project.

Yes indeed, that's why investors are selling their investment immediately after it entered the market. But having these done will only put not only the project but also the investors itself to failure. Without helping each other for the progress and improvement of the project, and losing the support from the community, there's no wonder that the project itself will fail.

[1714804337]

1714804337

[1714804337]

1714804337

[trauchot]

That's right, according to the idea, this is what you need to do, if you are investing in some project, it means that you believe in it and count on long-term profit, so you should not rush to sell your tokens very quickly, but many investors make investments in new projects in order to get a quick profit and they should not be blamed for it, because each investor has his own strategy and plans.

[Bitfling]

It usually surprise me when I see investors complaining about a good project that didn't increase  or providing returns immediately it got listed on the exchange and they term it scam or say different things like rekted.
But the truth is, are these investors investing in the project because they believe in it or are they just in it for the immediate profit and move on?  Because if you are investing in a project because you believe in it then you should be willing to HODL the tokens and wait for the team to gradually deliver the project and meet its necessary roadmap before you judge it and not condemn it on its first listing.

Many types of investors, there are holding for the long term and waiting for the product to be finished and there are types of investors who are trying to find for the short term. I think this is normal because we cannot dictate the market or investors. If the project is good, I don't think we need to worry

[OliviaS]

That's right, according to the idea, this is what you need to do, if you are investing in some project, it means that you believe in it and count on long-term profit, so you should not rush to sell your tokens very quickly, but many investors make investments in new projects in order to get a quick profit and they should not be blamed for it, because each investor has his own strategy and plans.

A quick investment strategy is now much more profitable and profitable than a simple coin hold strategy. Coin Hold is not working yet. From my own experience, the hold reduced my wallet by 2 times in 2019.
But in any case, everything is not necessary to merge into minus. To get free funds and try to invest in something new and fast growing.

[zeze18]

Maybe those investors are frustated with crypto projects because lately most of projects are scam.
And you're also right that many of crypto investors want a fast profit and leave, they mostly cannot divide between investing and trading

[meliodas]

Maybe those investors are frustated with crypto projects because lately most of projects are scam.
And you're also right that many of crypto investors want a fast profit and leave, they mostly cannot divide between investing and trading

It is true that they are just frustrated and they have a less trust to give to the cryptocurrency projects since most of their investment are from projects that sound good but after the crowd funding they all just slack off and the project slowly dies. Today, it is better for the projects to do some work first so they can really justify their words when they are talking to the investors.

[btcmegastar]

People invest money to make a profit, so it is not surprising that some investors are unhappy with the development of the project or the first exchange on which the token appeared. In addition, there are many scammers at the moment, and there are always reasons for concern and danger.

Usually others main goal of some investors is to earn quick profit, but they did not think clearly that a projects need time for development. Easy for them to judge projects indeed but let’s take a note some doesn’t want to lose money of what they invested for. There are good projects and we cannot hold it too long in our wallet that we cannot enjoy the profit that we must have. So many scam literally, however some investors judge easily the project due to other project ended up losing value and they learned a lesson from it.

Tell me then, how at an early stage of development to understand whether this is a good project or not, will the price of this token increase in the future or not

It is impossible to find the legit project before ICO/IEO their promotion seems to be very active but when it comes to reality it is impossible to find their developments. During their fundraising stage they will attend lots of conferences in order to get more awareness and once after raising enough money they are very silent without any product development.

[tanjiran]

Actually we cannot blame and draw unilateral conclusions. The market is not conducive. All those involved with cryptocurrency, whether miners, traders, investors, bounty hunters, are faced with a very difficult time. Opportunities are getting smaller, many scamer, and other unfavorable circumstances. So, to cover up the drought, if there is an opportunity to get the slightest profit it will surely be pursued and tried as much as possible. Instead of being in a hurry, there are also many needs that must be met.

[Xxmodded]

Investor is not fault with judge an ICO project because they can't waiting for long time get profit with ICOs investment project, after buying on pre sale they have waiting more than two months and more do not the same with road map planning for selling their ICO coin and want to judge an ICO owner, because they want get back their money.

[BAGOBO]

Investor is not fault with judge an ICO project because they can't waiting for long time get profit with ICOs investment project, after buying on pre sale they have waiting more than two months and more do not the same with road map planning for selling their ICO coin and want to judge an ICO owner, because they want get back their money.

it is not easy to get profit in investing in new projects, new projects must have excellent and real features so that they can compete while projects that miss features will be unable to compete. better to invest in BTC, BTC has proven to have high prices look at price growth in the buying market when prices go down and sell when prices go up.

[Ailmand]

I think investros changed since the bull market most ICOs had brought quick income for investors. And this suddenly changed when the bear market started, most ICOs had to close their project, some who had a good ICO had a hard time developing due to lack of funds. Investors became impatient because they had a mentality that investing in ICOs can bring them good instant income. Some investors do not intend to support the real cause of the project. They just want to get out early to get some income.

[Colt81]

It usually surprise me when I see investors complaining about a good project that didn't increase  or providing returns immediately it got listed on the exchange and they term it scam or say different things like rekted.
But the truth is, are these investors investing in the project because they believe in it or are they just in it for the immediate profit and move on?  Because if you are investing in a project because you believe in it then you should be willing to HODL the tokens and wait for the team to gradually deliver the project and meet its necessary roadmap before you judge it and not condemn it on its first listing.

In my own personal opinion, investors became impatient because they are now getting scared to take some risk in projects which they believe that it is successful, but it turns out to be a scam or the coin will don't have a good value, that is why investors is starting to judge a lot of projects nowadays because they didn't receive any good profit from it.

[X-ray]

It usually surprise me when I see investors complaining about a good project that didn't increase  or providing returns immediately it got listed on the exchange and they term it scam or say different things like rekted.
But the truth is, are these investors investing in the project because they believe in it or are they just in it for the immediate profit and move on?  Because if you are investing in a project because you believe in it then you should be willing to HODL the tokens and wait for the team to gradually deliver the project and meet its necessary roadmap before you judge it and not condemn it on its first listing.

In my own personal opinion, investors became impatient because they are now getting scared to take some risk in projects which they believe that it is successful, but it turns out to be a scam or the coin will don't have a good value, that is why investors is starting to judge a lot of projects nowadays because they didn't receive any good profit from it.

That does obviously have the affect to the market psychological as well as investors' but it's still improper to be really impatience and demanding fast profit. all these projects aren't quick cash that could make you rich overnight everything needs process. Although there might be many garbage project out there but there still some of good projects that deliver what it promised.
If the investors are just there to dump their token at the distribution date then I assume the project's token will be done for thus lacking the fund making realization or execution of the idea harder.

[Finestream]

Projects can only be judged by the following factors: does the project adhere to the deadlines and dates indicated on the roadmap, does the project pay regularly promised dividends, and is there a systematic development, or is it all just in words.

Most of the projects needs a longer period to be able to deliver, while majority of the investors wants instant result, that's is the difference now because people are thinking that a project is already successful when it pump during its first day of trade in an exchange which is a wrong mentality.

If we look on a good project that will deliver in the long run, we should be willing to hold and always understands the market situation.
Like for almost 2 years, the market is still dry, altcoins are in drought so we didn't witness a good rise that we are expecting, but despite of that, we still have to believe that this market will continue to bloom and good projects will eventually rise at the right time.

[dcomomal]

The problem is not the patient, but the results that teams are providing after a certain period of time. Unfortunately, if they fail to keep the price stable after the token sale, it is very unlikely that a fresh coin would ever recover from the bottom.

[BlackFor3st]

It usually surprise me when I see investors complaining about a good project that didn't increase  or providing returns immediately it got listed on the exchange and they term it scam or say different things like rekted.
But the truth is, are these investors investing in the project because they believe in it or are they just in it for the immediate profit and move on?  Because if you are investing in a project because you believe in it then you should be willing to HODL the tokens and wait for the team to gradually deliver the project and meet its necessary roadmap before you judge it and not condemn it on its first listing.

Most of the newbie investors are investing not because they believe in the project but because they believe that they can double or multiply their investment after the tokens that they brought will hit the exchange.

Because of this kind of mindset, most of the coins price will go down immediately upon reaching the exchange. Even if 60% of the investors will know the term of HODL, I am sure that any project that they will support will continue to grow especially it's price even after listing.

[desticy]

The essence of investing is the income that the investor receives for his trust in the project in which he invests.
Investors invest in the project, which gives the project the opportunity to develop, having achieved success, the project, as it were, repays the debt to the investor through profit.

However, when projects stand still and do not fulfill their promises, postpone listing, cannot decide with the exchange or choose a bad one and so on, all this, of course, annoys any investor, no matter how much he loves the project.

Therefore, before investing, you always need to think carefully and study all the possible factors and risks.
If we do not invest in unreliable projects, they will not be.

[sapnu]

It usually surprise me when I see investors complaining about a good project that didn't increase  or providing returns immediately it got listed on the exchange and they term it scam or say different things like rekted.
But the truth is, are these investors investing in the project because they believe in it or are they just in it for the immediate profit and move on?  Because if you are investing in a project because you believe in it then you should be willing to HODL the tokens and wait for the team to gradually deliver the project and meet its necessary roadmap before you judge it and not condemn it on its first listing.

I do understand what OP is trying to point out. But I think we really cannot blame those who are losing their patience from their project investments since they are expecting for profit which is normal when you have invested for something. It is really a waiting gsme but waiting for too long kills the profit itself. What do I mean? The time an investor have put waiting for the profit is being wasted along with the money they have invested in to those project rather than earning profit if they would be able to invest the expected "net" from their engagements. Projects nowadays are just really hard to predict because most of it are failing.

[awakpane]

In the business world, a professional investor can predict and assess a good project or not in the future. it is natural that investors can assess the project in a fast time.

[Redemption59]

Being impatient when its an issue concerning money is very okay to me because everybody works hard to earn their money but when its related to projects and investors, I think there is nothing good to talk about since these investors are not ready to learn to determine the future of the projects they invest in, they only go for hype and when the project is not doing a expected by them, they start to judge the project. It is time investors sit down and read projects whitepaper, know their roadmap and come to the knowledge of understanding whether the project is a short or long term investment project and make a decision on that rather than following hype and being quick in judging projects.