Is ...<name>... still/on DT/yet? - Requests welcome.

[Timelord2067]

such is the skewered perspective of right and wrong this place has.

I agree the decentralized Trust system isn't perfect, and I'm pretty sure theymos would agree, but so far no better system has been proposed.

Some people suggest reviewing after a certain period of time, why not after 2 years (or even four or five years) negatives fade to neutral?  (especially if the user is inactive) Those that are truly burned up will count down the milliseconds to renewing their distrust or negative trust feedback, however most will live and let live.

Also, why not once a person has given negative trust feedback they can neither add more negative, neutral or even positive unless they first remove (or change to neutral) their trust feedback?

Having radio buttons on the trust feed back page to deselect one or even two of the types (Neutral, negative, posative) might help people search through old feedback's (or even sort positive to negative (or visa-versa))

[LoyceV]

why not after 2 years (or even four or five years) negatives fade to neutral?

Type 2 and 3 Flags expire, I see no reason to make my feedback expire too.

Also, why not once a person has given negative trust feedback they can neither add more negative, neutral or even positive unless they first remove (or change to neutral) their trust feedback?

There's already a limit in place: you can't leave more than 5 tags on a user.
I can think of reasons why someone doesn't want to remove a tag that was placed on a certain date, it's serves as a timeline of events.

Having radio buttons on the trust feed back page

I don't think this will get very high on theymos' Todo list.

[Timelord2067]

I see no reason to make my feedback expire too.

Perhaps expire is too strong a word, but have less weight after a while (while keeping it's chronological position in the list of feedbacks)

There's already a limit in place: you can't leave more than 5 tags on a user.

I *did* have six on a couple of users' trust feedback pages and have dialed them down to just one or two as part of an overall review of my previous work (which is a work in progress)

[Timelord2067]

LoyceV must be excluded from DT because his scripts violates privacy of forum users

The same could be said for bpip.org which also makes public default trust information (which is only available after logging into this Forum) yet you know that and choose only to attack LoyceV - why is that?

[Foxpup]

LoyceV must be excluded from DT because his scripts violates privacy of forum users

What privacy? It's all public information.

[Bitcoin SV]

LoyceV must be excluded from DT because his scripts violates privacy of forum users

What privacy? It's all public information.

Nope, LoyceV scripts intercepting personal data. Nobody gave such permission. This is collecting of personal data which is prohibited. Only government has the right to do this

[Foxpup]

Nope, LoyceV scripts intercepting personal data. Nobody gave such permission.

Aside from the nude pictures of me (which I did, in fact, give LoyceV permission to publish), what personal (non-public) data is LoyceV intercepting?

[Bitcoin SV]

what personal (non-public) data is LoyceV intercepting?

Trust list management is non-public data. LoyceV makes all "distrustings" are public, which is non-public by default. This is must be personal, but nobody fixes that.

[Foxpup]

Trust list management is non-public data. LoyceV makes all "distrustings" are public, which is non-public by default. This is must be personal, but nobody fixes that.

Go into your Trust settings, add to your trust list the name of anyone who's trust list you want to see, then click Hierarchical view to see their trust list. If you think this information is not supposed to be public, please inform theymos at once about this gaping data leak. (Don't forget to also tell him to stop his weekly publishing of everyone's trust lists in a giant compressed text file, which is what LoyceV is actually using, but that's not as bad since the information is less up-to-date.)

[LoyceV]

(Don't forget to also tell him to stop his weekly publishing of everyone's trust lists in a giant compressed text file, which is what LoyceV is actually using, but that's not as bad since the information is less up-to-date.)

Well, the troll has a point: you can't see live data without logging in. But is visiting Is Lauda Still On DT.tk really more likely than just creating an account to see the same information?

Of course, this topic is all about requests:

Nope, http://istimelord2067ondtyet.tk/ has the same problem at the moment.

Please delete the website thank you.

I've cancelled the domain.

Thank you for respecting my request.

Then again, I have troll "Bitcoin SV" on ignore, so I don't care about his opinion.

[Timelord2067]

Might not be anything but...

I just had a look at just about every "Is..." that I could find.  On the 26th of September practically all pages dropped their values to zero (it's more striking for those with green scores).  One or two (such as for Vod) drop to zero every few months.  I somehow don't imagine it's because of transitioning to DT 2 from DT 1.

[LoyceV]

practically all pages dropped their values to zero

It happens once in a while, probably caused by a connection error when it can't reach Bitcointalk. Once in a while I manually remove it, and I thought I fixed it last time, but clearly it didn't work.

[LoyceV]

The cat is back on DT2: Is Lauda still on DT?

[suchmoon]

I could swear I saw Lauda asking to be banned... but the thread in now gone.

[LoyceV]

I could swear I saw Lauda asking to be banned... but the thread in now gone.

Confirmed
See https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5540/55402747.html:

I had to consult TryNinja's site to get the original title: Goodbye, world!

But the post is removed now.

[suchmoon]

Confirmed

Great. I was worried I may need to start reducing the consumption of fragrant substances.

So the cat's gone? Or does the removal of the thread indicate a change of mind? Confusing.

[Timelord2067]

Goodbye Lauda.

You had a great innings.

[LoyceV]

So the cat's gone? Or does the removal of the thread indicate a change of mind? Confusing.

Are you trying to understand a cat?

What they seem, things are not always.

[suchmoon]

Are you trying to understand a cat?

Fair point. Lauda is Schrödinger's cat now. Gone and not gone simultaneously.

[dkbit98]

Chipmixer campaign has the magic and power to change peoples mind.